Yes, I'm using 1.1. The example in my last email is an expected result,
not the real result. Indeed I didn't see the arr element in the
highlighting element when either prefix wildcard or true wildcard query
is used.
I just tried nightly build, as you said, it works great except for
prefix
Hi all,
At first, lucene user for years, I should really thanks you for Solr.
For a start, I wrote a little results writer for an app. It works like
what I understand of Solr, except a strange exception I'm not able to
puzzle.
Version : fresh subversion.
1. Class
2. stacktrace
3. maybe
I am an absolute noob to solr and I am trying out the Solr tutorial
present at http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
In the tutorial, post.jar is mentioned but I don't find post.jar
anywhere. I downloaded the solr tarball from
On 6/6/07, Frédéric Glorieux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't figure why, but when writer.write(HEAD) is executed, I see code
from StandardRequestHandler executed 2 times in the debugger, first is
OK, second hasn't the q parameter.
I don't know why that would be... what is the client sending
Hi,
Three questions:
1. I want to use solr for some sort of live search, querying with
incomplete terms + wildcard and getting any similar results. Radioh*
would return anything containing that string. The DisMax req. hander
doesn't accept wildcards in the q param so i'm trying the simple
I have a similar question about dismax, here is what Chris said:
the dismax handler uses a much more simplified query syntax then the
standard request handler. Only +, -, and are special characters so
wildcards are not supported.
HTH
-Original Message-
From: galo [mailto:[EMAIL
At 4:40 PM +0100 6/6/07, galo wrote:
1. I want to use solr for some sort of live search, querying with incomplete
terms + wildcard and getting any similar results. Radioh* would return
anything containing that string. The DisMax req. hander doesn't accept
wildcards in the q param so i'm trying
Yeah i thought of that solution but this is a 20G index with each
document having around 300 or those numbers so i was a bit worried about
the performance.. I'll try anyway, thanks!
On 06/06/07, *Yonik Seeley* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 6/6/07, galo [EMAIL
Thanks for answer,
I'm feeling less guilty.
I don't see a non-null default for HEAD/FOOT... perhaps
do if (HEAD!=null) writer.write(HEAD);
There may be an issue with how you register in solrconfig.xml
I get every thing I want from solrconfig.xml, I was suspecting some
classloader
Ok further to my email below i've been testing with q=radioh?*
Basically the problem is, searching artists even with Radiohead having a
big boost, it's returning stuff with less boost before like
Radiohead+Ani Di Franco or Radiohead+Michael Stipe
The debug output is below, but basically, for
: I am an absolute noob to solr and I am trying out the Solr tutorial
: present at http://lucene.apache.org/solr/tutorial.html
there is a big blurb on that tutorial URL attempting to point out that it
is for a nightly release (version 1.1.2007.05.29.12.05.29) and that you
should refer to the
I've found the problem.
The Context attribute path needed to be set:
Context path=/solr docBase=/users/mp15/solr.war debug=0
crossContext=true
Environment name=solr/home type=java.lang.String
value=/Users/mp15/solr override=true/
/Context
-Original Message-
From: Park, Michael
I'm baffled.
Would it be possible for you to send a scaled down (but compilable)
version of your response writer that demonstrates the problem, along with
a snippet that can be added to the example solrconfig.xml to register it
and and example request URL that triggers the problem?
that way we
: I have a local version of DisMax which parameterizes the escaping so
: certain operators can be allowed through, which I'd be happy to
: contribute to you or the codebase, but I expect SimpleRH may be a better
That sounds like it would be a really usefull patch if you be interested
in posting
: Yes, I'm using 1.1. The example in my last email is an expected result,
: not the real result. Indeed I didn't see the arr element in the
: highlighting element when either prefix wildcard or true wildcard query
Hmmm... yes, i'm sorry i wasn't thinking clearly -- that makes sense since
in 1.1
Ah i was missunderstanding your goal of doctypes ... the use case i
was thinking is that you have book documents and movie documents
and you frequently only query on one type of the other but sometime you do
a generic query on all of them using the fields they have in common.
this is
: I've found the problem.
:
: The Context attribute path needed to be set:
:
: Context path=/solr docBase=/users/mp15/solr.war debug=0
Michael, i don't really know much about tomcat, but is this becuase you
had a single config file for all context (the examples on our wiki suggest
that tomcat
Hi Chris,
No. I set up a separate file, same as the wiki.
