On Tue, 2014-11-04 at 22:57 +0100, Gili Nachum wrote:
My data center is out of SAN or local disk storage - is it a big no-no to
store Solr core data folder over NAS?
It depends on your NAS speed. Both Walter and David are right: It can
perform really bad or quite satisfactory. We briefly
Can anyone tell me the behavior of solr (and if it's consistent) when I do what
follows:
1) add document x
2) delete document x
3) commit
I've tried with solr 4.5.0 and document x get's indexed
Matteo
I searched wiki pages about that. I do not find any documentation. If
you help me I will be glad.
Thanks
2014-11-04 11:34 GMT+02:00 Talat Uyarer ta...@uyarer.com:
Hi folks,
We use Analytics Component for median, max etc. I wonder if I use
group.field parameter with analytics component, How
Hey,
maybe someone already faced the situation and could give me a hint.
Given one query includes Easter or Sylvester I search for the best
place to translate the string to the corresponding date.
Is there any solr.Mapping*Factory for that?
Do I need to implement it in a custom Solr Query
Hi Min,
Do you have the specific bit of text that caused this exception to be thrown?
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk
On 4 Nov 2014, at 23:15, Min L wrote:
Hi All:
I am using solr 4.9.1. and trying to use PostingsSolrHighlighter. But I got
errors during indexing. I thought LUCENE-5111 has
Do you have soft commits enabled by any chance in solrconfig.XML?
Regards,
Alex
On 05/11/2014 4:48 am, Matteo Grolla matteo.gro...@gmail.com wrote:
Can anyone tell me the behavior of solr (and if it's consistent) when I do
what follows:
1) add document x
2) delete document x
3) commit
Unfortunately, a date is a non-analyzed field, so you can't do something
like a synonym.
Further, Holidays are repeating - every year - and the dates can vary, so
they won't match exactly.
Use an update request processor to examine the date field at values index
time and look up and store
Document x doesn't exist - in terms of visibility - until the commit, so the
delete will no-op since a query of Lucene will not see the uncommitted new
document.
-- Jack Krupansky
-Original Message-
From: Matteo Grolla
Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 4:47 AM
To:
Greetings Comrades.
There were numerous requests and considerations on using Solr as both
search engine and NoSQL store at the same time.
While being an excellent tool as a search engine, Solr is looking not so
good when it comes to storing documents and various stored fields,
especially with big
It Depends (tm).
You have a lot of options, and it all depends on your data and
use-case. In general, there is very little cost involved when a doc
does _not_ use a field you've defined in a schema. That is, if you
have 100's of fields defined and only use 10, the other 90 don't take
up space in
On 5 November 2014 08:52, andrey prokopenko andrey4...@gmail.com wrote:
I assume, there might be other developers, trying to solve similar
problems, so I'd be interested to hear about similar attempts issues
encountered while trying to implement such an integration between Solr and
other
My experience was with Solr 1.2 and regular old NFS, so that was probably worst
case. I was very surprised that it was that bad, though.
So benchmark it before you assume it is fast enough.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Nov 5, 2014, at 12:27
There's no difference between the two. Even if you send updates to a shard
url, it will still be forwarded to the right shard leader according to the
hash of the id (assuming you're using the default compositeId router). Of
course, if you happen to hit the right shard leader then it is just an
Our production Solr-Slaves-Cores (we have about 40 Cores (each has a
moderate size about 10K documents to 90K documents)) produce many
exceptions of type:
014-11-05 15:06:06.247 [searcherExecutor-158-thread-1] ERROR
org.apache.solr.search.SolrCache: Error during auto-warming of
Awesome, thanks. That's what I was hoping.
Cheers,
Ian
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
shalinman...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no difference between the two. Even if you send updates to a shard
url, it will still be forwarded to the right shard leader according to the
Hello Guys,
Im a noob on this mailing list so bear with me.
Could i kindly get some help on this very elaborate problem?
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/26759366/solr-blockjoin-indexing-for-solr-4-10-1
Thanks
We define all fields as wildcard fields with a suffix indicating field
type. Then we can use something like Java annotations to map pojo variables
to field types to append the correct suffix. This allows us to use one very
generic schema among all of our collections and we rarely need to update
Hi,
I'm trying to use named config sets with a standalone Solr server (4.10.1).
But it seems there's no way to create a new core based on a named config
set using the Solr admin page. Or did I miss something?
Should I open a JIRA issue?
Regards,
Andreas
In our experience yes, it's a bad idea.
Charlie
On 5 November 2014 10:27, Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org wrote:
My experience was with Solr 1.2 and regular old NFS, so that was probably
worst case. I was very surprised that it was that bad, though.
So benchmark it before you assume
Sorry, I did not get your point, can you please elaborate more
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/create-new-core-based-on-named-config-set-using-the-admin-page-tp4167850p4167860.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
You can model this in different ways, depending on your searching/faceting
needs. Usually you'll use multivalued or dynamic fields. In the next
examples I'll omit the field type, indexed and stored flags:
field name=name type=text indexed=true stored=true /
field name=c_name type=string
Hi all,
I'm working on updating legacy Solr to 4.10.2 to use schemaless
configuration. As such, I have added this snippet to solrconfig.xml per the
docs:
schemaFactory class=ManagedIndexSchemaFactory
bool name=mutabletrue/bool
str
I'm wondered too, but it seems it warmups queryResultCache
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/20f9303f5e2378e2238a5381291414881ddb8172/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java#L522
at least this ERRORs broke nothing see
Perfectly clear,
thanks a lot!
Il giorno 05/nov/2014, alle ore 13:48, Jack Krupansky ha scritto:
Document x doesn't exist - in terms of visibility - until the commit, so the
delete will no-op since a query of Lucene will not see the uncommitted new
document.
