[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12855079#action_12855079
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1163:
I vote for a separate war: primarily because i think it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1801?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853445#action_12853445
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1801:
I'm really not sure what the 'bug here is. There are lots
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853447#action_12853447
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1553:
Jonathan: looking at the code, it seems completely
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1860?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12853679#action_12853679
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1860:
bq. I like the idea of an export - it's transparent and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1842?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851945#action_12851945
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1842:
Yeah, i don't know anything about ODBC, but it seems odd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851092#action_12851092
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1848:
I'm confused by yonik's comment...
bq .What's the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12851131#action_12851131
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1848:
Agreed: as we start adding sections, it will maek a lot of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man reopened SOLR-1672:
reopening ... not sure why it was marked resolved
RFE: facet reverse sort count
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12849755#action_12849755
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1672:
Some old notes on this patch that i just found on my laptop
Remove support for (broken) abortOnConfigurationError
-
Key: SOLR-1846
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1846
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Hoss
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1846:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1846.patch
Attached patch should get us to a good point to tackle some of the related
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1846:
---
Description:
Setting abortOnConfigurationError==false has not worked for some time, and
based on a POLL of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1832.
Resolution: Won't Fix
abortOnConfigurationError=false no longer works for most plugin types
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12848946#action_12848946
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1834:
Anders: I only had a few moments to skim your patch, but it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1823?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1823.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Assignee: Hoss Man
Nice catch Frank.
FWIW: the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847166#action_12847166
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1824:
Scratch that -- i get it now:
* IndexSchem uses anonymous
abortOnConfigurationError=false no longer works for most plugin types
-
Key: SOLR-1832
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1832
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1832?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847170#action_12847170
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1832:
This seems to be a result of switching away from the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847174#action_12847174
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1817:
I started looking a little more closely at the singleton
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12847177#action_12847177
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1817:
Tangential Comment...
If we *do* decide that it's worth
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1743.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 923909.
NOTE: since this bug was introduced after 1.4, and since i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846061#action_12846061
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1817:
Hey mark: i've only had a chance to skim your patch so far,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846217#action_12846217
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1817:
Some rore comments now that i've read things a little more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846227#action_12846227
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1817:
bq. this is part of the big open issue I think is left here
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846230#action_12846230
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1817:
Ugh... lots of cross talk, sorry still procesisng some of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846235#action_12846235
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1824:
Can someone point me to a method name and/or line number?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12846237#action_12846237
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1817:
bq. That is the issue where that possible NPE is - getting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12845691#action_12845691
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1803:
Lance: i agree that the current semantics are either poorly
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1743:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1743.restore14behavior.patch
Ok, I've been doing some more testing...
First off: a lot of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1815?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1815:
---
Description:
Using Solrj, I wanted to sort the response of a range query based on some
specific labels. For
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1808.
Resolution: Not A Problem
As mark said: IndexReaders are refcounted (regardless of whether they come from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843356#action_12843356
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1807:
No all plugin APIs are created equal ... some like
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12843373#action_12843373
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1743:
bq. Okay, I sat down and thought about what we should do
Possible perf improvement in UnInvertedField by using syncronizing on
CreationPlaceholder
-
Key: SOLR-1805
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1805
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839812#action_12839812
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1772:
bq. I'd almost rather see the default behavior changed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1553:
---
Attachment: edismax.unescapedcolon.bug.test.patch
On the train this past weekend i started trying to tackle
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1553:
---
Attachment: edismax.userFields.patch
FWIW: initial steps towards adding a uf param to let users specify what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1796?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1796.
Resolution: Not A Problem
Lucene 2.9.1-dev jars were used by Solr trunk temporarily during the vote of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839909#action_12839909
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1752:
Long term, we could evolve the Solr XML Update format to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839914#action_12839914
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1553:
bq. What does u in uf stand for?
user fields ... as in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839928#action_12839928
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1750:
Committed revision 917812.
I went ahead and commited the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1750:
---
Summary: SystemInfoRequestHandler - replacement for stats.jsp and
registry.jsp (was:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839943#action_12839943
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1797:
NOTE: Initial thread where Yonik had some more comments
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12839948#action_12839948
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1743:
Mark: i'm confused by your comments/patch
I applied your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1802?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1802:
---
Description:
When an IndexReaderFactory returns an instance of MultiReader, various places
in Solr try to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840014#action_12840014
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1743:
No worries dude .. i don't really even understand how it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1743:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1743.patch
Ok, here's my attempt at making sense of this.
As far as i can tell this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840021#action_12840021
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1743:
G... ignore that last patch, it changes the default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1743:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1743.patch
I think i give up.
First off: sorry mark, this comment was way off base...
bq.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12840045#action_12840045
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1743:
Okay now i'm just going to rant...
