On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Mark N nipen.m...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it possible to write nested queries in Solr similar to sql like query
where I can take results of the first query and use one or more of its
fields as an argument in the second query.
That sounds like a join. If so, the
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Jörg Agatz joerg.ag...@googlemail.comwrote:
Hallo Users...
At the Moment i test MultiCorae Solr, but i cant search in more than one
core direktly..
Exist a way to use multiindex, 3-5 Indizes in one core ans search direkty
in
all? ore only in one?
You
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 12:33 AM, AHMET ARSLAN iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
That'd be great. Please open an issue in Jira and attach a
patch. See
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
Hi Shalin,
I opened an issue (SOLR-1604) and attached a patch as well as a maven
project to enable
hi shalin
I am trying to achieve something like JOIN. Previously am doing this with
two queries on solr
solr index = ( field1 ,field 2, field3)
query1 = ( for example field1=ABC )
suppose query1 returns results set1= { 1, 2 ,3 ,4 } which matches query1
query2 = ( get all records having
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:14 PM, jmsm jtr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, All.
I have a problem regarding intensive query requesting.
I'm using SolrJ client through http in the client side and Solr 1.4 and
tomcat 6.0.20 on the server side.
My purpose is to execute 3 different queries for each
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:02 PM, Mark N nipen.m...@gmail.com wrote:
hi shalin
I am trying to achieve something like JOIN. Previously am doing this with
two queries on solr
solr index = ( field1 ,field 2, field3)
query1 = ( for example field1=ABC )
suppose query1 returns results set1=
field2=xyz we dont know until we run query1
To simply i was actually trying to do some kind of JOIN similar to following
SQL query
select * from table1 where *field2* in
( select *field2 *from dbo.concept_db where field1='ABC' )
if this is not possible then i will have to search inner
thanks for your help so do you think I should execute solr queries twice ?
or is there any other workarounds
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 3:07 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Mark N nipen.m...@gmail.com wrote:
field2=xyz we dont know
I don't know the use-case so I cannot suggest anything. Solr is different
from relational databases and techniques which are taken for granted in the
RDBMS world are usually not required or have bad performance
characteristics. You shouldn't try to solve problems the same way in solr
and
Hi I have a problem with phrase search.
If I search test then tests is also coming in search result.
Please help me ...
My schema continues...
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
Hi all
I searched through the mail-list archives and saw that sometime ago Toby
Cole was going to integrate a spellchecker named Spelt into Solr. Does
anyone now what's the status of this? Anyone tried to use it with Solr? Does
it make sense to try it instead of standard spell checker?
Some
Shameless plug here if you're having trouble grasping the schema and
differences from relational databases then I think you'll find my book helpful
(chapter 2).
https://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/book
~ David Smiley
From: Mark
Hey everyone,
I'm what one would probably call a beginner with Solr. I have my data loaded
in and I am getting the hang of querying things. However, I'm still rather
unclear as to how the score can be affected by various parameters. I'm using
the dismax request handler, and I just don't quite get
I think the problem here is that underlying WordDelimiterFactory
is StandardTokenizer, at least that's what I infer from here:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/AnalyzersTokenizersTokenFilters#solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
I got it running. -Dsolr.solr.home=c:\web\solr is needed.
Thanks all for the help,
Jill
-Original Message-
From: dipti khullar [mailto:dipti.khul...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2009 11:01 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: configure solr
X-HOSTLOC:
You didn't say what field you're searching on, but if it's any
field with one of the stemmers involved, then this is expected
behavior. That is, test and tests are both stemmed to
test. I do see SnowballPorterFilterFactory in your schema,
so this is what I'd check first
Think carefully about
All,
I have a quick question for anyone with an idea how to solve this. We have
times when our users don¹t put spaces between words. So for instance
³airmax² returns 0 results but ³air max² has at least 100 results. Other
than adding to the synonyms file every time, is there a more
Thanks Otis for the reply. Yes this will be pretty memory intensive.
