[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789174#action_12789174
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on SOLR-1632:
-
I'm not sure what approach you are
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1625?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul resolved SOLR-1625.
--
Resolution: Fixed
committed r889537
Thanks Uri Boness
Add regexp support for TermsComponent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul resolved SOLR-1598.
--
Resolution: Fixed
committed r889541
Reader used in PlainTextEntityProcessor.nextRow() is not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1598?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789191#action_12789191
]
Noble Paul edited comment on SOLR-1598 at 12/11/09 9:25 AM:
fixed. Thanks Hoss
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
Noble:
1) you *have* to include a CHANGES.txt entry for every non-trivial commit
... if it has a Jira issue, there better be a CHANGES.txt entry, and the
CHANGES.txt entry really needs to be
Provide a clean way to keep flags and helper objects in ResponseBuilder
---
Key: SOLR-1644
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644
Project: Solr
Issue Type:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789226#action_12789226
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1644:
--
Let us keep a Map in RB so that each component can
On Dec 10, 2009, at 11:30 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote:
Hi Yonik,
While thinking about SOLR-1131, something important just came to mind. If we
allow poly fields to add fields to the schema (be it via dynamic fields, or
explicit field decls, either way), then we introduce a disconnect
I think it is the job of the cloud branch to merge to trunk when ready. I
don't feel strongly about it, but I suspect that applying patches to both all
the time would just complicate things for the people working on the cloud
branch, but I don't feel all that strong about it.
On Dec 11, 2009,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.orgwrote:
I think it is the job of the cloud branch to merge to trunk when ready. I
don't feel strongly about it, but I suspect that applying patches to both
all the time would just complicate things for the people working on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789236#action_12789236
]
Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1644:
--
Don't you have it already with the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789240#action_12789240
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1131:
---
{quote}
Quick comment based on a spot check
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789241#action_12789241
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1131:
---
I've got a patch almost ready that brings in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-1644:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1644.patch
A new Map is kept is ResponseBuilder. It is also possible to use
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789259#action_12789259
]
Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1644:
--
It should also be possible to share objects between
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-1644:
-
Comment: was deleted
(was:
bq.)
Provide a clean way to keep flags and helper objects in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789269#action_12789269
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1644:
--
bq.
Provide a clean way to keep flags and helper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789271#action_12789271
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1644:
--
bq.I guess this can be supported by publishing the key
I would say you *certainly* don't have to. But anyone that's willing
to, +1 :)
Someone will have to do it. The merge back to trunk will be easy,
because we will be periodicly merging trunk to cloud.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Dec 11, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Shalin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789290#action_12789290
]
Uri Boness commented on SOLR-1644:
--
bq. We should not keep it static. public final should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Akshay K. Ukey updated SOLR-1358:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1358.patch
Patch with test case, tika parser configurable via parser attribute
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789300#action_12789300
]
Akshay K. Ukey edited comment on SOLR-1358 at 12/11/09 1:23 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789302#action_12789302
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1621:
---
I'd like to take a quick look - will report back.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul resolved SOLR-1358.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
committed r889613
Thanks Akshay
Integration of Tika and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar updated SOLR-1177:
Attachment: SOLR-1177.patch
# Based on Matt's patch
# Synced to trunk
# Uses
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1139?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar reassigned SOLR-1139:
---
Assignee: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
SolrJ TermsComponent Query and Response
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789330#action_12789330
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-1131:
-
Hi Grant:
bq.The array is sorted and
Hi Grant:
By declaring the poly field, you are declaring the dynamic field. I don't see
why this leads to drift. Sure, it is an abstraction and their are Lucene
fields that will be created under the hood, but that is one of the primary
features of Solr, it hides all that mess.
Actually if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789334#action_12789334
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1177:
The facet component internally uses long to add up
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J)
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov wrote:
Actually if it was the case that poly field mapped to a single dynamic
field, then I would agree with you, but as is the discussion, poly field can
map to _many_ dynamic fields, which is where the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789336#action_12789336
]
Matt Weber commented on SOLR-1177:
--
Thanks for the update Yonik! I will see if I can get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789339#action_12789339
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1131:
---
{quote}
I'm wondering what there is to agree
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789342#action_12789342
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-1131:
-
bq. Speed and memory.
Unfortunately,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789351#action_12789351
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1131:
---
bq. Unfortunately, it's at the cost of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789354#action_12789354
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-1131:
-
bq. Maybe. It took me all of 30 seconds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789379#action_12789379
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-1632:
I didn't look a the patch, but from your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789381#action_12789381
]
Marc Menghin commented on SOLR-236:
---
Hi,
new to Solr, so sorry for my likely still
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated SOLR-1131:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1131.patch
OK, this is getting a lot closer to ready to commit.
Changes:
#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789418#action_12789418
]
Ankul Garg commented on SOLR-1316:
--
Shouldn't we be creating a separate
FYI...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.org
Date: December 11, 2009 2:20:50 PM GMT+01:00
To: annou...@apache.org, priv...@hc.apache.org, d...@hc.apache.org,
httpclient-us...@hc.apache.org
Subject: [ANNOUNCEMENT] HttpComponents HttpClient 4.0.1 (GA) Released
There are, in fact, updates to many of Solr's dependencies that we should
consider. I like the sound of 5-10% perf. improvement in HttpClient...
