Re: [SLUG] pppd setuid not recognized

2002-01-01 Thread Mike Holland
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, getadog wrote: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:07:32PM +0800, Mike Holland wrote: > > Use 'strace' to see what is happening when (if) it tried to suid. > > strace is one of those cases where suid won't work. Its Sure, but you cant still run it, either as user or root, and see if

Re: [SLUG] Linux not suitable as a fileserver for MYOB ???

2002-01-01 Thread Howard Lowndes
Is this MYOB plain or MYOB Premier? I haven't had the chance to try MYOB on a Linux server as the one client of mine who uses MYOB Premier has just ditched me because he wanted to upgrade to a M$ SBS server and I wasn't prepared to recommend it to him. I guess the new consultant will have the cha

RE: [SLUG] Linux not suitable as a fileserver for MYOB ???

2002-01-01 Thread Stephan Borg
Last time I looked at MYOB (on Win2000), it was still using 16-bit dialogs. I think 'Newness' just isn't in their vocabulary. Stephan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Jeff Waugh Sent: Wednesday, 2 January 2002 6:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> will rsync/wget just get the diffs? (assuming there is any) Yep, use rsync. Servers are described on cdimage.debian.org. - Jeff -- "The ability to procrastinate is what separates us from the machines." - Chris Gregory, Desktop Magazine -- S

Re: [SLUG] Linux not suitable as a fileserver for MYOB ???

2002-01-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> It is not very logical that it works with a *OLD* Novell server but not > with a newer filesharing OS/protocol. It is logical, you're just looking at it from the protocol angle, not the destination filesystem management angle. "Newness" doesn't imply appropriateness. - Jeff -- There's no

Re: [SLUG] Linux not suitable as a fileserver for MYOB ???

2002-01-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> > Comments anyone ? > > We have a couple of clients not to mention our own internal systems running > myob fine off a file server. Not hugely multi-user though. > I'm sure any samba feature that you have problems with can be configured > away anyway. locking = yes (default) posix locking =

Re: [SLUG] pppd setuid not recognized

2002-01-01 Thread getadog
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:07:32PM +0800, Mike Holland wrote: > Use 'strace' to see what is happening when (if) it tried to suid. strace is one of those cases where suid won't work. Its disabled for security. The program still runs but as the user who runs it, not root. Try "strace ping 127.0.0.

Re: [SLUG] Linux not suitable as a fileserver for MYOB ???

2002-01-01 Thread admin
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:29:59PM +1100, Vince Meissner wrote: > I've got a client that uses MYOB Accountant's Office. > It's a multi-user practice managment, time billing, invoicing type > program. An Accountant needing a special version of MYOB to run thier own practise? Oooh the irony... =)

Re: [SLUG] Linux not suitable as a fileserver for MYOB ???

2002-01-01 Thread Andre Pang
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:29:59PM +1100, Vince Meissner wrote: > ** > Question > Is Accountants Office supported on a Linux Server? > > Answer > No, Linux is not a compatible Network Operating System for Accountants > Office because of > fundamental incom

Re: [SLUG] Linux not suitable as a fileserver for MYOB ???

2002-01-01 Thread David Kempe
> Comments anyone ? We have a couple of clients not to mention our own internal systems running myob fine off a file server. I'm sure any samba feature that you have problems with can be configured away anyway. I would not worry at all, if you client needs references from business using MYOB on

[SLUG] Linux not suitable as a fileserver for MYOB ???

2002-01-01 Thread Vince Meissner
I've got a client that uses MYOB Accountant's Office. It's a multi-user practice managment, time billing, invoicing type program. They're looking at replacing their existing Novell server which is at the end of it's life. I had them sold on the idea of a Linux based server until we discovered thi

Re: [SLUG] pppd setuid not recognized

2002-01-01 Thread Mike Holland
On 2 Jan 2002, Simon Wong wrote: > 220 -rwsr-xr--1 root dip218524 Sep 29 22:00 /usr/sbin/pppd > > But when I try and connect I get this error: > /usr/sbin/pppd: must be root to run /usr/sbin/pppd, since it is not > setuid-root Is the partition mounted with the no-su

Re: [SLUG] RE: Can't install Linux on Solaris.

