Hi,
I'm trying to enable realtime search in Solr 4.0 (So I can see new documents
without committing).
I've added:
realtime visible=0 facet=truetrue/realtime
updateLog class=solr.FSUpdateLog
str name=dir${solr.data.dir:}/str
/updateLog
But documents aren't seen before commit (or
for a simple, hackish (albeit inefficient) approach look up wildcard searchers
e,g foo*, *bar
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Devon Baumgarten
dbaumgar...@nationalcorp.com wrote:
I have been tinkering with Solr for a few weeks, and I am convinced that it
could be very helpful in many of
Hello list,
In a distributed faceting search scenario, does SOLR frontend (the merger)
expect shard facets to be pre-sorted (by count or by index) ? If so, when
merging the results, is there some smart strategy for combining the shards
results into a final sorted list? Can someone explain what
Hi guys,
I'm developing a custom SolrEventListener, and inside the PostCommit()
method I need to execute some queries and collect results.
In my SolrEventListener class, I have a SolrCore
Object( org.apache.solr.core.SolrCore) and a list of queries (Strings ).
How can I use the SolrCore to
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:25 AM, Avni, Itamar itamar.a...@verint.com wrote:
[...]
This electronic message may contain proprietary and confidential information
of Verint Systems Inc., its affiliates and/or subsidiaries.
The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) or
Hi community,
Say I have lots of documents to index, each with primary key in the index, and
I index them frequently.
They are not indexed all together (like in bulk), but each in a different time.
1) Is there a significant difference in performances between a freshly created
core (the first
On Dec 29, 2011, at 3:39 AM, Avner Levy wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to enable realtime search in Solr 4.0 (So I can see new documents
without committing).
I've added:
realtime visible=0 facet=truetrue/realtime
updateLog class=solr.FSUpdateLog
str name=dir${solr.data.dir:}/str
/updateLog
Well, we don't use multicore feature of SOLR, so in our case SOLR instances
are just separate web-apps. The web-app loading order probably then affects
on which app gets hold of a jmx 'pipe'.
We should probably start using the feature to collect stats from different
cores at the same time. Thanks.
Thanks Mark, I appreciate your help.
I need the Solr index to be in sync with my database.
This means that even if one record was added I need it to appear in the next
search (including faceting).
I've read in Solr-RA documentation that if you add realtimetrue/realtime
you can add documents and
That's absolutely right. Thanks for the suggestion.
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Gora Mohanty g...@mimirtech.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Well, we don't use multicore feature of SOLR, so in our case SOLR
instances
are just separate
I have never developed for solr yet and don't know much internals but Today
I have tried one approach with searcher.
In my update processor I get searcher and search for ID. It works but I
need to load test it. Will index traversal be faster (less resource
consuming) than search?
Best Regards
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Well, we don't use multicore feature of SOLR, so in our case SOLR instances
are just separate web-apps. The web-app loading order probably then affects
on which app gets hold of a jmx 'pipe'.
We should probably start using
The problem is that for each record in fd, Solr makes three distinct SELECT
on the other three tables. Of course, this is absolutely inefficient.
You can also try to use GROUP_CONCAT (it's MySQL function, but maybe
there's something similar in MS SQL) to select all the nested 1-N
entities in a
Aleksander -
Looks like you've experienced the issue described with fixes here:
http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/48b9e75fe68be4b7
Erik
On Dec 29, 2011, at 08:40 , Aleksander Akerø wrote:
Hi!
So I've decided try out Solr 3.5.0.
What I have done this far is basicly
This should help: http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrTomcat
The difference here is that you're not copying the example directory, you're
copying the example/solr directory. And this is just basically to get the
configuration files and directory structure right. You're not copying
executables, jars,
Which Solr version do you use? Maybe it has something to do with
default collection?
I do see separate jmx domain for every collection, i.e.
solr/collection1
solr/collection2
solr/collection3
...
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Dmitry Kan dmitry@gmail.com wrote:
Hello list,
This might
Try to cast MySQL decimal data type to string, i.e.
CAST( IF(drt.discount IS NULL,'0',(drt.discount/100)) AS CHAR) as discount
(or CAST AS TEXT)
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Niels Stevens ni...@kabisa.nl wrote:
Hey everybody,
I'm having an issue importing Decimal numbers from my Mysql DB
Hi!
So I've decided try out Solr 3.5.0.
What I have done this far is basicly just to copy the /example/solr
folder, install the webapp .war file in a tomcat instance and start up.
At first I complained about the VelocityResponseWriter, so i created a
/lib folder in /$SOLR_HOME and added the
Hmmm, we're not communicating G...
