On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 10:16, David wrote:
Hmmm... so we should all use Windows? Dodgey logic here. ;-)
Apache runs fine on Windows, I can assure you. Who defined it had to run
on Linux? I would like to point out that slug does support Free and
Open Source Software (FOSS) on any platform.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003, Ken Foskey wrote:
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 10:16, David wrote:
Hmmm... so we should all use Windows? Dodgey logic here. ;-)
Apache runs fine on Windows, I can assure you. Who defined it had to
run on Linux? I would like to point out that slug does support Free
and
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 18:32, Ken Foskey wrote:
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 10:16, David wrote:
Hmmm... so we should all use Windows? Dodgey logic here. ;-)
Apache runs fine on Windows, I can assure you. Who defined it had to run
on Linux? I would like to point out that slug does support Free
On Thu, 2003-11-27 at 18:53, Mary Gardiner wrote:
I think this is fair enough actually.
The popularity of MS Windows *is* a reason to use it (it's familiar,
there are a lot of admins who know it...). The popularity of Apache is
also a reason to use Apache.
This is a very reasonable approach.
Slug should actively support Windows gimp, OOo, cygwin, putty because it
is a start on the road to all that is right and good.
(Ooops fell off my soapbox...)
miniplug
Over here at Solutions First, we have put together a cd with apps just like
this that we consider useful.
You can get the
Hi Sluggers:
When I run a script via browser to get the domain name of a website I use
$ENV{'HTTP_HOST'}.
How do I get the same domain name from the command line ?
I have tried
use Net::Domain qw(hostname hostfqdn hostdomain);
But the contents of hostdomain is returning the actual server's
On Wed 26 Nov, Eddie F bloviated thus:
I'd like to *sell* apache to the boss.
Something like this on IIS and Apache would be great.
Anyone got any such links handy?
Code Red and Nimbda. Enough said.
--
Rev Simon Rumble [EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.rumble.net
If we knew what it was we were doing,
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 12:41:42 +
Rev Simon Rumble [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Code Red and Nimbda. Enough said.
That's Nimda.
And they'd come back with Slapper.
Matt
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info: http://lists.slug.org.au/listinfo/slug
Normally I like to think I can work out what people mean when they don't
explain it well. This time I just cant make sense of the question. Please
try to explain the flow eg.
browser click--web_server1--perl_script1--web_server2--perl_script2
or
ssh server1--perl_script2
If you're trying to run
Grant == Grant Parnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Grant HTTP_HOST=`grep ^ServerName /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf| awk
Grant '{print $2}'`
Why bother with grep when awk can do it for you?
$ awk '/^ServerName/ { print $2 } ' /etc/httpd/conf/httpd.conf
or whatever.
Sorry, but excessive
Hi All,
I have debian Woody installed, and noticed something a little odd
There is two enable commands, one appears to be a bash builtin, and the
other for enabling printers in cups.
lotus-server:~# enable kyocera
bash: enable: kyocera: not a shell builtin
lotus-server:~# /usr/bin/enable
This one time, at band camp, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have debian Woody installed, and noticed something a little odd
There is two enable commands, one appears to be a bash builtin, and the
other for enabling printers in cups.
lotus-server:~# enable kyocera
bash: enable: kyocera:
In Debian Woody - I have two window managers installed. How does Debian
determine the default when I startx?
Thanks,
Alan
--
--
Alan L Tyree
http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel: +61 2 4782 2670
Mobile: +61 405 084 990
Fax: +61 2 4782 7092
--
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 11:53:05AM +1100, Alan L Tyree wrote:
In Debian Woody - I have two window managers installed. How does Debian
determine the default when I startx?
update-alternatives --display x-window-manager
If you want to change the default, change --display to --config.
--
As far
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 11:53:05AM +1100, Alan L Tyree wrote:
In Debian Woody - I have two window managers installed. How does Debian
determine the default when I startx?
Using the alternatives system.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo update-alternatives --display x-window-manager
Password:
This one time, at band camp, Alan L Tyree wrote:
In Debian Woody - I have two window managers installed. How does Debian
determine the default when I startx?
