Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-17 Thread Picher, Michael
ry.org] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 11:59 AM To: Ken Fulmer Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Ken Fulmer wrote: We've been talking about internal extensions as our default

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-16 Thread Tony Graziano
alf solutions dont work well. > > > Thanks, > > > > Ken > > > > *From:* Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 16, 2010 9:31 AM > > *To:* Ken Fulmer > *Cc:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-us

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-16 Thread Ken Fulmer
rg Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Ken Fulmer wrote: Ok, thanks for your help. I configured Option 66 to go to the primary server. On that server, I configured the Primary Registration Server with the domain name. That did the trick. Now

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-16 Thread Tony Graziano
> > Thanks, > > > > Ken > > > > > > *From:* Picher, Michael [mailto:mpic...@cmctechgroup.com] > *Sent:* Monday, March 15, 2010 8:16 PM > *To:* Ken Fulmer; Tony Graziano > > *Cc:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > *Subject:* RE: [sipx-users] DNS S

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-16 Thread Ken Fulmer
no Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: RE: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom Option 66 tells the phone to go to that IP for its configuration files (tftp). The config files configure the phone to look for a sip server in the sip domain (the SIP SRV record lookup). Mike From:

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-15 Thread Picher, Michael
] On Behalf Of Ken Fulmer Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 6:57 PM To: 'Tony Graziano' Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom We have the SRV records setup on the sipX primary and secondary servers. When I do a dig -T for _sip._udp.example.com (actu

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-15 Thread Tony Graziano
ziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] > *Sent:* Monday, March 15, 2010 5:36 PM > > *To:* Ken Fulmer > *Cc:* Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom > > > > The FQDN will always break your phones. > > SRV is for

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-15 Thread Ken Fulmer
phones can pull the necessary information to utilize the DNS SRV records? From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 5:36 PM To: Ken Fulmer Cc: Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom The

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-15 Thread Tony Graziano
and SRV records. Should we use the domain name or > _sip._udp.example.com? > > > > -Original Message- > From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 5:13 PM > To: Ken Fulmer > Cc: Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.o

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-15 Thread Ken Fulmer
...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 5:13 PM To: Ken Fulmer Cc: Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom If you do an nslookup for the SRV records for that domain, and it returns the correct records, you should be fine so long as the correct

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-15 Thread Tony Graziano
; > > > From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:49 PM > To: Ken Fulmer > Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom > > > > I do, but I don't know about the whole &q

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-15 Thread Ken Fulmer
hones will look for the following uri: _sip._udp.example.com? Ken From: Josh Patten [mailto:jpat...@co.brazos.tx.us] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:49 PM To: Ken Fulmer Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom I do, but I don't know about

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-09 Thread Ken Fulmer
r Cc: Josh Patten; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Ken Fulmer wrote: Should I also set the domain name in the scope? Will this cause the phones to "scan" the domain (DNS server zone) for the SRV record

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-09 Thread Tony Graziano
..@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto: > sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Patten > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:37 PM > *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom > > > > You must set the DNS servers in y

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-09 Thread Josh Patten
*From:* sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh Patten *Sent:* Tuesday, March 09, 2010 4:37 PM *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom You must set the DNS servers in your DHCP scope on

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-09 Thread Ken Fulmer
10 4:37 PM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom You must set the DNS servers in your DHCP scope on whatever DHCP server you are using. Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 On 3/9/2010 4:32 PM, Ken Fu

Re: [sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-09 Thread Josh Patten
You must set the DNS servers in your DHCP scope on whatever DHCP server you are using. Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT Dept. (979) 361-4676 On 3/9/2010 4:32 PM, Ken Fulmer wrote: I have DNS SRV setup on a MS DNS server. Using NSLOOKUP, the records return the cor

[sipx-users] DNS SRV and Polycom

2010-03-09 Thread Ken Fulmer
I have DNS SRV setup on a MS DNS server. Using NSLOOKUP, the records return the correct information. I'm not sure how to get the phones to contact the DNS server to look up the SRV records. Do we still use option 66 or some other mechanism? Thanks, Ken Fulmer ___