Nope, nothing yet.
I just send a friendly reminder
From:
Opyzcinr
To:
Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Date:
26-05-2011 10:55
Subject:
Re: [sipx-users] Bria 3.2 Contact Directory
Sent by:
sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
Paul,
Have you recived any answer from
GET-ing the file
> "69073331.th.internal.epo.org.pres-rules".
> Can you tell me why it's not getting "69073331-directory.xml"?
> Did the provisioning fields change for example or do we have to
> specify a different file name?
>
> If I get an answer that
te:
19-05-2011 15:46
Subject:
Re: [sipx-users] Bria 3.2 Contact Directory
Sent by:
sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
I couldn't try Bria, because they want an NDA just to talk sales numbers.
But I can tell you all the functions your looking for work fine in Spark
client 3.6.0.
Matt Wh
rg.pres-rules".
Can you tell me why it's not getting "69073331-directory.xml"?
Did the provisioning fields change for example or do we have to
specify a different file name?
If I get an answer that the provisioning fields have changed then I can
quickly create
Yeah didn't mean to hijack thread, just wanted to express that the ignite spark
client works flawlessly with the integrated version of ignite openfire server
in sipXecs.
I wanted to try Bria but 100 bucks for two copies just to see if it would work
wasn't justifiable.
Regards,
Aaron Pursell
>>> On 5/19/2011 at 11:37 AM, in message
>>> <4dd4e4ea02d200018...@smtp.esgw.org>, "Aaron Pursell"
>>> wrote:
>
>No, talking to sales, they required and Nda just for a sales quote. They
>wouldn't quote me for 500 licenses >without the NDA.
>
>And can't justify spending $100 to try a product
No, talking to sales, they required and Nda just for a sales quote. They
wouldn't quote me for 500 licenses without the NDA.
And can't justify spending $100 to try a product which looks like according to
this thread doesn't even work "as advertised".
"Tony Graziano "
wrote:
You don't need
>>> On 5/19/2011 at 10:36 AM, in message
, Opyzcinr
wrote:
> Bria 3.2 has changed approach to Contact Directory storage..
> Bria 3.1 gets Contact Directory from sipX (softphone-directory.xml)
> correctly but Bria 3.2 doesn't.
>
Does anybody have a link to the new webdav method used in 3.2?
A
You don't need an NDA to try a regular license. They only want an NDA to do
a customization. Th between the standard commercial/retail version and the
guts are essentially the same. If you read their NDA, it's rather plain and
very standard, so if you need a custom skin, etc., I don't see why you
w
Bria 3.2 has changed approach to Contact Directory storage..
Bria 3.1 gets Contact Directory from sipX (softphone-directory.xml)
correctly but Bria 3.2 doesn't.
On 19 May 2011 14:56, Matt White wrote:
> Has anybody gotten Bria 3.2 to use the contact directory from sipx?
>
>
> The device profile
I couldn't try Bria, because they want an NDA just to talk sales numbers. But
I can tell you all the functions your looking for work fine in Spark client
3.6.0.
Matt White wrote:
Has anybody gotten Bria 3.2 to use the contact directory from sipx?
The device profile in sipx show the softpho
Has anybody gotten Bria 3.2 to use the contact directory from sipx?
The device profile in sipx show the softphone-directory.xml which contains
valid data.
I've also set a few speeddials on the user account with presence enabled which
also never shows up.
The softphone does autoprovision fro
12 matches
Mail list logo