The alternatives system.
ls -l /etc/alternatives/x-window-manager
When each of the window manager packages are installed, they register
I noticed a discussion here about this topic but it wandered from what I need to know.
We are currently runinng a Windows NT Domain, we need to move on to an Windows AD
Domain (NT is no longer sujpported etc). A simple option is of course to just put in
a Windows 2003 server - but this then means
Thanks for the multiple replies on this. As an old RH user, I am very
impressed with Debian configuration, etc, etc. I think I will be
switching over main machines soon.
Cheers,
Alan
--
--
Alan L Tyree
http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel: +61
quote who=Simon Bryan
The question is can I go to Samba 3 and completely replace the Windows
server - therefor no access licences to worry about. Has anyone done this
that can give me amy pitfalls to watch out for?
Only a few minor compatibility issues (but they're documented). The major
Simon Bryan wrote:
The question is can I go to Samba 3 and completely replace the Windows server -
therefor no access licences to worry about. Has anyone done this that can give me
amy pitfalls to watch out for? Will I need a separate authentication server such as
LDAP or will the SAMBA server do
Phil Scarratt wrote:
Simon Bryan wrote:
The question is can I go to Samba 3 and completely replace the Windows
server -
I'm going to stick my neck out and say Yes.
amy pitfalls to watch out for? Will I need a separate authentication
server such as
LDAP or will the SAMBA server do the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 28-11-2003 12:37:52 PM:
Phil Scarratt wrote:
Simon Bryan wrote:
The question is can I go to Samba 3 and completely replace the
Windows
server -
I'm going to stick my neck out and say Yes.
As far as I understand (I have not used Samba 3, or Windows AD,
Del wrote:
Yes, but as of Samba 3, Windows 2000 / XP machines can now join that
domain. There is no effective difference from the
user-on-a-workstation-typing-word-documents point of view.
Win2k and WinXP Pro could join on smb2.x as well - just needed a little
tweaking before handhaving
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As far as I understand (I have not used Samba 3, or Windows AD, so I am
speaking from purely research and interpretation) you cannot have
'control' of the user profile like with Windows AD.
ie: adding/modifying printers, removing access to certain resources etc.
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 12:45, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PLEASE prove me wrong! We have a samba 2 domain, with Win2k/XP machines,
and I am forever fixing printer problems, and other things that people
stuff up...
It would be easier if we all ran Linux though. *sigh*
this post probably helps
For domain accounts on the server I'm using there is no httpd.conf under
the directory /etc/httpd/conf, although the directory itself exists.
This file can only be seen from admin or root user's /etc/httpd/conf
directory owned by root.
Then what does the browser ENV% queries to get HTTP_HOST as
For some unknown reason, sendmail has started putting mail into /home/usr/Mail/mbox
files, rather than /var/spool/mail/usr files.
Although I've set up a cron job to move the files regularly so that our user POP
clients can access them, I'd prefer a real solution - like knowing what's changed.
This one time, at band camp, Louis wrote:
Hi Sluggers:
When I run a script via browser to get the domain name of a website I use
$ENV{'HTTP_HOST'}.
How do I get the same domain name from the command line ?
HTTP_HOST gets set in the environment by the webserver when it calls the
CGI, thus
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Louis wrote:
My objective is to get a Perl command line script get this for a domain.
That's why I was trying some Net modules. Via browser the script gets it
easy from the ENV%.
You are referring to %ENV, I presume.
The environment inside the web server is the CGI
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 13:55, Edwin Humphries wrote:
For some unknown reason, sendmail has started putting mail into /home/usr/Mail/mbox
files, rather than /var/spool/mail/usr files.
*snip*
We were doing some fooling around with procmail to allow spamassassin to work, but
that (as far as I
Could you be just simply after echo $HTTP_HOST in shell script?
If that's not it don't ask me again directly, I still can't understand the
question.