Document peculiar behavior of TestHarness.LocalRequestFactory
-
Key: SOLR-1792
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1792
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1792:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1792.patch
patch ... i would have already committed this but SVN seems to be down.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1792?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1792.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 915637.
Document peculiar behavior of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1776.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed revision 915646.
dismax
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1776:
---
Description: the DismaxQParser (and ExtendedDismaxQParser) is completely
useless w/o specifying the qf param,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836930#action_12836930
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1687:
bq. Traditionally, this type of stuff is delegated to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1772?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12836933#action_12836933
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1772:
Actually my point is that the new FieldTypes make it
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1786?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1786:
---
Fix Version/s: 1.5
marking Fix for 1.5 -- we shouldn't release w/o either moving forward or
rollingback the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835334#action_12835334
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1695:
Doh!
Note to self: don't just run the tests, remember to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835364#action_12835364
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1695:
Hmmm ok so the reason the legacy test passed prior to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835373#action_12835373
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1695:
bq. schema.xml does not require the id field, and the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1695.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 911595.
rolledback the changes to DocumentBuilder and improved the
existence of exactly one value for uniqueKey field is not checked when
overwrite=false or allowDups=true
Key: SOLR-1780
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1777?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835424#action_12835424
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1777:
Yonik: just to be verify: was this bug was introduced in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12834938#action_12834938
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1365:
The constraints on what can be SolrCoreAware exist for two
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-741?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835008#action_12835008
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-741:
---
bq. With the introduction of Trie fields is it not irrelevant
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-270?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-270.
---
Resolution: Fixed
This was fixed at some point as a side effect of some other change.
dismax handler should
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1679?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1679.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed revision 911216.
Thanks
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1695.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Assignee: Hoss Man
Committed revision 911228.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1695:
---
Summary: Missleading error message when adding docs with missing/multiple
value(s) for uniqueKey field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12835075#action_12835075
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1687:
Hmmm... QParser.getSort is where the current
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1687?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1687:
---
Attachment: SOLR-1687.patch
patch with the logic i attempted to describe. it doesn't contain any Unit
Tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-397:
--
Description: Date faceting should support configuration for controlling how
edge boundaries are dealt with.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12834597#action_12834597
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-397:
---
Additional idea that i like much better then the interval idea
dismax should treate schema's default field as a default qf
---
Key: SOLR-1776
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1776
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1579?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1579.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Hoss Man (was: Erik Hatcher)
I fully expect stats.jsp will be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1008:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 1.4)
1.5
Note: the fix included in Solr 1.4 was not actually
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1771?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1771.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Hoss Man
I'm not convinced that the wording of the new error message is
UpdateProcessor to prune empty values
---
Key: SOLR-1772
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1772
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: Hoss Man
Users seem to frequently get
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-534?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12832333#action_12832333
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-534:
---
bq. But if you use the REALLY_BIG_NUMBER approach, the same
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1765:
---
Component/s: (was: multicore)
(was: search)
Description:
When searching across
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1742?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1742.
Resolution: Duplicate
the string dependency for QueryElevationComponent does seem to be the root of
the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829747#action_12829747
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1743:
We definitely shouldn't be generating a missing core name
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829769#action_12829769
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1754:
The reason we never explicitly tested the input value was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829773#action_12829773
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1750:
bq. Any thoughts on the naming of this beast?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1750?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man updated SOLR-1750:
---
Attachment: SystemStatsRequestHandler.java
Some updates to Erik's previous version...
# adds everything from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1754?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12829902#action_12829902
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1754:
The second array you are talking about only exists if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12828835#action_12828835
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1677:
bq. I guess I could care less what the default is, if you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12828842#action_12828842
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1718:
bq. Consider the JIRA interface we are using to comment on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12828846#action_12828846
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1729:
Peter: I think you may have misconstrued my comments --
debug output should include explanation of what input strings were passed to
the analzyers for each field
-
Key: SOLR-1749
URL:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1749?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=1282#action_1282
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1749:
This is an idea that's been rolling arround in my head for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1739?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hoss Man resolved SOLR-1739.
Resolution: Not A Problem
w/o knowing more details about your schema, this seems to be working exactly as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12806616#action_12806616
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1603:
{quote}
the output is a complex Perl data structure with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12805167#action_12805167
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1677:
bq. And here are the JIRA issues for stemming bugs, since
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1603?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12805186#action_12805186
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1603:
I realize this is analogous to the python, php, and ruby
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1718?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12805190#action_12805190
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1718:
I don't understand what you mean. both forms use a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12805247#action_12805247
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1725:
Some random comments/questions from the peanut gallery...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12805291#action_12805291
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1728:
Noble: your issue description is a bit terse, so i'm a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1729?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12805313#action_12805313
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1729:
bq. (e.g. they are in a different time-zone, not
1 - 100 of 965 matches
Mail list logo