Re: [sipx-users] Problem with hunting busy users

...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Adam Lulek Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 6:11 PM To: sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org Subject: [sipx-users] Problem with hunting busy users Dear SipXecs creators, I would like to ask you for a possible solution or

[sipx-users] Problem with hunting busy users

Dear SipXecs creators, I would like to ask you for a possible solution or an explanation of the following issue. I work with SipXecs software platform in my bachelor thesis and one of the features that I have configured are Hunt Groups. Here is the scenario where my problem appeared: I ha

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

It's working now. Thanks. openacd-0.9.5-741.gd7f6.x86_64 sipxopenacd-4.6.0-890.ge4ca9.x86_64 are the ones I have installed yesterday. - MM On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 10:23 AM, George Niculae wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Kumaran < > thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote: > >>

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

Great, that did the trick, thanks! Regards, Alan Worstell A1 Networks - Systems Administrator VTSP, dCAA, LPIC-1, Linux+, CLA, DCTS (707)570-2021 x204 For support issues please email supp...@a-1networks.com or call 707-703-1050 On 11/27/12 4:23 AM, George Niculae wrote: On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Kumaran < thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote: > George,I see this issue intermittently in previous build..Will check in > the latest build > > New RPMs published with fixes for OpenACD, please retry Thanks George

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

George,I see this issue intermittently in previous build..Will check in the latest build Regards, Kumaran T On 11/27/2012 1:20 AM, George Niculae wrote: On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Melcon Moraes > wrote: I believe you hitted this: https://list.sipfoundry.

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

Hello, This happened with version: openacd-0.9.5-649.g3370.x86_64 and after I ran updates (today, right before my first post), openacd-0.9.5-740.ga82e.x86_64 and sipxopenacd packages: sipxopenacd.x86_64 0:4.6.0-669.gbc73a7 (before update) and sipxopenacd.x86_64 0:4.6.0-890.ge4ca9 (after update) R

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Melcon Moraes wrote: > I believe you hitted this: > https://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/msg28473.html > > Is this still reproducible with RPMs from today? George ___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipf

Re: [sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

I believe you hitted this: https://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/msg28473.html - MM On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Alan Worstell wrote: > Hello, > On a 4.6 system, I discovered that the service Contact Center (openacd) > was listed as shut down. Checking the box and selecting "restart"

[sipx-users] Problem starting OpenACD on sipx 4.6

Hello, On a 4.6 system, I discovered that the service Contact Center (openacd) was listed as shut down. Checking the box and selecting "restart" did not bring it up. Trying a "service openacd start" from command line fails with: erlexec: HOME must be set I found this thread that refers to a bug

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

Yes, this is correct, it was set to managed in the gui again. I know that it *was* set to unmanaged, because I had to create the cfengine script to allow udp 53 through the local firewall. I've set it to unmanaged again. Alan Worstell A1 Networks - Systems Administrator VTSP, dCAA, LPIC-1, Linux

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:19 AM, George Niculae wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Alan Worstell > wrote: >> Hello, >> My earlier reply to the list is currently held in moderation (I believe >> because I attached another log which was slightly larger) but named.conf >> is still actually be

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:11 AM, Alan Worstell wrote: > Hello, > My earlier reply to the list is currently held in moderation (I believe > because I attached another log which was slightly larger) but named.conf > is still actually being overwritten. /etc/named.conf.unmanaged still has > our chang

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

Hello, My earlier reply to the list is currently held in moderation (I believe because I attached another log which was slightly larger) but named.conf is still actually being overwritten. /etc/named.conf.unmanaged still has our changes, but /etc/named.conf keeps going back to the default. Here

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Alan Worstell wrote: > Hello, > As Trevor mentioned, replacing /etc/named.conf.unmanaged with our changed > conf resolved this. I had noticed in sipxagent.log entries about fulfilling > promises from that file. > Attached is the log file in question. > Thanks, co

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

Of Alan Worstell > [aworst...@a-1networks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:00 PM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6 > > Hello, > We have a 4.6 server set up, and wanted to have a s

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

Mike, We have ACL's, Views, and split the zone into an internal AND external zone already. We are returning internal IP's to the RFC 1918's defined in our internal ACL and view for external carries "any" and has a modified zone that includes the A record for the public entry instead of the p