It's either a tomcat version issue or a difference between how tomcat on
my Win laptop is configured vs. the configuration on our tomcat Unix
machine.
I intend to run multiple instances of solr in production and wanted to
use the
I'm baffled.
[Yonic]
I don't know why that would be... what is the client sending the request?
If it gets an error, does it retry or something?
Good !
It's the favicon.ico effect.
Nothing in logs when the class is resquested from curl, but with a
browser (here Opera), begin a response with
Frédéric Glorieux a écrit :
I'm baffled.
[Yonic]
I don't know why that would be... what is the client sending the
request?
If it gets an error, does it retry or something?
Good !
Nothing in logs when the class is resquested from curl,
Sorry, same idea, but it's a CSS link.
--
: It's the favicon.ico effect.
: Nothing in logs when the class is resquested from curl, but with a
: browser (here Opera), begin a response with html, and it requests for
: favicon.ico.
HA HA HA HA that's freaking hilarious.
One way to avoid that might be to register a NOOP request
Hi, Hoss.
I have a number of things I'd like to post... but the generally-useful stuff is
unfortunately a bit interwoven with the special-case stuff, and I need to get
out of breathing-down-my-back deadline mode to find the time to separate them,
clean up and comment, make test cases, etc.
: Here is what I found on the Apache site about this:
...i think you are refering to...
http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.0-doc/config/context.html
..correct? it definitely seems to be something that was changed in 5.5.
Note the added sentence in the 5.5 docs...
The value of this field
I made a plugin that has a Tokenizer, its Factory, a
Filter and its Factory. I modified example/solr/conf/schema.xml
to use these Factories.
Following
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrPlugins
I placed the plugin jar in the top level lib and ran
the start.jar. I got:
This is about Solr 1.1.0 running on Win XP w/JDK 1.5.
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Teruhiko Kurosaka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 5:32 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Where to put my plugins?
I made a plugin that has a Tokenizer, its
If the example is in:
C:\workspace\solr\example
Try putting you custom .jar in:
C:\workspace\solr\example\solr\lib
Check the README in solr home:
C:\workspace\solr\example\solr\README.txt
This directory is optional. If it exists, Solr will load any Jars
found in this directory and use them
Ryan,
Thank you.
But creating lib under example/solr and placing
my plugin jar there yielded the same error of
not able to locate
org/apache/solr/analysis/BaseTokenizerFactory
How can this be
-kuro
Never mind. My mistake. I still had a copy of the jar in ext dir.
After cleaning it up, it's now loading my plugin.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH!
-Original Message-
From: Teruhiko Kurosaka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2007 5:58 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
On Jun 6, 2007, at 5:32 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
: It's the favicon.ico effect.
: Nothing in logs when the class is resquested from curl, but with a
: browser (here Opera), begin a response with html, and it
requests for
: favicon.ico.
HA HA HA HA that's freaking hilarious.
One
Hi,
I'm having trouble using a * wildcard after a term in a search. It does not
seem to match 0 or more, but rather something more, as long as it's not
nothing. This is using the standard query handler, by the way.
Examples:
Search for theatr* = returns 112 results, for things named 'theatre'
anyone agree?
Next solr's development 's plan is? anyone know?
--
regards
jl
On 6/6/07, James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone agree?
No ;-)
At least not if you mean using map-reduce for queries.
When I started looking at distributed search, I immediately went and
read the map-reduce paper (easier concept than it first appeared), and
realized it's really more for
On 6/6/07, Nigel McNie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having trouble using a * wildcard after a term in a search. It does not
seem to match 0 or more, but rather something more, as long as it's not
nothing. This is using the standard query handler, by the way.
Examples:
Search for theatr* =
I've been exploring distributed search, as of late. I don't know about the
next solr but I could certainly see a distributed solr grow out of such
an expansion.
In terms of the FederatedSearch wiki entry (updated last year), has there
been any progress made this year on this topic, at least
2007/6/7, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/6/07, James liu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
anyone agree?
No ;-)
At least not if you mean using map-reduce for queries.
When I started looking at distributed search, I immediately went and
read the map-reduce paper (easier concept than it first
On 6/6/07, Jeff Rodenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In terms of the FederatedSearch wiki entry (updated last year), has there
been any progress made this year on this topic, at least something worthy of
being added or updated to the wiki page?
Priorities shifted, and I dropped it for a while.
I
36 matches
Mail list logo
