Thanks Shawn. This is good to know.
Steve
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 9:00 AM, Shawn Heisey elyog...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 4/22/2015 6:33 AM, Steven White wrote:
Is there anything I should be taking into consideration if I have a large
number of fields in my Solr's schema.xml file?
I
Hi Everyone
Is there anything I should be taking into consideration if I have a large
number of fields in my Solr's schema.xml file?
I will be indexing records into Solr and as I create documents, each
document will have between 20-200 fields. However, due to the natural of
my data source, the
I see. I'm running on SolrCloud with 2 replicia, so I guess mine will
probably use much more when my system reaches millions of documents.
Regards,
Edwin
On 22 April 2015 at 20:47, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
On 4/22/2015 12:11 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
Roughly how many
For the sake of others who would look for the solution and stumble upon this
thread, consider sharing.
I'd expect Solr to return whole field, if it's a text block then that's it.
@LAFK_PL
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: Martin Keller
Wysłano: środa, 22 kwietnia 2015 16:36
Do:
Anything more informative in the Solr logs?
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Srinivas Rishindra
sririshin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a project in which i have to find similar documents.
While I implementing the following error is occurring. Please let me know
Hi guys,
I've enabled language detection in solrconfig.xml:
updateRequestProcessorChain name=langid
processor class=
org.apache.solr.update.processor.TikaLanguageIdentifierUpdateProcessorFactory
lst name=defaults
str name=langid.flcontent,title/str
str
A purely negative sub-query is not supported by Lucene - you need to have
at least one positive term, such as *:*, at each level of sub-query. Try:
((*:* -(field:V1) AND -(field:V2)) AND -(field:V3))
-- Jack Krupansky
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Dhutia, Devansh ddhu...@gannett.com
wrote:
Are they not _indexed_ correctly or not being displayed correctly?
Take a look at admin UIschema browser your field and press the
load terms button. That'll show you what is _in_ the index as
opposed to what the raw data looked like.
When you return the field in a Solr search, you get a verbatim,
Sorry if my question was too vague. In my mind it wasn't but you led me in the
right direction which gave me a new issue.
I added the following to my schema.xml to bring back the Created Date: field
name=created type=date indexed=false stored=true/ but now I am getting
back the created
On 4/22/2015 6:33 AM, Steven White wrote:
Is there anything I should be taking into consideration if I have a large
number of fields in my Solr's schema.xml file?
I will be indexing records into Solr and as I create documents, each
document will have between 20-200 fields. However, due to
Hi , We are having an issue without PROD environment and its say below message
when we access solr using browser..
HTTP Status 503 - Server is shutting down or failed to initialize
type Status report
message Server is shutting down or failed to initialize
On 4/22/2015 12:11 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
Roughly how many collections and how much records do you have in your Solr?
I have 8 collections with a total of roughly 227000 records, most of which
are CSV records. One of my collections have 142000 records.
The core that shows 82MB for
Hello There,
We are using hybris with SOLR (4.6.1) I checked the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6563 and saw that problem has
been solved. However we are still getting same problem on standalone
server. There is no problem on embedded server.
Is there any idea? You can find log file
LAFK,
Yes, or even more, than 1k. Based on sloppyFreq component (hopefully, same
as phraseFreq) we get documents where keywords occur near each other ranked
higher. As if we used slop=10 or something.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 2:59 PM, LAFK tomasz.bo...@gmail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity, why
Hi,
I'm currently implementing highlighting on my Solr-5.0.0. When I issue the
following command:
http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=conducted
http://localhost:8983/solr/edmtechnical/select?q=conducted
hl=truehl.fl=Content,Summarywt=jsonindent=truerows=10,
the highlighting result is
I have an automated filter query builder that uses the SolrNet nuget package to
build out boolean filters. I have a scenario where it is generating a fq in the
following format:
((-(field:V1) AND -(field:V2)) AND -(field:V3))
The filter looks legal to me (albeit with extra parentheses), but the
If I upgrade to using the edismax parser in my fq, I get the desired
results.
The default lucene parser on fq must not be able to parse the more complex
nested clauses
q=*:*fq={!type=edismax}((-(field:V1) AND -(field:V2)) AND -(field:V3)) -
Works
On 4/22/15, 3:27 PM, Dhutia, Devansh
On 4/22/15, 7:36 AM, Martin Keller martin.kel...@unitedplanet.com
wrote:
OK, I found the problem and as so often it was sitting in front of the
display.
