Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Tony Graziano
No offense, but if G729 were that important, I would implement a SBC at the edge that transcodes. This really makes the best sense (at least to me), because then sipx would be a standard installation (not even behind nat or remote users) and let the SBC handle the qos as best it could and negotiate

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Tony Graziano
5/21/2010 01:55 PM > To: "'Michael Scheidell'" , "'Tony Graziano'" > > CC: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and >  Internal users to Remote users > >   Where does G711 use

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Jermaine Pinder
f traffice on the LAN side -Original Message- From: "Todd Hodgen" [thod...@verizon.net] Date: 05/21/2010 01:55 PM To: "'Michael Scheidell'" , "'Tony Graziano'" CC: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remo

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Todd Hodgen
Tony Graziano Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users yes, but if the bandwidth is that bad, the 128K G.711 uses vs 32K on G.729a, if you don't have 32K, what happens when you don't

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Tony Graziano
dec how would I go about making it system wide? > > Thanks! > > Gerald > > -- > From: "Tony Graziano" > Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:51 AM > To: > Cc: ; > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and > Internal users to Rem

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Gerald Harper
use a certain codec how would I go about making it system wide? Thanks! Gerald -- From: "Tony Graziano" Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:51 AM To: Cc: ; Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Interna

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Tony Graziano
com ; sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Fri May 21 11:48:57 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users yes, but if the bandwidth is that bad, the 128K G.711 uses vs 32K on G.729a, if you don't have 32K, what happens when you

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
emote users Can you talk more about the license for G.729A? How would one go about implementing this? From: Michael Scheidell Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:40 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote user

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Tony Graziano
rg Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users On 5/21/10 11:26 AM, Jermaine Pinder wrote: What's the best approche to setup QoS between internal and remote users that are using UDP ports between 3-31000? just so you know, your

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
2010 8:40 AM *To:* sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org <mailto:sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org> *Subject:* Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users On 5/21/10 11:26 AM, Jermaine Pinder wrote: What's the best approche to setup QoS betwee

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Gerald Harper
Can you talk more about the license for G.729A? How would one go about implementing this? From: Michael Scheidell Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 8:40 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users On

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Tony Graziano
You can only control so much. Typically from your firewall the only thing you can do is promote or give priority to sipx traffic. Once it leaves your firewall for the internet, it's a "crap shoot" to the remote user. You can actuate qos settings in a remote users UA, but there is little likelihood

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Josh Patten
The only thing you can do to help yourself is to set up outbound QoS on both sides that way RTP packets leaving your network will have priority in your equipment. After that it's entirely up to your ITSP to do QoS (which they may not) Josh Patten Assistant Network Administrator Brazos County IT

Re: [sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 5/21/10 11:26 AM, Jermaine Pinder wrote: What's the best approche to setup QoS between internal and remote users that are using UDP ports between 3-31000? just so you know, your ISP and/or the ISP on the other end, or on any of the 15 hops in between might not even support QOS. yo

[sipx-users] QoS for Remote Users to Internal extension and Internal users to Remote users

2010-05-21 Thread Jermaine Pinder
What's the best approche to setup QoS between internal and remote users that are using UDP ports between 3-31000? Thanks ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users Unsubscri