Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-06 Thread Mark Wood
[mailto:dwor...@nortel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 7:18 PM To: Mark Wood Cc: 'sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org' Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways As Scott said, in general, you shouldn't copy trace information into the body of your e-mail, as it rarely survives transit. You should

[sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Wood
Fresh ISO install of 4.0 Setup an Asterisk box as an unmanaged gateway for interim purposes, also setup associated dial plan. I can make calls from the SipXecs system to asterisk and use the Asterisk box as a PSTN gateway as well. But calls from the Asterisk to the SipXecs do not go through,

Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-05 Thread Jhony Perez
Mark, This sounds like the same issue I'm having with the Cisco gateways, I don't have a fix for it yet but you can see the SipXecs 4 with Cisco gateway issues (Jhony Perez) in the list. When you call in from the Asterisk try sending the call to the SipXecs Auto Attendant, if this works

Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-05 Thread Tony Graziano
I would suggest you go through your dialplan entries and compare them to what you had before. You might also think of putting a catchall rule in for troubleshooting and turn the proxy log up to debug and see what is being sent to sipx in the way of digits. I saw a weird thing too trying to

Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Wood
...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 10:41 AM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org; Mark Wood Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways I would suggest you go through your dialplan entries and compare them to what you had before. You might also think of putting a catchall rule

Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-05 Thread Scott Lawrence
On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 13:28 -0700, Mark Wood wrote: OK, went thru the dialplan and it is identical to the 3.10 version. Ran the tail command and got the log info: Don't paste logs into email - line wrapping and other mail-client nonsense makes it hard to analyze them. To debug this, you'll

Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Wood
OK, I can wireshark it and do the same thing as sipviewer right? -Original Message- From: Scott Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 1:42 PM To: Mark Wood Cc: 'Tony Graziano'; 'sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org' Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-05 Thread Mark Wood
Lawrence [mailto:scott.lawre...@nortel.com] Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 1:42 PM To: Mark Wood Cc: 'sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org' Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 13:28 -0700, Mark Wood wrote: OK, went thru the dialplan and it is identical to the 3.10 version

Re: [sipx-users] Unmanged Gateways

2009-05-05 Thread Dale Worley
As Scott said, in general, you shouldn't copy trace information into the body of your e-mail, as it rarely survives transit. You should put the information into a file and attach it. However, in this case, you were your information didn't get mutilated. On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 18:28 -0700, Mark