On 3/3/11 8:47 AM, Matthew Kitchin (usenet/public) wrote:
I use a Cisco router that had to be in the mix anyway.
Cisco might be smart enough to xlate it. we are on metro
ethernet/fiber, and were provided with a (managed by the isp) router we
don't have access to.
I might be forced to put a small cisco in front. but I hate one more
single point of failure. not as bad now that I have a failover FS in
secondary location, but still goes against my religion.. guess I will
need to gargle with holy water if I do this.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
ISN: 1259*1300
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Certified SNORT Integrator
* 2008-9 Hot Company Award Winner, World Executive Alliance
* Five-Star Partner Program 2009, VARBusiness
* Best in Email Security,2010: Network Products Guide
* King of Spam Filters, SC Magazine 2008
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list
sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
