Re: [sniffer] Increase in FPs

On Wednesday, September 15, 2004, 2:06:22 AM, Landry wrote: LW> I have seen a fairly substantial increase on false positives LW> today.  I have submitted several FPs to the false@ address.  Has LW> there been a big change in the core rulebase today?  I wouldn't LW> think that upgrading to the new

[sniffer] Increase in FPs

Title: Increase in FPs I have seen a fairly substantial increase on false positives today.  I have submitted several FPs to the false@ address.  Has there been a big change in the core rulebase today?  I wouldn't think that upgrading to the new code this morning would cause this, would it? Bi

Re[6]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 4:06:47 PM, Jonathan wrote: JH> How does a user go about modifying the custom sniffer rules? Must Sort JH> Monster be contacted or is it possible to do this with some other system JH> (such as a web based interface)? The "normal" way right now is to work through u

RE: Re[4]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

How does a user go about modifying the custom sniffer rules? Must Sort Monster be contacted or is it possible to do this with some other system (such as a web based interface)? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pete McNeil Sent: Tuesday, Sep

[sniffer] On the edge... Anybody try Message Sniffer on Mac OS X yet?

Hello Sniffer folks, I'm curious if anybody has tried compiling and running Message Sniffer on a Mac yet? Since OS-X is bsd? based this should be an easy thing to do. I know it's rare, but how rare is it that folks will use a Mac for an email server? I've had clients do it in the past -

Re: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

Actually, we scan for many businesses as well as home users, and have clients with mail boxes on every continent except Antarctica.  To me it's really a matter of what classifies spam, and while these phrases are spammy, they are not accurate enough to use in my rulebase.  Pete knows what he is

Re[4]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 1:05:29 PM, Landry wrote: LW> Pete, I started running the new code this morning, and so far, so good. LW> I'll let you know if I see anything strange. Thanks. _M This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription inst

Re: [sniffer] Group 62

On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 12:40:43 PM, Jorge wrote: JA> What is Group 62? Is there anywhere I can get a list of all group types? 62 - Abstract patterns for spam structures. This group also contains some domain rules tha

RE: Re[2]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

Pete, I started running the new code this morning, and so far, so good. I'll let you know if I see anything strange. Bill -Original Message- From: Pete McNeil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:56 AM To: Agid, Corby Subject: Re[2]: [sniffer] Surprising missed

Re: [sniffer] Group 62

JA> What is Group 62? Is there anywhere I can get a list of all group types? http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help/ResultCodesHelp.html -- John M. Cline, LTC, USAFR "Never Give Up!" This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription inst

[sniffer] Group 62

What is Group 62? Is there anywhere I can get a list of all group types? -- Jorge Asch Revilla CONEXION DCR www.conexion.co.cr 800-CONEXION This E-Mail came from the Message Sniffer mailing list. For information and (un)subscription instructions go to http://www.sortmonster.com/MessageSniffer/Help

Re[2]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 11:48:43 AM, Corby wrote: AC> I suppose everyone's userbases have differenent AC> requirements.  An ISP or private enterprise might worry about AC> false postives on "horny teenagers" and "penis enlargement", but AC> for our local government agency, it causes proble

Re[2]: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, 11:41:48 AM, Corby wrote: AC> To which addresss should I send these? AC> Also, I mis-stated the spam. They were not plain text, but AC> html, but clearly have many "classic" spam attributes. I will AC> send them along, but need to know where. Please zip them an

Re: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

I just forwarded half a dozen myself, they have been coming in for the last week or so, much more so than before. Jim Matuska Jr. Computer Tech II CCNA Nez Perce Tribe Information Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Agid, Corby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

I suppose everyone's userbases have differenent requirements.  An ISP or private enterprise might worry about false postives on "horny teenagers" and "penis enlargement", but for our local government agency, it causes problems.    Corby From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

RE: [sniffer] Surprising missed spam

To which addresss should I send these? Also, I mis-stated the spam. They were not plain text, but html, but clearly have many "classic" spam attributes. I will send them along, but need to know where. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Beh