Dear all,
we are currenty using Solr 4.3.1 in production (With SolrCloud).
We encounter quite the same problem described in this other old post:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/SolrCloud-CloudSolrServer-Zookeeper-disconnects-and-re-connects-with-heavy-memory-usage-consumption-td4026421.html
Hi Joel,Thanks a lot for the suggestion.After thinking more about this, I think I could skip the faceting count for now,and so just provide a filtering option without display how many items that wouldbe there after filtering. After all, even Google Shopping product search doesn'tdisplay the facet
Hi All,
I have a question regarding retrieval of documents by lucene.
I know lucene uses many files on disk to keep documents, each comprising
fields in it, and uses many IR algorithms, and inverted index to match
documents.
My question is :
1. How lucene stores these documents inside file
Hello
I think you can start from
http://www.lucenerevolution.org/2013/What-is-in-a-lucene-index
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Harshvardhan Ojha
ojha.harshvard...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I have a question regarding retrieval of documents by lucene.
I know lucene uses many files on
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for sharing this nice link. I am pretty comfortable with searching
of lucene and this is very beginner level question on storage, mainly
Hashing part(storage and retrieval).
Which DS(I don't know currently), is being used to keep and again calculate
that hash to get document
Harshvardhan,
There almost nothing like this in bare Lucene, the closest analogy is
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#documentCache
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Harshvardhan Ojha
ojha.harshvard...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for sharing this nice link. I am pretty
Hi Alexey,
I would be very interested in your progress with this. Your use case seems
to match ours, we found enum to be much quicker than fc particularly for
multivalued fields. We found that fc caused memory issues and caused us to
frequently lose nodes. We, like you, have no interest in the
I suspect (not certain) one reason for the performance difference with
Solr vs Lucene joins is that Solr operates on a top-level reader?
This results in fast joins, but it means whenever you open a new
reader (NRT reader) there is a high cost to regenerate the top-level
data structures.
But if
Hi Mikhail,
Don't you
think org.apache.lucene.codecs.bloom.FuzzySet.java, contains(BytesRef
value) methods returns probability of having a field, and it is a place
where we are using hashing ?
Are there any other place in source which when given with document id,
could determine by calculating
Thanks Mike, that surely helps to clarify the difference.
On the related note, if we have provide a scoring support for solr
join, instead of using lucene join, what would be best way to do that .
There's one suggestion that david gave below :- build a custom QParser
and call Lucene's JOIN
I was having similar problem with delta import.
I am using solr 4.6 and making use of ${dih.last_index_time},
${dih.delta.xxx} shorter variable names.
I think the issue in previously discussed posts in the thread lies in
deltaQuery and deltaImportQuery.
if deltaQuery=select *rowId* from
Hi Rajeev,
You can take this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201307.mbox/%3CCAEN8dyX_Am_v4f=5614eu35fnhb5h7dzkmkzdfwvrrm1xpq...@mail.gmail.com%3E
I haven't created the jira yet, but I have improved the plugin. Recently, I
have seen a use case of passing 90K identifiers
Hi Tri,
Look at this:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201307.mbox/%3CCAEN8dyX_Am_v4f=5614eu35fnhb5h7dzkmkzdfwvrrm1xpq...@mail.gmail.com%3E
Roman
On 13 Feb 2014 03:39, Tri Cao tm...@me.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
Thanks a lot for the suggestion.
After thinking more about
Hello,
I'm using block join to store nested documents with a huge number of children.
I want to update some fields in the parent document using atomic
updates, because I don't want to re-index all the child documents again.
So, as far as I understood atomic updates, solr is reindexing the
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:25 AM, m...@preselect-media.com wrote:
Is there any workaround to perform atomic updates on blocks or do I have to
re-index the parent document and all its children always again if I want to
update a field?
The latter, unfortunately.
-Yonik
http://heliosearch.org -
Yonik Seeley yo...@heliosearch.com:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 8:25 AM, m...@preselect-media.com wrote:
Is there any workaround to perform atomic updates on blocks or do I have to
re-index the parent document and all its children always again if I want to
update a field?
The latter,
Hello, Someone can help me on implementing the below query in Solr, I will
using a rank in MS SQL and a return distinct Productid
Select productid from products where SKU = 101
Select Productid from products where ManufactureSKU = 101
Select Productid from product where SKU Like 101%
Select
Use the OR operator between the specific clauses.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI, Automotive-Service-Solutions)
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2014 9:09 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Multiple Column Condition with Relevance/Rank
Dear All,
I am getting ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 4032
bytes error when I try to index xmltype data from Oracle DB. I have registered
in Solr support the ID is SOLR-5723
I have xmltype data in my oracle DB. I am converting xmltype to clob and to xml
string using
Hi guys,
I'm looking for reviewers for our newly published book titled, ‘Apache Solr
Beginner’s Guide’
I'll be happy to provide a free eBook copy to anyone interested in writing a
review for this book specifically on their Blog/Website, Amazon, Goodreads,
Dzone within 2-3 weeks after receiving
Hi
I am using SOLR 4.6.
