Ahh, LOL! I wouldn't have thought about that unless I were fixing the issues
that you guys have worked on.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have t
hi all
I have question is it possible to perform a phrase search with wild cards in
solr/lucene as if i have two queries both have exactly same results one is
+Contents:"change market"
and other is
+Contents:"chnage* market"
but i think the second should match "chages market" as well but i
If I haven't deleted the index for some reason before doing the full
import, then I can search the old data.
On 10/13/2010 4:41 PM, Tri Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
As long as I can search on the current ("older") index while importing, I'm
good. I've tested this and I can search the older index while
just update on this issue...
we turned off the new/first searchers (upgrade to Solr 1.4.1), and ran
benchmark tests, there is no noticeable performance impact on the queries we
perform comparing with Solr 1.3 benchmark tests WITH new/first searchers.
Also the memory usage reduced by 5.5 GB after
You can build 2 similiar Solr cores. One for service & one for importing.
When the importing is done, you can do either MERGE or SWAP actions,
depending on how you put your data on these 2 cores.
- Original Message -
From: "Tri Nguyen"
To:
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 5:51 AM
S
Solr is designed in scalable aritechture. So you question depends on how
many resources (cpu, memory, space, etc.) you have to scale Solr how high
(within a single machine), how wide (how fast a request you wish to response
to user using replication), and how deep (how many slices/partition (Sol
Marco (use solr-u...@lucene list to follow up, please),
There are no precise answers to such questions. Solr can keep indexing. The
limit is, I think, the available disk space. I've never pushed Solr or Lucene
to the point where Lucene index segments would become a serious pain, but even
tha
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 6:38 PM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
> If you are using the DataImportHandler, you will not be able to search new
> data until the full-import or delta-import is complete and the update is
> committed. When I do a full reindex, it takes about 5 hours, and until it
> is finished,
Spans do care about the order of words, so that might help
Erick
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:23 PM, Ron Mayer wrote:
> Erick Erickson wrote:
> > You can do some interesting things with payloads. You could index a
> > particular value as the payload that identified the "kind" of word it
> was
If I haven't deleted the index for some reason before doing the full
import, then I can search the old data.
On 10/13/2010 4:41 PM, Tri Nguyen wrote:
Hi,
As long as I can search on the current ("older") index while importing, I'm
good. I've tested this and I can search the older index while
Hi,
As long as I can search on the current ("older") index while importing, I'm
good. I've tested this and I can search the older index while data-importing
the newer index.
So you can search the older index in your 5 hour wait?
Thanks,
Tri
From: Shawn He
If you are using the DataImportHandler, you will not be able to search
new data until the full-import or delta-import is complete and the
update is committed. When I do a full reindex, it takes about 5 hours,
and until it is finished, I cannot search it.
I have not tried to issue a manual co
You don't know what documents to bring up summaries for before you have merged
and sorted the docIds from all shards. And you don't want to waste resources by
fetching it all. Example:
Phase 1 request: q=foo bar&rows=10&sort=price
asc&shards=node1:8983,node2:8983,node3:8983
Phase 1 response: The
Hi,
Can I perform searches against the index while it is being imported?
Does importing add 1 document at a time or will solr make a temporary index and
switch to that index when indexing is done?
Thanks,
Tri
I have just implemented (well, almost) a Solr solution for a "More
Like This" type of application.
Let me just say that I am BLOWN AWAY by how great of a job the Solr
team has done. It works! It works fast! It works VERY well!
i
No this isn't the MLT, just the standard query parser for now. I did
try the heuristic approach and I might stick with that actually. I ran
the process on known duplicates and created a collection of all
scores. I was then able to see how well the query worked. The scores
seemed focused to one rang
Harry, could you please file a jira for this and I'll address this in
a patch. I fixed related issue (SOLR-2102) and I think it's pretty
similar.
> Interesting, I was under the impression that case does not matter.
>
> From http://wiki.apache.org/solr/DataImportHandler#A_shorter_data-config :
> "I
Thanks Robert, that Jira issue aptly describes what I'm seeing, I think.
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> if you are going to fill up your disk space all the time with solr
> 1.4.1, I suggest replacing the lucene jars with lucene jars from
> 2.9-branch (http://svn.apache.org
There's a corrupt index exception thrown when opening the searcher.
The rest of the files of the segment are OK. Meaning the problem has
occurred in writing the bit vector well after the segment has been
written. I'm guessing we're simply not verifying that the BV has been
written fully/properly,
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Lohrenz, Steven
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to figure out if how I can accomplish the following:
>
> I have a fairly static and large set of resources I need to have indexed
> and searchable. Solr seems to be a perfect fit for that. In addition I need
> to have th
Hi,
are you using moreLikeThis for that feature?
I have no suggestion for a reliable threshold, I think this depends
on the domain you are operating and is IMO only solvable with a heuristic.