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

s being overwritten > in the first place. > > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [ > sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Alan Worstell [ > aworst...@a-1networks.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:00 PM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs s

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

lf Of Alan Worstell [aworst...@a-1networks.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2012 4:00 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6 Hello, We have a 4.6 server set up, and wanted to have a split view DNS system so it

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

Alan, Typically you would want to manage your external DNS at a DNS provider. For instance, a-1networks.com DNS is probably hosted somewhere (godaddy, network solutions, etc). The real goal here is to make it easy for users to roam outside the network and inside the network. Thus when you setup

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Alan Worstell wrote: > Hello, > We have a 4.6 server set up, and wanted to have a split view DNS system > so it hands the public IP address out to public queries and the internal > address to anything on the local LAN. I've configured the DNS service to > be unman

[sipx-users] Problem with named.conf being overwritten in 4.6

Hello, We have a 4.6 server set up, and wanted to have a split view DNS system so it hands the public IP address out to public queries and the internal address to anything on the local LAN. I've configured the DNS service to be unmanaged in the GUI, added a firewall script in /usr/share/sipxecs

Re: [sipx-users] Problem tranferring calls via an audiocodes gateway to voicemail

. -Original Message- From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Watkins Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 4:07 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: [sipx-users] Problem tranferring calls via an

Re: [sipx-users] problem with sipx4.40 and user moh

the user group on that should be sipxchange:sipxchange On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Michael Scheidell < michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote: > upgraded from 4.2.0->4.2.1->4.4.0 > (in between, did a full backup, built the next server with the cd rom, did > a restore , yum update, the replaced

[sipx-users] problem with sipx4.40 and user moh

upgraded from 4.2.0->4.2.1->4.4.0 (in between, did a full backup, built the next server with the cd rom, did a restore , yum update, the replaced repo, and upgraded again) I have a problem with going to the user->{userx}, Music-on-hold param. I get a ' An internal error has occurred. Click her

Re: [sipx-users] Problem tranferring calls via an audiocodes gateway to voicemail

of sipXecs software' Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem tranferring calls via an audiocodes gateway to voicemail Nathaniel, Can you post a sanitized INI file of the Audiocodes for review, or send it privately? This application definitely does work. A trace of a failed call would

Re: [sipx-users] Problem tranferring calls via an audiocodes gateway to voicemail

...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Watkins Sent: Friday, July 27, 2012 4:07 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: [sipx-users] Problem tranferring calls via an audiocodes gateway to voicemail I have the following request/scenario from our 911 department: Request: When someone

[sipx-users] Problem tranferring calls via an audiocodes gateway to voicemail

I have the following request/scenario from our 911 department: Request: When someone calls in on one of their admin lines looking for a deputy that is not in the station - the dispatchers would like to press a button on their console station to transfer the call to a voicemail box that is then e

[sipx-users] problem with dial plan

I'm running into some troubles with dialplan and schedules. I was trying to define some rewrite rules , so that I can forwards an extesion (like 1000) to 2030 in some hours or to 100 in other. So i define a rule with a specific schedule and then a rule scheduled always with lower priority. Is thi

Re: [sipx-users] problem with phonelogd

If it were me, I would look up the rsyslogd error in the Centos forum. I do see errors with rsyslogd in their forums as people try to compile, etc. This is not an answer, I know. If rsyslogd is happier with an older version, so be it. On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Ivan Pletenev wrote: > 1. y

Re: [sipx-users] problem with phonelogd

1. you mean rsyslog.conf? it's very common, i didn't change it. here is it(i removed strings with # to shorten it): *.info;mail.none;authpriv.none;cron.none/var/log/messages authpriv.* /var/log/secure mail.*

Re: [sipx-users] problem with phonelogd

OK, as I re-read this... The actual issue is with rsyslogd. The subject of the thread made me assume something else. Have you looked at your conf file for it? What is the OS? How do did you install, from RPM or did you compile onboard? On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:12 AM, Ivan Pletenev wrote:

Re: [sipx-users] problem with phonelogd

i can't remember exactly but it was the same 4.4 but from the last year. as i can understand it's not a symlink: [root@sipx ~]# service phonelogd start rsyslog runtime error(-2066): could not load module '/lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so', dlopen: /lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so: cannot open shared object file: No suc

Re: [sipx-users] problem with phonelogd

What version did you upgrade "from"? Since the phonelogd is compiled for you and was originally introduced before 4.4, it might be the symlink for lmnet.so is not pointing to the right place. Did you look for a symlink for lmnset.so on your system and if so where it points? On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at

[sipx-users] problem with phonelogd

Hello, Since i've updated my sipxecs to 4.4.0- 2012-02-08 version i got error with phonelogd: [root@sipx ~]# service phonelogd start rsyslog runtime error(-2066): could not load module '/lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so', dlopen: /lib/rsyslog/lmnet.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

I do recall the #of calls per line key needs to be "1", and voicemail needs to be disabled. If you find NO difference in the configs of the phone, you should peruse the web interface of each phone to see if one (that has not been wiped yet) has a manual setting. I seem to recall that was something

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

you'll find the phone configs in /var/sipxdata/configserver/phone/profile/tftproot (or something close to this... Mike On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Claas Hilbrecht < claas.hilbrecht+maillinglists.sipx...@linum.com> wrote: > --Am Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 08:46 -0500 Michael Picher > schrie

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

> Change the order of the lines on the phone and see if the problem flips > lines. Good idea, I will try this. And just to make sure. Is sending a busy on DND something that is supported by sipxecs? Reading the help text on the DND setting I would think so. -- Claas Hilbrecht http://www.jucs

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

--Am Dienstag, 7. Februar 2012 08:46 -0500 Michael Picher schrieb: > In sipXecs the non-default settings all have dashes around them. Yes, this is a good thing and I used this already to find something, but without luck so far. > the other thing you could do is check out the config files for

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

users of sipXecs software Cc: gunnar.kr...@grz.com Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND > It is very possible the one created 14 months ago has some custom user > settings in it from the menu/interface of the phone. these override > the generat

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

In sipXecs the non-default settings all have dashes around them. the other thing you could do is check out the config files for differences. Mike On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 4:33 AM, Claas Hilbrecht < claas.hilbrecht+maillinglists.sipx...@linum.com> wrote: > > It is very possible the one created 14

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

> It is very possible the one created 14 months ago has some custom user > settings in it from the menu/interface of the phone. these override > the generated config. Wipe the phone to defualts (i.e., 4,6,8,* at > bootup with larger polcyoms, try again). I erased the polycom 650 to default, using

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

It is very possible the one created 14 months ago has some custom user settings in it from the menu/interface of the phone. these override the generated config. Wipe the phone to defualts (i.e., 4,6,8,* at bootup with larger polcyoms, try again). On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:32 AM, Claas Hilbrecht w

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

--Am Montag, 6. Februar 2012 11:07 -0500 Tony Graziano schrieb: > I would not be sure this applies to your environment (or any). I'm not > aware sipx will send busy to PSTN callers. That is usually done at a > gateway or provider. sipx's incoming call design is designed to avoid > call blocking

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

I would not be sure this applies to your environment (or any). I'm not aware sipx will send busy to PSTN callers. That is usually done at a gateway or provider. sipx's incoming call design is designed to avoid call blocking (so the calls would go to voicemail, etc.). Internally if the user does not

[sipx-users] Problem with enabling Busy on Busy and/or Busy on DND

Hello, today I tried to understand what settings are reponsible for Busy on Busy (send busy to calling party if a user is already talking to someone) or Busy on DND (send busy if a user marks a line DND). I have several polycom phones and set "calls per line key" to "1". In the same "tab" there

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000

k for you, and > you > > >> can > > >> tweak it as necessary. > > >> > > >> -Original Message- > > >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > > >> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Gar

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000

-Original Message- > >> From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > >> [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Gary Davis > >> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:16 AM > >> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > >>

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000

: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:16 AM >> To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software >> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000 >> >> Thanks Tony, >> >> I had problems with trying to manage the Mediant thru Sipxecs so I went >> ah

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000

al Message- > From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org > [mailto:sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org] On Behalf Of Gary Davis > Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 8:16 AM > To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software > Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000 > &g

