I believe there is a change to the data structure of a class...
The dev would know better.
Chris
On 27 Sep, 2013, at 11:29 PM, Stephen Blair wrote:
> Yes I understand that. But if your plugin works with SP1 and not SP2, then
> that narrows it down somewhat, since there were presuma
e time.
Thanks
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Chris Chia wrote:
> Hi Guillaume,
> You sure know who to send to to troubleshoot your custom node.
> Mind sending it to them?
>
> Chris
>
>
> On 27 Sep, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Guillaume Laforge <
> guillaume.laforge...@gmai
Hi Guillaume,
You sure know who to send to to troubleshoot your custom node.
Mind sending it to them?
Chris
On 27 Sep, 2013, at 11:25 PM, Guillaume Laforge
wrote:
> Yes, SP2 fixed the ICE instance memory issue in SiToA I think.
> So it does not make sense to use 2014 SP1 as we are
Yes I understand that. But if your plugin works with SP1 and not SP2, then
that narrows it down somewhat, since there were presumable so few changes
in SP2.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Guillaume Laforge <
guillaume.laforge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, SP2 fixed the ICE instan
Yes, SP2 fixed the ICE instance memory issue in SiToA I think.
So it does not make sense to use 2014 SP1 as we are using Arnold.
On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Stephen Blair wrote:
> Maybe you should try compiling against SP1 and see if that crashes too.
> In SP2, wasn't there ju
Maybe you should try compiling against SP1 and see if that crashes too.
In SP2, wasn't there just that one SDK change for ICE array access,
which broke binary compatibility?
On 27/09/2013 10:37 AM, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
Hi guys,
I compiled a custom ICE node for 2014 SP2 and it cras
Hi guys,
I compiled a custom ICE node for 2014 SP2 and it crash all the time (It
works perfectly in 2013 QF7).
As this node is rather complicated and call external libraries, it is not
easy to send it to support (and I don't have the time right now to isolate
the problem in a simpler
further exploration looking for guaranteed repro , it seems applying my
compound directly after a merge curve (from a script because it cannot be
done in soft or ICE) causes the segmentation. but if I create an empty ICE
tree to the merged curve, freeze, then apply my compound then it works fine.
and tried it (sketch curves) on centos 6.4, its rock solid . great!
but trying to manipulate one of the nbSubCurves from a merged curve with a
simple ICE compound is EXTREMELY flakey and getting segmentation faults
per minute. even in centos 6.4
On 27 September 2013 11:31, Stephen Blair
Well, it's repro in a CentOS 6.2 VM
Too bad there's no sketch command logged, otherwise I'd try running it
with the viewports hidden/muted
On 26/09/2013 9:31 PM, Chris Chia wrote:
Find the repro steps and submit a bug report. Softimage QAs will verify.
Chris
On 27 Sep, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Rob
Find the repro steps and submit a bug report. Softimage QAs will verify.
Chris
On 27 Sep, 2013, at 6:13 AM, Rob Chapman wrote:
> dont think its the preferences folder. we tried it on 4 separate
> workstations, but of course will give it a go. but I have no choice on the
> centos 6.2 install
dont think its the preferences folder. we tried it on 4 separate
workstations, but of course will give it a go. but I have no choice on the
centos 6.2 install either - it was recently updated from 5.x and was the
same bug there as well I think - will check
On 26 September 2013 22:58, Chris Chia
Try purging the preference folder. Might be corrupted.
Chris
On 27 Sep, 2013, at 3:12 AM, Rob Chapman wrote:
> thats good to know, thanks Alan!
>
>
> On 26 September 2013 20:00, Alan Fregtman wrote:
> I think it's something with your setup.
>
> On CentOS 6.3 here. Sketched 20 curves and ga
thats good to know, thanks Alan!
On 26 September 2013 20:00, Alan Fregtman wrote:
> I think it's something with your setup.
>
> On CentOS 6.3 here. Sketched 20 curves and gave up. No crashes.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Rob Chapman wrote:
>
>> Centos 6.2
>>
>> Create>Curve>Sketch
I think it's something with your setup.
On CentOS 6.3 here. Sketched 20 curves and gave up. No crashes.
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Rob Chapman wrote:
> Centos 6.2
>
> Create>Curve>Sketch curve
>
> 2nd or 3rd curve drawn
>
> Softimage disappears with segmentation fault.
