Did you search for it?
2015-08-21 16:59 GMT+03:00 Benjamin Lallement
benjamin.lallem...@desjardins.com:
Is there a JIRA on this case ?
[image: cid:image001.jpg@01CFEA10.1CD52220]
*Benjamin Lallement*
Soutien au développement
Technologies et Centre
de services partagés
Mouvement
Hi Chris,
I have added a method in SOLR-7954 jira ticket to index sample data which
can be used to reproduce the issue.
Regards,
Modassar
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Modassar Ather modather1...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Chris,
I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7954
Thanks for the clarification!
On Aug 19, 2015 3:05 PM, david.w.smi...@gmail.com
david.w.smi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jamie,
Your understanding is inverted. The predicates can be read as:
indexed shape predicate query shape.
For indexed point data, there is almost no semantic different
CustomerID is a string
CustomerName is text
I have a query like this (i.e. (CustomerID is NULL or CustomerID = 56789)
and (CustomerName like smith)):
((-(CustomerID: [* TO *])) OR (CustomerID: 56789))AND(CustomerName:smith)
Number of results: 150 (Not correct)
But when I change the query to
I can't find the discussion/presentation about it (about 2 years ago),
but basically you can use LatLong geographic field to do this.
You represent start date/time on X axis and end date/time on Y axes.
Then, for search you intersect it with a rectangle of your desired
check dates.
Hopefully
On 8/21/2015 8:34 AM, Brian Narsi wrote:
CustomerID is a string
CustomerName is text
I have a query like this (i.e. (CustomerID is NULL or CustomerID = 56789)
and (CustomerName like smith)):
Note that you must leave the default operator as OR for +/- syntax to
work as intended. It will not
Please provide details. You might want to review:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/UsingMailingLists
You haven't provided
1 the sample doc
2 the schema you're using, at least for the search field
3 the solrconfig.xml file, particularly the default search field
4 the results of adding debug=query and
Hello,
DocValuesTermsQuery ?
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Pablo Mincz pmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm doing a migration from Lucene 3.6.1 to 5.2.1, and for what I see
FieldCacheTermsFilter does not exists any more.
Is there any replacement for keep same functionality?
Thanks for the
use 2 unique fields to do what? Solr replaces older docs with newer
docs based _solely_ on the uniqueKey defined in schema.xml.
There is no notion of compound unique key like there can be in a
database.
You could concatenate the PK and a uuid, but what would be the point?
Since the uuid
Can you give me a brief description on how to use a transformer to excludes
docs from a folder?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/exclude-folder-in-dataimport-handler-tp4224267p4224489.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi,
I'm doing a migration from Lucene 3.6.1 to 5.2.1, and for what I see
FieldCacheTermsFilter does not exists any more.
Is there any replacement for keep same functionality?
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Pablo.
i add document to solr(cloud) using rsolr. it returns responseHeader = {
status = 0,
QTime = 5
}
}. But when i search for added document nothing is found.
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/solr-add-document-tp4224480.html
Sent from the
Is there a JIRA on this case ?
[cid:image001.jpg@01CFEA10.1CD52220]
Benjamin Lallement
Soutien au développement
Technologies et Centre
de services partagés
Mouvement Desjardins
Montréal
514 281-7000, poste 5551850
1 866 866-7000, poste 5551850
Télécopieur : 514 281-5916
Faites bonne
You might find this useful:
https://lucidworks.com/blog/why-not-and-or-and-not/
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 7:58 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch
arafa...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can use + and -, please do so. That's what Lucene uses
under the covers (MUST, SHOULD, MUST NOT). Anything else is
If you can use + and -, please do so. That's what Lucene uses
under the covers (MUST, SHOULD, MUST NOT). Anything else is mapping to
that.
You can also enable the debug flag on your queries and see exactly how
the other forms (e.g. AND) are mapped to the underlying Lucene
queries.
Regards,
Kindly help on this
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Kiran Sai Veerubhotla sai.sq...@gmail.com
wrote:
i have used json facet api and noticed that its relying heavily on filter
cache.
index is optimized and all my fields are with docValues='true' and the
number of documents are 2.6 million
thank you Yonik
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Yonik Seeley ysee...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Kiran Sai Veerubhotla
sai.sq...@gmail.com wrote:
i have used json facet api and noticed that its relying heavily on filter
cache.
