Good point, thanks :-)
Tony Graziano wrote:
even so, you do not want a remote user hitting the web portal during peek voice
traffic and making all of the voice traffic problematic. so it is probably a
good idea to get a handle on traffic shaping first and foremost even with a
dedicated conn
even so, you do not want a remote user hitting the web portal during peek
voice traffic and making all of the voice traffic problematic. so it is
probably a good idea to get a handle on traffic shaping first and foremost
even with a dedicated connection 4 it.
On May 11, 2011 9:16 PM, "Carl Farringt
Thanks. There will be a dedicated adsl2+ annex-m just for voice. I'll use a
reasonable router firewall - mikrotik rb750g looks worth a shot. I have good
experience of the rb450g.
Tony Graziano wrote:
only 1 network card is supported. you should employees a firewall in front and
since you on
of sipXecs
software
Reply-To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration,
and extension numbering scheme.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http:/
only 1 network card is supported. you should employees a firewall in front
and since you only have a single small connection you should also enact
adequate traffic shaping on your firewall to ensure voice traffic gets
priority.
On May 11, 2011 6:44 PM, "Carl Farrington" wrote:
> Can somebody give
mended NIC configuration,
and extension numbering scheme.
___
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
___
sipx-users mailing list
d Hodgen
[thod...@frontier.com]
Sent: 12 May 2011 00:28
To: 'Discussion list for users of sipXecs software'
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension
numbering scheme.
On this list, you will find excellent support for use of the PFSense router.
Very afforda
of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension
numbering scheme.
Thanks Todd. That's fairly straightforward then. I will probably look to use
the existing Windows DHCP and DNS servers and share the LAN. These sites
would tend not to have proper mult
ilto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Carl Farrington
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 3:46 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering
scheme.
Can somebody give me some recommendations on NIC configuration
Farrington
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 3:46 PM
To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
Subject: [sipx-users] Recommended NIC configuration, and extension numbering
scheme.
Can somebody give me some recommendations on NIC configuration on a small
(15 user) deployment with a dedicated DSL line for the
Can somebody give me some recommendations on NIC configuration on a small (15
user) deployment with a dedicated DSL line for the ITSP trunk? My background is
really in Asterisk & FreePBX, and I have to date configured those systems with
a dedicated WAN NIC, and either a separate LAN for the hand
11 matches
Mail list logo