>
> we are having
Centos 6.2
Create>Curve>Sketch curve
2nd or 3rd curve drawn
Softimage disappears with segmentation fault.
we are having to open Maya to sketch curves? :(
--
To unsubscribe: mail softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with subject
"unsubscribe" and reply to the con
compile things. It's up on
> GitHub: https://github.com/claudevervoort-perso/xsi-audio-spectrum
>
> I'll send him an email & see if he can recompile.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Paul
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Alan Fregtman wrote:
>
>> Ther
Has anyone had any luck getting the Wave to Spectrum addon to work under
2014 SP2?
I've got it installed, but it's not showing up.
Thanks,
-Paul
--
To unsubscribe: mail softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with subject
"unsubscribe" and reply
an ICE C++ API change in 2014 SP2 that will require a specific
> compilation for that particular version (because it must be compiled
> against the newest libraries.) I'd ask the author to recompile; it
> shouldn't be a big deal for him/her/them.
>
>
>
> On F
There was an ICE C++ API change in 2014 SP2 that will require a specific
compilation for that particular version (because it must be compiled
against the newest libraries.) I'd ask the author to recompile; it
shouldn't be a big deal for him/her/them.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 1:0
Very nice script there. I too had problems with it at first because some
Softimage versions didn't have any crashCount value. Probably because it
never crashed :)
Here's my ugly fix to the script:
if QueryInfoKey(pi_key)[1] > 4:
value = QueryValueEx(pi_key, "crashCount" )
dCrashes[ s ] = va
who 2012sap crashed really a lot on that image :)
2013/9/12 Ciaran Moloney
> Really solid here on linux, but not doing any rendering.
> However, 9 times out of 10 there is a segfault reported at the console
> upon quitting the program.
>
>
>
>
Really solid here on linux, but not doing any rendering.
However, 9 times out of 10 there is a segfault reported at the console upon
quitting the program.
: RE: Poll. How frequently 2014 SP2 crashes, and when?
Interesting, it runs (doesn’t break) but no feedback at all in Script Editor
From:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com]&
: Poll. How frequently 2014 SP2 crashes, and when?
I just ran it from Softimage's script editor...works fine.
Szabolcs Matefy mailto:szabol...@crytek.com>> hat am 12.
September 2013 um 08:38 geschrieben:
How to run this snippet? I ran it within the Pywin window, but it listed only
2012 SA
Softimage back since 7?
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
>
>
> Szabolcs
>
>
>
> From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
> [mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Chris Chia
> Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 4:06 AM
> T
, September 12, 2013 4:06 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Poll. How frequently 2014 SP2 crashes, and when?
Vincent, it's looking good on your image ;)
From:
softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com<mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com>
[mailto:sof
Vincent, it's looking good on your image ;)
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Vincent Ullmann
Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2013 6:07 AM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: Poll. How frequently 201
Hey folks
Here most of our artists have plenty of crashes with
Softimage 2014 SP2 (Daily 4-5 on average)
They have crashes on Knife tool, Connect edge,
Texture Editor.
They have migrated their preferences
ep 11, 2013 at 3:23 AM, Szabolcs Matefy wrote:
> Hey folks
>
>
>
> Here most of our artists have plenty of crashes with Softimage 2014 SP2
> (Daily 4-5 on average)
>
> They have crashes on Knife tool, Connect edge, Texture Editor.
>
>
>
> They have migrated thei
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 11.09.2013 09:44, schrieb Jens Lindgren:
>>>
>>> I have been using it for about a month and not a single crash yet.
>>> Used the knife tool like crazy on the current project.
>>> I never migrate the preferences and I delet
image-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Szabolcs Matefy
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 3:24 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Poll. How frequently 2014 SP2 crashes, and when?
Hey folks
Here most of our artists have plenty of crashes with Softimage 2014 SP2 (Daily
4-5
s time to update Arnold. I then have a script that I run manually to set
>> up all my preferences again.
>>
>> /Jens
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Szabolcs Matefy wrote:
>>
>>> Hey folks
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
gt; up all my preferences again.
>
> /Jens
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Szabolcs Matefy wrote:
>
>> Hey folks
>>
>>
>>
>> Here most of our artists have plenty of crashes with Softimage 2014 SP2
>> (Daily 4-5 on average)
>>
>> T
mailto:szabol...@crytek.com>> wrote:
Hey folks
Here most of our artists have plenty of crashes with Softimage
2014 SP2 (Daily 4-5 on average)
They have crashes on Knife tool, Connect edge, Texture Editor.
They have migrated their preferences from previous versions
(S
again.
/Jens
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Szabolcs Matefy wrote:
> Hey folks
>
> ** **
>
> Here most of our artists have plenty of crashes with Softimage 2014 SP2
> (Daily 4-5 on average)
>
> They have crashes on Knife tool, Connect edge, Texture Editor
Hey folks
Here most of our artists have plenty of crashes with Softimage 2014 SP2 (Daily
4-5 on average)
They have crashes on Knife tool, Connect edge, Texture Editor.
