: > assuming we have more use-case specific examples, wouldn't that just be
: > something that copies one of them to a target directory?
:
: I guess what I really want is a way to be able to say: Give me a Solr home
: that has these X features (DIH, Solr Cell, spell checking, highlighting, plus
: Wouldn't one solution to this bundling and aggregating/separating of examples
: and plugins be made a lot less painful if SolrResourceLoader could load from a
: list of directories rather than only a single directory? What are the
I'm not understanding how that would help the example situation
On Apr 22, 2009, at 12:20 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
I was aiming simple... like some simple tweaks to
SolrResourceLoader, at least a way to allow plugins to all live
separately and wired into a single Solr instance without copying
files and such.
What would it take to wire in OSGI (I know
I was aiming simple... like some simple tweaks to SolrResourceLoader,
at least a way to allow plugins to all live separately and wired into
a single Solr instance without copying files and such.
What would it take to wire in OSGI (I know nothing about it)?
Erik
On Apr 22, 2009, at
Even better, is probably something like OSGI where we can make sure
that we have some level of isolation between the class loaders so that
we can have different versions of different JARs w/o breaking the
application. Since it is clear that Solr is entering into a "contrib"
phase, it is on
On Apr 20, 2009, at 5:45 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Fair enough. FWIW, I'd still like to be able to generate a Solr
container
: from an example (i.e. "minimal" or "DIH" or whatever)
by "container" do you mean a Solr home with configs and neccessary
libs
ready to be tweaked to suite y
Wouldn't one solution to this bundling and aggregating/separating of
examples and plugins be made a lot less painful if SolrResourceLoader
could load from a list of directories rather than only a single
directory? What are the negatives to adding that support? Let's
keep solr.war lean an
: Fair enough. FWIW, I'd still like to be able to generate a Solr container
: from an example (i.e. "minimal" or "DIH" or whatever)
by "container" do you mean a Solr home with configs and neccessary libs
ready to be tweaked to suite your purposes?
assuming we have more use-case specific exampl
On Apr 16, 2009, at 7:37 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: It is similar, indeed, but I think it results in there only ever
being one
: active Solr example and the user need not worry about setting solr
home.
Hmmm... this seems like a bad idea.
we want to make sure that *users* who have down
: It is similar, indeed, but I think it results in there only ever being one
: active Solr example and the user need not worry about setting solr home.
Hmmm... this seems like a bad idea.
we want to make sure that *users* who have downloaded Solr can run all of
the examples without needing ant
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Apr 13, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
>
>>
>> Isn't this the same as the current setup with the name of the directory
>> changed and different ant targets to set them up? The new ant target will
>> setup the default so
On Apr 13, 2009, at 3:44 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
Instead of a kitchen-sink example directory, we "revert" it back to
being
the tutorial example. It still can get built by ant example, but
ultimately
we "deprecate" it (
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> Instead of a kitchen-sink example directory, we "revert" it back to being
> the tutorial example. It still can get built by ant example, but ultimately
> we "deprecate" it (more later).
>
> Then, as a replacement, we create a directory
Funny you should mention it, b/c I had an idea the other day of how to
speed all this up, plus will satisfy one of my other annoyances with
the example and make it easier for people to get started (I think).
So, here goes:
Instead of a kitchen-sink example directory, we "revert" it back to
Hello,
As part of SOLR-934, I'd like to setup an example for indexing mail boxes
with the existing example/example-DIH demo. I see that ant example has a
dependency on example-contrib. Do we want to do that? I vaguely remember
Yonik complaining about the time ant example takes.
For setting up the
15 matches
Mail list logo
