For the first install, I copied over all files in the directory "example"
into, let's call it, "install1". I did the same for "install2". The two
installs run on different ports, use different jar files, are not really
related to each other in any way as far as I can see. In particular, they
are no
M. Della Bitta is right- we're not talking about post.jar, but starting Solr:
java -xMx300m -jar start.jar
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Erick Erickson
wrote:
> Well, it _used_ to be defaulted in the code, but on looking at 3.6 it's seems
> like it defaults to Integer.MAX_VALUE, so you're fi
it's still not work in delta-import mode.
and the result as follow:
0
15
data-config.xml
delta-import
idle
0
0
0
2012-06-20 10:48:16
2012-06-20 10:48:16
2012-06-20 10:48:17
2012-06-20 10:48:17
0
0
0:0:0.62
This response format is experimental. It is likely to change in the future.
-
You'll have to reindex. It's the only way out of this situation, sorry.
Erik
On Jun 19, 2012, at 18:05, Bruno Mannina wrote:
> Le 20/06/2012 00:26, Rafał Kuć a écrit :
>> Hello!
>>
>> Try using string type instead of text_general. That should help.
>>
> it's too late now no?
>
> I index
Le 20/06/2012 00:26, Rafał Kuć a écrit :
Hello!
Try using string type instead of text_general. That should help.
it's too late now no?
I indexed around 18 000 000 docs.
Do you think it could be the problem? (text_general instead of string)
Hello!
Try using string type instead of text_general. That should help.
--
Regards,
Rafał Kuć
Sematext :: http://sematext.com/ :: Solr - Lucene - Nutch - ElasticSearch
> Hi All,
> In my Schema.xml I have:
> stored="true" required="true"/>
>
>
> patent-number
>
> And when I
I believe that is the issue.
We recently lost a physical server and a misinformed (due to weekend fire)
sys admin moved one of the master shards. This caused the automated
deployment scripts to change the order of publishing. When a rebuild
followed the following day, we essentially wrote the sa
Hi All,
In my Schema.xml I have:
stored="true" required="true"/>
patent-number
And when I do on my Admin Page:
patent-number:BE858458A1
then I get two identical documents ?!!!
May be I run twice:
java -jar post.jar BE.xml
but as Patent-Number is a uniqueKey the second indexat
: Confirming that there are no active records being written, the "numFound"
: value is decreasing as we page through the results.
1) check that the "clones" of each shard are in fact identical (just look
at the index files on each machine and make sure they are the same.
2) distributed searching
Does anybody know of a way to detect when the highlight snippet begins
at the beginning of the field or ends at the end of the field using one
of the standard highlighters shipped w/Solr? We'd like to display
ellipses only when there is additional text surrounding the snippet in
the original
As I understand your problem, it sounds like you were using your master as
part of your search cluster so the two distributed queries were returning
conflicting numbers.
In my scenario, our eight Masters are used for /updates & /deletes only.
There are no queries issued to these nodes. When the
On 6/19/2012 2:32 PM, Justin Babuscio wrote:
2) For the shards, we use the URL
parameters, shards=s1/solr,s2/solr,s3/solr,...,s8/solr
where s# point to a baremetal load balancer that routes the requests to
one of the two slave shards.
This most likely has nothing to do with your question a
1) We have 1 core and we use the default search handler.
2) For the shards, we use the URL
parameters, shards=s1/solr,s2/solr,s3/solr,...,s8/solr
where s# point to a baremetal load balancer that routes the requests to
one of the two slave shards.
There is definitely the chance that on each
On 6/19/2012 4:06 PM, Justin Babuscio wrote:
> Solr v3.5.0
> 8 Master Shards
> 2 Slaves Per Master
>
> Confirming that there are no active records being written, the "numFound"
> value is decreasing as we page through the results.
>
> For example,
> Page1 - numFound = 3683
> Page2 - numFound = 36
Frankly, that seems like a heck of a lot of work relative to moving the
indexes. _why_ do your bosses insist on this? And have you made it
explicit to them that
1> this will cost considerable time to develop that you could spend
putting in _useful_ features.
2> you'll have to maintain this cod
Solr v3.5.0
8 Master Shards
2 Slaves Per Master
Confirming that there are no active records being written, the "numFound"
value is decreasing as we page through the results.
For example,
Page1 - numFound = 3683
Page2 - numFound = 3683
Page3 - numFound = 3683
Page4 - numFound = 2866
Page5 - numFou
I am running Solr in a shared Tomcat v5.5.28 (I have access to all
instances) on a Linux VPS server.
When I set it all up, Tomcat starts properly and I can see that it has
accesses my Solr Config directory properly.
