[SLUG] Postfix Virtual Mailbox redirection/copy

I've got a virtual mailbox that the user wants all incoming email *COPIED* to an external email address. Easy to do in procmail but I can't quite see how to do it for postfix virtual mailboxes. Can anyone point me the right way please? thanks -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List -

Re: [SLUG] Postfix and PCRE filtering

Jeremy Visser writes: > On 06/06/10 20:10, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> If I send email from a gmail account with the word 'casino' in the >> subject line, the email is rejected and the gmail account gets a >> 'Delivery Status Notification' message. >> >> However, even with all the above, I'm sti

Re: [SLUG] Postfix and PCRE filtering

On 06/06/10 20:10, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > If I send email from a gmail account with the word 'casino' in the > subject line, the email is rejected and the gmail account gets a > 'Delivery Status Notification' message. > > However, even with all the above, I'm still getting emails with > 'cas

Re: [SLUG] Postfix and PCRE filtering

Erik de Castro Lopo writes: > I'm messing postfix-pcre version 2.6.5-3 from Debian testing. In the > /etc/postfix/pcre_table I have the following rule: [...] > However, even with all the above, I'm still getting emails with 'casino' in > the subject line. Anybody have any idea why PCRE is only

[SLUG] Postfix and PCRE filtering

Hi all, I'm messing postfix-pcre version 2.6.5-3 from Debian testing. In the /etc/postfix/pcre_table I have the following rule: /^Subject: .*(casino|nline pharmacy).*/i REJECT I also have in /etc/postfix/main.sf I have: header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/pcre_table to enable pcre

[SLUG] postfix - moving queue to another server?

A question for the postfix gurus about moving the queue to another server ... I'm working on a system with n postfix mailservers behind load balancers. I want to take one of the the servers (say MTA2) off the load balancers for testing a new configuration (there's no test environment - duh!).

[SLUG] postfix/dovecot/ssl and certificates

On a clean Hardy server install, I'm running postfix/dovecot/ssl/imap/postfixadmin/squirrelmail Using squirrelmail, everything works fine. I've imported the snakeoil certificate [1] into evolution [2] on my fiesty client and although it seems to accept the certificate correctly it always wants to

Re: [SLUG] postfix error sending email every 15 mins

On Tue, June 17, 2008 10:56 pm, Daniel Pittman wrote: > Ben Donohue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Where can I look to see the queue? as well as mailq, there is also qshape QSHAPE(1) QSHAPE(1) NAME qshape - Print Postfix queue

Re: [SLUG] postfix error sending email every 15 mins

Ben Donohue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a postfix email server with dovecot. Someone I sent an email > to with an attachment is getting the email every 15 minutes. > > I presume it's my mail server resending it as there was some error > somewhere. After Googling a bit I've run... The e

[SLUG] postfix error sending email every 15 mins

Hi all, I have a postfix email server with dovecot. Someone I sent an email to with an attachment is getting the email every 15 minutes. I presume it's my mail server resending it as there was some error somewhere. After Googling a bit I've run... postfix flush I'm not a postfix guru so is t

[SLUG] Postfix, SASL, old-skool

On Mon, Apr 21, 2008, Jeff Waugh wrote: > Well, how about using multiple parameters in the postfix relayhost setting? > > relayhost = > [usual.server.on.normal.port]:25 > [usual.server.on.submission.port]:587 > [fascist.university.server]:25 > > Then set up multiple entries in /etc/

[SLUG] Postfix configuration

Can anyone guide me in the following Postfix configuration? mx.example.com has local users who receive mail, it is an MX for a particular domain AND it is a mail gateway for users of its network. 1. mx.example.com should deliver mail for local users in the usual manner. If local delivery is impos

[SLUG] postfix rpm mysql yum centos prob

I'm trying to build binary postfix rpm from source rpm on centos I'm failing dependencies as: # rpmbuild -ba postfix.spec error: Failed build dependencies: MySQL-shared is needed by postfix-2.4.5-3.pcre.MySQL.sasl2.rhel4.i386 MySQL-devel is needed by postfix-2.4.5-3.pcre.MySQL.sas

Re: [SLUG] Postfix question

Of course. Note the use of "E.g." inferring "for example" ;) For an LDAP example see http://postfix.wiki.xs4all.nl/index.php?title=Relay_recipient_maps_using_LDAP_against_Active_Directory Aah... the beauty of documentation... :) All the best, Raphael Dave Kempe wrote: Raphael Kraus wrote:

Re: [SLUG] Postfix question

Raphael Kraus wrote: E.g. in main.cf: relay_recipient_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relay_recipients And ensure that you put the list in relay_recipients and run postmap on it. or you could make that an ldap lookup i think dave --

Re: [SLUG] Postfix question

Howard Lowndes wrote: That's what I am trying to achieve. Ideally and ultimately, the Postfix machine will do a lookup into the Domino LDAP system to find valid users, but until I can get that working I am doing LDAP lookups into an OpenLDAP database where the user account names match those

Re: [SLUG] Postfix question

Howard, I think you have the wrong idea about relayhost. The relayhost parameter in main.cf of postfix is for you to specify an external SMTP server to send through (aka a smarthost). Don't specify an internal host for this (unless you insist on sending through that host). Usually the parame

Re: [SLUG] Postfix question

My apologies to anyone looking at this in the archives and wondering why I seem to be responding to a non-existent email. Howard didn't feel that his email was worth archiving, even thous the replies are going to be archived. On 13/06/07, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have a Linux/

Re: [SLUG] Postfix/SASL issue on ubuntu

Yes On 14/04/2007, at 10:53 PM, David Ward wrote: How is your saslauthd running ? My working one is running like so: server:/var/run/saslauthd# ps ax | grep sasl 3352 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a pam 3354 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a pam 3355 ?S 0

Re: [SLUG] Postfix/SASL issue on ubuntu

PS I am running Debian Sarge though On Fri, 13 Apr 2007 09:47:05 pm Tony Green wrote: > I resorted to some stracing and found that it looks like it's not > able to file /var/run/saslauthd/mux, however it's there and the > saslauthd is running > > 8652 read(12, "AUTH PLAIN xxx\r"..., 40

Re: [SLUG] Postfix/SASL issue on ubuntu

How is your saslauthd running ? My working one is running like so: server:/var/run/saslauthd# ps ax | grep sasl 3352 ?Ss 0:00 /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a pam 3354 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a pam 3355 ?S 0:00 /usr/sbin/saslauthd -a pam 3356 ?S 0

Re: [SLUG] Postfix/SASL issue on ubuntu

I resorted to some stracing and found that it looks like it's not able to file /var/run/saslauthd/mux, however it's there and the saslauthd is running 8652 read(12, "AUTH PLAIN xxx\r"..., 4096) = 33 8652 gettimeofday({1176464431, 158663}, NULL) = 0 8652 socket(PF_FILE, SOCK_STREAM,

Re: [SLUG] Postfix/SASL issue on ubuntu

On 13/04/2007, at 3:10 PM, Sonia Hamilton wrote: If you feel it isn't reading the conf file, could it be errors related to postfix chrooting? On my server I do this in /etc/fstab, so postfix can access saslauthd: Hey Sonia, thanks for the reply. I've tried it both chrooted and none-chrooted,

Re: [SLUG] Postfix/SASL issue on ubuntu

* On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 02:38:53PM +1000, Tony Green wrote: > I've got an issue trying to get SMTP auth working on a 6.10 ubuntu server. > I've got it working on 6.06, but I'm banging my head against a wall > trying it in 6.10. > > Basically, I get "535 5.7.0 Error: authentication failed: authe

[SLUG] Postfix/SASL issue on ubuntu

Sluggers, I've got an issue trying to get SMTP auth working on a 6.10 ubuntu server. I've got it working on 6.06, but I'm banging my head against a wall trying it in 6.10. Basically, I get "535 5.7.0 Error: authentication failed: authentication failure" when I try to authenticate using SMTP AUTH

Re: [SLUG] Postfix, LDAP, NFS, virtual domains, Mailman, et al

On 21/02/07, Howard Lowndes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: An even further alternative thinking might be to not NFS mount anything anywhere, but to have Postfix on the mail server relay all inbounds to the mailing lists on the mail server directly to the MTA on the web server. Does that all make se

Re: [SLUG] Postfix experts

On 1/4/07, Michael Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > can anybody suggest a reason for this? If it is timing can postfix be told to > wait-longer? > Of course mostly it works correctly > thanks James > > > Jan 4 13:04:03 server postfix/s

