Chris Hostetter wrote:
: To get that going, it looks like a Project PMC needs to file a ticket with
: infrastructure.
I can do this (or ask Doug to do it if they really want it to be the
chair) but just to clarify
: o Also specify the key name for the Space. The key name cannot be
Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Javadocs aren't appropriate for documenting configuration and RequestHandler
: parameters/usage. These are used by many non-java folks and should have
: nothing to do with the java class structure/methods/etc
i agree that the generated javadocs are not very freindly
: SOLRxSITE -- that will be hosted at:
Requested: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-1441
-Hoss
Yonik Seeley wrote:
On Dec 11, 2007 9:29 AM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we feel ok about moving forward with step #0? That is request a
cwiki site and evaluate it.
+1
To get that going, it looks like a Project PMC needs to file a ticket
with infrastructure.
From the
: Javadocs aren't appropriate for documenting configuration and RequestHandler
: parameters/usage. These are used by many non-java folks and should have
: nothing to do with the java class structure/methods/etc
i agree that the generated javadocs are not very freindly for end users,
but i
: To get that going, it looks like a Project PMC needs to file a ticket with
: infrastructure.
I can do this (or ask Doug to do it if they really want it to be the
chair) but just to clarify
: o Also specify the key name for the Space. The key name cannot be changed.
: + If you use
On Dec 11, 2007 9:29 AM, Ryan McKinley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we feel ok about moving forward with step #0? That is request a
cwiki site and evaluate it.
+1
-Yonik
: What is really missing is that we don't (at least I don't) have a clear sense
: where what type of docs should go. Some in javadocs, some on the wiki, almost
: none on the forrest site. Javadocs work great since they are attached to
: sources and get included in releases. But solr's users
If someone wants to investigate what it would take to switch to use
Confluence for the main site and/or the wiki i say great ... but it's
important to keep in mind that:
a) we need to be able to include official docs in releases
b) wiki pages editable by anyone can't be included in
If the solr community decides to go this way I would like to present the
same option to the nutch community.
Dennis Kubes
Ryan McKinley wrote:
I think its safe to say we that the solr wiki is not nearly as complete
as it could/should be. I've added a ton of stuff to 1.3 that needs some
: Looks like http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ answers all our licensing questions.
: Notable:
See also this previous discussion in Lucene-Java, notably this
clarification from Doug...
http://www.nabble.com/Created%3A-%28LUCENE-805%29-New-Lucene-Demo-tf3234570.html#a9242876
If someone wants to
Both the wiki and the homepages look much nicer than the lucene/solr
ones. More professional too, FWIW.
Obviously the main issue here is manpower to convert everything. An
easier solution might be to install a MoinMoin theme. see http://
moinmoin.wikiwikiweb.de/ThemeMarket for many bad
: Looks like http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/ answers all our
licensing questions.
: Notable:
See also this previous discussion in Lucene-Java, notably this
clarification from Doug...
http://www.nabble.com/Created%3A-%28LUCENE-805%29-New-Lucene-Demo-tf3234570.html#a9242876
If someone wants to
: Wow, I didn't even realize that individual user's could reset their personal
: theme. 'classic' is so much better!
:
: +1 on changing the default.
other people should try this out (just go to your UserPrefrences, change
the theme, and then force reload some pages) if enough people like
On 7-Dec-07, at 3:19 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
Personally: I don't think MoinMoin is that bad of a wiki system ...
then
again, i have to deal with some extremely shitty wiki systems in
the other
aspects of my life, so maybe i just have low expectations. I'm all in
favor of picking a
Mike Klaas wrote:
Both the wiki and the homepages look much nicer than the lucene/solr
ones. More professional too, FWIW.
Obviously the main issue here is manpower to convert everything. An
easier solution might be to install a MoinMoin theme. see
I think its safe to say we that the solr wiki is not nearly as complete
as it could/should be. I've added a ton of stuff to 1.3 that needs some
documentation. Beyond the normal, 'I dislike writing docs' thing, I
find writing things in MoinMoin disappointing and even less fun then it
needs to
17 matches
Mail list logo
