but i don't think changing the api Solr compiles against to
commons-logging makes sense -- not since we're already using the
least common denominator API (slf4j)
sounds good. I agree.
We could add a new dependency tomorow that uses log4j, and ship with
log4j-over-slf4j.jar; but would we th
: > Ryan: I may not know where you live, and i may not know what you look
: > like, but if you insist on goading me like this i will dedicate myself to
: > answering those questions so i can come to your house and hurt you.
: game on!
In case anyone is concerned for Ryan's safety: i'm only kiddi
The suggestion is to compile against the commons-loggging *API*, but
use an SLF4j implementation in the .war file. The net result is
identical behavior and one fewer dependency.
However, lets wait to see what happens with:
http://www.nabble.com/Java-logging-in-Lucene-td20859711.html
(Hoss, i
I'm not sure I follow. We're going to switch to commons-logging, but
one that was written by the SLF4J people?
On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
While I'm on a roll tossing stuff out there
Since SOLR-560, solr depends on SLF4j as the logging interface.
However since we
On Dec 9, 2008, at 12:39 AM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: If I knew you had the day off, I would ask about moving to jdk 1.6!
Ryan: I may not know where you live, and i may not know what you look
like, but if you insist on goading me like this i will dedicate
myself to
answering those question
: If I knew you had the day off, I would ask about moving to jdk 1.6!
Ryan: I may not know where you live, and i may not know what you look
like, but if you insist on goading me like this i will dedicate myself to
answering those questions so i can come to your house and hurt you.
: > I feel d
On Dec 4, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: Subject: logging revisited...
I'm starting to think Ryan woke up today and asked himself "what's the
best way to screw with Hoss on his day off when he's only casually
skimming email?"
If I knew you had the d
04, 2008 4:44 PM
To: solr-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: logging revisited...
While I'm on a roll tossing stuff out there
Since SOLR-560, solr depends on SLF4j as the logging interface.
However since we also depend on HttpClient we *also* depend on commons-
logging. This is a stra
: Subject: logging revisited...
I'm starting to think Ryan woke up today and asked himself "what's the
best way to screw with Hoss on his day off when he's only casually
skimming email?"
: So, with that in mind I think we should consider using the commons-logging AP
LOL!
On Dec 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
While I'm on a roll tossing stuff out there
Since SOLR-560, solr depends on SLF4j as the logging interface.
However since we also depend on HttpClient we *also* depend on
commons-logging. This is a strange. Our maven artifacts n
While I'm on a roll tossing stuff out there
Since SOLR-560, solr depends on SLF4j as the logging interface.
However since we also depend on HttpClient we *also* depend on commons-
logging. This is a strange. Our maven artifacts now depend on two
logging frameworks!
However the good
11 matches
Mail list logo