Re: [SLUG] Postfix experts

On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Michael thanks this is the error logged at destination saying unable to find source (wa.gov.au) machine which DOES exist. The puzzle it it mostly works, but intermittently fails Hmmm your latest letter makes sense! I reckon if you have th

Re: [SLUG] Postfix experts

On Thursday 04 January 2007 13:17, you wrote: > On 1/4/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > can anybody suggest a reason for this? If it is timing can postfix be > > told to wait-longer? > > Of course mostly it works correctly > > thanks James > > > > > > Jan 4 13:04:03 serv

[SLUG] Postfix experts

Hi can anybody suggest a reason for this? If it is timing can postfix be told to wait-longer? Of course mostly it works correctly thanks James Jan 4 13:04:03 server postfix/smtpd[17455]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT from unknown[202.14.131.60]: 450 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [2

Re: [SLUG] postfix error "cannot finx your hostname"

* On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 01:59:29PM +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote: > >>It's also probably also happening because you are not culling CC: > >>addresses in your responses to the SLUG list. > > > >No, I use the list-reply feature of mutt (L). > > I don't know mutt, but my guess is that it's doing a r

Re: [SLUG] postfix error "cannot finx your hostname"

* On Tue, Jan 02, 2007 at 12:30:30PM +1100, Howard Lowndes wrote: > Guilty. Didn't want to point the bone in my email :-) > You'll need to talk to whoever has the in-addr.arpa zone for your IP > block (most likely your ISP) about getting PTR records inserted. Am doing now. > It's also probabl

[SLUG] postfix error "cannot finx your hostname"

I occasionally get errors from my postfix mail server like this: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: connect to mx.bar.com[1.2.3.4]: server refused to talk to me: 591 5.7.1 Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname, [203.57.122.98] I presume this is because I don't have a PTR dns record setup for my

[SLUG] Postfix configuration help needed

Hi all, I'm trying to configure postfix on a new machine at home to replace an old installation of sendmail on another machine. I want the new machine to be the outgoing mail server for the LAN and to masquerade addresses in my domain, exactly as sendmail is already doing. The mail server for my

[SLUG] Postfix query

This is a dumb postfix question that I should be able to answer, but can't. If I have a virtual mail domain of, say, example.com.au, then how do I get emails addressed to, say, [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] to be directed into the virtual mailbox <...>/example.com.au/fred I'm using virtu

[SLUG] postfix and SRS (used with SPF filtering)

I've done some experimenting and have found a short-term workaround for not having SRS support in postfix for the SLUG machine. This affects those SLUG members who've got [EMAIL PROTECTED] email addresses and who use SPF to verify the host of the domain of the sender of an email. The workaround is

Re: [SLUG] postfix

> I'm used to setting up qmail. > > > I found some references on setting up postfix from postfix.org. However > some references are better than others. Does anybody know a good reference > for setting up a "decent" postfix server for a postfix newbe? (decent > Imean spam filter, virus et al) I'v

Re: [SLUG] postfix

ashley maher wrote: I found some references on setting up postfix from postfix.org. However some references are better than others. Does anybody know a good reference for setting up a "decent" postfix server for a postfix newbe? (decent Imean spam filter, virus et al) there are a few guides aro

[SLUG] postfix

I'm used to setting up qmail. I found some references on setting up postfix from postfix.org. However some references are better than others. Does anybody know a good reference for setting up a "decent" postfix server for a postfix newbe? (decent Imean spam filter, virus et al) I tried to find Je

Re: [SLUG] Postfix, IMAP, Lotus Notes, Evolution & OfflineIMAP

At Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:28:57 +1000, steven wrote: > 2. With the Lotus Notes client running in IMAP mode I can create emails > offline. When I sync the client with the server the server will send out > any unsent emails. Copies of sent mails are thus filed in the main server > "sent" folder or

Re: [SLUG] Postfix, IMAP, Lotus Notes, Evolution & OfflineIMAP

> 1. At the moment I use an entry in the "transport" file for Postfix to > direct all mail for our domain to the Notes server. I need to be able to > this by user but can't see how it is done. Transport seems only to accept > domains. Can postfix do this,and if so, how? How about aliases?

