ect: Re: [sipx-users] Incoming call bounces back and forth between SipProxy
and SipRegistrar
[...]
Depending on exactly how you do it, "ring all extensions" should only cost 2 or
4 more on Max-Forwards. Have you checked the number of M-F that are actually
being consumed, that is, the
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike
[...@lynk.com]
Is there a better way to get “incoming calls ring all extensions” functionality
without taking such a hit on Max Forwards? Be
users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Incoming call bounces back and forth between SipProxy
and SipRegistrar
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Worley, Dale R
(Dale)
OTOH, 11 times for a single call is hig
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Worley, Dale R
(Dale)
OTOH, 11 times for a single call is higher than would be expected, and may
indicate that your dial plans are arranged to put the call through too many
steps of "redir
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Burden, Mike
[...@lynk.com]
When I run a siptrace of an inbound call, I see that before an INVITE is sent
to any of our phones, the following sequence is r
When I run a siptrace of an inbound call, I see that before an INVITE is sent
to any of our phones, the following sequence is repeated 11 times:
SipProxy SipRegistrar
|-- INVITE -->|
|<--- 100 TRYING -|
|<--- 302 MOVED TEMPORARILY --|
|--
