You should create separate fields in your solr schema for each field
in your database that you want recognized separately. You can use a
query parser like edismax to do a weighted query across all of your
fields and then provide highlighting on the specific field which
matched.
2011/9/10 Eugeny B
oh, it is good for me. Thank Erik Hatcher-4 very much. I have done to index
from https.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/indexing-data-from-rich-documents-Tika-with-solr3-1-tp3322555p3326971.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hmmm, would it be simpler to do something like append
a clause like this?
BloggerId:12304^10 OR CoBloggerId:123404^5?
Best
Erick
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:14 AM, tkamphuis wrote:
> Well, I'd like to do the following:
>
> I've got a website full of blogposts and every blogpost has an owner, this
>
Hmm, OK. You might want to look at the non-cached filter query stuff,
it's quite recent.
The point here is that it is a filter that is applied only after all
of the less expensive filter
queries are run, One of its uses is exactly ACL calculations. Rather
than calculate the
ACL for the entire doc s
Any idea why solr is unable to return the pound sign as-is?
I tried typing in £ 1 million in Solr admin GUI and got following response.
0
5
on
0
£ 1 million
10
2.2
Here is my Java Properties I got also from admin interface:
java.runtime.name = Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment
sun.boot.li
Well, this answer isn't much more satisfactory than "get more memory",
but about all I can say is "try it and see".
Sure, make your caches very small and monitor memory and test it out.
You'll get a sense of how fast (or slow) the queries are pretty quickly. Or
you can get a ballpark estimate of
This smells like an XY problem, can you back up and give a higher-level
reason *why* you want this behavior?
Because given your problem description, this seems like you are getting
correct behavior no matter how you define the problem. You're essentially
saying that you have two records with ident
Try escaping it for a start.
But why do you want to? If it's a phrase query, enclose it in double quotes.
You really have to provide more details, because there are too many
possibilities
to answer. For instance:
If you're entering field:a b then 'b' will be searched against your
default text fie
So are you still having a problem, and if so what?
Best
Erick
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 5:48 AM, crisfromnova wrote:
> Hi,
>
> key:value1^8 key:value2^4 key:value3^2 is correct.
>
> Sorry for bad query written.
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-wri
Does this JIRA apply?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3171
Best
Erick
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Andy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does Solr support nested documents? If not is there any plan to add such a
> feature?
>
> Thanks.
Erick
Thanks very much for the reply.
I typed this late Friday after work and tried to simplify the problem
description. I got something wrong. Hopefully this restatement is better:
My PK is FLD1, FLD2 and FLD3 concatenated together.
In some cases FLD1 and FLD2 can be the same. The ONLY diff
Erick
My field contains "a b" (without ")
We are trying to assemble the query as a String by appending the various
values. I think that is a large part of the problem and our lives would be
easier if we let the Solr api do this work.
We've experimented with our "query assembler" producing
fiel
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Mark juszczec wrote:
> We've also tried making it create
>
> field:a\ b
>
> The first case just does not work and I'm unsure why.
>
> The second case ends up url encoding the \ and I'm unsure if that will cause
> it to be used in the query or not.
URL encoding is
>
> But as Erick says, it's not clear that's really what you want (to
> search on a single term with a space in it). If it's a normal text
> field, each word will be indexed separately, so you really want a
> phrase query or a boolean query:
>
> field:"a b"
> or
> field:(a b)
>
>
I am looking for
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Mark juszczec wrote:
> I am looking for a text string with a single, embedded space. For the
> purposes of this example, it is "a b" and its stored in the index in a field
> called field.
>
> Am I incorrect in assuming the query field:"a b" will match the the stri
That's what I thought. The problem is, its not and I am unsure what is
wrong.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Mark juszczec
> wrote:
> > I am looking for a text string with a single, embedded space. For the
> > purposes of this example,
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 1:39 PM, Mark juszczec wrote:
> That's what I thought. The problem is, its not and I am unsure what is
> wrong.
What is the fieldType definition for that field? Did you change it
without re-indexing?
-Yonik
http://www.lucene-eurocon.com - The Lucene/Solr User Conference
The field's properties are:
field name="CUSTOMER_TYPE_NM" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true"
required="true" default="CUSTOMER_TYPE_NM_MISSING"
There have been no changes since I last completely rebuilt the index.
Is re-indexing done when an index is completely rebuilt with a a
dataimpor
Hmmm, there's no good way I can think of off the top of my
head to do this. Whenever people find themselves thinking
in terms of RDBMSs, I have to ask whether the problem is
really appropriate for a search engine. And/or what the problem
you're trying to solve with this approach is from a higher le
OK, there are several issues here:
q= *:* AND CUSTOMER_TYPE_NM:Network Advertiser AND
ACTIVE_IND:1&defType=edismax&rows=500&sort=ACCOUNT_CUSTOMER_ID
asc&start=0
the *:* is doing you no good, I'd just remove it.
defType=edismax probably isn't doing what you expect, you're not
specifying any field
You can get what you want - unique lists of values from docs matching
your query - for a single field (using facets), but not for the
co-occurrence of two field values. So you could combine the two fields
together, if you know what they are going to be "in advance." Facets
also give you count
On Sep 9, 2011, at 1:09 PM, Pulkit Singhal wrote:
> I think I understand it a bit better now but wouldn't mind some validation.