It also depends on fields, boosts, ...
It could be that there is a 'score gap' between duplicates and none
On 10/13/10, Lohrenz, Steven wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to figure out if how I can accomplish the following:
>
> I have a fairly static and large set of resources I need to have indexed and
> searchable. Solr seems to be a perfect fit for that. In addition I need to
> have the ability for my use
Hi,
I am trying to figure out if how I can accomplish the following:
I have a fairly static and large set of resources I need to have indexed and
searchable. Solr seems to be a perfect fit for that. In addition I need to have
the ability for my users to add resources from the main data set to a
: solr errors come back as HTML instead of XM or JSON
:
: Is it possible to get the response to come back as XML or JSON, or at
: least something I could show to an end user?
At the moment, Solr just relies on the Servlet Container to generate the
error response, so you'd have to customize it at
if you are going to fill up your disk space all the time with solr
1.4.1, I suggest replacing the lucene jars with lucene jars from
2.9-branch (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/branches/lucene_2_9/).
then you get the fix for https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2593 too.
On Wed
that explains it then, using 1.4.1
thanks for that
Ron
- Original Message -
From: "Ephraim Ofir"
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, 13 October, 2010 2:11:49 PM
Subject: RE: multicore defaultCoreName not working
Which version of solr are you using?
I believe this
I'm not certain whether we test this particular case, but we do have
several disk full tests.
But: are you seeing a corrupt index? Ie, exception on open or on
searching or on CheckIndex?
Or: do you see a disk-full exception when writing the del file, during
indexing, that does not in fact corrup
I think that's good thinking. I wonder, do the two phases have to be invoked
externally by two queries, or why couldn't it be all self contained in each
instance behind the load leveler?
Just curious how it works.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to lea
Ken,
looks like we posted at same time :-)
thanks very much!
Renee
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/using-HTTPClient-sending-solr-ping-request-wont-timeout-as-specified-tp1691292p1695584.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
thanks Michael, I got it resolved last night... you are right, it is more
like a HttpClient issue after I tried another link unrelated to solr. If
anyone is interested, here is the working code:
HttpClientParams httpClientParams = new HttpClientParams();
httpClientParams.setSoTim
Hi Renee,
Mike is right, this is a question to post on the HttpClient users list
(httpclient-us...@hc.apache.org).
And yes, there is a separate setConnectionTimeout() that can be used.
Though I'm most familiar with HttpClient 4.0, not 3.1.
One possibility is that the ping response handler
We have unit tests for running out of disk space? However we have
Tomcat logs that fill up quickly and starve Solr 1.4.1 of space. The
main segments are probably not corrupted, however routinely now, there
are deletes files of length 0.
0 2010-10-12 18:35 _cc_8.del
Which is fundamental index co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
>ough the command line using:
>
> java -jar -Xms512M -Xmx1024M -Dsolr.solr.home=solr start.jar
>
solr.home seems to refer to a directory containing the solr.xml
file. I am using basically an out-of-the-box configuration and
can no
ArggghhhI was working in OLD data-config...it now works! :)
Thanks, this is a GREAT addition. I do like to know when the final
implementation of this feature is implemented (as I understood it might
change in the final release).
Which issue can I subscribe to, to be informed?
Thanks again!!
On 10/13/2010 6:46 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
A related point - the load balancing implementation that's part of
SolrCloud (and looks like it will be committed to trunk soon), does
keep track of what server it used for the first phase and uses that
for subsequent phases.
Are the cloud bits likel
Thanks Hoss for the reply.
Yes, The ASCIIFoldingFilterFactory factory does not exist in Solr 1.3. Its
present in lucene-core-2.9.0-sources.jar which is part of Solr 1.4. I found out
after checking the java docs for this file.
-param
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hoss
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
markus.rietz...@rzf.fin-nrw.de wrote:
> in the standard solr distribution its unter ./contrib/extraction/lib
> solr 1.4.1 comes with a tika included. you want to have a newer version of
> tika, right?
>
>
ok... my lib directory now contains:
suxma
Great, thanks Hoss. I'll try dismax out today and see what happens with this.
Matt
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Chris Hostetter
wrote:
>
> : Is it possible to have certain query terms not effect score, if that
> : same query term is present in a field? For example, I have an index of
>
> tha
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 10:06 AM, PeterKerk wrote:
>
> haha ;)
>
> But so I DO have the right solr version?
>
> Anyways...I have added the lines you mentioned, what else can I do?
The fact that the geolocation field does not show up in the results means that
it's not getting added (i.e. something
haha ;)
But so I DO have the right solr version?
Anyways...I have added the lines you mentioned, what else can I do?