2002-01-01 Thread David Fitch
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 11:59:44AM +1100, Kevin Saenz wrote: > Dave, > > Sorry I am unable to remember your previous email but did you create > the ISO image or downloaded the ISO image from a debian mirror? downloaded (from planetmirror or aarnet can't remeber now) > Could you have a look at t

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread David Fitch
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:43:30PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote: > That, plus the exceptional (albeit strangely structured) Debian installation > manual will get you *everywhere*. I had an existing dhcp server that > answered bootp queries, and tftp was just a matter of installation (having a > Debian

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> thats odd, since Sun Firmware uses ARP/RARP to get IP, not BOOTP/DHCP. > > [and, oh boy is RARP fun] It sucks of the arse, and... I was installing something crackful that didn't like bootp recently. Maybe it was the Mac. That's like... "ARGH, GET ME MY WRENCH!" - Jeff -- "Love never

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread Crossfire
Jeff Waugh was once rumoured to have said: > > > > [I haven't used the sparc32 port in a while - and Linux on ultrasparc is > > fairly solid. Would sombody with recent experience with sparc32 like to > > comment. Jeff?] > > > > anyhows, I might write up instructions for network installing spa

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> [I haven't used the sparc32 port in a while - and Linux on ultrasparc is > fairly solid. Would sombody with recent experience with sparc32 like to > comment. Jeff?] > > anyhows, I might write up instructions for network installing sparcs to go > alongside my network install for irix worksta

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread Michael Lake
Kevin Saenz wrote: > > I know that this may be a little off but I have installed Linux on DEC > alpha. > What I had to keep in mind was that I needed to create a 1 meg fat bootable > partition, otherwise Linux or NT would not boot. Hope this tidbit helps. The Sparc will not need any such evil on

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread Crossfire
David Fitch was once rumoured to have said: > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:10:15AM +1100, Craige McWhirter wrote: > > The closest SPARC I have to > > yours is a SPARC Station 20 and it boots off the CD (well, it needs to - > > no floppy!). There should be no major differences between a SS5 and SS20

Re: [SLUG] MTU problems ??

2002-01-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> It is Telstra ADSL, but I don't think that is my problem, besides, I don't > have a competitive alternative where some of these sites are located. Unfortunate. :( FreeS/WAN should be doing everything it can to get the MTU right, if you want to force it, use overridemtu in ipsec.conf. Mine hav

FW: [SLUG] MTU problems ??

2002-01-01 Thread Scott Ragen
Howard, This is actually a known freeswan problem, you need to make the packets of the freeswan ipsec* smaller then the ppp*. To accomplish this, put in your ipsec.conf `overridemtu=` Hopefully this will solve your problem. Cheers, Scott > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [ma

Re: [SLUG] Cannot execute setuid progs (WAS: pppd setuid notrecognized)

2002-01-01 Thread Simon Wong
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 02:01, Jeff Waugh wrote: > Check to see if you've mounted any of your partitions with the 'nosuid' > option. Bugger! That was it! Have removed that parameter and am back in business. I'm going to have to tread more warily with my "hardening" of my system. -- *

[SLUG] checkout jdub's (r)evolutionary head

2002-01-01 Thread Angus Lees
http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~gusl/Jeff.jpg tee hee -- - Gus -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug

Re: [SLUG] MTU problems ??

2002-01-01 Thread Howard Lowndes
J & J, It is Telstra ADSL, but I don't think that is my problem, besides, I don't have a competitive alternative where some of these sites are located. The server, which is behind a gateway box (which latter has the ADSL connection), has its MTU set at 1500, but I think the chocking is happening

[SLUG] RE: Can't install Linux on Solaris.

2002-01-01 Thread Kevin Saenz
Dave, Sorry I am unable to remember your previous email but did you create the ISO image or downloaded the ISO image from a debian mirror? Could you have a look at the redhat site regarding how to install on sparc? they might have something to help you thru. > so far I haven't got it to boot off

Re: [SLUG] MTU problems ??