[SLUG] Postfix, IMAP, Lotus Notes, Evolution & OfflineIMAP

Our current email setup at work is Postfix on firewall running spamassassin across all incoming emails, dropping emails for unknown local users and forwarding what remains via SMTP to the local Notes Domino server (running on RedHat 9). I am trying to gradually phase out Notes. I am looking to

[SLUG] postfix + sasl smtp auth

hi just having a problem with postfix and sasl smtp auth. system is debain stable with postfix from backports.org sasl v1 is installed: libsasl7 sasl-bin libsasl-modules-plain libsasl-digestmd5-plain relevant bits of main.cf: smtpd_sasl_local_domain = $myhostname smtpd_sasl_auth_enable = yes

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

O Plameras wrote: I assume SMTP AUTH is now working. no, but I've run out of time now, will have to play with it again at a later date. thanks for your efforts anyway. Dave. -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mai

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 01:55, O Plameras wrote: > In the Postfix RPM distribution, as far as I know, config > for inet_interfaces defaults to 'localhost',i.e, > 'inet_interfaces=localhost'. debian have their own (sensible) defaults, but I've put it in to see if it makes any difference. > Well it h

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

David Fitch wrote: O Plameras wrote: 'inet_interfaces' has another functionality and if you try, inet_interfaces = all, you'll discover you can smtp from another host. I hadn't heard of inet_interfaces before, but as I said any host can already connect (I suspect the default is 'all') to send mail

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

O Plameras wrote: 'inet_interfaces' has another functionality and if you try, inet_interfaces = all, you'll discover you can smtp from another host. I hadn't heard of inet_interfaces before, but as I said any host can already connect (I suspect the default is 'all') to send mail to local users. It'

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

Michael Fox wrote: On 5/6/05, David Fitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: do you mean "mynetworks"? as I said, it receives mail on all interfaces so that's not it. mynetworks relates to which hosts are allowed to use this smtp server.. ie. relay control. It doesn't relate to what interfaces the smtp wi

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

On 5/6/05, David Fitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you mean "mynetworks"? > as I said, it receives mail on all interfaces so that's not it. mynetworks relates to which hosts are allowed to use this smtp server.. ie. relay control. It doesn't relate to what interfaces the smtp will listen on.

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

David Fitch wrote: As a matter of fact, CRAM-MD5, GSSAPI, and DIGEST-MD5 should'nt be used at all in your case because you are already using TLS. TLS and anyone of these are mutually exclusive. You use TLS of one of this. hmm dunno TLS is needed to protect plain text messages sent and received acr

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

David Fitch wrote: I think it is your, inet_interfaces = localhost You're telling postfix to accept 'SMTP' connections from 'localhost' only. do you mean "mynetworks"? as I said, it receives mail on all interfaces so that's not it. No, 'mynetworks' has different functionality. 'inet_interfaces'

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

O Plameras wrote: This is strange. What displays here is controlled by 'smtp.conf' and '#smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes'. # cat sasl/smtpd.conf pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: plain login AUTH PLAIN LOGIN should be listed and no more. I can't explain this. Something is wrong somewhere. As a matter of

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

O Plameras wrote: This is strange. What displays here is controlled by 'smtp.conf' and '#smtpd_tls_auth_only=yes'. # cat sasl/smtpd.conf pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: plain login AUTH PLAIN LOGIN should be listed and no more. I can't explain this. Something is wrong somewhere. I noticed th

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

David Fitch wrote: O Plameras wrote: The ff. are the suggested configurations: 1. smtp.conf may have: pwcheck_method:saslauthd mech_list: plain login # cat sasl/smtpd.conf pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: plain login #log_level: 7 saslauthd_path: /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd/mux 2. /e

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

O Plameras wrote: The ff. are the suggested configurations: 1. smtp.conf may have: pwcheck_method:saslauthd mech_list: plain login # cat sasl/smtpd.conf pwcheck_method: saslauthd mech_list: plain login #log_level: 7 saslauthd_path: /var/spool/postfix/var/run/saslauthd/mux 2. /etc/default/saslauthd

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

I received an email asking how do I check if TLS/PLAIN auth works since there are several mail clients with various setup procedures. So, it is difficult to tell if it is the mail client that is not working or it is the postfix setup that has a problem. To separate any problem with mail-clients fr

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

David Fitch wrote: O Plameras wrote: What does this show when your do this on your postfix server ? the AUTH stuff is there: $ telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail ESMTP Postfix ehlo localhost 250-mail 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 1024 2

