Hallo,
: SELECT ... CAST(LAST_ACTION_TIMESTAMP AS DATE) AS LAT
:
: This removes the time part of the timestamp in SOLR. althought it is
: shown in PL/SQL-Developer (Tool for Oracle).
Hmmm... that makes no sense to me based on 10 seconds of googling...
The first rule of Solr without Unique Key is that we don't talk about Solr
without a Unique Key.
The second rule...
On May 16, 2013, at 8:47 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com wrote:
Technically, core Solr does not require a unique key. A lot of features in
Solr do require unique
Am 16.05.2013 17:19, schrieb Shawn Heisey:
On 5/16/2013 3:24 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
OK, solved.
I have now run-jetty-run with log4j running.
Just copied log4j libs from example/lib/ext to webapp/WEB-INF/classes and
set -Dlog4j.configuration in run-jetty-run VM classpath.
The location
No, exactly the same JVM of Java6
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-4-memory-usage-increase-tp4064066p4064108.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
It is past time to get off of Java 6. That is dead. End of life. No more
updates, not even for security bugs.
What version of Java 6? Some earlier versions had bad bugs that Solr would run
into. We hit them in prod until we upgraded.
wunder
On May 16, 2013, at 11:28 PM, Wei Zhao wrote:
No,
Hi
I moved to 4.2.1 from 4.1 recently.. everything was working fine until i added
few more stats query..
Now i am getting this error frequently that solr does not run even for 2
minutes continuously.
All 5GB is getting used instantaneously in few queries...
SEVERE:
Hallo,
To delete:
curl http://localhost:8983/solr/update?commit=true \
-H 'Content-type:application/json' \
-d '{delete: {id:doc-0001}}'
I try it in this way:
http://localhost:9180/solr/mycore/update?commit=truestream.body=delete
I get the same issue in 1.7.0_09-b05 also.
./zahoor
On 17-May-2013, at 12:07 PM, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
It is past time to get off of Java 6. That is dead. End of life. No more
updates, not even for security bugs.
What version of Java 6? Some earlier versions had
Hi,
To calculate some stats we are using a field B with 50.000. different
values as facet pivot in a schema that contains 200.000.000 documents. We
only need to calculate how many different B values have more than 1
document but it takes ages Is there any other better way/configuration
to
Hi, sorry for the delay.
I have two live nodes (also zookeeper knows these two
[app02:9985_solrl,app03:9985_solr])
But when I want to create a collection via:
http://app02:9985/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATEname=storagenumShards=1replicationFactor=2collection.configName=storage-conf
Can you solve by retaining hl.maxAnalyzedChars=maxLength+buffer, where
maxLength is the max length of your text field plus some reasonable buffer
on top?
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 1:03 PM, meghana meghana.rav...@amultek.com wrote:
Hi,
Query pasted in my post, is returning 1 record with 0
Hi Alexander,
So it sounds like you want the collection created with a master and a
replica and you want one to be on each node? If so, I believe that you can
get that effect by specifying maxShardsPerNode=1 as part of your url line.
This will tell solr to create the master and replica that you
Sorry, 16 GB RAM (not 8).
2013/5/17 Carlos Bonilla carlosbonill...@gmail.com
Hi,
To calculate some stats we are using a field B with 50.000.
different values as facet pivot in a schema that contains 200.000.000
documents. We only need to calculate how many different B values have
more
Hi Guys,
I have a field defined with the following custom data type,
fieldType name=cust_str class=solr.TextField positionIncrementGap=100
sortMissingLast=true
analyzer type=index
tokenizer class=solr.StandardTokenizerFactory/
filter class=solr.StopFilterFactory
Hi Jared,
yes that is what I want to achieve:
Creating a master and a replica and I want them to be separate nodes.
I just realized that I posted the wrong URL, I was already using the
parameter maxShardsPerNode=1.
But just to be sure, I also tried it with your URL and I get the same
Is this really a text field where you want to search for tokenized keywords?
Or is it a string field where you wish strictly to deal with equality of the
entire string or explicit wildcards for substring matches, as you've show.
You haven't told us your full requirements for this field.
The
Dear all,
I am running a grouped query including facets in my Junit Test cases
against a Solr 4.2.1 Embedded Server. When faceting the groups, I want the
counts to reflect the number of groups, not the number of documents. But
when I enable group.facet=true on the query, the test fails with the
The way Solr uses ZK, unless you are also using ZK with something else, I
wouldn't worry about it at all. In a steady state, the cluster won't even
really talk to ZK in any intensive manner at all.
- Mark
On May 16, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Furkan KAMACI furkankam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Shawn;
I
Hi All
I am trying to add few fields in schema.xml file as below.
field name=salary type=long indexed=true stored=true /
field name=experience type=long indexed=true stored=true /
* field name=last_updated_date type=tdate indexed=true
stored=true default=NOW multiValued=false /
*
Start by simply experimenting with 2 shards and 2 replicas - 4 nodes. And
just run zk on the nodes themselves for simple experiments. It's better to
deploy zk separate from the Solr nodes, but for simple testing it shouldn't
matter. Get experience with SolrCloud using a simple configuration
On 16 May 2013 19:11, Rohan Thakur rohan.i...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Mohanty
I tried what you suggested of using id as common field and changing the SQL
query to point to id
and using id as uniqueKey
it is working but now what it is doing is just keeping the id's that are
not same in both the
Thank you Erik and Jack.
