; ran Product Marketing for M&E (recently moved into a new role) and we did
> focus on ways to promote Softimage given our budgets and business
> priorities. It was just not realistic to expect the same level of coverage
> given the sheer volume of business driven by the other products.
>
> > coverage given the sheer volume of business driven by the other products.
> > >
> > > Maurice
> > >
> > > Maurice Patel
> > > Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134
> > >
> > > From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
st not realistic to expect the same level of coverage
> given the sheer volume of business driven by the other products.
> > >
> > > Maurice
> > >
> > > Maurice Patel
> > > Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134
> > >
> > > From: softimage
: Tél: 514 954-7134
> >
> > From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Paul Griswold
> > Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:27 PM
> > To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> > Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more gracef
of business driven by the other products.
>
> Maurice
>
> Maurice Patel
> Autodesk : Tél: 514 954-7134
>
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
> [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Paul Griswold
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:2
514 954-7134
>
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [mailto:
> softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Paul Griswold
> Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2014 1:27 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
>
mage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Re[2]: A more graceful retirement - my counter offer
I suppose I should have phrased that "There has literally never been a single
public "champion" of Softimage at a decision-making level."
Was there ever a SIGGRAPH, usergroup meeting, or anything o
Not really. Which is why my top 5 list for Alastair would have been
something like:
-Chinny
-Halfdan
-Ronald
-Schoennagel
-Jen
-etc...
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Paul Griswold <
pgrisw...@fusiondigitalproductions.com> wrote:
> I suppose I should have phrased that "There has literally nev
I suppose I should have phrased that "There has literally never been a
single public "champion" of Softimage at a decision-making level."
Was there ever a SIGGRAPH, usergroup meeting, or anything of the sort where
anyone with any sort of authority at Autodesk called for more exposure,
more marketi
Was wondering where your voice was Brad!
On 13 March 2014 17:21, Bradley Gabe wrote:
>
>> Since the day Autodesk bought Softimage, it's been one cruel joke. There
>> has literally never been a single "champion" of Softimage at a
>> decision-making level, right? It's been the red-headed step-c
>
>
> Since the day Autodesk bought Softimage, it's been one cruel joke. There
> has literally never been a single "champion" of Softimage at a
> decision-making level, right? It's been the red-headed step-child since
> the moment of the acquisition.
>
>
I'm not sure this statement is entirely tr
Unfortunately it doesn't seem like Autodesk had any idea who Softimage
users even are before making the decision to take away our main tool.
It's been said over and over again. If we felt Maya or Max were the best
tool for the job, we'd buy it. But there are dozens and dozens of reasons
why Maya
12 matches
Mail list logo