Now the next problem:
The suggestions returned consist always of a complete text block where
the match was found. I would have expected a
text/xml is not a safe content-type, because of the way that HTTP handles
charsets. Always use application/xml.
wunder
Walter Underwood
wun...@wunderwood.org
http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
On Apr 22, 2015, at 3:01 AM, bengates benga...@aliceadsl.fr wrote:
Looks like Solarium
I don’t know if that’s completely true, or maybe I’m misunderstanding
something.
If it doesn’t support purely negative subqueries, this shouldn't work, but
does:
q=*:*fq=(-(field:V1))
However, for me, the following is a summary of what works what doesn’t.
q=*:*fq=(-(field:V1))
Steve,
Are you using ExtractingRequestHandler / DataImportHandler or extracting
the text content from the PDF outside of Solr?
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:40 AM, steve.sch...@t-systems.com wrote:
Hi guys,
hopefully you can help me with my issue. We are using a solr setup and
have the
+1 - I like Erick's answer. Let me know if that turns out to be the
problem - I'm interested in this problem and would be happy to help.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are they not _indexed_ correctly or not being displayed correctly?
Take a
OK, I found the problem and as so often it was sitting in front of the display.
Now the next problem:
The suggestions returned consist always of a complete text block where the
match was found. I would have expected a single word or a small phrase.
Thanks in advance
Martin
Am 22.04.2015 um
A similar problem seems to happen when sending application/json to the
search handler. Solr returns a NullPointerException for some reason:
vagrant@precise64:~/solr-5.1.0$ curl
http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/select?wt=jsonindent=trueq=foundation;
-H Content-type:application/json
{
The generic problem with all the semi-structured documents is that
the meta-data has no consistent naming. Making up names here, but Word
might have created_on, PDF created etc. Its really frustrating,
but each type has to be investigated to figure out which field you
want to map to created. Tika
What version of Solr? And do the Solr logs show anything useful? Or
catalina.out?
Best,
Erick
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:23 AM, EXTERNAL Taminidi Ravi (ETI,
AA-AS/PAS-PTS) external.ravi.tamin...@us.bosch.com wrote:
Hi , We are having an issue without PROD environment and its say below
message
Right, this is what the suggester you're using is built for. Which is
actually way cool for certain situations.
Try the FreeTextLookupFactory (warning, I'm not too familiar with the
nuances here)
Or maybe spelling suggestions are more what you're looking for which
look at the terms and
return a
Roughly how many collections and how much records do you have in your Solr?
I have 8 collections with a total of roughly 227000 records, most of which
are CSV records. One of my collections have 142000 records.
Regards,
Edwin
On 22 April 2015 at 13:49, Shawn Heisey apa...@elyograg.org wrote:
Hi All,
I want to use suggest option in solr but my SOLR is in cloud mode hence to
get the suggestion every time in query I need to provide shard url with it
like below:-
I got same issue when using 4.10.2. I suspected this issue will cause
trouble when using too many reducers.
Then I tried to use less reducers, and made it work.
I do not think map-reduce contrib in this version is stable... Anyway it is
free.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:56 PM, ralph tice
: To be clear, here is an example of a type from Solr's schema.xml:
:
: field name=weight type=float indexed=true stored=true/
:
: Here, the type is float. I'm looking for the complete list of
: out-of-the-box types supported.
what you are asking about are just symbolic names that come
: I'm confused. If type=float is just a symbolic name, how does Solr knows
: to index the data of field weight as float? What about for date per
: this example:
:
: field name=last_modified type=date indexed=true stored=true/
:
: How does Solr applies date-range queries such as:
because
Hi Everyone,
I Googled for this with no luck.
Where can I find a complete list of field type that Solr supports? In
the sample scheam.xml that comes with Solr 5 and prior version, I am able
to compile a list such as boolean, float, string, etc. but I cannot
find a complete list documented
Hi Hoss,
I'm confused. If type=float is just a symbolic name, how does Solr knows
to index the data of field weight as float? What about for date per
this example:
field name=last_modified type=date indexed=true stored=true/
How does Solr applies date-range queries such as:
1) https://lucidworks.com/blog/why-not-and-or-and-not/
2) use debug=query to understand how your (filter) query is being parsed.
: Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 14:56:22 +
: From: Dhutia, Devansh ddhu...@gannett.com
: Reply-To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
: To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
I got it now.