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

O Plameras wrote: What does this show when your do this on your postfix server ? the AUTH stuff is there: $ telnet localhost 25 Trying 127.0.0.1... Connected to localhost. Escape character is '^]'. 220 mail ESMTP Postfix ehlo localhost 250-mail 250-PIPELINING 250-SIZE 1024 250-VRFY 250-ETRN 250

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

What does this show when your do this on your postfix server ? # telnet localhost 25 then put 'ehlo localhost' and ''. then put 'quit' and '' to exit. # David Fitch wrote: ok think I've got the ssl stuff sorted out now, problem is the smtp authentication still doesn't work, eg. see log extract: Ma

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

ok think I've got the ssl stuff sorted out now, problem is the smtp authentication still doesn't work, eg. see log extract: May 2 23:21:02 gw postfix/smtpd[22461]: TLS connection established from noodle[192.168.1.5]: TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD 5 (128/128 bits) May 2 23:21:02 gw postfix/smtpd[22461

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

David Fitch wrote: O Plameras wrote: After the above procedure insert these: openssl -new -x509 -keyout demoCA/private/cakey.pem \ -out demoCA/cacert.pem -days 365 no such command '-new', did you mean: openssl req -new -x509 -keyout demoCA/private/cakey.pem \ -out demoCA/

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

O Plameras wrote: After the above procedure insert these: openssl -new -x509 -keyout demoCA/private/cakey.pem \ -out demoCA/cacert.pem -days 365 no such command '-new', did you mean: openssl req -new -x509 -keyout demoCA/private/cakey.pem \ -out demoCA/cacert.pem -days 365

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

* On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:26:15AM +0930, David Fitch wrote: > has anyone got this combination working? (postfix with TLS/SASL > on debian woody) No, haven't got it going, but it's on my todo list... The tutorial at [1] may help. [1] http://workaround.org/articles/ispmail-sarge/ -- Sonia Hami

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

David Fitch wrote: O Plameras wrote: Firstly, I assume you have postfix running as distributed without SASL/TLS. yes If so, I suggest that you test each of the major components, SASL and TLS (or OPENSSL) to ensure that you have them setup correctly before combining them to work in Postfix. This

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

O Plameras wrote: Firstly, I assume you have postfix running as distributed without SASL/TLS. yes If so, I suggest that you test each of the major components, SASL and TLS (or OPENSSL) to ensure that you have them setup correctly before combining them to work in Postfix. This is the part that's le

Re: [SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

Firstly, I assume you have postfix running as distributed without SASL/TLS. If so, I suggest that you test each of the major components, SASL and TLS (or OPENSSL) to ensure that you have them setup correctly before combining them to work in Postfix. This is the part that's left out by the HOWTO's

[SLUG] postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody

Hi all has anyone got this combination working? (postfix with TLS/SASL on debian woody) I've followed all the instructions I can find on the web, and even added backports.org to get postfix2 and sasl2 and still I keep getting the same error: May 1 22:09:15 gw postfix/smtpd[13280]: starting TLS eng

Re: [SLUG] Postfix Virtual Domains and Timezones

On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Angus Lees wrote: > At Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:26:02 -0700 (MST), Dennis M. Gray wrote: > > I have set up a Postfix MTA with several virtual mail domains. So far in > > the doucmentation I have not found a way to have mail sent by Postfix to > > show a time that is different than

Re: [SLUG] Postfix Virtual Domains and Timezones

At Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:26:02 -0700 (MST), Dennis M. Gray wrote: > I have set up a Postfix MTA with several virtual mail domains. So far in > the doucmentation I have not found a way to have mail sent by Postfix to > show a time that is different than that of the server, which is in > Arizona, USA.

Re: [SLUG] Postfix HELO host

On Wed, 23 Mar 2005 17:27:17 -0700 (MST), Dennis M. Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know how Postfix determines the host to use when sending a > HELO to a remote SMTP server? Is there any way I can control that? I believe it uses whatever is set in $myhostname (which, unless set manu

Re: [SLUG] Postfix HELO host

postfix relies on DNS and looks up MX records. or do you want to make a mail gateway? > Does anyone know how Postfix determines the host to use when sending a > HELO to a remote SMTP server? Is there any way I can control that? > > Regards - This

[SLUG] Postfix Virtual Domains and Timezones

I have set up a Postfix MTA with several virtual mail domains. So far in the doucmentation I have not found a way to have mail sent by Postfix to show a time that is different than that of the server, which is in Arizona, USA. I would like virtual domain users to have their mail sent with the corre

