On 5/29/2012 11:05 AM, Dave May wrote:
This is the way we configure it as well. The parent domain is managed
by corporate DNS servers, which delegate a sub domain to the
sipXecs/openUC config server to manage.
We have other servers in the sipXecs domain though, which has made
managing DNS
design?
Dave.
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of
pscheep...@epo.org
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 3:08 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Unmanaged services plan for 4.6
Yes
ehalf Of pscheep...@epo.org
> > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:24 AM
> > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Unmanaged services plan for 4.6
> >
> > Douglas Hubler wrote on 25-05-2012 11:01:14:
> >
> > > On Fri,
ndry.org] On Behalf Of pscheep...@epo.org
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 7:24 AM
> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Unmanaged services plan for 4.6
>
> Douglas Hubler wrote on 25-05-2012 11:01:14:
>
> > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:
-users] Unmanaged services plan for 4.6
Douglas Hubler wrote on 25-05-2012 11:01:14:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:59 AM, wrote:
> >> then we should make sure webmin works. Did you typically install
> >> webmin on sipxecs systems before or just thinking ahead?
> >
>
estinataire désigné(e) est
> interdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser
> immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen.)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoun
utre moyen.)
-Original Message-
From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
[mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Hubler
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2012 8:44 AM
To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Unmanaged services plan for 4
Douglas Hubler wrote on 25-05-2012 14:44:01:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:23 AM, wrote:
> > 2) Use UC DNS for the servers and the company DNS for the clients,
this
> > means putting the
> > necessary records in the company DNS. All records are available on the
UC
> > servers as well.
> > This
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 7:23 AM, wrote:
> 2) Use UC DNS for the servers and the company DNS for the clients, this
> means putting the
> necessary records in the company DNS. All records are available on the UC
> servers as well.
> This is the safest I think because the client records are availabl
Douglas Hubler wrote on 25-05-2012 11:01:14:
> On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:59 AM, wrote:
> >> then we should make sure webmin works. Did you typically install
> >> webmin on sipxecs systems before or just thinking ahead?
> >
> > I think it is important that there is at least also a UC interface
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:59 AM, wrote:
>> then we should make sure webmin works. Did you typically install
>> webmin on sipxecs systems before or just thinking ahead?
>
> I think it is important that there is at least also a UC interface where
> the important things for the UC system can be set
Douglas Hubler wrote on 25-05-2012 01:52:58:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Gerald Drouillard
> wrote:
> >> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> > I think you can get as crazy as you want with this. I believe the
> > ultimate in interfaces for managing the service
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Gerald Drouillard
wrote:
>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
> I think you can get as crazy as you want with this. I believe the
> ultimate in interfaces for managing the services on the server is
> webmin. It is very rare that you ca
On 5/24/2012 9:10 AM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> DNS, IP tables, NTP and DHCP are among the few services that some
> folks configure separately on sipxecs 4.4 or older systems. Starting
> with the 4.6 release these services are integrated in a much tighter
> way. In order not to conflict with any cu
are
>
> Date:
>
> 24-05-2012 16:53
>
> Subject:
>
> Re: [sipx-users] Unmanaged services plan for 4.6
>
> Sent by:
>
> sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Douglas Hubler
wrote:
> > DNS, IP tables, NT
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Douglas Hubler wrote:
> DNS, IP tables, NTP and DHCP are among the few services that some
> folks configure separately on sipxecs 4.4 or older systems. Starting
> with the 4.6 release these services are integrated in a much tighter
> way. In order not to conflict
DNS, IP tables, NTP and DHCP are among the few services that some
folks configure separately on sipxecs 4.4 or older systems. Starting
with the 4.6 release these services are integrated in a much tighter
way. In order not to conflict with any custom configuration methods,
these select services no
17 matches
Mail list logo