2002-01-01 Thread John Ferlito
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:14:13PM +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote: > I have set up a VPN over an ADSL link and I am getting traffic snarl-ups > as a result. > > Previously this link was running without VPN and over PSTN. > > My guess is that the server is sending out packets which are now too big.

Re: [SLUG] MTU problems ??

2002-01-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> I have set up a VPN over an ADSL link and I am getting traffic snarl-ups > as a result. If you're going Telstra-Telstra ADSL, and their routing issues still exist, then you're stuffed. :) Basically you have to get on the opposite networks to get decent performance at all. > 1. Am I correct

[SLUG] MTU problems ??

2002-01-01 Thread Howard Lowndes
I have set up a VPN over an ADSL link and I am getting traffic snarl-ups as a result. Previously this link was running without VPN and over PSTN. My guess is that the server is sending out packets which are now too big. 1. Am I correct in assuming that both freeswan and ADSL add over head to t

Re: [SLUG] Should that space be there?

2002-01-01 Thread Gareth Walters
- Original Message - From: "Howard Lowndes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Mail List - SLUG" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 4:52 PM Subject: [SLUG] Should that space be there? > I have been playing around with dnssec-keygen to generate keys suitable > for running a dy

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread David Fitch
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:10:15AM +1100, Craige McWhirter wrote: > I'm not familiar with a sparc5 so I cannot offer any help on the matter > but I would highly recommend searching the debian-sparc archives and > perhaps also fielding your question there. I've searched there and found similar qu

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread Craige McWhirter
On Tue, 2002-01-01 at 22:56, David Fitch wrote: > On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 09:07:07PM +1100, Kevin Saenz wrote: > > I know that this may be a little off but I have installed Linux on DEC > > alpha. > > What I had to keep in mind was that I needed to create a 1 meg fat bootable > > partition, other

Re: [SLUG] Cannot execute setuid progs (WAS: pppd setuid not recognized)

2002-01-01 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Would sudo stop the use of setuid apps? No. > Is there a genral setting for controlling the excution of setuid apps? Check to see if you've mounted any of your partitions with the 'nosuid' option. If it's not that, there's probably some more magic about suid privileges that another SLUGger

[SLUG] Cannot execute setuid progs (WAS: pppd setuid not recognized)

2002-01-01 Thread Simon Wong
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 01:14, Simon Wong wrote: > Is there some other file that the permissions need to be changed on? > This is quite annoying as it used to work :-( H...it seems I cannot run setuid progs as I tried to execute crontab and that failed too. I can't think of any security apps

[SLUG] pppd setuid not recognized

2002-01-01 Thread Simon Wong
Happy New Year all! My ppp dial-up has stopped working as non-root. The premissions on pppd are: lonewolf: ~ $ lsa /usr/sbin/pppd 220 -rwsr-xr--1 root dip218524 Sep 29 22:00 /usr/sbin/pppd But when I try and connect I get this error: lonewolf: ~ $ pon

Re: [SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread David Fitch
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 09:07:07PM +1100, Kevin Saenz wrote: > I know that this may be a little off but I have installed Linux on DEC > alpha. > What I had to keep in mind was that I needed to create a 1 meg fat bootable > partition, otherwise Linux or NT would not boot. Hope this tidbit helps.

[SLUG] talent is here

2002-01-01 Thread TEARRIE
  Hi slug   My name is Tearrie and iam from los angelel california.   i have been singing and writing songs since i was nine.   im not sure of where your location is.   i have written over 150 songs and if you are ever looking for   song lyrics i would be more than gl

[SLUG] Re: can't Install linux on Sun

2002-01-01 Thread Kevin Saenz
I know that this may be a little off but I have installed Linux on DEC alpha. What I had to keep in mind was that I needed to create a 1 meg fat bootable partition, otherwise Linux or NT would not boot. Hope this tidbit helps. Kevin -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User Group Mailing List - http://slu