Re: Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase

2001-11-27 Thread WDimick
In a message dated 11/27/01 10:15:14 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: One other thing to be careful of is the difference between stiffness and stiffness-to-weight. The stiffness of most carbon fiber-epoxy per square inch of material is nowhere near as high as that of steel. A 1/8 diameter

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase

2001-11-26 Thread WDimick
Mark Drela wrote: Someone else mentioned using hardened RDS torsion rods. This is not a solution, since hardening has little or no effect on the stiffness of a metal. It only increases its strength. Mark. . .As the maker of the hardened and tempered drive shafts for the RDS, I'm

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase.

2001-11-26 Thread Bill Johns
At 11:59 PM 11/18/2001 -0500, Mark Drela wrote: Someone else mentioned using hardened RDS torsion rods. This is not a solution, since hardening has little or no effect on the stiffness of a metal. It only increases its strength. Should work just fine. In this case I think one is designing to

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase.

2001-11-19 Thread MyMassMail
Harley, EXQUISITE! At first a good idea is ridiculed and maligned by those who don't understand it, slowly it is accepted, so much so that finally it is embraced as their own! Author unknown. Give them MORE time. RCSE-List facilities provided by Model Airplane News. Send subscribe and

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase.

2001-11-19 Thread Mark Drela
This did stiffen the surfaces to an acceptible level, but there was still some flex right where the rod bends 45 or 90 degrees. An all carbon rod would be ideal! Uh.. actually, a carbon rod would be horrible. Unidirectional carbon has a puny shear modulus compared to steel, even aluminum.

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase.

2001-11-18 Thread Gavin Botha
I have tried RDS in F3B ships with good results. There are however a few problems. F3B control surfaces must be very ridid (remember Daryl P. recent post describing why he likes using 3 control surfaces per wing panel with 3 servos per wing panel for added control rigidity). The RDS system uses

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase.

2001-11-18 Thread Gavin Botha
A hollow-molded wing is likely to have less trouble in this regard. However, even with these, any time you start adding or subtracting stuff that is going to possibly alter the load paths in a highly-loaded structure, it's best to proceed with caution! It is kind of nice to build RDS

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase.

2001-11-17 Thread Bill Harris
of religious dogma with little empirical data to demonstrate claims. Let me see a before-and-after set of numbers to evaluate. --Bill From: Harley Michaelis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bob Pope [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase.

2001-11-17 Thread Joe Parsons
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase. Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2001 16:52:20 -0800 Just thinking, if 5% reduced drag could increase speed that much, a 16 second run would be reduced to 15.2 seconds. If drag is reduced 12% as Bob says, it would be reduced to 14.08 seconds

Re: [RCSE] RDS drag reduction, speed increase.

2001-11-17 Thread Bob Pope
Bill Harris wrote: Give us empirical data to show that RDS gives % reduction in drag, and this x-% reduction in drag correlates to a y-% increase in performance-- speed, sink rate, whatever. I have nothing against the RDS system, and it seems to be a wonderful idea, but these