but i don't think changing the api Solr compiles against to
commons-logging makes sense -- not since we're already using the
least common denominator API (slf4j)
sounds good. I agree.
We could add a new dependency tomorow that uses log4j, and ship with
log4j-over-slf4j.jar; but would we
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:39 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: If I knew you had the day off, I would ask about moving to jdk 1.6!
Ryan: I may not know where you live, and i may not know what you look
like, but if you insist on goading me like this i will dedicate
myself to
answering those
I'm not sure I follow. We're going to switch to commons-logging, but
one that was written by the SLF4J people?
On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
While I'm on a roll tossing stuff out there
Since SOLR-560, solr depends on SLF4j as the logging interface.
However since
The suggestion is to compile against the commons-loggging *API*, but
use an SLF4j implementation in the .war file. The net result is
identical behavior and one fewer dependency.
However, lets wait to see what happens with:
http://www.nabble.com/Java-logging-in-Lucene-td20859711.html
(Hoss,
: If I knew you had the day off, I would ask about moving to jdk 1.6!
Ryan: I may not know where you live, and i may not know what you look
like, but if you insist on goading me like this i will dedicate myself to
answering those questions so i can come to your house and hurt you.
: I feel
LOL!
On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
While I'm on a roll tossing stuff out there
Since SOLR-560, solr depends on SLF4j as the logging interface.
However since we also depend on HttpClient we *also* depend on
commons-logging. This is a strange. Our maven artifacts
: Subject: logging revisited...
I'm starting to think Ryan woke up today and asked himself what's the
best way to screw with Hoss on his day off when he's only casually
skimming email?
: So, with that in mind I think we should consider using the commons-logging API
: and shipping the .war
To a certain extent SLF4j makes this decision a fairly small one, namely
what API do you want to code to inside SOLR and what jars do you want to
ship as a part of the distribution. It doesn't really matter if you pick
commons-logging, log4j or slf4j; all have drop in replacements via SLF4j.
They
On Dec 4, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Subject: logging revisited...
I'm starting to think Ryan woke up today and asked himself what's the
best way to screw with Hoss on his day off when he's only casually
skimming email?
If I knew you had the day off, I would ask about