I can access the JSP pages if I reference them directly
(http://mysite.com/solr/
Well, it _used_ to be defaulted in the code, but on looking at 3.6 it's seems
like it defaults to Integer.MAX_VALUE, so you're fine
And it's all deprecated in 4.x, will be gone
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
> Actually -Xmx512m and no effect
>
> Concerning
My bosses are insisting on not changing our current Lucene folders.
So I have to get back on this, can I overwrite Solr's CoreAdminHandler (or
other classes) to change the way it'll look for the index directory?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-change-dat
Bruno,
Look at SPM for Solr ( http://sematext.com/spm ) - very handy for understanding
disk IO vs. CPU vs. JVM GC, etc. during indexing/performance testing.
You could also play with ramBufferSizeMB in solrconfig.xml
Otis
Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase -
http://se
: I have the requirement to support searching for numbers with their
: alphabetic or by digits.
: For example, if we have a document with a field's value of '200',
: if we search for "two hundred", that document should match.
:
: I haven't found anything like this yet. Do we have other option tha
Just an observation...
The OP is tweaking the heap size on post.jar, but wouldn't some tuning
of the container that Solr is running in also be in order?
Michael Della Bitta
Appinions, Inc. -- Where Influence Isn’t a Game.
http://www.appinions.com
Hi all,
I just wanted to check if there is a demand for this feature. I had to
implement this functionality for one of our customers and would like to
contribute it.
Here is the use case:
We are using the ExtractingRequestHandler with the extractOnly=true flag set.
With a request to this handle
On Jun 19, 2012, at 9:59 AM, fabio curti wrote:
> Hi,
> i tried to set a Multicore master-slaver replication in Solr Cloud found in
> this post
> http://pulkitsinghal.blogspot.it/2011/09/multicore-master-slave-replication-in.html
> but
> i get the following problem
>
> SEVERE: Error while trying
Forget to mention:
After Tomcat-restart, the slaves still have an index with 300GB.
After an manual replication command in UI, 100GB like master in a
couple of seconds and all is ok.
2012/6/19 Vadim Kisselmann :
> Hi folks,
>
> i have to look for an old live system with solr 1.4.
> When i optimi
Hi folks,
i have to look for an old live system with solr 1.4.
When i optimize an bigger index with round about 200GB(after optimize
and cut, 100GB) and my slaves
replicate the newest version after(!) optimize, they hang(all) with
100% in replication and they have at once circa 300GB index sizes.
Hi,
i tried to set a Multicore master-slaver replication in Solr Cloud found in
this post
http://pulkitsinghal.blogspot.it/2011/09/multicore-master-slave-replication-in.html
but
i get the following problem
SEVERE: Error while trying to recover.
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.SolrServerException: Ser
Hi,
i found this article about your issue.
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpellCheckComponent#Distributed_Search_Support
Fabio
2012/6/19 Eric Wilson
> I have a Solr application that is distributed into 11 shards, using Solr
> version 4.0.0.2011.07.26.16.34.16
>
> In the solrconfig.xml for each sh
I have a Solr application that is distributed into 11 shards, using Solr
version 4.0.0.2011.07.26.16.34.16
In the solrconfig.xml for each shard, I have configured a spellcheck
component:
textSpell
cn_spell
company_name_spell
0.0001
true
There is a lot of good information about that on the web, just google for
'ubuntu performance monitor'
Also the ubuntu website has a pretty good help section:
https://help.ubuntu.com/
and a community wiki:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community
Cheers
François
On Jun 19, 2012, at
Hi.
Just now i deactivated the spellcheck component in the default request handler
by commenting out the last-components arr. Our other search request handler has
spellcheck enabled and uses distributed search. After deactivating the
component in the default handler the queries never yield sugg
Linux Ubuntu :) since 2 months ! so I'm a new in this world :)
Le 19/06/2012 15:01, François Schiettecatte a écrit :
Well that depends on the platform you are on, you did not mention that.
If you are using linux, you could use atop ( http://www.atoptool.nl/ ), or top,
or iostat or stat, or al
Well that depends on the platform you are on, you did not mention that.
If you are using linux, you could use atop ( http://www.atoptool.nl/ ), or top,
or iostat or stat, or all four.
Cheers
François
On Jun 19, 2012, at 8:55 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
> CPU is not used, just 50-60% sometimes d
CPU is not used, just 50-60% sometimes during the process but How can I
check IO HDD ?
Le 19/06/2012 14:13, François Schiettecatte a écrit :
Just a suggestion, you might want to monitor CPU usage and disk I/O, there
might be a bottleneck.