I opened a JIRA issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4834
I wish a will have time to sumbit a patch file soon.
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 7:38 AM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.comwrote:
(Erik: Or he can get the LucidWorks Search product and then use
Hi everyone..
I'm indexing docs into Solr using the update request handler, by POSTing
data to the REST endpoint (not SolrJ, not DIH).
My indexer should return an indication, whether the document existed in the
collection before or not, based in its ID.
The obvious solution is the perform a
Do you have the types corresponding to those fields present?
Specifically, long. You don't get any special type names out of the
box, they all need to be present in types area.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn:
Using SqlEntityProcessor with cacheImpl=SortedMapBackedCache is the same as
specifying CachedSqlEntityProcessor. Because the pluggable caches are only
partially committed, I never added details to the wiki, so it still refers to
CachedSEP. But its the same thing.
What is new here, though, is
Does anybody know of a tokenizer which can be configured with (multiple)
regular expressions to mark some of the input text as keyword
and behave like StandardTokenizer (or UAX29URLEmailTokenizer) otherwise?
Input:
Does my order 4711.0815!-somecode_and.other(stuff) arrive on friday?
Tokens:
Hprof introspection shows that huge Double Array are using up 75% of heap
space... which belongs to Lucen's FieldCache..
./zahoor
On 17-May-2013, at 12:47 PM, J Mohamed Zahoor zah...@indix.com wrote:
Hi
I moved to 4.2.1 from 4.1 recently.. everything was working fine until i
added few
Hello Jack,
Thanks for pointing the issues out and for your valuable suggestion. My
preliminary tests were okay on search but I will be doing more testing to
see if this has impacted any other searches.
Thanks once again and have a nice sunny weekend,
Sandeep
On 17 May 2013 05:35, Jack
On 5/17/2013 12:25 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
Actually there is no real container in my eclipse debugging env :-(
/opt/indigo/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/884/1/.cp/lib/jetty-webapp-8.1.2.v20120308.jar
Then it should be copied to lib/ext of eclipse/run-jetty-run
On 5/17/2013 2:47 AM, Carlos Bonilla wrote:
To calculate some stats we are using a field B with 50.000. different
values as facet pivot in a schema that contains 200.000.000 documents. We
only need to calculate how many different B values have more than 1
document but it takes ages Is
Can you explain your setup more ?
ie. is it master/slave, indexing in parallel, etc ?
We had to commit more often to reduce JVM memory usage due to
transaction logs in SolrCloud mode, compared with previous setups
without tlogs.
update?commit=trueopenSearcher=false
André
On 05/17/2013 09:56
On 5/17/2013 4:03 AM, Jared Rodriguez wrote:
So it sounds like you want the collection created with a master and a
replica and you want one to be on each node? If so, I believe that you can
get that effect by specifying maxShardsPerNode=1 as part of your url line.
This will tell solr to
Is there some StandardTokenizer Implementation which does not break words on
hyphens?
I think it would be more flexible to retain hyphens and use a
WordDelimiterFactory to split these tokens.
StandardTokenizer today:
doc1: email - email
doc2: e-mail - e|mail
doc3: e mail - e|mail
query1:
On 5/17/2013 1:17 AM, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
I moved to 4.2.1 from 4.1 recently.. everything was working fine until i
added few more stats query..
Now i am getting this error frequently that solr does not run even for 2
minutes continuously.
All 5GB is getting used instantaneously in few
What version of Solr? I think there was a bug a couple versions back (perhaps
introduced in 4.1 if I remember right) that made it so creates were not spread
correctly.
- Mark
On 5/17/2013 10:26 AM, Kai Gülzau wrote:
Is there some StandardTokenizer Implementation which does not break words on
hyphens?
I think it would be more flexible to retain hyphens and use a
WordDelimiterFactory to split these tokens.
You can use the whitespace tokenizer with WDF. This is
Hi Solr Users,
I've been migrating our existing app from Solr 3.6.2 to Solr 4.3 and I've
come across some strange behaviour that I think demonstrate one or more
bugs in the edismax parser.
-- Setup
--
with a clean copy of
I think I just found the solution.
Would the right strategy be to store the original XML content and then use a
solr.HTMLStripCharFilterFactory when querying? I just made a quick test and
it work,
the only problem now is that it also finds the data contained in the XML
attribute fields.
I think
Memory increase a lot with queries which have facets…
./Zahoor
On 17-May-2013, at 10:00 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 5/17/2013 1:17 AM, J Mohamed Zahoor wrote:
I moved to 4.2.1 from 4.1 recently.. everything was working fine until i
added few more stats query..