I have to start from fieldType/ to create my field/ list. If I want a
list of supported field-types (used in my schema.xml), I have to look at
the class attribute of fieldType/ to get that list. The out-of-the-box
list of field-types is documented in the link you provided:
Awesome thanks! I was on 4.10.2
Ryan
On Apr 22, 2015, at 16:44, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
For your own implementation you'll need to implement the following methods:
public Query rewrite(IndexReader reader) throws IOException
public void extractTerms(SetTerm terms)
You
Just confirmed that wildcard queries work with Re-Ranking following
SOLR-6323.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Joel Bernstein joels...@gmail.com wrote:
This should be resolved in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6323
.
Solr 4.10.3
This should be resolved in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6323.
Solr 4.10.3
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Ryan Josal rjo...@gmail.com wrote:
Using edismax, supplying a rq= param, like {!rerank ...} is causing an
For your own implementation you'll need to implement the following methods:
public Query rewrite(IndexReader reader) throws IOException
public void extractTerms(SetTerm terms)
You can review the 4.10.3 version of the ReRankQParserPlugin to see how it
implements these methods.
Joel Bernstein
Just to close this thread – It looks like it’s working fine now. Not sure what
mistake I had done last time. But now, the index data is still persistent on
the pen drive even after server shutdown and restarting it on a different
machine where the pen drive is plugged in.
Thanks for all
Hi,
I want to use solr to index some scanned document, after settings solr
document with a two field content and filename, I tried to upload the
attached file, but it seems that the content of the file is only \n \n
\n.
But if I used the tesseract from command line I got the result correctly.
Thanks for your answer. Maybe my English is not good enough, what are you
trying to say? Sorry I didn't get the point.
:-(
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: LAFK [mailto:tomasz.bo...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 22. April 2015 14:01
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org;
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:00 AM, didier deshommes dfdes...@gmail.com wrote:
curl
http://localhost:8983/solr/gettingstarted/select?wt=jsonindent=trueq=foundation;
-H Content-type:application/json
You're telling Solr the body encoding is JSON, but then you don't send any body.
We could catch
Hi guys. I'm executing the following proximity query: leader the~1000. In
the debugQuery I see phraseFreq=0.032258064. Is phraseFreq same thing as
sloppyFreq from
https://lucene.apache.org/core/4_3_0/core/org/apache/lucene/search/similarities/DefaultSimilarity.html
?
Do higher phraserFreq
Hi guys,
hopefully you can help me with my issue. We are using a solr setup and have the
following issue:
- usual pdf files are indexed just fine
- pdf files with writable form-fields look like this:
Ich�bestätige�mit�meiner�Unterschrift,�dass�alle�Angaben�korrekt�und�vollständig�sind
Somehow
Looks like Solarium hardcodes a default header Content-Type: text/xml;
charset=utf-8 if none provided.
Removing it solves the problem.
It seems that Solr 5.1 doesn't support this content-type.
--
View this message in context:
Hello,
I am working on a project in which i have to find similar documents.
While I implementing the following error is occurring. Please let me know
what to do.
Exception in thread main
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.impl.HttpSolrClient$RemoteSolrException: Error
from server at
Unfortunately, setting suggestAnalyzerFieldType to text_suggest didn’t change
anything.
The suggest dictionary is freshly built.
As I mentioned before, only words or phrases of the source field „content“ are
not matched.
When querying the index, the response only contains „suggestions“ field
Hello,
I've got the same issue after an upgrade from Solr 5.0 to 5.1, even on GET
requests.
Actually i'm using PHP Solarium library to perform my requests. This is the
error the library gets now, on a search handler. The request is transported
with cUrl.
What's weird is when I copy/paste the
We have the same issue as this JIRA.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6156
I have posted my query, response and solr logs to the JIAR.
Could anyone please take a look? Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
Out of curiosity, why proximity 1k?
@LAFK_PL
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: Dmitry Kan
Wysłano: środa, 22 kwietnia 2015 09:26
Do: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Odpowiedz: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Temat: phraseFreq vs sloppyFreq
Hi guys. I'm executing the following proximity query: leader
Out of my head I'd follow how are writable PDFs created and encoded.
@LAFK_PL
Oryginalna wiadomość
Od: steve.sch...@t-systems.com
Wysłano: środa, 22 kwietnia 2015 12:41
Do: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Odpowiedz: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Temat: solr issue with pdf forms
Hi guys,
hopefully
53 matches
Mail list logo