I would suggest you go through your dialplan entries and compare them to what 
you had before. You might also think of putting a "catchall" rule in for 
troubleshooting and turn the proxy log up to debug and see what is being sent 
to sipx in the way of digits.

I saw a "weird" thing too trying to return calls through our Ingate, which is 
also an unmanaged gateway. I used to have an entry "%2B" that would have to be 
stripped on returning calls from call-logs on the phone where they showed "+" 
(and an eleven digit number). In 4.0 that call needs to now send "+" instead of 
the SIP HEX value of of + as "%2B" in order for it to make it past the dial 
rule and hit the proxy and get sent. At that point if you tail the log:

tail -f /var/log/sipxpbx/sipXproxy.log

you might be able to see what the proxy might be complaining about.

So In my case I changed the rule from a  prefix of %2B to + and now it all 
works again. Dialing 1 (and 11 digits) always worked, but when the callerid 
said +1 and you wanted to hit the dial button on the polycom it did not until I 
made the above change. So I am convinced some items did change in the proxy for 
sure.

>>> Mark Wood <mark.w...@redphonetech.com> 05/05/09 12:54 PM >>>
Fresh ISO install of 4.0
Setup an Asterisk box as an unmanaged gateway for interim purposes, also setup 
associated dial plan. I can make calls from the SipXecs system to asterisk and 
use the Asterisk box as a PSTN gateway as well. But calls from the Asterisk  to 
the SipXecs do not go through, it (Asterisk) responds with an "all circuits are 
busy" announcement.  If I check the CDR records in the SipXecs system it shows 
the call with all the correct info but with a failed in the status column. This 
exact configuration worked in our 3.10.2 system, any additional configs for the 
4,0?

M Wood

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users

Reply via email to