Cheers
François
On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Bruno M
May be related to https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3418
which does ensure things are really written; if you do commit very
often, you may see this sort of performance loss (at least me did in my
junit test where i do commit very often and 3.3 switch to 3.4 really
hurts here at test time
thanks for the reply. Yes I have started the admin/analysis thing before you
suggested but just wanted to know if out of the box anything specific is
notsupported/supported by the tokenizers specified.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/What-we-loose-if-we-use-C
Just a suggestion, you might want to monitor CPU usage and disk I/O, there
might be a bottleneck.
Cheers
François
On Jun 19, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
> Actually -Xmx512m and no effect
>
> Concerning maxFieldLength, no problem it's commented
>
> Le 19/06/2012 13:02, Erick Erick
Actually -Xmx512m and no effect
Concerning maxFieldLength, no problem it's commented
Le 19/06/2012 13:02, Erick Erickson a écrit :
Then try -Xmx600M
next try -Xmx900M
etc. The idea is to bump things on separate runs.
But be a little cautious here. Look in your solrconfig.xml file, you'll se
Solr indexes all times as UTC (that's what the "Z' is all about). You ought
to be able to get your SQL to return UTC time rather than local, and that
should fix things up for you.
Best
Erick
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 6:24 AM, alex.wang wrote:
> hi all:
> when i import the data from db to solr.
Then try -Xmx600M
next try -Xmx900M
etc. The idea is to bump things on separate runs.
But be a little cautious here. Look in your solrconfig.xml file, you'll see
a commented-out line
1
The default behavior for Solr/Lucene is to index the first 10,000 tokens
(not characters, think of tokens
You're asking us to predict the future, which if I could I'd be rich enough
to build a mansion. If it's not marked as deprecated in 4.x or trunk, so it
doesn't look like there's any plans to deprecate it. Although what the future
holds is a good question..
I'd _strongly_ advise that you look at th
hi all:
when i import the data from db to solr. and solr changed the value with
timezone.
eg, the original value is 16/02/2012 12:05:16 , changed to 1/02/2012
04:05:06
. and i add the 8 hours in my sql . it's be correct.
but when i use delta-import mode to add index. it's not working.
the
In order to clear all the indexed data please try to use this code
private void Btn_Delete_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
var solrUrl = this.textBoxSolrUrl.Text;
indexer.FixtureSetup(solrUrl);
indexer.Delete();
MessageBox.Sho
FATAL: Solr returned an error #400 ERROR:unknown field
>'name'
This issue is due to data type mismatch in both solr(schema.xml) and in
coding part(Adding documents).
Try to make both the fields should be similar.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/indexing-a-xml
Like that?
java -Xmx300m -jar post.jar myfile.xml
Le 19/06/2012 11:11, Lance Norskog a écrit :
Ah! Java memory size is a java command line option:
http://javahowto.blogspot.com/2006/06/6-common-errors-in-setting-java-heap.html
You would try increasing the memory size in stages up to maybe 30
Ah! Java memory size is a java command line option:
http://javahowto.blogspot.com/2006/06/6-common-errors-in-setting-java-heap.html
You would try increasing the memory size in stages up to maybe 300m.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 2:04 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
>
>
> Le 19/06/2012 10:51, Lance Norskog
Hello,
I need to know that if I use ClassicTokenizer instead of StandardTokenizer
then what things I will loose. Is it the case that in future solr versions
ClassicTokenizer will be deprecated? or development in ClassicTokenizer is
going to halt? Please let me know this.
--
View this message in c
Le 19/06/2012 10:51, Lance Norskog a écrit :
675 doc/s is respectable for that server. You might move the memory
allocated to Java up and down- there is a balance between amount of
memory in Java v.s. the OS disk buffer.
How can I do that ? is there an option during my command line or in a
c
When one document fails, the entire update fails, right? Is there now
a mode where successful documents are added and failed docs are
dropped?
If you want to know if a document is in the index, search for it!
There is no other guaranteed way.
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Jack Krupansky wrote
675 doc/s is respectable for that server. You might move the memory
allocated to Java up and down- there is a balance between amount of
memory in Java v.s. the OS disk buffer.
And, of course, use the latest trunk.
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:10 AM, Bruno Mannina wrote:
> Correction: file size is
Correction: file size is 40 Mo !!!
Le 19/06/2012 09:09, Bruno Mannina a écrit :
Dear All,
I would like to know if the indexation speed is right.
I have a 40Go file size with around 27 000 docs inside.
I index around 20 fields,
My (old) test server is a DualCore 3.06GHz Intel Xeon with only 1G
Dear All,
I would like to know if the indexation speed is right.
I have a 40Go file size with around 27 000 docs inside.
I index around 20 fields,
My (old) test server is a DualCore 3.06GHz Intel Xeon with only 1Go Ram
The file takes 40 seconds with the command line:
java -jar post.jar myfile.
52 matches
Mail list logo
