You did not supply your actual query. Try to add a q=foobar parameter, also
you don't need a before shards since you have the ?.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Training in Europe - www.solrtraining.com
On 1. sep. 2010, at 20.14, Ma, Xiaohui
Hi,
This smells like a job for Hadoop and perhaps Mahout, unless your use cases are
totally ad-hoc research.
After Nutch has fetched the sites, kick off some MapReduce jobs for each case
you wish to study:
1. Extract phrases/contexts
2. For each context, perform detection and whitelisting
3. In
Thanks Steven and Jonathan, we got it working by using a combination of
quoting and the PositionFilterFactory, like is shown below. The
documentation for the position filter doesn't make much sense without
understanding more about how positioning of tokens is taken into account,
but it appears to
If you really want to see performance, try external DRAM disks. Whew! 800X
faster than a disk.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Thu, 9/2/10, Shawn
Hi there,
Im having some issues with my relevancy of some results. I have 5 fields,
with varying boost values and being copied into a copyfield text which is
used to be searched on
field name=i_title type=alphaOnlySort indexed=true stored=true
omitNorms=false/
field name=i_authors
I don't have any fancy links, but from the documentation shingles make
pretty good sense.
You typically tokenize an input string so that the best apple pie becomes
the best apple pie, so that each term can then be filtered to remove
stop words, take off plurals and suffixes like ing, etc. The
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 03:45 +0200, Shawn Heisey wrote:
On 9/2/2010 2:54 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
We've done a fair amount of experimentation in this area (1997-era SSDs
vs. two 15.000 RPM harddisks in RAID 1 vs. two 10.000 RPM harddisks in
RAID 0). The harddisk setups never stood a chance
Hi,
When I take the two letters from the middle of a word and put the first
in place of the second and the second in place of the first, ex : jospin
= jopsin, I don't get any suggestion from the spellchecker component.
I tryed the default algorithm and the Jaro Winkler Distance, with a
I'm writing a client using SolrJ and was wondering how to handle a multi
core installation. We want to use the facility to rebuild the index on one
of the cores at a scheduled time and then use the SWAP facility to switch
the live core to the newly rebuilt core. I think I can do the SWAP with
aaah okay.
so its SolrDocument in normal search never been used ? its only for other
solr-plugins ?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Purpose-of-SolrDocument-java-tp1408443p1411276.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 11:07 +0200, Dennis Gearon wrote:
If you really want to see performance, try external DRAM disks.
Whew! 800X faster than a disk.
As sexy as they are, the DRAM drives does not buy much more extra
performance. At least not at the search stage. For searching, SSDs are
not
Hi Shaun,
you create the SolrServer using multicore by just adding the core to the
URL. You don't need to add anything with SolrQuery.
URL url = new URL(new URL(solrBaseUrl), coreName);
CommonsHttpSolrServer server = new CommonsHttpSolrServer(url);
Concerning the default core thing - I wouldn't
Hi all,
I am unable to index the files of remote system that contains escaped
characters in their file names i think there is a problem in solr for
indexing the files of escaped characters in remote system...
Has anybody tried to index the files in remote system that contain the
Thanks Chantal I hadn't spotted that that's a big help.
Thank you.
Shaun
On 3 September 2010 12:31, Chantal Ackermann
chantal.ackerm...@btelligent.de wrote:
Hi Shaun,
you create the SolrServer using multicore by just adding the core to the
URL. You don't need to add anything with
Have you tried running the queries through with debugQuery=true?
It may well be that, for certain documents, the lower-boosted fields
are still overwhelming the contribution to scoring from the higher-boosted
fields for the documents in question.
The problem is that index-time boosting is fairly
Hi all,
I am experiencing a strange behavior while indexing italian text (an indexed
not stored text field) when stemming with italian language:
fieldType name=text class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory/
aaah okay.
so its SolrDocument in normal search never been used ? its only for other
solr-plugins ?
SolrDocument is under org.apache.solr.common which is for the
solr-solj.jar and not available for the solr-core.jar
see e.g.:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
Hi,
When I take the two letters from the middle of a word and put the first in
place of the second and the second in place of the first, ex : jospin =
jopsin, I don't get any suggestion from the spellchecker component.
I tryed the
On Sep 2, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Gerald wrote:
Thanks Grant
Am looking forward to the day when I can create a SOLR URL that looks
something like this:
http://mysolrserver:8080/solr/select?q=*:* AND
mycustomstrfunction(mysolrstrfield):'somestringvalue' AND
Analysis returns app mou.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:12 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
What does analysis.jsp show?