[SLUG] Postfix HELO host

Does anyone know how Postfix determines the host to use when sending a HELO to a remote SMTP server? Is there any way I can control that? Regards -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] Postfix/amavisd-new/clamav setup

> I'm looking at installing amavisd-new/clamav with Postfix 2 on RH73; > > I've used amavisd-new-2.2.0-1.0.rh7.test.i386.rpm and > clamav-0.80-1.0.rh7.dag.i386.rpm from dag.wieers.com/packages/ > > so far, I have amavisd-new running > > looking at various docs and howtos, they talk about a 'cla

[SLUG] Postfix/amavisd-new/clamav setup

I'm looking at installing amavisd-new/clamav with Postfix 2 on RH73; I've used amavisd-new-2.2.0-1.0.rh7.test.i386.rpm and clamav-0.80-1.0.rh7.dag.i386.rpm from dag.wieers.com/packages/ so far, I have amavisd-new running looking at various docs and howtos, they talk about a 'clamd', but, the c

[SLUG] Postfix + mailman..

Anyone happen to recommend a decent site or howto on configuring mailman with postfix... The machine is a debian sarge box :) Thanks -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Mailing List - http://slug.org.au/ Subscription info and FAQs: http://slug.org.au/faq/mailinglists.html

Re: [SLUG] Postfix + MySQL

Jon Austin wrote: Hey, I have tried to get MySQL and postfix to talk to each other on Debian stable. The problem I have is when Postfix tries to connect to MySQL, it has issues. Oct 28 15:03:09 sheadoffice-bne postfix/trivial-rewrite[27803]: warning: connect to mysql server localhost: Can't connect

[SLUG] Postfix + MySQL

Hey, I have tried to get MySQL and postfix to talk to each other on Debian stable. The problem I have is when Postfix tries to connect to MySQL, it has issues. Oct 28 15:03:09 sheadoffice-bne postfix/trivial-rewrite[27803]: warning: connect to mysql server localhost: Can't connect to local MySQL

Re: [SLUG] Postfix Question

Howard Lowndes wrote: > I'm running Postfix with virtual mailboxes and virtual mainbox domains > and it runs fine using the virtual delivery agent. > > So, how do I get it to deliver via Procmail to this same virtual > mailboxes. > It kind of depends on what you are trying to accomplish. Assu

Re: [SLUG] Postfix Question

Howard Lowndes wrote: I'm running Postfix with virtual mailboxes and virtual mainbox domains and it runs fine using the virtual delivery agent. So, how do I get it to deliver via Procmail to this same virtual mailboxes. dont you need a shell for procmail? dave -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group Ma

[SLUG] Postfix Question

I'm running Postfix with virtual mailboxes and virtual mainbox domains and it runs fine using the virtual delivery agent. So, how do I get it to deliver via Procmail to this same virtual mailboxes. -- Howard. LANNet Computing Associates; Your Linux people ---

[SLUG] Postfix mess (mutt config) - update

Just for the archives: the Debian distributions have # don't generate a From header unset use_from in the /etc/Muttrc configuration. This overrides the setting in the .muttrc file Changing to set use_from fixes it (obviously). Thanks to those who helped me with this. Cheers, Alan -- -

Re: [SLUG] Postfix mess - NOT!

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 10:36 +1000, Alan L Tyree wrote: > I just realised that it is not a postfix problem at all since this mail > is sent via postfix. It is a mutt problem - which I can probably fix. In your .muttrc put this: set from="\"My Name\" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" -- Hell is empty and a

Re: [SLUG] Postfix mess

On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 10:41:02 +1000 Shane Machon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Ok, that's a little different :) > > The first part of the email address is configurable in your email > client. Just make sure you have an alias to your account name from > alan to alant (in /etc/aliases).

Re: [SLUG] Postfix mess

Hi Alan, Ok, that's a little different :) The first part of the email address is configurable in your email client. Just make sure you have an alias to your account name from alan to alant (in /etc/aliases). But the main problem is with your email client, not postfix. Cheers, Shane. On Wed, 2

Re: [SLUG] Postfix mess

On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 10:30 +1000, Alan L Tyree wrote: > Thanks Shane - it turns out that my problem is slightly different from > what I described. I *want* the From line to be: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is really handled in your MUA. If your MUA can't do it, switch to something like Mutt or Evoluti

Re: [SLUG] Postfix mess - NOT!

