[SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread K L
Hi All, does anyone know of any linux-based filtering software I can put in place to protect him from himself? Requirements would be; Subscription-based; so, someone out there keeping the list of sites, keywords, extensions, etc. up to date. Ability for me to add to it for personal choice;

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Erik de Castro Lopo
K L wrote: Hi All, does anyone know of any linux-based filtering software I can put in place to protect him from himself? Requirements would be; Subscription-based; so, someone out there keeping the list of sites, keywords, extensions, etc. up to date. Ability for me to add to it

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Brendan Molloy
You could also consider the WOT tool: http://www.mywot.com/. It's ja plugin for a web browser that shows a rating based on child safety, trustworthiness, etc, so instead of purely blocking, simply explain to your child links that show up with an orange circle shouldn't be taken at face value, and

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread K L
not sure whether that's a bane or blessing? - Original Message - From: Erik de Castro Lopo mle+s...@mega-nerd.com To: slug@slug.org.au Sent: Tuesday, 21 June, 2011 4:32:46 PM Subject: Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking) Furthermore, if your child is more

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Kevin Saenz
I am assuming that the computer is in the loungeroom/family room. I guess with a subscription based tool you might need to use an authentication based system which could be very annoying with the number of popups you'd get if you require a user based internet filter. about 10 years ago I used

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Grant Street
Have a look at http://whitetrash.sourceforge.net/ * It protects against Malware attacks etc * Can be used in conjunction with dansguardian * the user's name is put against the whitelist entry * Checks against google's safe browsings API * authentication * can run it in learning mode to start

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Mark Walkom
DNS filtering could be an option; http://www.opendns.com/ On 21 June 2011 16:17, K L k...@attitia.com wrote: Hi All, does anyone know of any linux-based filtering software I can put in place to protect him from himself? Requirements would be; Subscription-based; so, someone out there

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Jeremy Visser
Thus spake K L: 1. that is one reason I want it gateway/router based as opposed to host based. If he doesn't have the passwords to the gateway, he can't mess with it. I can picture the owl with the 'O RLY?' caption beneath it right now. In this context, we need to make the use of the words

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Sridhar Dhanapalan
On 21 June 2011 16:43, Brendan Molloy bren...@bbqsrc.net wrote: You could also consider the WOT tool: http://www.mywot.com/. It's ja plugin for a web browser that shows a rating based on child safety, trustworthiness, etc, so instead of purely blocking, simply explain to your child links that

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Heracles
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21/06/11 16:43, Brendan Molloy wrote: You could also consider the WOT tool: http://www.mywot.com/. It's ja plugin for a web browser that shows a rating based on child safety, trustworthiness, etc, so instead of purely blocking, simply

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread James Linder
On 22/06/2011, at 6:56 AM, slug-requ...@slug.org.au wrote: As for bypassing the filter; 1. that is one reason I want it gateway/router based as opposed to host based. If he doesn't have the passwords to the gateway, he can't mess with it. 2. He has thus far shown zero interest in

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread James Linder
On 22/06/2011, at 8:38 AM, K L wrote: Steady on. :-( I can understand the simile, but I'm not entirely sure I appreciate the comparison. This is, after all, a parent looking after the innocence of his child. It's not like he's 18 and able to make sane choices for himself.

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread david
James Linder wrote: On 22/06/2011, at 8:38 AM, K L wrote: Steady on. :-( I can understand the simile, but I'm not entirely sure I appreciate the comparison. This is, after all, a parent looking after the innocence of his child. It's not like he's 18 and able to make sane choices for

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread K L
Message - From: James Linder j...@tigger.ws To: slug@slug.org.au Sent: Wednesday, 22 June, 2011 11:17:16 AM Subject: Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking) On 22/06/2011, at 8:38 AM, K L wrote: Steady on. :-( I can understand the simile, but I'm not entirely

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Jake Anderson
On 06/21/2011 04:17 PM, K L wrote: Hi All, does anyone know of any linux-based filtering software I can put in place to protect him from himself? Requirements would be; Subscription-based; so, someone out there keeping the list of sites, keywords, extensions, etc. up to date. Ability for me

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Jon Jermey
I believe the main motive for keeping 'adult' material away from children is to try and prevent them from embarrassing their parents with questions like: Daddy, what does it mean when two people do THIS? Jon. Being 18 doesn't have much to do with it either. That's a very arbitrary line

Re: [SLUG] Subscription-based netfiltering (parentally speaking)

2011-06-21 Thread Kevin Saenz
LOL I believe the main motive for keeping 'adult' material away from children is to try and prevent them from embarrassing their parents with questions like: Daddy, what does it mean when two people do THIS? Jon. Being 18 doesn't have much to do with it either. That's a very