Now i am
Yeah how to turn off index writer ?
On Friday, May 17, 2013, Andre Bois-Crettez wrote:
Can you explain your setup more ?
ie. is it master/slave, indexing in parallel, etc ?
We had to commit more often to reduce JVM memory usage due to
transaction logs in SolrCloud mode, compared with
On 17 May 2013 00:02, geeky2 gee...@hotmail.com wrote:
[...]
i have tried setting them up as clob fields - but this is not working (see
details below)
i have also tried treating them as plain string fields (removing the
references to clob in the DIH) - but this does not work either.
DIH
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Carlos Bonilla
carlosbonill...@gmail.comwrote:
We
only need to calculate how many different B values have more than 1
document but it takes ages
Carlos,
It's not clear whether you need to take results of a query into account or
just gather statistics from
Hi All,
Its Friday 3:00pm, warm sunny outside and it was a good week. Figured I'd
share some good news.
I work for AOL mail team and we use SOLR for our mail search backend.
We have been using it since pre-SOLR 1.4 and strong supporters of SOLR
community.
We deal with millions indexes and
Here is the JVM info:
$ java -version
java version 1.6.0_26
Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_26-b03)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 20.1-b02, mixed mode)
--
View this message in context:
Hi,
i want implement security through jetty realm in solr4. So i configured
related stuffs in realm.properties ,jetty.xml, webdefault.xml under
/solrhome/example/etc. But still it is not working. Please advise.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
We have master/slave setup. We disabled autocommits/autosoftcommits. So the
slave only replicates from master and serve query. Master does all the
indexing and commit every 5 minutes. Slave polls master every 2.5 minutes
and does replication.
Both tests with Solr 3.5 and 4.2 was run with the same
This is great; data like this is rare. Can you tell us any hardware or
throughput numbers?
On 05/17/2013 12:29 PM, Rishi Easwaran wrote:
Hi All,
Its Friday 3:00pm, warm sunny outside and it was a good week. Figured I'd
share some good news.
I work for AOL mail team and we use SOLR for our
Hi Mark;
Thanks for the answer. Does Solr nodes holds the current state of cluster
(which Zookeeper ensemble knows) inside their cache/RAM?
2013/5/17 Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com
The way Solr uses ZK, unless you are also using ZK with something else, I
wouldn't worry about it at all. In
As an example, I have 9 SOLR nodes (3 clusters of 3) using different versions
of SOLR (4.1, 4.1, and 4.2.1), utilizing the same zookeeper ensemble (3
servers), using chroot for the different configs across clusters.
My zookeeper servers are just VMs, dual-core with 1GB of RAM and are only
used
Hello Gora,
thank you for the reply -
i did finally get this to work. i had to cast the column in the DIH to a
clob - like this.
cast(att.attr_val AS clob) as attr_val,
cast(rsr.rsr_val AS clob) as rsr_val,
once this was done, the ClobTransformer worked.
to my knowledge - this
Hi
It will not be double the disk space at all. You will not need to store the
field you search, only the field being returned needs to be stored.
Furthermore if you are not searching the XML field you will not need to index
that field, only store it.
Hope that helps,
Robi
-Original
First time on forum.
We are planning to use Solr to house some data mining formation, and we are
thinking of using attributes to add some semantic information to indexed
content. As a test, I wrote a filter that adds an animal attribute to tokens
like dog, cat, etc. After adding a document with
Thank you James. I think I got this to work using CachedSqlEntityProcessor –
and it seems extremely fast. I will try SortedMapBackedCache on Monday :-).
Thank you,
O. O.
Dyer, James-2 wrote
Using SqlEntityProcessor with cacheImpl=SortedMapBackedCache is the same
as specifying
Maybe you want to set the payload for each term, based on your animal
attribute. Then there is minimal support in Solr for payloads. There is no
immediate filter for capturing an arbitrary attribute.
Take a look at TypeAsPayloadTokenFilterFactory . You could do something
similar, like
I am trying to use Solr inside of another framework (Storm) that provides a
version of HttpClient (4.1.x) that is incompatible with the latest version
that SolrJ requires (4.3.x). Is there a way to use the older version of
HttpClient with SolrJ? Are there any issues with using an earlier SolrJ
On 5/17/2013 5:06 PM, Jamie Johnson wrote:
I am trying to use Solr inside of another framework (Storm) that provides a
version of HttpClient (4.1.x) that is incompatible with the latest version
that SolrJ requires (4.3.x). Is there a way to use the older version of
HttpClient with SolrJ? Are
A lot of people (including me) are asking for this type of support in this
JIRA:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4470
Although brought up frequently on the list, the effort doesn't seem to be
moving too much. I can confirm that the most recent patch on this JIRA will
work with the
On 18 May 2013 02:24, geeky2 gee...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello Gora,
thank you for the reply -
i did finally get this to work. i had to cast the column in the DIH to a
clob - like this.
cast(att.attr_val AS clob) as attr_val,
cast(rsr.rsr_val AS clob) as rsr_val,
once this was
58 matches
Mail list logo