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 10:30:42 +1000 Alan L Tyree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 09:46:18 +1000 > Shane Machon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Alan, > > > > My guess is an incorrect value in the myhostname variable. You need > > to modify the myhostname value in /etc/postfix/m

Re: [SLUG] Postfix mess

On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 09:46:18 +1000 Shane Machon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Alan, > > My guess is an incorrect value in the myhostname variable. You need to > modify the myhostname value in /etc/postfix/main.cf. > > Set this value to just your domain name and restart postfix. Thanks Shane

Re: [SLUG] Postfix mess

Hi Alan, My guess is an incorrect value in the myhostname variable. You need to modify the myhostname value in /etc/postfix/main.cf. Set this value to just your domain name and restart postfix. Cheers, Shane. On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 08:55, Alan L Tyree wrote: > I have just installed a postfix se

[SLUG] Postfix mess

I have just installed a postfix setup and made a boo-boo. For some reason, mail is set as being From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@x. it should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] Where do I look to fix this? Thanks, Alan -- -- Alan L Tyree http://www2.austl

[SLUG] Postfix potentially relaying

Hi all, I have just tested a server I have been given the pleasure of playing with and I from a few tests I have ran it is reported that the server is has relaying ability. the main.cf file looks a little like this smtpd_sender_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_unknown_client,reject_rbl_c

[SLUG] POSTFIX smtp relay access problem SOLVED

POSTfix for RHAS-2.1.with squirrelmail Keyword: == Redhat Linux AS 2.1 RLAS21 RLAS 2.1 postfix configuration compatibility outlook not sending mail to postfix smtp. Postfix smtp relay simple postfix relay how to, postfix relay-how-to. postfix+squirrelmail how to configure.. Server is

Re: [SLUG] postfix question

This one time, at band camp, Kevin Saenz wrote: >Hi all, > >I have built a mail gateway on my dmz using postfix and currently >building an internal mail server >using postfix as part of Kolab. Has anyone built postfix to relay any >internet bound emails to a >mail gateway? I have the mail gateway

[SLUG] postfix question

Hi all, I have built a mail gateway on my dmz using postfix and currently building an internal mail server using postfix as part of Kolab. Has anyone built postfix to relay any internet bound emails to a mail gateway? I have the mail gateway forwarding to the internal mail server. Nothing the ot

[SLUG] Postfix upgrade

Hi all, I have upgraded postfix to 2.1.0 and found that my settings for anomy, and spamassassin doesn't work now. Has got this problem? I was reading the new documentation on Postfix and content filtering and I am a little lost in how I could still use the likes of anomy. Could anyone help out?

Re: [SLUG] Postfix and regexp

> All who asked for a copy from me, I would advise the securitysage's > works better than mine :) Kevin, thanks for letting know I'm as yet not installed it, but, did look, and, d/l ss's files and, was going to look at it next day or two Voytek -- SLUG - Sydney Linux User's Group - http://slug

Re: [SLUG] Postfix and regexp

All who asked for a copy from me, I would advise the securitysage's works better than mine :) > if my header_check file doesn't work for you, you could always try > > http://www.securitysage.com/files/header_checks > > it is more comprehensive than mine. > > > > > let us know how you go with

Re: [SLUG] Postfix and regexp

At 01:13 AM 5/11/2003, Voytek sent this up the stick: ** Reply to note from Kevin Saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 04 Nov 2003 12:24:07 +1100 > > why are you tuesday 10pm? Kevin, that's a good Q. the answer is long and involved, and, I do not understand some parts of it... so, today, when I noti

Re: [SLUG] Postfix and regexp

** Reply to note from Kevin Saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 04 Nov 2003 12:24:07 +1100 > > why are you tuesday 10pm? Kevin, that's a good Q. the answer is long and involved, and, I do not understand some parts of it... but if you really need to know: this machine used to run 'daytime' aga

Re: [SLUG] Postfix and regexp

why are you tuesday 10pm? > ** Reply to note from Kevin Saenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 04 Nov 2003 00:31:14 +1100 > > > > It will be in your next email. > > thanks, I'll try to implement later today > > > > say, I'm DISCARDing all windoze executables, except .doc and .xls, now, > > > that sh

  1   2   >