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Louis wrote:
For domain accounts on the server I'm using there is no httpd.conf under
the directory /etc/httpd/conf,
Thanks all for the quick info, that combined with a bit more reading has convinced
us that what we will do is setup the server as a Samba server specifically to become
the PDC in our domain and then retire the exisiting one - which is slow and running
out of space. We are pretty sure that we
Hi all
Is there a way that I can see what config options my current Samba install was
configure with? I notice with Samba 3 it is in the config.log, but does not seem to
be there in earlier versions.
--
Simon Bryan
IT Manager
OLMC Parramatta
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group -
quote who=Simon Bryan
Is there a way that I can see what config options my current Samba install
was configure with? I notice with Samba 3 it is in the config.log, but
does not seem to be there in earlier versions.
Grab the source package for your distribution and check the build info (in
the
- Original Message -
From: Simon Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Simon - I just got tasked with the same neat job you got!
I noticed a discussion here about this topic but it wandered from what I
need to know.
We are currently runinng a Windows NT Domain, we need to move on to an
Windows
hi, this is for those of you that use smoothwall.
I've configured smoothwall as follows.
ip address 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0
dns will be auto configured as I have a ppp connection.
network configuration with reference to nics and internet is as follows.
green/red modem will be on
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Nathan Clark wrote:
Cons - $$$, 2003 AD is not compatible with Samba 3 AD clients
Where did you get this i9nformation before? I'm fairly sure I've set this
up in the past and its worked fine.
Mike
--
SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug.org.au/
More Info:
Cons - $$$, 2003 AD is not compatible with Samba 3 AD clients
Where did you get this i9nformation before? I'm fairly sure
I've set this up in the past and its worked fine.
From the official samba docos...
http://samba.mirror.aarnet.edu.au/samba/docs/man/samba-pdc.html#id289292
1
quote who=Michael Collins
Cons - $$$, 2003 AD is not compatible with Samba 3 AD clients
2003 AD does not work with Samba 3 AD clients.
Samba-3 is not, and cannot act as, an Active Directory Server.
Samba cannot be an AD server.
The second is correct. The first, as far as I know, is
Hello.
Our security certificate is going to expire on the 11-12-03.
I'm new to this business since the original was implemented. Back then, it
was done via Equifax.
The old keys etc. went under the default names of 'server.key'
'server.crt' and so on
I have generated a new key for the
Hi all,
While on the subject of window managers... I have just got X and
enlightenment running again after a reinstall due to apple upgrading
firmware. I dont have any debian menus when I click with the left mouse
button on the desktop.
They are normally created under a directory debian_menus
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Michael Collins wrote:
Cons - $$$, 2003 AD is not compatible with Samba 3 AD clients
Where did you get this i9nformation before? I'm fairly sure
I've set this up in the past and its worked fine.
From the official samba docos...
Samba-3 is not, and cannot act
- Original Message -
From: Mike MacCana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for your response, but I think you may have read the above post
incorrectly.
The person I am responding to says Samba 3 can't be a *client* in a Win2K3
Active Directory domain. I think it can.
I'll recant that
Hi SLUGs,
I am brand new to Linux and know practically nothing
aboutitbut somehow managed to install Mandrake 9.1 alongside XP.
Need advice on suitable medium price colour inkjet printer and suitable scanner
plus drivers. Also need a driver for either Wacom tablet or Acecat Flair tablet.
John Gibbons wrote:
Hi SLUGs,
I am brand new to Linux and know practically nothing about it but
somehow managed to install Mandrake 9.1 alongside XP. Need advice on
suitable medium price colour inkjet printer and suitable scanner plus
drivers. Also need a driver for either Wacom tablet or
John Gibbons wrote:
Hi SLUGs,
I am brand new to Linux and know practically nothing about it but
somehow managed to install Mandrake 9.1 alongside XP. Need advice on
suitable medium price colour inkjet printer and suitable scanner plus
drivers. Also need a driver for either Wacom tablet or
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 11:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have debian Woody installed, and noticed something a little odd
There is two enable commands, one appears to be a bash builtin, and the
other for enabling printers in cups.
lotus-server:~# enable kyocera
bash: enable:
47 matches
Mail list logo
