hi Everyone
I am a complete noob when it comes to Solr and when I try to follow the
tutorial and run Solr I get the error message
"Waiting to see Solr listening on port 8983 [-] Still not seeing Solr
listening on 8983 after 30 seconds!"
I did some googling and all I found was instruction for rem
Hi All
Im using solrcloud 4.10.2 with zookeepr 3.4.6. there are 3 zk servers and 4
solr instances. deployed on weblogic 12c server. zookeeper and solr servers are
running without any issue. all 3 zk servers are separate physical servers. i
have tested this configuration in locally using virtual
Just test a manual example yourself. Much easier. I am pretty sure Solr
can't read your mind which particular semicolon is which use case.
Worse though, I can't remember how smart it is about quotes either.
Easier to test than to guess.
Regards,
Alex
On 15/12/2014 7:28 pm, "onyourmark" wrot
No problem,
I have reviewed this content before except the blogs from McCandless,
I will look it over. I think the missing piece here that I did not
describe is that I am working with a SOLR instance that is embedded
within an already existing enterprise application, and is very tightly
coupled wi
Hi,
It's just FYI,
Join query is (currently) not supported at distributed environment. It
would be same at SolrCloud mode (I have not tried.)
Please see "Limitations" notation this page, if you have not.
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Join
Thanks,
Tomoko
2014-12-16 9:04 GMT+09:00 ArnabK :
>
> I ha
For Eg: I have 2 shards in solr cloud environment, My query is like
http://localhost:8983/solr/B/select?wt=json&indent=true&q=*:*&fq={!join
from=id to=uid fromIndex=A}type:xxx
Now what happens while retrieving data from collection B the query only
searching in the shard which gave data for the j
Hi,
This issue might be related to your question.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4212
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6353
So short answer, currently it's not possible.
I cannot come up with good solution with Solr, but you may be able to
summing up facet counts returned fro
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Peter Keegan
wrote:
>
> If a timeout occurs, does the distributed update then go to the next
> replica?
>
A distributed update is streamed to all available replicas in parallel.
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
> shalinman...@gmail.co
Hi Alex, thank you for the response and information. In your opinion, data is
stored in semicolon delimited files and some of the fields in the data are
text and may on occasion have semicolons in them, will it be possible for
solr to index the data properly by itself or will I have to use some out
I have the following scenario:
Collection A has:
Collection B has:
http://localhost:8983/solr/B/select?wt=json&indent=true&q=*:*&fq={!join
from=id to=uid fromIndex=A}type:xxx
Any help?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-join-not-working-for-multi
: ?I have a SolrCloud cluster with two servers and I created a collection using
two shards with this command:
...
: There were 230 documents in the set I indexed and there were 3 different
prefixes (RM!, WW! and BH!) but all were routed into the same shard. Is there
anything I can do to
Darin,
I hardly follows your approach. I can propose you to check a few materials,
just to sync terminology and align to the common problem definition.
Here is a series of post where colleague of mine defines faceted navigation
problem for eCommerce site:
http://blog.griddynamics.com/2011/06/solr-e
Hi Mikhail,
Sorry for having a few things unclear, I am creating a custom QParser, not
QueryParser, that was a slip up. I believe you have answered my question
though, and I think I have found a slightly better way to do the code anyway.
*Keep reading if curious. I could use some validation tha
Hello Darin,
Let me try to answer below,
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Darin Amos wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have a simple question, is an instance of the QueryParser created for
> every single request and is that object thread safe?
>
QueryParser and QParser are request scope not-thread safe o
If a timeout occurs, does the distributed update then go to the next
replica?
On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry I should have specified. These timeouts go inside the
> section and apply for inter-shard update requests only. The socke
I added distribUpdateConnTimeout and distribUpdateSoTimeout to solr.xml and
the commit did timeout.(btw, is there any way to view solr.xml in the admin
console?).
Also, although we do have an init.d start/stop script for Solr, the 'stop'
command was not executed during shutdown because there was n
?I have a SolrCloud cluster with two servers and I created a collection using
two shards with this command:
http://server1:8983/admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=products&numShards=2
When I look at clusterstate.json in the Solr admin page I can see the
collection is correctly places across
Hello,
I have a simple question, is an instance of the QueryParser created for every
single request and is that object thread safe?
