.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
> m...@grounded.net
> Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 9:34 PM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
> realistically be added after 4.2?
>
> If Mike i
sage-
> From: Todd Hodgen [mailto:thod...@verizon.net]
> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 2:02 PM
> To: 'Martin Steinmann'
> Cc: m...@grounded.net
> Subject: FW: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
> realistically be added after 4.2?
>
> Marti
; From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
> m...@grounded.net
> Sent: Saturday, July 03, 2010 9:39 AM
> To: sipx-users
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
> realistically be added aft
03, 2010 9:39 AM
To: sipx-users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
realistically be added after 4.2?
> Think: if that question was never ever ever asked again, how much noise
> would it save on the mailing list?
One more problem is definitely old infor
> Think: if that question was never ever ever asked again, how much noise
> would it save on the mailing list?
One more problem is definitely old information, such as wiki and other sipx
related historical info.
I can't count how many times I've searched high and low only to find old
informatio
On 7/2/10 9:09 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
Smells like an applet, but I don't see how that would make it easier.
you guys are thinking too much like programmers and engineers :-).
Think 'stupid user' or first time user.
I haven't been using sipx so long that I don't
On 7/2/10 7:41 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> A lot of people are griping and moaning about this but their comments
> lie in completely unrelated email threads.
>
Diagnostic in general, look at the FAQ's (not the written FAQ's, but
the questions and problems people post the most about). look at the
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:09 PM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> Smells like an applet, but I don't see how that would make it easier.
applet could build a list of calls, or servers, or phones, can you can
pick them from a drop down and applet would show just that data
instantly. otherwise you'd have t
putty
integration to a screen.
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:39 PM
To: Tony Graziano
Cc: Sipx-users list
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tool
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler
Sent: Friday, July 02, 2010 5:39 PM
To: Tony Graziano
Cc: Sipx-users list
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Diagnostics Tools in sipxecs 4.2 :: What could
realistically be added after 4.2
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 7:41 PM, Tony Graziano
wrote:
> 3. Have the merged.xml ready for download in sipxconfig (nice, comments
> about what it is, storing it there for future reference) to display in
> viewer.
it might be possible to wrap the sip viewer as an applet so you have
an integrated view
A lot of people are griping and moaning about this but their comments lie in
completely unrelated email threads.
To understand sip signalling, one must understand that the internal
components DO NOT show everything in a packet capture. Furthermore, running
a packet capture manually on the interfac
12 matches
Mail list logo