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:53 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm having a different issue with the EdgeNGram technique described
here:
Hi Dennis,
I took a stab at answering this question in the following java-user mailing
list post:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/6cb7b54cce6872b3/lucene_indexes
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Dennis Gearon [mailto:gear...@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Friday, September 03,
On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 03/09/2010 14:47, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
no, jopsin isn't in the index.
I tryed this with other words and I had the same error.
Thx for your reply.
And what happens if you drop the
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.comwrote:
Does anyone know what could be the root cause or if I am missing something?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Tommaso
I didn't see a definition of your 'query' analyzer, only 'index'. Can you
ensure you specify
First of all, I suggest you ask in the SolrNET group:
http://groups.google.com/group/solrnet
Second, Solr support both database tables and XML files through the Data Import
Handler (DIH). You may wish to configure indexing in Solr, then query via
SolrNET.
-Original Message-
From:
On 03/09/2010 15:31, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:14 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
On 03/09/2010 14:47, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Sep 3, 2010, at 6:02 AM, Xavier Schepler wrote:
no, jopsin isn't in the index.
I tryed this with other words and I had the same
Alok,
I noticed you also posted to the SolrNet forum, and that's a better place
for this question. But basically, SolrNet is a wrapper around Solr
functionality. It lets you build your Solr interactions (Queries, Stats,
Facets, etc) and Inserts/Deletes using .Net objects.
The reading of a data
thanks for replying erick,
We are currently using dismax but for this particular client we have coupled
their implementation to standard parser and will be difficult to switch,
although i might just have to bite the bullet for this.
which you can do without dismax BTW, although you have to
To clarify, the query analyzer returns that. Variations such as
apple mou also do not return anything. Maybe Jay can comment and
then we can amend the article?
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
Analysis returns app mou.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at
I finally managed to get spatial searching working in combination with
dismax so I'm sending this should anyone else have the same problem.
I gave up using localsolr in the end - one of the resultsets of the two
it returned was correct (dismax+spatial) but I don't trust this enough
to depend
What about if you do something like this? -
facet=truefacet.mincount=1q=applefacet.limit=10facet.prefix=moufacet.field=term_suggestqt=basicwt=javabinrows=0version=1
Jason Rutherglen wrote:
To clarify, the query analyzer returns that. Variations such as
apple mou also do not return anything.
Thanks so much for your help, Jan Høydahl.
Have a great weekend!
Xiaohui
-Original Message-
From: Jan Høydahl / Cominvent [mailto:jan@cominvent.com]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 3:46 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: how to deal with virtual collection in solr?
You
I set this up a few years ago with something like the following:
fieldType name=autocomplete class=solr.TextField
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory /
well balanced system
=
Agree. Here we'll start a performance load test this month. I've defined a
test criteria of 'qps', 'RTpQ' worse case according to our use case past
experience. Our goal is pursuing this criteria adjust hardware system
configuration to find a well
I dont really have any specific use case in mind; I was just wondering what I
could (or couldn't) do with custom functions
possible reasons for allowing that type of syntax include:
1. in general, to simplify queries, and make them more readable, by
eliminating the need for the _val_ hack
I do not want to make the solrconfig.xml huge. I think I saw a patch a
couple of weeks back that allowed passing a csv file as a parameter.
Can anyone help ?
Thanks
Papiya
Pink OTC Markets Inc. provides the leading inter-dealer quotation and trading
system in the over-the-counter (OTC)
I wouldn't have thought that CPU was a big deal with the speed/cores of CPU's
continuously growing according to Moore's law and the change in Disk Speed
barely changine 50% in 15 years. Must have a lot to do with caching.
What size indexes are you working with? Are you saying you can get the
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:10 PM, Landon Kuhn landon9...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello, I am using the ReversedWildcardFilterFactory, and I am
wondering if there is a way to prevent false matches when a query
token matches the reversed indexed token. For instance, the query
*zemog* matches documents
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.comwrote:
Off the top of my head, I'm not sure of an easy way to prevent this.
we could fix this in trunk easily for these queries, with
intersection/subtraction (e.g. minus \u0001.* from the DFA)
--
Robert Muir
Ok - found it - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-784 .
On 09/03/2010 11:51 AM, Papiya Misra wrote:
I do not want to make the solrconfig.xml huge. I think I saw a patch a
couple of weeks back that allowed passing a csv file as a parameter.
Can anyone help ?
Thanks
Papiya
Pink OTC
So you are saying we definitely do not need to pause ADD activity on other
threads while we send the COMMIT? And the same goes with AUTOCOMMIT right?