Thanks again!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Spatial-search-in-Solr-1-5-tp489948p1694683.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archiv
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 9:42 AM, PeterKerk wrote:
> Im now thinking I downloaded the wrong solr zip, I tried this one:
> https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/solr/dist/apache-solr-4.0-2010-10-12_08-05-48.zip
>
> In that example scheme
> (\apache-solr-4
Im now thinking I downloaded the wrong solr zip, I tried this one:
https://hudson.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/trunk/solr/dist/apache-solr-4.0-2010-10-12_08-05-48.zip
In that example scheme
(\apache-solr-4.0-2010-10-12_08-05-48\example\example-DIH\solr\db\conf\sch
I have a solr index full of documents that contain lots of duplicates.
The duplicates are not exact duplicates though. Each may vary slightly
in content.
After indexing, I have a bit of code that loops through the entire
index just to get what I'm calling "target" documents. For each target
docume
Which version of solr are you using?
I believe this is only available on trunk, not even on 1.4.1 (SOLR-1722).
Also, watch out for SOLR-2127 bug, haven't gotten around to creating a patch
yet...
Ephraim Ofir
-Original Message-
From: Ron Chan [mailto:rc...@i-tao.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Does the spatial constraints for laton types work for multivalued latlon
fields? Is there an example of it? using a field conjunction with > <
operators didn't work, last I checked.
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:28 AM, PeterKerk wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks for the quick reply :)
>>
>> I downloaded t
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:28 AM, PeterKerk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for the quick reply :)
>
> I downloaded the latest version from the trunk. Got it up and running, and
> got the error below:
Hopefully the QuickStart on the wiki all worked for you,
but you only got the error when customizing your
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jan Høydahl / Cominvent
wrote:
> I'm pretty sure the 2nd phase to fetch doc-summaries goes directly to same
> server as first phase. But what if you stick a LB in between?
A related point - the load balancing implementation that's part of
SolrCloud (and looks li
This does seem more like an HTTPClient question than a solr question - you
might get more traction on their lists? Still, from what I remember
HTTPClient has a number of timeouts you can set. Perhaps it's the read
timeout you need?
-Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Renee Sun [mailto:r
Hi,
Thanks for the quick reply :)
I downloaded the latest version from the trunk. Got it up and running, and
got the error below:
URL:
http://localhost:8983/solr/db/select/?wt=xml&indent=on&facet=true&fl=id,title,lat,lng,city&facet.field=province_raw&q=*:*&fq={!geofilt%20pt=45.15,-93.85%20sfiel
Nice, that's the trick to remember.
On Wednesday, October 13, 2010 12:16:07 pm Robert Muir wrote:
> > SEVERE: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> > org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardFilter.(Lorg/apache/luc
> > ene/util/Version;Lorg/apache/lucene/analysis/TokenStream;)V
--
Markus Jelsma - CT
you need to clean and recompile
> SEVERE: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError:
> org.apache.lucene.analysis.standard.StandardFilter.(Lorg/apache/lucene/util/Version;Lorg/apache/lucene/analysis/TokenStream;)V
Hi,
Something funny is going on in the current 3.1 branch which is bothering me at
least since a couple of days. My solrconfig hasn't really changed (perhaps some
request handler diffs) and my schema hasn't changed for a long time.
For some unknown reason, indexing or searching with spellcheck
Thanks Iorixxx... Boosting is working while using DIH to import XML.
Thanks,
SRD
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Index-time-boosting-is-not-working-with-boosting-value-in-document-level-tp1649072p1693423.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at
2010/10/12 Peter Keegan :
> I listened with great interest to Grant's presentation of the NoSQL
> comparisons/alternatives to Solr/Lucene.
My question: will this presentation be available somewhere? I do not
find any presentation material nn the conference web site.
Király Péter
http://eXtensible
Hi Jason,
> Hi, all.
> I got some question about solrconfig.xml.
> I have 10 fields in a document for index.
> (Suppose that field names are f1, f2, ... , f10.)
> Some user will want to search in field f1 and f5.
> Another user will want to search in field f2, f3 and f7.
>
> I am going to use dism
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Israel Ekpo wrote:
> I think this feature will take care of this.
>
> What do you think?
sounds good!
Hello
I have this in my solr.xml
admin is working and the individual cores are working through
http://localhost:8080/solr/live/select/?q=abc
and
http://localhost:8080/solr/staging/select/?q=abc
returning the correct results from the right core
however, I wanted to keep the
in the standard solr distribution its unter ./contrib/extraction/lib
solr 1.4.1 comes with a tika included. you want to have a newer version of
tika, right?
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Andreas Jung [mailto:li...@zopyx.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 12. Oktober 2010 19:14
> An: solr-u
> Should I create a JIRA ticket?
already there:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2005
we should provide a patch though ...
Regards,
Peter.
> With solrj doing a more like this query for a missing document:
> /mlt?q=docId:SomeMissingId
> always throws a null pointer exception:
> Ca
59 matches
Mail list logo