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000

for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000 Thanks Tony, I had problems with trying to manage the Mediant thru Sipxecs so I went ahead and started a manual config of the mediant system to get it started. I would be happy to take advice as to a better

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000

appreciate the help, Gary -Original Message- From: Tony Graziano [mailto:tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net] Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 7:52 AM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000 you need to explain "how

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000

you need to explain "how" you configured your mediant. Did you use the sipxconfig provided configuration or did you configure it by hand? On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Gary Davis wrote: > Hi all, > > > > I’m new to Sipxecs and to the list and still learning. > > > > I have setup a new installa

[sipx-users] Problem with AA and Mediant 1000

Hi all, I'm new to Sipxecs and to the list and still learning. I have setup a new installation of Sipxecs 4.4.0 with a Mediant 1000 PRI. I finally got connection to the telco working, but is not managed by Sipxecs at this point, and can make and receive calls without problem now. I noticed th

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

I did end up figuring out why the counts were off and a non-ideal way to fix it. We were using IMAP sync but had problems so we switched just to smtp delivery. For this account, I reconnected it to IMAP then deleted all the messages from my email account and it fixed the counts. On Tue, Dec 20,

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

Did you send the server profile after the update? On Dec 20, 2011 6:07 PM, "Kevin George" wrote: > Oh, sorry, this was always a 4.4 system. I just did an update from a 4.4 > to a later 4.4 release. > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tony Graziano < > tgrazi...@myitdepartment.net> wrote: > >> >

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

Oh, sorry, this was always a 4.4 system. I just did an update from a 4.4 to a later 4.4 release. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > >From what version did you come? When you updated did you send the server > profiles and restart services if prompted? > > I've always had the

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

>From what version did you come? When you updated did you send the server profiles and restart services if prompted? I've always had the opinion you cannot update versions (4.0 > 4.4 without stopping by to grab 4.2 first... On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:52 PM, Kevin George wrote: > No, but this prob

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

No, but this problem may have existed since the last time I updated which was probably back in September. On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:12 PM, Tony Graziano wrote: > Have you updated the system recently? > On Dec 20, 2011 5:04 PM, "Kevin George" wrote: > >> I didn't do a restore. I can't remember

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

Have you updated the system recently? On Dec 20, 2011 5:04 PM, "Kevin George" wrote: > I didn't do a restore. I can't remember if I did this on this system or > not, but if I did mess with the directory structure it would've only been > to delete a voicemail wav along with it's xml/sta file duri

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

I didn't do a restore. I can't remember if I did this on this system or not, but if I did mess with the directory structure it would've only been to delete a voicemail wav along with it's xml/sta file during testing and not the directories. Also, that would've been only for 1 user and I'm having

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

It sounds like a permissions problem. Can you explain if you did a backup/restore or manually moved any folders/files around in the message store area? On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Kevin George wrote: > I'm running sipxecs 4.4.0-231. I have some voicemail boxes that have > message counts tha

[sipx-users] Problem with voicemail count and missing items

I'm running sipxecs 4.4.0-231. I have some voicemail boxes that have message counts that are incorrect from the TUI. For example, my voicemail box says I have 34 saved messages although I don't (saved messages folder is empty and web interface reports 0 messages). When I try to play the voicemai

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with full g729 system

thinking about this, take me to a 2 differents ways of solve this: 1) add a config parameter into "Call Control" service to define codecs to add into first INVITE sdp 2) send an sdp free INVITE I know that both solution are valid from SIP point of view and the latter seems to be more effective '

[sipx-users] Problem with full g729 system

I've just tryed sipXecs into a g729 full environment and I've got some problems. One of the many is within conference when I try to invite a participant, I've got that the initial invite presents just one codec and this one isn't g729 :), so is there some reason for this behaviour? or this is just

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

It was the IM_ID. However it is not a bug anymore. IT does appear in the UI under the users IM ID now so it can be fixed by an average user. I don't know if it was the YUM update or dropping and rebuilding the index that fixed it. Previously it was NOT showing up in the IM ID in the UI. That wa

