Using 'curl' is fine. There is a library called SolrJ for Java and
other libraries for other scripting languages that let you upload with
more control. There is a thing in Solr called the DataImportHandler
that lets you script walking a file system.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 8:38 PM, K. Seshadri
I think you have to compile all of the stempel source including your
filter factory into one jar at the same time. Everybody does this; I
don't know how different Java versions make class file binaries.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 3:06 AM, Jakub Godawa jakub.god...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi! Sorry for
Did you do a 'commit' after this? If there is no error in the log or
the HTTP response, the document should get added.
Solr 1.4.1 has much newer versions of this software.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 6:46 AM, Nikola Garafolic
nikola.garafo...@srce.hr wrote:
Hi,
I use solr 1.3 with patch for
In fact Lucene can rollback to a previous commit.
You just need to use a deletion policy that preserves past commits
(the default policy only keeps the most recent commit).
Once you have multiple commits in the index you can do fun things like
open an IndexReader on an old commit, rollback (open
I want to provide a full text search function.
This function has to search through the 2 fields: title and description
that I have defined in my schema.xml (both of type string).
Now, since solr doesnt (by default) provide an or operator, I thought I
should somehow combine these fields into 1
Hi,
2010/11/12 PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com
I want to provide a full text search function.
This function has to search through the 2 fields: title and description
that I have defined in my schema.xml (both of type string).
Now, since solr doesnt (by default) provide an or operator,
--- On Fri, 11/12/10, PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com wrote:
From: PeterKerk vettepa...@hotmail.com
Subject: full text search in multiple fields
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Date: Friday, November 12, 2010, 1:32 PM
I want to provide a full text search function.
This function has
Am I not doing it in the point no 4? I am compiling all the folder
that was extracted before, but now with that new class file.
2010/11/12 Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com:
I think you have to compile all of the stempel source including your
filter factory into one jar at the same time.
thanks. got it!
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-facet-fields-tp1883106p102.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi Lance,
Thank you very much for responding (not sure how I reply to the group, so,
writing to you).
Can you please expand on your suggestion? I am not a web guy and so, don't
know where to start.
What is the difference between SolrJ and DataImportHandler? Do I need to set
up web servers on
I require the expertise of a developer who can assist with fine-tuning my
nutch/solr setup. I have the basics working but I think I probably need a
custom nutch plugin written.
If you're interested please contact me: jeanluct [at] gmail . com
Hope it's ok to post this here - I'm not a
In addition to the other replies, do be careful about string types. It's
probably not what you want as it indexes the entire input as a single
token. For instance, indexing great expectations as a string type
would NOT get you a hit when searching for great. Think about
a text type instead...
And
Think of the data import handler (DIH) as Solr pulling data to index
from some source based on configuration. So, once you set up
your DIH config to point to your file system, you issue a command
to solr like OK, do your data import thing. See the
FileListEntityProcessor.
Ahmet,
Thanks for the reply.
select/?q=built+to+lastdefType=dismaxqf=searchFields^0.2+title^20debugQuery=on
For some reason if I use title field in my query I don't get any results.
I am copying all searchable fields into searchFields field. So I am able to
search only in the searchFields
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:52 PM, AC acanuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is the correct place to post but I'm looking for someone to
help finish a Solr install on our LAMP based website. This would be a paid
project.
The programmer that started the project got too busy with
Have you tried posting on odesk.com? I have had decent success finding
Solr/Lucene resources there.
On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 7:52 PM, AC acanuc...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if this is the correct place to post but I'm looking for someone
to
help finish a Solr install on our LAMP based
select/?q=built+to+lastdefType=dismaxqf=searchFields^0.2+title^20debugQuery=on
For some reason if I use title field in my query I don't
get any results.
I am copying all searchable fields into searchFields field.
So I am able to
search only in the searchFields field not in any other
Ahmet,
In production system we are using
/spell/?q=built+to+last
so that we can check the spelling. We are not using /select?q=built+to+last
Can I use dismax with /spell?