The size of the index is 5 cores with a maximum of 500K documents each
core. I did search the archives before but did not find any definite
answer. Thanks again!
Alex
On Nov 27, 2009, at 11:09 PM, Otis Gospodnetic
Yes. code I posted in first thread does work. And I am able to retrieve data
from the document index. did you include all required jars in deployed solr
application's lib folder? what errors are you seeing?
Juan Pedro Danculovic wrote:
HI! does your example finally works? I index the data
Any suggestion/pointers on this?
javaxmlsoapdev wrote:
Is there an API to upload files over one connection versus looping through
all the files and creating new ContentStreamUpdateRequest for each file.
This, as expected, doesn't work if there are large number of files and
quickly run into
Shalin,
Thanks for your suggestion. A few questions though:
1. Are Mutli-valued fields essential to denormalizing the database in indexes?
2. What is the role of documents tag in data-config xml file?
3. How does SolrJ or any other framework convert the returned results back into
an object
I have a quick question for anyone with an idea how to
solve this. We have
times when our users don¹t put spaces between words.
So for instance
³airmax² returns 0 results but ³air max² has at least
100 results. Other
than adding to the synonyms file every time, is there a
more
I have a requirement where I am indexing attachements. Attachements hang off
of a database entity(table). I also need to include some meta-data info from
the database table as part of the index. Trying to find best way to
implement using custom handler or something? where custom handler gets all
Hi Andrew,
We ended up abandoning the spelt integration as the built in solr
spellchecking improved so much during our project. Also, if you did go
the route of using spelt, I'd implement it as a spellcheck plugin
(which didn't exist as a concept when we started trying to shoehorn
spelt
I got solr running on the tomcat server,
http://localhost:8080/solr/admin/
After I enter a search word, such as, solr, then hit Search button, it
will go to
http://localhost:8080/solr/select/?q=solrversion=2.2start=0rows=10in
dent=on
and display
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
-
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 9:55 PM, Jill Han jill@alverno.edu wrote:
I got solr running on the tomcat server,
http://localhost:8080/solr/admin/
After I enter a search word, such as, solr, then hit Search button, it
will go to
Hello,
While my current implementation of searching on a map works, rendering
hundreds of markers in an embedded Google map tends to slow browsers on
slower computers (or fast computers running internet explorer :\) down
to a crawl. I'm looking into generating tiles with the markers rendered
And of course Heritrix http://crawler.archive.org/
I think this one's quite cool. You'll see example usage in my book.
~ David Smiley
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/
On Nov 26, 2009, at 5:01 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote:
On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 1:54 PM,
Thanks a lot Patrick. I think your solution may work for my needs as well.
-Brad
2009/11/26 Patrick Jungermann patrick.jungerm...@googlemail.com
Hi Brad,
I was trying this, too, and there is a possibility how to get multi-term
synonyms to work properly. I wrote my solution already on this
book? i order Solr 1.4 today, i see some examples in this book?
Start reading midway page 224.
Additionally, you might want to get the online supplement available at
packtpub.com.
FYI my co-author Eric Pugh wrote the last 3 chapters which includes this.
~ David
On Nov 30, 2009, at 1:37 PM, Jörg Agatz wrote:
book? i order Solr 1.4 today, i see some
Hey folks. I wrote a piece comparing Solr and database based text search.
It's obviously pro-Solr ;-) Of course if you're reading this then you're
already drinking the cool-aid, so to speak, but you may find this article
interesting.
Hi,
I created a brand new core (on Solr 1.4), added a few documents and then
searched for *:*, but got no results. Strangely enough, if I search for a
specific document I know is in the index, like say versionId:3, I get the
expected result.
Any ideas on why that might be?
Thank,
Gio.
Add debugQuery=on to give you clues.