>
> 1) solr.xml does not become part of ZooKeeper
Right - currently it does not. Info is put there to tell Solr how to connect to
zookeeper and register the cores.
>
Hi everybody,
I just started playing around with solr, however i'm facing some
trouble. The test data i'm indexing with solr is, amongst other things,
containing date and times.
By the way, I'm using mono and i'm talking to solr through the SolrNet
library.
The issue i'm facing:
Some of t
Just to clarify, that link doesn't do anything to promote an already running
slave into a master. One would have to bounce the Solr node which has that
slave and then make the shift. It is not something that happens at runtime
live.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Akshay wrote:
> Yes you can p
Hi,
You'll not be able to detect language and change stemmer on the same field in
one go. You need to create one fieldType in your schema per language you want
to use, and then use LanguageIdentification (SOLR-1979) to do the magic of
detecting language and renaming the field. If you set langid
Hi,
Beware that Solr4.0 branch has multiple RAM conserving optimizations which may
cause your index to take considerably less space, so try it out.
Also, of course, prune your schema to turn off everything you don't need, and
also your OS to stop services you don't use.
Consider disallowing cert
Hello,
Thanks for answer!
I have created separate fields in mysolr schema for each field in database
(more than 500!). How to ask parser for search via all these fields? By
default Solr schema should contain explicit declaration of default search
field like following:
TEXT
I tried to use follow
Hi,
Can you try to make a plain HTTP query from the admin GUI on your index and
tell us what the XML response is for that date field?
http://localhost:8983/solr/select?q=*:*
If that date output is wrong as well, there may be a bug with Solr. If it is
correct, you have a problem in SolrNet.
Btw,
Even if it applies, this is for Lucene. I don't think we've added
Solr support for this yet... we should!
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Does this JIRA apply?
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3171
>
> Bes
Hi,
The XML output when performing a query via the solr interface is like this:
1-01-01T00:00:00Z
It's solr 3.3.0 on an ArchLinux desktop machine with "OpenJDK
6.b22_1.10.3-1" as my java runtime environment.
/Nicklas
On 2011-09-12 00:26, Jan Høydahl wrote:
Hi,
Can you try to make a plain H
My task is very simple:
I have a big database with a lot tables and fields. This database has
dynamic structure and can be extended or changed in any time.
I need a tool for full-search possibility via all fields in all tables of my
database. On the input of this tool - some text for search. On th
How much search-specific stuff are we talking here? Do you want to
do stemming? Plurals? Or are you talking exact match? Phrases?
multi-word queries? If exact match on individual terms
is all you want, you could hack something together like this:
index each term into a catch-all field with the fie
I am new to solr.
I tried to upload a pdf file via curl to my solr webapp (on tomcat)
curl
"http://www/SearchApp/update/extract?stream.file=c:\dmvpn.pdf&stream.contentType=application/pdf&literal.id=pdf&commit=true";
0860
but
http://www/SearchApp/select/?q=vpn
does not find the docu
Hi all,
I am wondering if Solr will do the following for a project I am working on.
I want to create a search engine with facets for potentially hundreds of
websites.
Similar to say crawling amazon + buy.com + ebay and someone can search these
3 sites from my 1 website.
(I realise there are better
Nope, there's nothing in Solr that crawls anything, you have to feed
documents in yourself from the websites.
Or, look at the Nutch project, see: http://nutch.apache.org/about.html
which is designed for this kind of problem.
Best
Erick
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 8:53 PM, dpt9876 wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi thanks for the reply.
How does nutch/solr handle the scenario where 1 website calls price, "price"
and another website calls it "cost". Same thing different name, yet I would
want the facet to handle that and not create a different facet.
Is this combo of nutch and Solr that intelligent and or
On Sep 11, 2011, at 7:04pm, dpt9876 wrote:
> Hi thanks for the reply.
>
> How does nutch/solr handle the scenario where 1 website calls price, "price"
> and another website calls it "cost". Same thing different name, yet I would
> want the facet to handle that and not create a different facet.
>
I am using 3.3 SOLR. I tried passing in -Denable.master=true and
-Denable.slave=true on the Slave machine.
Then I changed solrconfig.xml to reference each as per:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrReplication#enable.2BAC8-disable_master.2BAC8-slave_in_a_node
But this is not working. The enable para
: The XML output when performing a query via the solr interface is like this:
: 1-01-01T00:00:00Z
i think you mean: 1-01-01T00:00:00Z
: > > So my question is: Is this a bug in the solr output engine, or should mono
: > > be able to parse the date as given from solr? I have not yet tried it out
:
: Hmmm, would it be simpler to do something like append
: a clause like this?
: BloggerId:12304^10 OR CoBloggerId:123404^5?
Definitely, but that won't garuntee you a strict ordering if there is a
particularly good relevany match.
There's a bunch of ways to go about something like this, but tryi
: When I was using Lucene directly I used a custom implementation of query
: filter to enforce entitlements of search results. Now, that I'm
: switching my infrastructure from custom host to Solr, what is the best
: way to configure Solr to use my custom query filter for every request?
It depe
I can't create one field per language, that is the problem but I'll dig into
it following your indications.
I let you know what I could come out with.
Patrick.
2011/9/11 Jan Høydahl
> Hi,
>
> You'll not be able to detect language and change stemmer on the same field
> in one go. You need to cre
42 matches
Mail list logo
