Can you please open a Jira issue? It'd be nice to have this.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:03 AM, Branham, Jeremy [HR]
jeremy.d.bran...@sprint.com wrote:
Is there a JMX metric for measuring the cache request time?
I can see the avg request times, but I'm assuming this includes the cache
and
I found someone had customised the solr1.4 default highlight before I joined
the team.
so It is not a bug.
The standard solr1.4 default highlighter works like solr3.6.
--
View this message in context:
Anybody knowing this issue?
Gesendet: Dienstag, 03. Juni 2014 um 09:11 Uhr
Von: jay list jay.l...@web.de
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: highlighting on hl.alternateField (copyField target) doesnt highlight
Hello,
im trying to implement a user friendly search for phone
Hi,
the Velocity example that comes with SOLR displays all data contained in
the database when you connect to the following page with a browser:
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/browse .
I have looked through collection1's Velocity templates, but unfortunately
can't locate the code that
I can't get Solr to start up inside a tomcat7 server. Other Wars are
starting but this one isn't. That's it really. It works on my Mac. The
sitename bit is a slight redaction, the work is for a client.
I've added a solr.xml file:
Context docBase=/var/www/solr/solr.war crossContext=true
Hi,
Can you please help me solr distribued search in multicore? i would
be very happy as i am stuck here.
In java code how do i implement distributed search?
--
Thanks Regards
Anurag Verma
Hi, you can search using this sample Url
http://localhost:8080/solr/core1/select?q=*:*shards=localhost:8080/solr/core1,localhost:8080/solr/core2,localhost:8080/solr/core3
Mahmoud Almokadem
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 8:13 AM, Anurag Verma vermanur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Can you please
Hi,
I just have want know that does the lucene used the tries data structure to
store the
data.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
Brett,
It's really interesting observation. I can only speculate. It's worth to
check cache hit stats and cache content via
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching#showItems (the key question what
are cached doc sets classes). Also if you tell the overall number of docs
in the index, and
Philippe -
/browse is a Solr request handler defined in solrconfig.xml. It’s
configuration is shipped using edismax and q.alt=*:*, meaning that if there is
no client provided query string it defaults to all documents. You could
either adjust the configuration such that an empty /browse
bq. The file /var/www/sitename/search/collection1/solrconfig.xml does
exist,
the owner is tomcat7 and the permissions are 664 and contains a
configuration that is working on my mac with the same version of solr.
The exception is self-explanatory: solr is looking for conf directory
inside
No, i will try it after getting the some deep knowledge, because i am just
a beginner it will take some time :)
Thanks for the help david.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 6:49 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
Did my suggestion work out?
RE
Yeah sometime i feels that too, but as per my organization i have to go
with the tomcat. So any help with tomcat will be really appreciated, i am
still stucked here.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:14 AM, Greg Walters greg.walt...@answers.com
wrote:
While solr can run under
Hi,
We are using the SOLR 4.6 version and trying to implement Delta import
functionality .On implementing the delta import , the indexing is gettting
completed but not fetching the updated or newly inserted rows from the table
while executing the query.
Please suggest.
Below is the data
Hi,
Solr is good at caching: even if first cold query takes longer time, the
subsequent one is much quicker, given that it shares the fq's of the first
query.
This is more like an idea question:
what about the out-of-vocabulary (OOV) queries? According to my quick
measurements, they take same
@rulinma:
I've analyzed all your messages and noticed you keep sending useless mark
and good. Are you trying to spam the mailing list? Could you please stop
doing this?
E-mail clients these days have bookmarking / staring in case you want to
save the good post for later reading or mark it
Thank you for your quick responses.
The numeric values are determined by external system which I don't have any
control of. There is a gap between values to reserve holes that may be filled
in later in the future.
The values are sent as integers. In Solr, there is no need to retrieve the
It seems as if 0-hit queries should be pretty fast since they can
terminate very early? Are you seeing a big difference between
first-time and subsequent (cached) no-match queries?