The update processor wouldn't search in the
classic sense. It would just use lower-level
index traversal to determine if the doc (identified
by your unique key) was already in the index
and skip indexing that document if it was. No real
*searching* involved (see
Hello all,
i want to configure saxon xslt processor for solr; how to do that?
its taking xalan as default processor.
also if its needed to set classpath, please provide me path where can i set
classpath?
and also how can we check that which xslt processor default use.
i am using solr 1.4
Thanks Hoss, I'll take a look at this and see if i can understand this.
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Chris Hostetter
hossman_luc...@fucit.org wrote:
: I've seen in the solr faceting overview that it is possible to sort
: either by count or lexicographically, but is there a way to sort so
Hi Vijayaragavan, did you apply a patch for grouping in Solr 3.1? It is
available out of the box since 3.3.
Also, the result from grouping will not look exactly like you are
expecting, as results with the same value in the grouping field (in this
case, thread_id) will be collapsed into one group.
well. The first results are ready. I have implemented custom update
processor following your suggestion using low level index reader and
termdocs.
Launched scripts which add about 10 000 docs. Indexing took about 1 minute
including commit that is quite good for me. I don't have larger datasets so
I'd guess it would be much faster, assuming that
the search savings wouldn't be swamped by the
additional transmission time over the wire and
parsing the request (although SolrJ uses a binary
format, so parsing request probably isn't all
that expensive).
You could even do a hybrid approach. Pack
I have been tinkering with Solr for a few weeks, and I am convinced that it
could be very helpful in many of my upcoming projects. I am trying to decide
whether Solr is appropriate for this one, and I haven't had luck looking for
answers on Google.
I need to search a list of names of companies
Hi!
So I've decided try out Solr 3.5.0.
What I have done this far is basicly just to copy the /example/solr
folder, install the webapp .war file in a tomcat instance and start up.
At first I complained about the VelocityResponseWriter, so i created a
/lib folder in /$SOLR_HOME and added the
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Avner Levy av...@checkpoint.com wrote:
Thanks Mark, I appreciate your help.
I need the Solr index to be in sync with my database.
This means that even if one record was added I need it to appear in the next
search (including faceting).
You could just add
: I have a more complex query condition like this:
:
: (city:15 AND country:60)^4 OR city:15^2 OR country:60^2
:
: What I want to achive with this query is basically if a document has
: city = 15 AND country = 60 it is more important then another document
: which only has city = 15 OR country =
SQLs like is usually handled with ngrams if you want
*stuff* kinds of searches. Wildcards are interesting
in Solr.
Things Solr handles that aren't easy in SQL
Phrases, phrases with slop, stemming,
synonyms. And, especially, some kind
of relevance ranking.
But Solr does NOT do the things SQL is
See below
1) Is there a significant difference in performances between a freshly
created core (the first time to index), to an old core (every
document already exists is the core)?
not really. Documents are indexed in segments, and a fresh one is
usually opened after every commit (you only commit
Hi,
I'm trying to deploy a Solrj based application into JBoss AS 7 using
Eclipse Indigo. When deploying it I get the following error message:
ERROR [org.jboss.msc.service.fail] (MSC service thread
The SolrParams class is in the solrj.jar file so you should verify that this is
in the classpath. Also see if it is listed in the manifest.mf file in the
war's META-INF dir. If you're running this on a server within Eclipse and
letting Eclipse do the deploy, my experience is it can be
Erick,
Thanks. I know I'll be able to utilize some of Solr's free text searching
capabilities in other search types in this project. The product manager wants
this particular search to exactly mimic LIKE%.
N-Grams get me pretty great results in general, but I don't want the results
for this
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Avner Levy av...@checkpoint.com wrote:
I've read in Solr-RA documentation that if you add
realtimetrue/realtime you can add documents and search for them without
any commit at all (and I assumed it is functionality of Solr).
In Solr 4 (trunk) you can either
Hi Devon,
Have you considered using a permuterm index? Its workable, but depending
on your requirements (size of fields that you want to create the index
on), it may bloat your index. I've written about it here:
http://sujitpal.blogspot.com/2011/10/lucene-wildcard-query-and-permuterm.html
: Thanks. I know I'll be able to utilize some of Solr's free text
: searching capabilities in other search types in this project. The
: product manager wants this particular search to exactly mimic LIKE%.
...
: Ex: If I search Albatross I want Albert to be excluded completely,
: rather
Hi Frederik,
Did you figure out a solution to this problem?
I'm asking because I recently ran into a similar problem, with a similar setup
(8 shards on one server).
Occasionally a query will take a very long time. Occasionally I see timeout
exceptions with the HTTP requests. E.g.
348914
: Looks like you've experienced the issue described with fixes here:
: http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/48b9e75fe68be4b7
but specifically, since you've already copied the jar file in question,
and are now getting a class not found for the *baseclass* it suggests you
have a diff
38 matches
Mail list logo