, May 14, 2009 12:17 PM
To: Nathaniel Watkins
Cc: sipX users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an
auto attendant
a few things:
(1) are the audiocodes and the sipx gear/phones on different subnets?
if so, make sure the sip alg is off on the device doing
he other audiocodes4.csv - It just
> didn't look right - so here is another one...
>
> From: milosz [mailto:mew...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wed 5/13/2009 5:38 PM
> To: Nathaniel Watkins
> Cc: sipX users
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3
Cc: sipX users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back
to an auto attendant
just read through this thread... nathaniel, try setting the syslog
level on the audiocodes to max, do a capture of a bad call, and send the file.
also,
ssing...
Nathaniel
From: milosz [mailto:mew...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wed 5/13/2009 5:38 PM
To: Nathaniel Watkins
Cc: sipX users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an
auto attendant
yeah, i love audiocodes.
go to
htt
ilosz [mailto:mew...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wed 5/13/2009 5:38 PM
To: Nathaniel Watkins
Cc: sipX users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an
auto attendant
yeah, i love audiocodes.
go to
http://gatewayip/AdminPage
GWDEBUGLEVEL=5
TraceLevel=1
burn and reset gatew
slog when there are only 3 extensions
> in the huntgroup (i.e. everything works perfectly)...
>
> --
> *From:* milosz [mailto:mew...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wed 5/13/2009 1:41 PM
> *To:* Nathaniel Watkins
> *Cc:* sipX users
> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users
Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an
auto attendant
just read through this thread... nathaniel, try setting the syslog level on the
audiocodes to max, do a capture of a bad call, and send the file. also, what's
the firmware on the audiocodes?
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:30 P
1:41 PM
To: Nathaniel Watkins
Cc: sipX users
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back to an
auto attendant
just read through this thread... nathaniel, try setting the syslog level on the
audiocodes to max, do a capture of a bad call, and send the file. also
just read through this thread... nathaniel, try setting the syslog level on
the audiocodes to max, do a capture of a bad call, and send the file. also,
what's the firmware on the audiocodes?
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Scott Lawrence
wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 12:16 -0400, Nathaniel Wat
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 12:16 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> Your sip Viewer skills are sick...
There's a well understood way to develop them - just debug a few hundred
different problems. :-)
> that aside, I removed the last phone
> that was set to ring for 30 seconds...and am uploading the xml
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 09:50 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> I've just ran the trace -
> http://www.garrettcounty.org/sipx/huntgrouptrace.xml - As Scott stated,
> Sip Viewer definately shows a 504 Gateway Time-out (although I do not
> understand the logic here - it shouldn't take any more time sin
-Original Message-
From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 12, 2009 10:00 AM
To: Nathaniel Watkins
Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: RE: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back
to an auto attendant
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:0
On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 09:04 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> All of the extensions in the hunt group are set to ring at the same time
> (so adding more isn't increasing the amount of time). I've adjusted the
> ring time from 15-30 seconds. This doesn't seem to matter. Here is a
> screen shot: h
g
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Hunt Group >3 extensions is not falling back
to an auto attendant
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:56 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> The following scenario fails if I have more than 3 extension in my
> huntgroup and set a fallback destination as an auto-attendant:
>
On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:56 -0400, Nathaniel Watkins wrote:
> The following scenario fails if I have more than 3 extension in my
> huntgroup and set a fallback destination as an auto-attendant:
>
> Incoming call from an 8 port audiocodes fxo gateway is routed to a
> huntgroup (extension 111). I h
The following scenario fails if I have more than 3 extension in my huntgroup
and set a fallback destination as an auto-attendant:
Incoming call from an 8 port audiocodes fxo gateway is routed to a huntgroup
(extension 111). I have a fallback Destination of 119 (which is an automated
attendant)
16 matches
Mail list logo