-Grant
On Dec 11, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Erik Hatcher wrote:
FYI...
Begin forwarded message:
From: Oleg Kalnichevski ol...@apache.org
Date:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789439#action_12789439
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1621:
---
You've deprecated handleAliasAction, but you have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789443#action_12789443
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1621:
---
Also, its confusing the way the Alias test is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789447#action_12789447
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-1621:
---
Lastly : there are a couple little unrelated changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-1621:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1621.patch
You mark setSolrConfigFilename as deprecated, but it simply doesn't work
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-1621:
--
Attachment: SOLR-1621.patch
This patch reinstates a fix for the SolrDispatcher config name override so
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789467#action_12789467
]
Mark Miller edited comment on SOLR-1621 at 12/11/09 7:13 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris A. Mattmann updated SOLR-1131:
Attachment: SOLR-1131.Mattmann.121109.patch.txt
OK, this is getting a lot closer to ready
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789484#action_12789484
]
Chris A. Mattmann edited comment on SOLR-1131 at 12/11/09 7:39 PM:
: : I think the initial geosearch feature can start off with
: : str10,20/str for a point.
:
: +1.
:
: Fundamentally, how is a string a point?
Fundementally a string is not a point, and a point is not a string -- but
if you want express the concept of a point in a manner that only uses
: themselves ... because of the back-ass-wards way we have FieldTypes write
: their values directly to an XMLWriter or a TextWriter the idea of using an
: object that stringifies itself as needed doesn't really apply very well
:
: I think it's rather powerful. You insulate the following
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1387:
---
Summary: Add more search options for filtering field facets. (was: Add
more search options for filtering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anil Khadka updated SOLR-1387:
--
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Affects Version/s: (was: 1.4)
Add more search options for filtering
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789526#action_12789526
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1131:
---
I think this is ready to commit. I'd like to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned SOLR-1297:
-
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
Enable sorting by Function Query
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Work on SOLR-1297 started by Grant Ingersoll.
Enable sorting by Function Query
Key: SOLR-1297
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789550#action_12789550
]
Chad Kouse edited comment on SOLR-236 at 12/11/09 9:37 PM:
---
Just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789550#action_12789550
]
Chad Kouse commented on SOLR-236:
-
Just wanted to comment that I am experiencing the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1297?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789551#action_12789551
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-1297:
---
For this, I think we want to be able to do
Hi Hoss,
: : I think the initial geosearch feature can start off with
: : str10,20/str for a point.
:
: +1.
:
: Fundamentally, how is a string a point?
Fundementally a string is not a point, and a point is not a string -- but
if you want express the concept of a point in a manner
Add human content-type
--
Key: SOLR-1645
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1645
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib - Solr Cell (Tika extraction)
Affects Versions: 1.4
Hi Hoss,
: I think it's rather powerful. You insulate the following variations into 1
: single place to change them (FieldType):
:
: * output representation
: * indexing
: * validation
:
: To remove this from FieldType would be to strew the same functionality
: across multiple classes,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789561#action_12789561
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-1131:
-
Hi Grant:
{quote}
My tests show it to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1506?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789600#action_12789600
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on SOLR-1506:
There's a different bug here, where because
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1632?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789607#action_12789607
]
Andrzej Bialecki commented on SOLR-1632:
-
I believe the API that I propose would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Matt Weber updated SOLR-1177:
-
Attachment: SOLR-1177.patch
Here is an updated patch that includes Shalin's suggestions:
- replace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789675#action_12789675
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1621:
--
bq.You mark setSolrConfigFilename as deprecated, but it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1592?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789678#action_12789678
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-1592:
-
Ok, never mind.
Refactor XMLWriter startTag to
Document the SOLR XML response schema in XMLSchema and DTD
--
Key: SOLR-1646
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1646
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Rename XMLWriter (and XMLResponseWriter) to SolrXmlResponseWriter
-
Key: SOLR-1648
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1648
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789682#action_12789682
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-1648:
-
See this thread for more detail:
Refactor all ResponseWriters to be more extension-friendly
--
Key: SOLR-1649
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1649
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
There are already components (ExtractingRequestHandler, Deduplication)
that secretly add fields which violate the schema. Personally I would
nuke this ability; I've had major problems with junk in the indexed
data and discovering secret fields would have made my head explode
that much louder.
On
Hi Lance,
On 12/11/09 9:08 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
There are already components (ExtractingRequestHandler, Deduplication)
that secretly add fields which violate the schema. Personally I would
nuke this ability; I've had major problems with junk in the indexed
data and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1637?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Noble Paul reassigned SOLR-1637:
Assignee: Noble Paul
Deprecate ALIAS command
---
Key:
They don't violate the schema, do they? The fields added from both
of those (and DIH too) all must be either fields or match dynamic
field patterns. Right?
Erik
On Dec 12, 2009, at 6:08 AM, Lance Norskog wrote:
There are already components (ExtractingRequestHandler,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1621?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12789689#action_12789689
]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1621:
--
I guess deprecating ALIAS can be committed first so
Hello,
I have a webapp on Tomcat that displays search results to the end users . I
have a Solr instance on the same linux box that has data indexed .
The webapp wraps an instance of CommonHTTPSolrServer presumably to send
HTTP requests to the Solr instance , now if Solr has indexed documents ,
78 matches
Mail list logo