-Mike
On 6/5/2014 8:47 AM, Dmitry Kan wrote:
Hi,
Solr is good at caching: even if first cold query takes
Mike,
I did only measurements by hand, i.e. no scientific figures yet. Basically
the same oov query takes about same amount of time when repeated. Which is
surprising. Ok, to add to the mix: from a list of fqs that are on that
query, one is marked with cache=false and a cost 100.
Dmitry
On
Hi,
The file system tree is:
├── collection1
│ ├── conf
│ │ ├── currency.xml
│ │ ├── data-config.xml
│ │ ├── dataimport.properties
│ │ ├── elevate.xml
│ │ ├── lang
│ │ │ ├── contractions_ca.txt
│ │ │ ├── contractions_fr.txt
│ │ │ ├──
Hi
I have a set of solr cloud nodes which were working correctly for a
while until one of them had problems (due to incorrect java version -
but the cause of how it went bad is not very important)
Once the problem was fixed and the node was started, I got the
following situation: The node
The following bit looks weird:
Can't find resource 'solrconfig.xml'
in classpath or '/var/www/sitename/search/
collection1/con*f*'
Where does con*f* comes from?
In any case, what I would do is use a hammer. One of the
truss/strace/dtrace/opensnoop utilities based on what O/S you are
doing this
Yeah, leaving holes as reservations for future fill-in seems like a
reasonable use case.
Why not just have explicit=n as an XML attribute for value. If no
explicit attribute is given, then simply use the previous value plus one. No
need for a separate pair then.
-- Jack Krupansky
As has been suggested on other threads here, the HDS distribution of Solr
from Heliosearch comes preconfigured with Tomcat, so it really is the
easiest way to install Solr with Tomcat.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 8:32 AM
To:
Lucene uses trie for numeric and date fields:
http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_8_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/NumericRangeQuery.html
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Aman Tandon
Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 5:32 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Does lucene uses
Thanks Mikhail, I'll try to profile it soon.
As for cardinality, on a single core:
created_at_tdid:[1392768001 TO 1393954400] = 241657215
text:coffee = 117593
Oddly enough, I just tried the query with distrib=false and both return in
about 50ms... hmm.
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:09 AM,
I've added a solr.xml file:
Context docBase=/var/www/solr/solr.war crossContext=true
Environment name=solr/home type=java.lang.String
value=/var/www/sitename/search/ override=true /
/Context
The file /var/www/sitename/search/collection1/solrconfig.xml does exist,
the owner is tomcat7
I just have want know that does the lucene used the tries data structure
to
store the
data.
Lucene (and Solr) will use whatever you tell it when you create the field.
If you indicate in your schema fieldType that you want to use a class of
solr.TrieIntField, then the field will use a Lucene
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Shawn Heisey elyog...@elyograg.org wrote:
I do not recommend it, but if you want to run in single core mode, you'll
need to put solrconfig.xml and schema.xml in collection1/conf, not
collection1. The messages that get logged are misleading.
Oops. Great catch.
Are you implying there is not way to lookup on a multiValued field with a
substring? If so, then how is it usually handled?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:44 PM, Jack Krupansky j...@basetechnology.com
wrote:
Wildcard, fuzzy, and regex query operate on a single term of a single
tokenized field
Wildcard search do work on multiValued field. I was able to pull up
records for following multiValued field -
Code : [
12344,
4534,
674
]
q=Code:45* fetched the correct document. It doesn't work in
quotes(q=Code:45*), however. Is there a workaround?
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:34 AM, Ethan
We have a requirement to for large data set like Billing data for example.
The Business wants to do sorting and type ahead functions for it. For
example, when I start typing “8164…” they want to list ALL the unique number
and the associated attributes displayed (name, description, etc).