I understood from your reply that I need to change my schema.xml and modify
the field types.
Do I need to still use the
Hi everybody,
I'm doing some indexing testing on solr 1.4.1 and I'm not understanding one
thing, let me try to explain.
I have 1.2 million xml files and I'm indexing then, when I do it for first
time my index size is around 3 GB and in my statistics on
http://localhost:8983/solr/admin/stats.jsp
Do you mean solr.core.name has the wrong value after the swap? You
swapped doc-temp so now it's doc and solr.core.name is still doc-temp?
This completely contradicts my experience, what version of solr are you
using?
Why use postCommit? You're running the risk of performing a swap when
you don't
Thanks for the replies, I will try odesk.
Haven't had any luck with the contact list in the wiki, tried contacting a few
people listed and no replies.
On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:16 AM, Shashi Kant sk...@sloan.mit.edu wrote:
Have you tried posting on odesk.com? I have had decent success finding
Hi Claudio,
What's happening when you re-index the documents is that Solr/Lucene implements
an update as a delete plus a new index. Because of the nature of inverted
indexes, deleting documents requires a rewrite of the entire index. In order to
avoid rewriting the entire index each time one
Can you please help me distinguish between analyzer types. i am not able to
find document for the same.
I want to add solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory in the schema.xml file.
And i can see two types defined in my schema.xml for analyzer
analyzer type=index
analyzer type=query
--
View this
On 11/7/2010 9:11 AM, Ephraim Ofir wrote:
Do you mean solr.core.name has the wrong value after the swap? You
swapped doc-temp so now it's doc and solr.core.name is still doc-temp?
This completely contradicts my experience, what version of solr are you
using?
Why use postCommit? You're running
Hi Tom, thanks for your explanation,
Do you recommend the index continues this way? Or can I configure it to make
optmize automatically?
tks
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Burton-West, Tom tburt...@umich.eduwrote:
Hi Claudio,
What's happening when you re-index the documents is that
/spell/?q=built+to+last
so that we can check the spelling. We are not using
/select?q=built+to+last
Can I use dismax with /spell?
Yes you can.
I understood from your reply that I need to change my
schema.xml and modify
the field types.
Correct. Make them full-text searchable. string
I want to search two fields for the phrase Call Of Duty. I tried this:
(title:Call of Duty OR subhead:Call of Duty)
No matches, despite the fact that there are many documents that should match.
So I left out the quotes, and it seems to work. But now when I try doing things
like
title:Call of
For a field type the anslysis applied at index time (when you are adding
documents to Solr) can be a slightly different than the analysis applied at
query time (when a user executes a query). For example, if you know you are
going to be indexing html pages, you might need to use the
(title:Call of Duty OR subhead:Call of Duty)
No matches, despite the fact that there are many documents
that should match.
Field types of title and subhead are important here. Do you use
stopwordfilterfactory with enable position increments?
What is you solr version?
So I left out the
Hi Jon, for the first query:
title:Call of Duty OR subhead:Call of Duty
If you are sure that you have documents with the same phrase, make sure you
don't have a problem with stop words and with token positions. I recommend you
to check the analysis page at the Solr admin. pay special attention
Ahmet Arslan iorixxx at yahoo.com writes:
(title:Call of Duty OR subhead:Call of Duty)
No matches, despite the fact that there are many documents
that should match.
Field types of title and subhead are important here. Do you use
stopwordfilterfactory with enable
position
Hi,
I am interested in using solr to return search results for products. Is
there any feature which will allow the result to be spread/shuffled
around a little? The problem is that there are lots of results for one
brand, but there are lots of other brands a few pages later. Is it
possible to
It's probably a good idea to optimize. How are you re-indexing anyway? DIH?
custom code? post.jar?
Manual optimizing is just issuing the appropriate curl command, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#A.22commit.22_and_.22optimize.22
Best
Erick
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:13 PM,
An optimize takes lots of cpu and I/O since it has to rewrite your indexes, so
only do it when necessary.
You can just use curl to send an optimize message to Solr when you are ready.
See:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UpdateXmlMessages#Passing_commit_parameters_as_part_of_the_URL
Tom
I am interested in using solr to return search results for
products. Is
there any feature which will allow the result to be
spread/shuffled
around a little? The problem is that there are lots of
results for one
brand, but there are lots of other brands a few pages
later. Is it
possible to
You could also try splitting the brand name from the product name into a
separate field and then boosting on the product name?
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Nov 2010, at 20:32, Ahmet Arslan iori...@yahoo.com wrote:
I am interested in using solr to return search results for
products. Is
there
Shawn
That is good if we can restart the solr. But we don't want to restart the
whole solr after every commit because some of the core usually have to
update for comparatively short times. So, we do a core reload to get all the
synonyms and other stuff getting updated with out the solr reload.
To get a more precise result on exact matches of your terms, how about
having another a string type field for title and subhead. And use dismax to
boost the string type fields more than the text type fields.
Cheers
-- Imran
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Jon Drukman j...@cluttered.com wrote:
Hi,
If you're still looking for someone, I might be interested in getting more
information
about your project. From you initial message that does not seem to be a lot
of work
so I might be willing to give you some time.
I've been working with Solr for the last 7 months on my full-time job
Hi,
This question is more suitable for nutch mailing list but let me give
you couple of pointers.
If its only metadata you can use the below mentioned patch, but if you
want more flexibility with your data you can look at writing your own
parser plugin, here is a good place to start:
Sorry all, I obviously meant to send this to the original poster
- Original Message -
From: Jean-Sebastien Vachon js.vac...@videotron.ca
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 10:09 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for help with Solr implementation
Hi,
If you're
I might be looking down the road. Send me a site showing the functionality you
described?
Filing this in the 'Solr Conultants' mail folder.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea to learn from
How easy is it to get good results from the Lucene crawling software?
Let's say for example I wanted only information about a general subject, but
nothing else? (Sorry, not ready to say what exactly at this point) Is it like
tuning Solr, or IS it tuning Solr to just not accept what does not fit
Hmmm, still getting used to the new Yahoo mail. This should have gone only to
the writer.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
It is always a good idea to learn from your own mistakes. It is usually a
better
idea to learn from others’ mistakes, so you do not have to make them
Actually, can Nutch be used for SCRAPING, not crawling?
I don't just want the url, I want the data assigned to specific fields, no
matter what site or format it is coming from.
I've done scraping, but it had to be custom tailored for each target.
Dennis Gearon
Signature Warning
There is a Random field type which returns random numbers. You might
try boosting with that.
Dave Searle wrote:
You could also try splitting the brand name from the product name into a
separate field and then boosting on the product name?
Sent from my iPhone
On 12 Nov 2010, at 20:32, Ahmet
About web servers: Solr is a servlet war file and needs a Java web
server container to run. The example/ folder in the Solr disribution
uses 'Jetty', and this is fine for small production-quality projects.
You can just copy the example/ directory somewhere to set up your own
running Solr;
I don't know of the Stempel jar includes the Java source. At this point
I think you should ask the author to Stempel to make a Solr front-end
for it. It's very simple for him.
Jakub Godawa wrote:
Am I not doing it in the point no 4? I am compiling all the folder
that was extracted before, but
Hey Jean-Sebastien,
Thanks for the reply. It sounds like your experience is exactly what is needed
for my project.
To give you some background this project is for a personal project related to
biomedical field that I'm trying to get up off the ground.
The site is www.antibodyreview.com
On 11/12/2010 2:48 PM, sivaram wrote:
That is good if we can restart the solr. But we don't want to restart the
whole solr after every commit because some of the core usually have to
update for comparatively short times. So, we do a core reload to get all the
synonyms and other stuff getting
Hi All,
Do you have any idea that why solr search for panasonic* ( without
quotes ) does not match panasonic ?
If we search panasonic it matches a result but if we search with
panasonic* it does not find it.
What needs to be done here ?
Thanks
Riz
51 matches
Mail list logo
