Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-03 Thread M. Ranganathan
Hi, See XX-8499. I tightened up error handling on the 4.2 and main branches. If you are using 4.0.4, you can look at the diff corresponding to this issue and apply and rebuild sipxbridge.jar. Regards, Ranga On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Sven Evensen wrote: > Ranga, Dale > > The same thing h

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-01 Thread Sven Evensen
Ranga, Dale The same thing happened when I used IP addresses. 1 REGISTER-287 2 REGISTER-287 3 401-287 4 REGISTER-288 w/nonce 5 401-288 6 200-288 I believe there are three faults. 1. The ITSP (Asterisk) should not send cseq 288 in line 5. 2. sipX should not disregard the 200 OK

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-01 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:03 PM, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > > From: Sven Evensen [sven.even...@onrelay.com] > > should be cseq=2 in line 5, which is a fault from the ITSP?: > > sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1. > after 500ms sipX resends REGISTER cseq=1. > a f

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-01 Thread WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
From: Sven Evensen [sven.even...@onrelay.com] should be cseq=2 in line 5, which is a fault from the ITSP?: sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1. after 500ms sipX resends REGISTER cseq=1. a few ms later 401 cseq=1 is received for first REGISTER. sipX sends new REGIST

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-01 Thread Sven Evensen
I see I have a typo in my scenario below. should be cseq=2 in line 5, which is a fault from the ITSP?: sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1. after 500ms sipX resends REGISTER cseq=1. a few ms later 401 cseq=1 is received for first REGISTER. sipX sends new REGISTER with nonce cseq=2. sipX receives 401 cseq=

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-01 Thread WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Sven Evensen [sven.even...@onrelay.com] The problem is a little more subtle, I will try to explain. And I will send you a snapshot too. sipX sends REGISTE

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-01 Thread Tony Graziano
To: Sven Evensen; mra...@gmail.com > Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering > > portahk.cordiaip.netx > > It can't resolve the A record for the above entry. If it can't find it, it > can't register to it. Check the DNS resolv

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-01 Thread Sven Evensen
net] Sent: 01 June 2010 00:38 To: Sven Evensen; mra...@gmail.com Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering portahk.cordiaip.netx It can't resolve the A record for the above entry. If it can't find it, it can't register to it. Check

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-06-01 Thread Sven Evensen
My conclusion regarding 401 being ignored is the fact that two 401 are received on same trunk, then a 200 OK is received, but the trunk is still disabled. And why does the trunk not try to register again, ever. Until sipXBridge restarted? I will try to use IP addresses like you suggest, see if

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-05-31 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 6:15 PM, Sven Evensen wrote: > Hi Ranga, > > I did not quite understand the conclusion. Where is the DNS fault? In sipX? > And what is it actually causing? > > Why does sipX ignore 200 OK after two 401? How do you conclude that it is being ignored? > Why does sipX sto

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-05-31 Thread Tony Graziano
sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org To: M. Ranganathan Cc: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Sent: Mon May 31 18:15:17 2010 Subject: Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering Hi Ranga, I did not quite understand the conclusion. Where is the DNS fault? In sipX? And what is it actually causing? Why does sip

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-05-31 Thread Sven Evensen
Hi Ranga, I did not quite understand the conclusion. Where is the DNS fault? In sipX? And what is it actually causing? Why does sipX ignore 200 OK after two 401? Why does sipX stop registration of that trunk? Regards, Sven -Original Message- From: M. Ranganathan [mailto:mra...@gmail.co

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-05-31 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:33 PM, M. Ranganathan wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Sven Evensen > wrote: >> Hi Ranga, >> >> The problem is a little more subtle, I will try to explain. And I will send >> you a snapshot too. >> >> sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1. >> after 500ms sipX resends REG

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-05-31 Thread M. Ranganathan
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:55 PM, Sven Evensen wrote: > Hi Ranga, > > The problem is a little more subtle, I will try to explain. And I will send > you a snapshot too. > > sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1. > after 500ms sipX resends REGISTER cseq=1. > a few ms later 401 cseq=1 is received for first REGI

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-05-31 Thread Sven Evensen
Hi Ranga, The problem is a little more subtle, I will try to explain. And I will send you a snapshot too. sipX sends REGISTER cseq=1. after 500ms sipX resends REGISTER cseq=1. a few ms later 401 cseq=1 is received for first REGISTER. sipX sends new REGISTER with nonce cseq=2. sipX receives 401 c

Re: [sipx-users] SIP trunk stops registering

2010-05-31 Thread M. Ranganathan
If sipxbridge sees two 401 or 407 for two successive REGISTER transactions that implies it tired to authenticate, failed, tried again, failed and hence there is a problem with the credentials. If such is the case, then sipxbridge will retry again in 60 sec. This has nothing to do with the 500 ms.