Yes. The root domain (the set of
Alexandre,
How would the data type look like ?
Currently, this is what I have:
fieldType name=days_of_year
class=solr.SpatialRecursivePrefixTreeFieldType
geo=false
worldBounds=0 0 366 366
distErrPct=0
maxDistErr=0.0009
units=degrees
/
field
On 21 August 2015 at 15:32, vaedama sudheer.u...@gmail.com wrote:
presentDays: [ [01 15 366 366], [13, 16, 366, 366], [19, 25, 366, 366] ]
This does not look right. Your January 1 2015 should map to a single
number, representing 'X' in the coordinates. Your January 15 2015
should map to another
A transformer on the outer entity will run before the inner entity is
invoked. So, you might be able to remove the list of files to ignore
before the inner entity starts extracting from them.
You could also pre-generate a list of files by doing ls/find with your
requirements and then just read
These look right.
Then, you just play around with mapping. Your dates to coordinates
could be as granular as you want as long as they fit into data type.
And with this being school, your epochs might be smaller (e.g.
semesters) and kept as a separate number.
Regards,
Alex.
Solr
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Kiran Sai Veerubhotla
sai.sq...@gmail.com wrote:
i have used json facet api and noticed that its relying heavily on filter
cache.
Yes. The root domain (the set of documents that match the base query
and filters) is cached in the filter cache.
For sub-facets,
You can always index to a second field with date math, or
even pull out the day as you're indexing.
Best,
Erick
On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 10:57 AM, vaedama sudheer.u...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
Thanks for your reply!
I guess these are the links that you were referring to :)
Hello Eric,
Thanks for your reply.
You can always index to a second field with date math, or
even pull out the day as you're indexing.
How would this second field look like ? Can you please provide me an example
for both fieldType definition and field definition ?
Also, please tell me how
Hi Alexandre,
Thanks for your reply!
I guess these are the links that you were referring to :)
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-solr-user/201212.mbox/%3c1354991310424-4025359.p...@n3.nabble.com%3E
https://wiki.apache.org/solr/SpatialForTimeDurations
Ramkumar R. Aiyengar wrote
Grouping does need 3 phases.. The phases are:
(2) For the N groups, each shard is asked for the top M ids (M is
configurable per request).
What do you exactly means by /M is configurable per request/ ? how exactly
is it configurable and what is the relation
how can i use collapse expand on the docValues with json facet api?
: - Did you have the exact same data in both fields?
: Both the field are string type.
that's not the question i asked.
is the data *in* these fields (ie: the actual value of each field for each
document) the same for both of the fields? This is important to figuring
out if the root problem
I'm wondering what different folks do out there for a health monitor for Solr.
I'm running Solr 5.2.1, so far without Solr Cloud, and I anticipate having
multiple cores.
For now, I can make use solr/corename/admin/ping, but how can I have Solr ping
all cores?
Dan Davis, Systems/Applications
Alexandre,
Fantastic answer! I think having a start position would work nicely with my
use-case :) Also I would prefer to do the date Math during indexing.
*Question # 1:* Can you please tell me if this doc looks correct (given that
I am not yet bothered about factoring in year into my use-case)
Hi Chris,
I have raised https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7954 for the issue.
- What was the datatype of the field(s)?
The data type of fields which passes are of type string with following
attributes.
fieldType name=string class=solr.StrField sortMissingLast=true
stored=false
Hi,
we have changed Solr from 4.10.3 to 5.2.1 and we don't know why, but 4.10.3
was caching grouping results and the new 5.2.1 don't.
Any suggestion howto cache results? We have 140M docs and some results takes
up to 60 secs, so cache will be good. :)
I red that grouping using faceting is
Custom authentication support was added in 5x, and the imminent (in the
next few days) 5.3 release has a lot of features in this regard, including
a basic authentication module, I would suggest upgrading to it. 5x versions
(include 5.3) do support Java 7, so I don't see an issue here?
On 20 Aug
Grouping does need 3 phases.. The phases are:
(1) Each shard is asked for the top N groups (instead of ids), with the
sort value. The federator then sorts the groups from all shards and chooses
the top N groups.
(2) For the N groups, each shard is asked for the top M ids (M is
configurable per
ok, can I use 2 unique fields one with uuid and one with db id? what will
happened then?
--
View this message in context:
http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/DIH-delta-import-pk-tp4224342p4224395.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
35 matches
Mail list logo