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

can you more precisely detail what type of address book entry you are seeing? On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > Bingo. address_book_entry. I updated the table by hand and it is all good > again. > > And the bug still exists after the latest update via YUM. I'll open a jir

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

Bingo. address_book_entry. I updated the table by hand and it is all good again. And the bug still exists after the latest update via YUM. I'll open a jira... <>___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoun

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > Strange. After I reindexed the error message I indicated in sipxconfig.log > went away. Now there is none, but it still won't allow me to reuse those user > ids. > > I am not seeing anything in the user or user_alias tables for them either

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

I had this issue when i updated their alias but not openfire address -- Ewan McLean Sent from a mobile device On 2 Nov 2011, at 14:47, "Geoff Van Brunt" wrote: > Strange. After I reindexed the error message I indicated in sipxconfig.log > went away. Now there is none, but it still won't allow

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

Strange. After I reindexed the error message I indicated in sipxconfig.log went away. Now there is none, but it still won't allow me to reuse those user ids. I am not seeing anything in the user or user_alias tables for them either. Is this a known bug? I havne't been able to find a jira for i

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > Actually now that I think of it, is it mongodb or postgres that would house > that information now? > Do psql -h localhost -U postgres -d SIPXCONFIG and then select * from user_alias; and check if you see your alias George ___

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

postgres On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > Actually now that I think of it, is it mongodb or postgres that would house > that information now? > > ___ > sipx-users mailing list > sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org > List Archive: ht

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

Actually now that I think of it, is it mongodb or postgres that would house that information now? <>___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

erdite. Si vous recevez ce courriel par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courriel ou par un autre moyen.) From: sipx-users-boun...@list.sipfoundry.org on behalf of Tony Graziano Sent: Wed 11/2/2011 9:25 AM To: Discussion list for users

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

You've left your own breadcrumbs here. Open the sipxconfig DB and look through users at entry 14 and view the data. What does it tell you? On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > Anybody have any ideas about this? I have a production install that I can't > get two users working

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

Anybody have any ideas about this? I have a production install that I can't get two users working because of this. This is a conversion so they must have their "old" extension numbers. Thanks Geoff Van Brunt <>___ sipx-users mailing list sipx-users@

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

lf of Douglas Hubler Sent: Tue 11/1/2011 3:16 PM To: Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB. On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > I have an problem that may be a known issue. I forgot to do a yum update > after installi

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with DB.

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Geoff Van Brunt wrote: > I have an problem that may be a known issue. I forgot to do a yum update > after installing the lastest ISO for 4.4. > > I had a user and I changed their User ID. Now the old User ID cannot be > reused as it complains that there is duplicate

[sipx-users] Problem with DB.

I have an problem that may be a known issue. I forgot to do a yum update after installing the lastest ISO for 4.4. I had a user and I changed their User ID. Now the old User ID cannot be reused as it complains that there is duplicate alias etc. I've updated via yum but the problem persists. I

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with LDAP only authentication

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 12:15 PM, George Niculae wrote: > > This is a bug, IVR compares received pin against the hashed one from > validusers.xml (that is the one from config db, not LDAP server), > please fill a JIRA issue > > Thanks, > George > ___ >

Re: [sipx-users] Problem with LDAP only authentication

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Kevin George wrote: > I've set my sipXecs 4.4 server to allow "LDAP only" under LDAP -> > Authentication Settings.  When I do this, I get an error message when I try > to change my PIN through the voicemail system. > > java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP resp

[sipx-users] Problem with LDAP only authentication

I've set my sipXecs 4.4 server to allow "LDAP only" under LDAP -> Authentication Settings. When I do this, I get an error message when I try to change my PIN through the voicemail system. java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 401 for URL: https://voice.domain.com:8443/sipxconfi

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

rinstance isn't defined in any RFC, it's simply an opaque URI parameter used by a number of UAs to differentiate it's own binding with others - another example of the same thing is snom's use of the "line" parameter. On Jul 13, 2011 6:57 AM, wrote: > That' what I'm doing right now :) > And there a

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

That' what I'm doing right now :) And there are some differences.. The Siemens registering line doesn't have "rinstance=" But what is it (rinstance=)? On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 06:51:32 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > view the registrations in sipx and compare the differences between > the two. >