I will try not to get into too much of the specifics but I have a custom
QueryParser and Search Component. Within my query parser when it is
instantiated, I execu
I realized I was missing
solr.IndexBasedSpellChecker
But that didn't really fix my issue either.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Matt Mongeau
wrote:
>
> I think you were right about maxChanges, that does seem get rid of the
> ridiculous values. However I don't seem to be getting anything reas
Good idea. That's cleaner than my current solution (hack up a query
parser). I'll try it out and report back.
-Doug
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
wrote:
>
> How about a pre-pended search component to un-escape Q and put it into
> QClean or some such. Then, your other pa
Hello lboutros,
That's the solution that I read about it, but I didn't tested yet. Probably
tomorrow. I'll let you know if it works for me, but from what I've seen,
seems to be exactly what I need.
Thank you for your answer,
Andrei
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabb
To me, it seems you are looking for faceting with the parameter
facet.mincount:
facet=true&facet.field=groupField&facet.mincount=yourMinimumValue.
Ludovic.
-
Jouve
France.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Get-groups-which-has-the-number-of-elements-great
How about a pre-pended search component to un-escape Q and put it into
QClean or some such. Then, your other parsers could use the other
variable name as needed?
Would that work?
Regards,
Alex.
Personal: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ and @arafalov
Solr resources and newsletter: http://www.solr
I think you were right about maxChanges, that does seem get rid of the
ridiculous values. However I don't seem to be getting anything reasonable.
Most variations look something like:
http://localhost:8982/solr/development/select?q=Rock+point&fq=type%3ACompany&wt=ruby&indent=true&defType=edismax&qf
Hello all,
I've been working on a search project that has a lot of special characters
in text (its programming language content). We use edismax as a base query
parser, but will use other query parsers in boost queries (such as field or
a custom query parser).
For example, we might have
q=c\+\+&
Hi Erlend,
I have written a similar token filter. Please see :
https://github.com/iorixxx/lucene-solr-analysis-turkish/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/lucene/analysis/tr/Zemberek2DeasciifyFilterFactory.java
replace
final String[] values = stemmer.stem(tokenTerm);
with
stack = stemmer.s
Well I think your first step should be finding a reproducible test case
and encoding it as a unit test. But I suspect ultimately the fix will
be something to do with positionIncrement ...
-Mike
On 12/15/2014 09:08 AM, Erlend Garåsen wrote:
On 15.12.14 14:11, Michael Sokolov wrote:
I'm not s
Hello,
I have a query which group my documents based on a field.
The returned groups could have any number of documents.
If you take a look to one of the groups, you'll see something like:
"groupValue": "",
"doclist": {
*"numFound": 3,*
"start": 0,
"d
On 15.12.14 14:11, Michael Sokolov wrote:
I'm not sure, but is it necessary to set positionIncAttr to 1 when there
are *not* any lemmas found? I think the usual pattern is to call
clearAttributes() at the start of incrementToken
It is set to 0 only if there are stems/lemmas found:
if (!terms.i
I'm not sure, but is it necessary to set positionIncAttr to 1 when there
are *not* any lemmas found? I think the usual pattern is to call
clearAttributes() at the start of incrementToken
-Mike
On 12/15/14 7:38 AM, Erlend Garåsen wrote:
I have written a dictionary-based lemmatizer for Universi
I have written a dictionary-based lemmatizer for University of Oslo
which I also want to donate back to Apache. Before I do that, I need
some help to figure out why it interferes with the highlighter. Some
totally irrelevant words get highlighted, so there is something strange
going on. It does
Hi,
I want to nested facet inside the range facet.
Please help..
Thanks,
Ankit Jain
Hi,
We are doing data update using solrj.First we are deleting the records that
needs to be updated and inserting them again with the updated
value.Sometimes this updates fails and we don't have any clue where it
stuck.So we want to track the UpdateRequestHandler activities something like
in a se
+1
> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:44:44 +1300
> Subject: Re: To understand SolrCloud configurations
> From: esj.f...@gmail.com
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>
> HI Shawn,
>
> Thanks, You have answered my question to a certain extend, But I wanted to
> Isolate Solr Cloud from application and do
HI Shawn,
Thanks, You have answered my question to a certain extend, But I wanted to
Isolate Solr Cloud from application and do some load testing by setting up
Jmeter Script. I could hit Solr instances, but it will not simulate how
Application (Client) will deal with Solr Cloud. Any suggestions fo
35 matches
Mail list logo