~ David Smiley
Author: http://www.packtpub.com/solr-1-4-enterprise-search-server/
On Nov 30, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade wrote:
Hi,
I created a brand new core (on Solr 1.4), added a few documents and then
searched for *:*, but got no
Hmm. When I include debugQuery=on I get two results (which is accurate):
result name=response numFound=2 start=0
Otherwise I get
result name=response numFound=0 start=0/
Why would you get different results with debugging on? Does anything look
peculiar here?
lst name=debug
str
Folks:
Reading the wiki, I saw the following statement:
Force a fetchindex on slave from master command :
http://slave_host:port/solr/replication?command=fetchindex
It is possible to pass on extra attribute 'masterUrl' or other attributes
like 'compression' (or any other parameter which
I'm working on replacing a custom, internal search implementation with
Solr. I'm having great success, with one small exception.
When implementing our version of faceting, one of our facets had a
peculiar sort order. It was dictated by the order in which the field
occurred in the results. The
Folks:
I do not want to hardcode the masterUrl in the solrconfig.xml of my slave. If
the masterUrl tag is missing from the config file, I am getting an exception in
solr saying that the masterUrl is required. So I set it to some dummy value,
comment out the poll interval element, and issue
Folks:
Sorry for this repost! It looks like this email went out twice
Thanks,
- Bill
--
From: William Pierce evalsi...@hotmail.com
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2009 1:47 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: How to avoid hardcoding
Ok, I think I figured out what might be happening. It appears that the
DataImporter issues the commit command without the expungeDeletes option set
to true (default in 1.4 for a commit command is for expungeDeletes to be set
to false). You can get around this by issuing the commit command
: Coming in a bit late but I would like a variant that is not a No-OP.
: Think of something like title:searchstring^10 OR catch_all:searchstring
: Of course I can always add the boosting at query time but it would make
: life easier if I could define a default boost in the schema so that my
:
: I am talking about field boosting rather than document boosting, ie. I
: would like some fields (say eg. title) to be louder than others,
: across ALL documents. I believe you are at least partially talking
: about document boosting, which clearly applies on a per-document basis.
index time
: I'm working on replacing a custom, internal search implementation with
: Solr. I'm having great success, with one small exception.
...
: For example, if a search yielded 10 results, 1 - 10, and hit 1 is in
: category 'Toys', hit 2 through 9 are in 'Sports' and the last is in
:
I do something very similar and it works for me. I noticed on your URL that
you have a mixed case fetchIndex, which the request handler is checking for
fetchindex, all lowercase. If it is not that simple I can try to see the exact
url my code is generating.
Hope it helps,
Joe
From:
Hi, Joe:
I tried with the fetchIndex all lower-cased, and still the same result.
What do you specify for masterUrl in the solrconfig.xml on the slave? it
seems to me that if I remove the element, I get the exception I wrote
about. If I set it to some dummy url, then I get an invalid url
On Nov 30, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
All of Solr's existing faceting code is based on the DocSet which is an
unordered set of all matching documents -- i suspect your existing
application only reordered the facets based on their appearance in the
first N docs (possibly just
: thanks for your help so do you think I should execute solr queries twice ?
: or is there any other workarounds
http://people.apache.org/~hossman/#xyproblem
XY Problem
Your question appears to be an XY Problem ... that is: you are dealing
with X, you are assuming Y will help you, and you are
Are you sure you're hitting the same core? Did a commit? Are you
possibly using the dismax query parser (where *:* is fairly
meaningless)?
Erik
On Nov 30, 2009, at 3:54 PM, Giovanni Fernandez-Kincade wrote:
Hi,
I created a brand new core (on Solr 1.4), added a few documents and
remove the lst name=slave section from your solrconfig. It should be fine
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:59 AM, William Pierce evalsi...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi, Joe:
I tried with the fetchIndex all lower-cased, and still the same result.
What do you specify for masterUrl in the solrconfig.xml on the
49 matches
Mail list logo
