of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010
>
> As I recall, with OCS at least, it was not so much a problem with their sip
> implementation, but rather their proprietary RT audio codec.
> (I do remember an MS rep saying that SIP didn't
...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Kyle Haefner
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 2:09 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010
As I recall, with OCS at least, it was not so much a problem
-Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Geoff Van Brunt
> Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2012 6:46 AM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchang
software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010
Couldn't agree more Tony. The cloud is the future, and SipX needs to support
these services to keep relevant. Unified Communicaitons really means all
your communications software/hardware working together. However it has only
been
"
> to something. It would be great if that was carried over to services as
> well.
>
> Geoff Van Brunt
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:19 PM
sers of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010
It is very clear to how microsoft markets Lync their aim is the same, for the
enterprise and as the pbx via their other products.
You can already qwasi integrate with other IM services via federation (meaning
I ca
in"
> to something. It would be great if that was carried over to services as
> well.
>
> Geoff Van Brunt
>
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:1
nt: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 5:19 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010
Certificates are perhaps a little more flexible in 4.6, but I know there were
workarounds in 4.4 for people who wanted to use a cert from the AD server
nesday, July 25, 2012 4:11 PM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010
>
> fyi - this has pretty much been discussed before, on-list and such a few
> times as I recall.
>
> Realize at the same time these are
f Tony Graziano
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 4:11 PM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] FW: MS Lync and Exchange 2010
fyi - this has pretty much been discussed before, on-list and such a few times
as I recall.
Realize at the same time these are two "com
fyi - this has pretty much been discussed before, on-list and such a few
times as I recall.
Realize at the same time these are two "competing" products.
How MS handles both their sip stack (which is tcp only I think) and how
they handle authentication has changed several times (various ways in
va
Hey Geoff,
I have an O365 E3 account I've tried to setup UM against.
Haven't really looked at the Lync but I assume if you have
the telephony on Sipx, you might be able to dispense with
Lync on premises and keep it all in the cloud. As for the
UM, I'm trying with 4.6 and have been unable to neg
This would be really cool to see. I don't have any experience with it but
look forward to seeing your results.
-Bryan Anderson
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 8:29 AM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote:
>
> Has anyone attempted any integration between sipx and Lync and/or
> Exchange 2010? I'm only talking about
Has anyone attempted any integration between sipx and Lync and/or
Exchange 2010? I'm only talking about precence, VM, and AA. I've looked
through the wiki and the only thing I can find is integration with
Exchange 2007. I played around with presense and Communicaitons Server
about 3 years ago, but
14 matches
Mail list logo
