Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4

2011-03-03 Thread Tony Graziano
I am going to test it. I start with a bandwidth.com trunk template and simply change the itsp address. On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Matt White wrote: > >>> On 3/3/2011 at 09:35 AM, in message <4d6fa71f.8030...@secnap.com>, > Michael > Scheidell wrote: > > On 3/3/11 9:30 AM, Matt White wrote:

Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4

2011-03-03 Thread Matt White
>>> On 3/3/2011 at 09:35 AM, in message <4d6fa71f.8030...@secnap.com>, Michael Scheidell wrote: > On 3/3/11 9:30 AM, Matt White wrote: >> We have several customers with sip trunks that require signaling on port > 5060 using this method without any issues of hairpin turns, AA, transfer > etc...a

Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4

2011-03-03 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 3/3/11 9:30 AM, Matt White wrote: We have several customers with sip trunks that require signaling on port 5060 using this method without any issues of hairpin turns, AA, transfer etc...and as I've noted one of these uses VOIP.MS using IP trunks. using ip based authentication, right? not u

Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4

2011-03-03 Thread Matt White
>>> On 3/3/2011 at 08:58 AM, in message <4d6f9e77.6020...@secnap.com>, Michael Scheidell wrote: > On 3/3/11 8:47 AM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: >> I use a Cisco router that had to be in the mix anyway. > Cisco might be smart enough to xlate it. we are on metro > ethernet/fiber, and

Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4

2011-03-03 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 3/3/11 8:47 AM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: I use a Cisco router that had to be in the mix anyway. Cisco might be smart enough to xlate it. we are on metro ethernet/fiber, and were provided with a (managed by the isp) router we don't have access to. I might be forced to put a s

Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4

2011-03-03 Thread Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public)
Subject: Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4 ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-

Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4

2011-03-03 Thread Michael Scheidell
On 3/3/11 7:38 AM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote: It does work. ill try again, what exactly did you use? a couple of people say it 'works', but when you finally drill down, it only works in a limited sense. does it require a third piece of hardware? full vm, AA, call transfer, inbound

Re: [sipx-users] doesn't work tony , Re: Q About port 5060 trunkingsupport on 4.4

2011-03-03 Thread Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public)
I know, but he said this too: "people tell me if i want port 5060 and not port 5080, its as simple as a port nat/reditect on a firewall.  I tried that also.  doen't work." It does work. -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 07:36:46 To: ; Discussion list for users