-- Jack Krupansky
So NFS it's doable, and performance will vary by the grade of storage I'm
getting and the volume of other activity on the NAS. Good to know it's not
attributed to index corruptions in Lucene (failures to sync to disk and
such).
Update: Turns out that someone did find 50TB over SAN laying around
Take a look at DataStax Enterprise, which is basically Cassandra with Solr
tightly integrated as an embedded search engine. Write and update your data
in Cassandra and it will automatically be indexed in Solr, all in one
cluster, so no need to build and maintain a separate SolrCloud cluster
Hello,
I am testing a small SolrCloud cluster on 2 servers. I started 2 nodes on
each server, so that each collection can have 2 shards with replication
factor of 2.
I am using below command from Collections API to create collection:
curl '
I am seeing the same problem. I suspect that the patch for SOLR-5634 does not
address the sharded case.
Cheers,
Judith
Hi there,
For some hyphenated terms, I want them to stay as is instead of being
tokenized. For example: e-cigarette, e-cig, I-pad. I don't want them to be
split into e and cig or I and pad because the single letter e and I produces
too many false positive matches.
Is there a way to tell
Hi,
Once I apply PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory to the input string, the
position of token is changed.
Here is an example.
charFilter class=solr.PatternReplaceCharFilterFactory
pattern=(lt;/?ce:italic[^]*) replacement=/
filter class=solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory
Pretty sure what you need is called KeywordMarkerFilterFactory.
|filter class=solr.KeywordMarkerFilterFactory
protected=protwords.txt /|
On 11/5/14 17:24, Tang, Rebecca wrote:
Hi there,
For some hyphenated terms, I want them to stay as is instead of being
tokenized. For example:
They should be pretty well distributed by default, but if you want to
take manual control, you can use the createNodeSet param on CREATE
(with replication factor of 1) and then ADDREPLICA with the node param
to put replicas for shards exactly where you want.
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at
Hi,
I am trying to apply the security patch(Solr-4470.patch) on solr 4.10.1 tag.
SOLR-4470.patch 14/Mar/14 16:15278 kB
Getting error with the hunk failure. Could any one confirm if this the right
patch for 4.10.1.
Thank you so much
RegardsRaj
Hi Ramzi,
Thanks for the response.
I should have pointed out that this is an overly simplified view of my
scenario at hand. Denormalisation is not an option for me as advised
because of the sheer volume, nature and spread/skewness of the
relations/schema of my actual data scenario. Also
hi all,i have two machine and each of them has two solr instance.the problem is
if i set the numShard =2 and replicationFactor=2,how could i ensure the shard
leader and replica exist on different machine.could solr help me do it or i
must do it myself ?
I have a use-case where I would like to capture click events for individual
users so I can answer questions like show me everything with x text and
that I have clicked before + the inverse of show me everything with x text
that I have *not* clicked. I am currently doing this by sticking the event
I am curious why you are trying to do this with Solr. This is straightforward
with other systems. I would use HBase for this. This could be really hard with
Solr.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/
On Nov 5, 2014, at 5:08 PM, Steve Davids
You didn't describe your analysis chain, but maybe you are using
WordDelimiterFilter to break up hyphenated words? If so, it has a
protwords.txt feature that lets you specify exceptions
-Mike
On 11/5/2014 5:36 PM, Michael Della Bitta wrote:
Pretty sure what you need is called
On 11/5/2014 5:04 PM, kuttan palliyalil wrote:
I am trying to apply the security patch(Solr-4470.patch) on solr 4.10.1 tag.
SOLR-4470.patch 14/Mar/14 16:15278 kB
Getting error with the hunk failure. Could any one confirm if this the right
patch for 4.10.1.
The latest patch is almost 8
Got it. Thank you Shawn.
RegardsRaj
On Wednesday, November 5, 2014 10:39 PM, Shawn Heisey
apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 11/5/2014 5:04 PM, kuttan palliyalil wrote:
I am trying to apply the security patch(Solr-4470.patch) on solr 4.10.1 tag.
SOLR-4470.patch 14/Mar/14 16:15278 kB
Thanks for the advice Erick.
Would you know what the underlying logic doing the shard distribution is?
Does it depend on the order in which each node joined the cluster or does
the collections api logic actually checks the node host IP to ensure even
distribution?
Best Regards,
Isabelle
On
On Wed, 2014-11-05 at 23:04 +0100, Gili Nachum wrote:
Update: Turns out that someone did find 50TB over SAN laying around the
data center for me to use, so I won't find out for my self how's life with
NFS/NAS in the near future.
There seems to be issues especially with NFS that you need to
Hi Isabelle,
If I understood correctly your question, you can check shard distribution
status at admin page
http://localhost:8983/solr/#/~cloud
if you started solr by using command like
$ java -Djetty.port=7574 -DzkHost=localhost:9983 -jar start.jar
(
Just curious if there are some suggestions here. The use case is fairly
simple:
Given a query like python OR solr OR hadoop, I want to sort results by
number of keywords matched first, and by relevancy separately.
I can think of ways to do this, but not efficiently. For example, I could
do:
Turns out that update processors perfectly suit me needs. I ended up using
the StatelessScriptUpdateProcessor with a simple js script :-)
On Mon Nov 03 2014 at 下午10:40:52 Yubing (Tom) Dong 董玉冰
tom.tung@gmail.com wrote:
I see. Thank you! :-)
Sent from my Android phone
On Nov 3, 2014 9:35
Hi,
Solr 4.8 introduced named config sets with
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4478. You can create a new
core based on a config set with the CoreAdmin API as described in
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Config+Sets
The Solr Admin page allows the creation of new
46 matches
Mail list logo