I need to highlight span queries. But when I fire a span query, there are
no highlight snippets.
Is there any highlighter out there that can be used?
Regards
Puneet
On 2/13/2014 9:20 AM, Murugan, Muniraja (CTR) Offshore wrote:
I am getting ORA-04030: out of process memory when trying to allocate 4032 bytes error
when I try to index xmltype data from Oracle DB. I have registered in Solr support the ID is
SOLR-5723
The issue tracker is for bugs and
hi
when i do quering status:verified for my core and adding facet then i
get result but for facet it wrong output as verifi not verified
why this is happaning ??
any suggestion for this
Regards,
Kishan Parmar
Software Developer
+91 95 100 77394
Jay Shree Krishnaa !!
Change the type of 'status' field to 'string'. At present it must be
'text_en' and hence while indexing its getting tokenized.
After changing the type in schema.xml you will have to re-index the
documents to see the expected facet response.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Kishan,
Facets are generated from indexed values. Probably you have stemmer in your
analysis chain. Thus 'verified' is indexed as 'verifi'. Remove stemming filter
factory from your field type definition.
Ahmet
On Thursday, February 13, 2014 8:53 PM, Kishan Parmar kishan@gmail.com
thanks
for help..
its working
Regards,
Kishan Parmar
Software Developer
+91 95 100 77394
Jay Shree Krishnaa !!
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 12:36 AM, Saumitra Srivastav
saumitra.srivast...@gmail.com wrote:
Change the type of 'status' field to 'string'. At present it must be
'text_en' and hence
I am using solr/solrj 4.6.1 along with the apache httpclient 4.3.2 as part
of a web application which connects to the solr server via solrj
using CloudSolrServer(); The web application is wired up with Guice, and
there is a single instance of the CloudSolrServer class used by all inbound
I found out that generated files are the same. I think this is because that
these lines inside build file
target name=gen-utr30-data-files depends=compile-tools
java
classname=org.apache.lucene.analysis.icu.GenerateUTR30DataFiles
dir=${utr30.data.dir}
fork=true
I found out that generated files are the same. I think this is because that
these lines inside build file
target name=gen-utr30-data-files depends=compile-tools
java
classname=org.apache.lucene.analysis.icu.GenerateUTR30DataFiles
dir=${utr30.data.dir}
fork=true
On 2/13/2014 1:38 PM, Jared Rodriguez wrote:
I am using solr/solrj 4.6.1 along with the apache httpclient 4.3.2 as part
of a web application which connects to the solr server via solrj
using CloudSolrServer(); The web application is wired up with Guice, and
there is a single instance of the
Hi Annette,
You might want to find initial version of patch attached
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5725
I'd be happy to find out performance improvement on your setup, let me know if
you need help with patching your version of solr.
--
Alexey
-Original Message-
From:
That did fix my issue, thanks so much.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/java-lang-IllegalArgumentException-when-using-SolrJ-CloudSolrServer-tp4116585p4117279.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On 2/13/2014 3:17 PM, Jared Rodriguez wrote:
I just regressed to Solrj 4.6.1 with http client 4.2.6 and am trying to
reproduce the problem. Using YourKit to profile and even just manually
simulating a few users at once, I see the same problem of open sockets. 6
sockets opened to the solr
Hi all,
I just want to verify that it is no longer possible to unload a Cloud
core via the Core API UNLOAD command, correct?
I had two situations: one where I wanted to remove old replicas in a
node that I was deactivating (and I had already created new replicas)
and one where I needed to
I was wondering if its possible to call a storedProcedure in the
deltaImportQuery. This is what I 'm trying to do.
entity name=entity1 transformer=RegexTransformer pk=id
query=SELECT * FROM table1
INNER JOIN tabl2 ON table2.tbl1Id = table1.id
I think it is not possible to use stored procedures in DIH.
Please see : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1262
On Friday, February 14, 2014 3:02 AM, Jay Potharaju jayasunde...@gmail.com
wrote:
I was wondering if its possible to call a storedProcedure in the
deltaImportQuery. This is
Lajos,
Just did a quick test on 4.6.1 UNLOADing a SolrCloud replica using the core
admin API and it worked as expected. I'm running with the core.properties
setup. Are you running with an old style solr.xml?
The org.apache.solr.core.CorePropertiesLocator.delete() method in trunk
and 4x are
On 2/13/2014 5:53 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
I was wondering if its possible to call a storedProcedure in the
deltaImportQuery. This is what I 'm trying to do.
entity name=entity1 transformer=RegexTransformer pk=id
query=SELECT * FROM table1
INNER JOIN tabl2 ON
38 matches
Mail list logo