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

view the registrations in sipx and compare the differences between the two. On Jul 13, 2011 6:41 AM, wrote: > I've found out a very interesting fact! > If I place a softphone (x-lite for example) under the same Router > everything works fine! SIP is ok, RTP is ok, too. > But Gigaset 470 still has

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

xlite can use setting: send local ip. siemens cannot. On Jul 13, 2011 6:41 AM, wrote: > I've found out a very interesting fact! > If I place a softphone (x-lite for example) under the same Router > everything works fine! SIP is ok, RTP is ok, too. > But Gigaset 470 still has no media during inboun

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

I've found out a very interesting fact! If I place a softphone (x-lite for example) under the same Router everything works fine! SIP is ok, RTP is ok, too. But Gigaset 470 still has no media during inbound calls. Does it mean that the NAT router and my SIP server work correct and the only pr

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

sbc's can do trucking remote users or both. it sounds like it would be easier to use a different phone with it On Jul 12, 2011 4:13 AM, wrote: > Thank you for your replay Tony. But how can I use SBC with a single > phone? I thought that SBC can be "fixed" onlu using a trunk? > > On Tue, 12 Jul 201

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

Thank you for your replay Tony. But how can I use SBC with a single phone? I thought that SBC can be "fixed" onlu using a trunk? On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 04:09:00 -0400, Tony Graziano wrote: > because sip provider has a way handle your device randomizing portal. > that's what a sbc does.. that d

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

because sip provider has a way handle your device randomizing portal. that's what a sbc does.. that device was designed for consumer use . sipx is a system geared toward businesses. either get border controller with that phone or get another phone. On Jul 12, 2011 3:40 AM, wrote: > I tried ever

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

I tried everything i could, and it still doesn't work. An interesting thing is that there are 2 more connections via SIP between this phone and other SIP-providers, and everything is fine! >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:48 AM, wrote: >>  Hey there! >>  This is my first post in sipx-users mai

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

At least use A record name resolution on your servers This will of course preclude you from ever going to a cluster. Consult the wiki. I'd suggest walking before you try to run. Build a server on it's own little network, plug some phones (or use softphones) in and try to figure out how thin

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

This looks like you didn't portforward the RTP port on the REMOTE-NAT router. your phone probably is setup for port 5000-5012 or something like that. Creat a portforward from the modem to your phone for all those ports on UDP. That will probably help. (Also disable any Application helper

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

I'm new to VoIP. This sipX server is my first VoIP system. But I've read a lot about the importance of well-fixed DNS when using asterisk and sipX. On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:13:11 -0400, Michael Picher wrote: > have you been using asterisk and maybe is this your first sipXecs > system? > > On

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

have you been using asterisk and maybe is this your first sipXecs system? On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 7:07 AM, wrote: > I don't use domain names in my VoIP system. Only IP's.. > That's why I don't think that the reason of the problem is DNS, maybe > I'm wrong? > Regards, kga. > > On Fri, 8 Jul 2

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

I don't use domain names in my VoIP system. Only IP's.. That's why I don't think that the reason of the problem is DNS, maybe I'm wrong? Regards, kga. On Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:02:03 -0400, Michael Picher wrote: > Have you done your DNS tests remotely (in the same manner a phone > might)? > >

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

Have you done your DNS tests remotely (in the same manner a phone might)? On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 4:48 AM, wrote: > Hey there! > This is my first post in sipx-users mailing list, so I'm sorry if I do > something wrong. > Well.. the problem is strange enough, and I can't find out how to fix >

Re: [sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

Does your remote site with the gigaset have a router? If so, ensure any sip ALG or "helpers" are turned off within the router. Typically I would start by turning off NAT and STUN on a device, as sipx prefers to handle NAT on the server side for the UA. I am not sure if you can do this with the giga

[sipx-users] Problem using Siemens Gigaset C470 IP+NAT with sipX

Hey there! This is my first post in sipx-users mailing list, so I'm sorry if I do something wrong. Well.. the problem is strange enough, and I can't find out how to fix it during 2 days, hm.. So, i've got a sipX station, and it has public IP. So "Server behind NAT" is unchecked. There ar

  1   2   3   4   5   >