We are using SOLR 1.4 now. We were on 1.3 previously. We pretty much just
assumed pausing ADDs during COMMITs was required by SOLR when we
Solr handles all of this concurrency for you - it's actually even a
little too aggressive about that these days, as Lucene has changed a lot
- but yes - you can add while committing and commit while adding - Solr
will block itself as needed.
- Mark
On 9/3/10 1:27 PM, Robert Petersen wrote:
So
I'm investigating using Lucene for a project to index a massive HBase
database. I was looking at using Katta to distribute the index because
people have said that becomes a limitation with simply using Lucene as the
index grows. Then I came across Solr which seems like it would also help
this
On 9/2/10 3:20 PM, Koji Sekiguchi wrote:
(10/09/03 5:42), Brandon Evans wrote:
On 9/2/10 11:16 AM, Mark wrote:
I am using the built in replication. Can you send me a link to the patch
so I can give it a try? Thanks
This patch looks great!
Can you open a jira issue and contribute the
On 9/2/2010 9:31 AM, Mark wrote:
Thanks for the suggestions. Our slaves have 12G with 10G dedicated to
the JVM.. too much?
Are the rysnc snappuller featurs still available in 1.4.1? I may try
that to see if helps. Configuration of the switches may also be possible.
Also, would you mind
I've been considering the use of Hadoop, since that's what Nutch uses.
Unless I piggy-back onto Nutch's MR job, when creating a Solr index, I'm
wondering if it's overkill. I can see ways of working it into a MapReduce
workflow, but it would involve dumping the database onto HDFS beforehand.
I'm
On 9/3/2010 3:39 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote:
I'll have to extrapolate a lot here (also known as guessing).
You don't mention what kind of harddrives you're using, so let's say
15.000 RPM to err on the high-end side. Compared to the 2 drives @
15.000 RPM in RAID 1 we've experimented with, the
Is the OS disk cache something you configure, or something the OS just does
automatically based on available free RAM? Or does it depend on the exact OS?
Thinking about the OS disk cache is new to me. Thanks for any tips.
From: Shawn Heisey
On 9/3/10 11:37 AM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Is the OS disk cache something you configure, or something the OS just does
automatically based on available free RAM? Or does it depend on the exact OS?
Thinking about the OS disk cache is new to me. Thanks for any tips.
hello,
I have done all the suggested changes. My table name is 'info' having
columns id,name,city and skill. I am able to index them all successfully.
But I am able to search the data only using name and not other column names.
Where did I go wrong?
*My data-config.xml file is as below:*
I am using solr 1.4 version.
I have a requirement where need to show up all documents first which matched
most words from the free text search string. e.g. If user was searching for
two words with no quotes connectivity breakup my search results should
display all documents where both words
Thanks guys! I will be quite happy to remove the unnecessary complexity from
our code.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 03, 2010 10:28 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Do commits block updates in SOLR 1.4?
Solr
What is the query that you are using ? Try something like q=city:Chicago .
Look at the solrconfig file and you will see
defaultSearchFieldname/defaultSearchField . This is the reason that
unless you specify the search field in the query, solr will always
search the field name.
On 09/03/2010
I didn't find defaultSearchFieldname/defaultSearchField in my
solrconfig.xml. Do I need to include this tag?
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Papiya Misra pmi...@pinkotc.com wrote:
What is the query that you are using ? Try something like q=city:Chicago .
Look at the solrconfig file and you
On 9/3/2010 12:37 PM, Jonathan Rochkind wrote:
Is the OS disk cache something you configure, or something the OS just does
automatically based on available free RAM? Or does it depend on the exact OS?
Thinking about the OS disk cache is new to me. Thanks for any tips.
Depends on what you
Naming fields something_t but declaring them string will either not
work, or cause confusion.
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:49 AM, kenf_nc ken.fos...@realestate.com wrote:
You are querying for 'branch' and trying to place it in 'skill'.
Also, you have Name and Column backwards, it should be:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W-shingling
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 6:19 AM, Steven A Rowe sar...@syr.edu wrote:
Hi Dennis,
I took a stab at answering this question in the following java-user mailing
list post:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/6cb7b54cce6872b3/lucene_indexes
Thank you mucho much, Lance.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
EARTH has a Right To Life,
otherwise we all die.
Read 'Hot, Flat, and Crowded'
Laugh at http://www.yert.com/film.php
--- On Fri, 9/3/10, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Lance Norskog
57 matches
Mail list logo
