[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Male updated SOLR-1023:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1023.patch
I have attached a patch that adds support for String and Date fields. To
init-forrest-entities:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/web
compile-solrj:
[mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solrj
[javac] Compiling 84 source files to /tmp/apache-solr-nightly/build/solrj
Hi all,
Hoping your guys can help as I am real new to this :-(
I am trying to import documents using the csv handler. The process itself
works well but I get odd results when I try to search my index.
The problem is with a field which contains keywords, BUT the keywords could
contain spaces.
Sorry, meant to add that the category field will also be one of my faceting
fields which is why the full phrase is important
nostromo wrote:
Hi all,
Hoping your guys can help as I am real new to this :-(
I am trying to import documents using the csv handler. The process itself
works
OK, feel stupid now.
Query should have been category:Office Equipment, which worked !!
Thanks,
D
nostromo wrote:
Hi all,
Hoping your guys can help as I am real new to this :-(
I am trying to import documents using the csv handler. The process itself
works well but I get odd results
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-633?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12744117#action_12744117
]
Preetam Rao commented on SOLR-633:
--
Hi, Sorry for such a delay.
let me take an example of
On Aug 16, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I just profiled a CSV upload, and aside from the CSV parsing, Solr
adds pretty much no overhead!
I was expecting some non-trivial overhead due to Solr's
SolrInputDocument, update processing pipeline, and update handler...
but profiling showed
On Aug 15, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
Now that we have date fields that internally store milliseconds (and
can currently be used in function queries) we have the basis for a
good replacement for using things like ord(date)... which is now a bad
idea since it causes the FieldCache
I'm looking a little bit at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298
and some of the other pseudo-field capabilities and am curious how
the various Response Writers are handling writing out the Docs. The
XMLWriter seems to have a very different approach from the others when
it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-788?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12744233#action_12744233
]
Mike Anderson commented on SOLR-788:
What release of SOLR should one apply this patch to?
Ya, I like this idea.
Adding a meta field is OK, but it may just be kicking the can. Also
implementation wise, it works well when you have a SolrDocument, but
when directly using DocList, it gets a bit messy.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-705
Also with adding a meta field,
Add configurable Sweetspot Similarity factory
-
Key: SOLR-1365
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365
Project: Solr
Issue Type: New Feature
Affects Versions: 1.3
On Aug 17, 2009, at 6:59 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
Also with adding a meta field, I'm not sure I like that it is a
double object like:
doc.get( _meta_ ).get( distance)
It'd be more like: doc.getMeta().get(distance), at least. And
doc.get(distance) could be made to fetch first the main
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12744306#action_12744306
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1365:
Sweet! :)
Very nice use of the SimilarityFactory
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12744309#action_12744309
]
Erik Hatcher commented on SOLR-1365:
bq. I took a brief look at the patch, the only
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1143?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12744327#action_12744327
]
Artem Russakovskii commented on SOLR-1143:
--
Any idea when this will be approved for
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Grant Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
I'm looking a little bit at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1298 and some of the other
pseudo-field capabilities and am curious how the various Response Writers
are handling writing out the Docs. The
I'm interested in using a CharFilter, something like this:
fieldType name=html_text class=solr.TextField
analyzer
charFilter class=solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory/
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
/analyzer
/fieldType
In hopes of being able to
I broke it with reusable token streams. Just checked in a fix - can
you try now?
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 10:17 PM, Erik Hatchererik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm interested in using a CharFilter, something like this:
fieldType name=html_text
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Erik Hatchererik.hatc...@gmail.com wrote:
That fixes it with analysis.jsp, but not with FieldAnalysisRequestHandler I
don't think. Using that field definition below, and this request -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12744376#action_12744376
]
Kevin Osborn commented on SOLR-1365:
Thanks for the feedback. I looked at IndexSchema.
I our internal testing , the binary request writer gave very good perf
for large no:of docs.
Though we did not benchmark it
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Grant Ingersollgsing...@apache.org wrote:
On Aug 16, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
I just profiled a CSV upload, and aside from
22 matches
Mail list logo