They have migrated their preferences from previous versions (SI2013 or so)
I myself have also problems, but most of them are
Same here. new compiled plugins loads in SP2 but not in SP1.
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Nicolas Burtnyk wrote:
> 2014 SP2 *does* have API changes, even to the extent that plugins compiled
> against 2014 SP1 are not loadable in 2014 SP2.
>
> Our installer got broken by the
@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: Re: SP2
looks alright to me.
the build number change tell me SP2 is indistinguishable from SP1
except it's got some code change that caused 5 builds but dont affect
API or scene file. However, if SP1 is indeed a 11.1 instead of 11.0,
then there must have been API chan
2014 SP2 *does* have API changes, even to the extent that plugins compiled
against 2014 SP1 are not loadable in 2014 SP2.
Our installer got broken by the weirdness in version numbers. In all
versions back to 2011 (and probably before that), the "minor" version
referred to the SP#, i.e
Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Sven Constable wrote:
> My statement was a bit generic. I apologize for that. But the SP2 for 2014
> includes two bugfixes. I would call that a hotfix.
>
>
>
looks alright to me.
the build number change tell me SP2 is indistinguishable from SP1
except it's got some code change that caused 5 builds but dont affect
API or scene file. However, if SP1 is indeed a 11.1 instead of 11.0,
then there must have been API change or something that affect
My statement was a bit generic. I apologize for that. But the SP2 for 2014
includes two bugfixes. I would call that a hotfix.
From: softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com
[mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com] On Behalf Of Raffaele
Fragapane
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2013 12:13 AM
To
t; *From:* softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com [
> mailto:softimage-boun...@listproc.autodesk.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Hans Payer
> *Sent:* Monday, July 29, 2013 10:37 PM
> *To:* softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> *Subject:* SP2
>
> ** **
>
> Please some
13 10:37 PM
To: <mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: SP2
Please someone explain,
How does naming a release SP2 compare to SP1 has a version number increment
of 0.0.03?
2014 SP1 = 12.1.94
2014 SP2 = 12.1.99
Should itnot have been at least 12.2.x
0.0.05 rather
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Hans Payer wrote:
> Please someone explain,
>
> How does naming a release SP2 compare to SP1 has a version number
> increment of 0.0.03?
>
> 2014 SP1 = 12.1.94
> 2014 SP2 = 12.1.99
>
> Should itnot have been at least 12
Please someone explain,
How does naming a release SP2 compare to SP1 has a version number increment
of 0.0.03?
2014 SP1 = 12.1.94
2014 SP2 = 12.1.99
Should itnot have been at least 12.2.xx?
You can blame my code but I always have relied on point version to
differenciate versions.In this case
Opps...I meant 'Thanks Stephen!'
From: Hsiao Ming Chia
Sent: Monday, 8 July, 2013 1:39 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
<mailto:softimage@listproc.autodesk.com>
Subject: RE: Softimage 2014 SP2 released
Thanks Stefan!
The direct link to the SP2 is
#x27;Thanks Stephen!'
>
> From: Hsiao Ming Chia
> Sent: Monday, 8 July, 2013 1:39 PM
> To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
> Subject: RE: Softimage 2014 SP2 released
>
> Thanks Stefan!
>
> The direct link to the SP2 is
> http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl
Opps...I meant 'Thanks Stephen!'
From: Hsiao Ming Chia
Sent: Monday, 8 July, 2013 1:39 PM
To: softimage@listproc.autodesk.com
Subject: RE: Softimage 2014 SP2 released
Thanks Stefan!
The direct link to the SP2 is
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&id=2
Thanks Stefan!
The direct link to the SP2 is
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/ps/dl/item?siteID=123112&id=21964996&linkID=12544121
As mentioned in the Readme, some plugins may need to be recompiled in order for
them to work with SP2.
This is especially so if the plugin happens to
;>
>> SOFT-9089
>> Very slow access to the ICE attribute arrays
>>
>> *Note:
>> You may need to recompile your plugins, if they were compiled using
>> Softimage versions prior to 2014 SP2.
>>
>>
>
--
-Gene
www.genecrucean.com
simulation is broken
SOFT-9089
Very slow access to the ICE attribute arrays
*Note:
You may need to recompile your plugins, if they were compiled using
Softimage versions prior to 2014 SP2.
Softimage versions prior to 2014 SP2.
101 - 154 of 154 matches
Mail list logo