We
On 6/5/2014 10:55 AM, bbi123 wrote:
We have a requirement to for large data set like Billing data for example.
The Business wants to do sorting and type ahead functions for it. For
example, when I start typing “8164…” they want to list ALL the unique number
and the associated attributes
The default terms dictionary (BlockTree) also uses a trie index
structure to locate the block on disk that may contain a target term.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
I just have want know that does the
bbi123 [bbar...@gmail.com] wrote:
We have a requirement to for large data set like Billing data for example.
The Business wants to do sorting and type ahead functions for it. For
example, when I start typing “8164…” they want to list ALL the unique number
and the associated attributes
Update: this was a configuration error.
In my haste/carelessness, instead of defining separate spellcheck and
suggest components, I defined only suggest. (More specifically I
copied over the ch10 examples from solr in action, but did not copy the
spellcheck component. )
When solr complained
I update persistent=true in the solr.xml but still no change , after a restart
the Cores are removed..
-Original Message-
From: Michael Della Bitta [mailto:michael.della.bi...@appinions.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2014 2:54 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tomcat
Did you put that attribute on the root element, or somewhere else? The
beginning of solr.xml should look like this:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
solr sharedLib=lib persistent=true
Michael Della Bitta
Applications Developer
o: +1 646 532 3062
appinions inc.
“The Science of Influence
All of your links give 404 errors...
But wait. You say all three nodes are masters. First a nit: leader not
master unless you're using old-style replication...
That said:
bq: assuming that instance3 is a replica of instance1 or instance2
if all three are leaders, then this is not a correct
the new way of doing things is core discovery, see:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/Core%20Discovery%20(4.4%20and%20beyond). You
might just sidestep the problem.
What does disappeared mean? Not showing up in the admin UI? Files on disk
erased? The former may well be the persist bit, the latter would
Thanks for looking my email. Below is the content in the solr.xml under
solr-home\solr directory
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8 ?
solr persistent=true
cores adminPath=/admin/cores
core name=Collection1 instanceDir= Collection1 /
core name= Collection2 instanceDir= Collection2 /
Thanks to all.
And as Solr provides the field datatype as int as well as solr.TrieIntField
so which one is more better?
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
The default terms dictionary (BlockTree) also uses a trie
Hi
Can you not split it using oracle's string functions (as part of your
select statement)?
Something along the lines of:
SELECT .
RIGHT(LEFT(d.doc_name, (INSTR(d.doc_name, '#') - 1)),
LENGTH(LEFT(d.doc_name, (INSTR(d.doc_name, '#') - 1))) - 1) as Name,
^- (strip asterisk from
On 6/5/2014 3:39 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
Thanks to all.
And as Solr provides the field datatype as int as well as solr.TrieIntField
so which one is more better?
The example has int and tint as two different types that both use
TrieIntField. The difference between the two is the precisionStep
: edismax was developed before the lucene query parser syntax was
: changed to include regex, so maybe that's the issue.
edismax has never been explicilty updated to support regex queries...
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6009
-Hoss
http://www.lucidworks.com/
Thanks shawn for the explanation and for the example, that helps to
understand it quite easily.
With Regards
Aman Tandon
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:48 AM, Shawn Heisey s...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 6/5/2014 3:39 PM, Aman Tandon wrote:
Thanks to all.
And as Solr provides the field datatype as
: I have an external system that indexes the data.
: One field has a closed set of values, the values are sent as integer but
: should be represented as String. EnumField is perfect for it. The
: problem is that the values are predefined and not order sequentially
: (the values were spaced
Can anyone pleas reply..?
Thanks,
Vivek
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vivekanand Ittigi vi...@biginfolabs.com
Date: Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Integrate solr with openNLP
To: Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com
Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Hi all!
The question is how many collections I can put to one alias, using SolrCloud
alias collection API
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collections+API#CollectionsAPI-api4
to process distributed requests? Is it limited?
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
49 matches
Mail list logo
