Hello , I was following the instruction
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/7_1/uploading-data-with-solr-cell-using-apache-tika.html
to upload files with metadata stored and indexed in solr. I was checking
the extracted creation date ( attr_meta_creation_date ), for image, jpg
etc, the creation
Hi David,
Yes, I do have this field "_root_" in the schema.
However, I don't think I have use the field, and there is no difference in
the indexing speed after I remove the field.
Regards,
Edwin
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 22:57, David Smiley wrote:
> Hi Edwin,
>
> I'd like to rule something
We are noticing high CPU utilization on below threads. Looks like a known
issue with. (https://github.com/netty/netty/issues/327)
But not sure if this has been addressed in any of the 1.8 releases.
Can anyone help with this?
Version: solr cloud 7.5
OS: CentOS 7
JDK: Oracle JDK 1.8.0_191
Thanks Jim
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 1:39 AM Toke Eskildsen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2019-03-14 at 13:16 +0100, jim ferenczi wrote:
> > http://lucene.apache.org/solr/8_0_0/changes/Changes.html
>
> Thank you for the hard work of rolling the release!
> Looking forward to upgrading.
>
> - Toke Eskildsen,
Yes, I know the reasons why put this work on a client rather than use Solr
directly and it should be maybe the next my task.
But I need to finish first my task - index a pdf files stored in SqlBase
database. The pdf files are pretty simple, sometimes only dozens text lines.
Regards,
Aruna
On
Looks like: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11728
> On Apr 3, 2019, at 1:09 AM, JiaJun Zhu wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> I got an "Unexpected docvalues type SORTED_NUMERIC" exception when I perform
> group facet on an IntPointField. Debugging into the source code, the cause is
> that
For a lot of reasons, I greatly prefer to put this work on a client rather than
use Solr directly. Here’s a place to get started, it connects to a DB and also
scans local file directory for docs to push through (local) Tika and index. So
you should be able to modify it relatively easily to get
Hi Edwin,
I'd like to rule something out. Does your schema define a field "_root_"?
If you don't have nested documents then remove it. It's presence adds
indexing weight in 8.0 that was not there previously. I'm not sure how
much though; I've hoped small but who knows.
~ David Smiley
Apache
On 4/3/2019 8:16 AM, Bernd Fehling wrote:
If I now use the Admin GUI at port 8983 and select "Cloud"->"Graph" I
see both collections.
Also with Admin GUI at port port 7574.
And I can select both collection in "Collection Selection" dropdown box.
Why and is this how it should be?
I thought
bq. I thought different JAVA instances at different ports are separated by each
other?
Not at all. If that were true, how would you use more than one physical
machine? The combination URL:PORT is, from Solr’s perspective, just some Solr
node. There’s no assumption about what machine it’s
I have SolrCloud with a collection "test1" with 5 shards 2 replicas accoss 5
server.
This cloud is started at port 8983 on each server.
Now I have a second collection "test2" with 5 shards 1 replica accross the same
5 server. But this second collection is started in seperate JAVA instances at
Hello,
I’m looking for the documentation for the latest release of SolR (8.0) but
it looks like it’s not online yet.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/news.html
http://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/
Do you know when it will be available?
>>>
>>> The Solr
The *DRAFT* 8.0 Guide is also available from Jenkins:
https://builds.apache.org/view/L/view/Lucene/job/Solr-reference-guide-8.0/javadoc/
Cassandra
On Apr 2, 2019, 3:23 AM -0500, Jan Høydahl , wrote:
> There is also a *DRAFT* HTML version of the to-be 8.1 guide built by Jenkins,
> see
>
What/where is this benchmark? I recall once Ishan was working with a
volunteer to set up something like Lucene has but sadly it was not
successful
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 6:04 AM Đạt Cao Mạnh wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I'm seeing the same problems with Shalin nightly indexing benchmark. This
>
Hi all,
I'm importing documents (rows in excel file) that includes latitude and
longitude fields. I want to use those two separate fields for searching with a
bounding box. Is this possible (not using deprecated LatLonType) or do I need
to combine them into one single field when indexing? The
On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 18:04 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> I have tried to set all the docValues in my schema.xml to false and
> do the indexing again.
> There isn't any difference with the indexing speed as compared to
> when we have enabled the docValues.
Thank you for sparing me the work.
Oh great, thanks for the hint!
I've upvoted this issue, since I think it might be worth to be able to
configure that (rather low) ThreadPool count.
On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 10:23, Shalin Shekhar Mangar
wrote:
> Thanks Roger. This was reported earlier but missed our attention.
>
> The issue is
Hi Toke,
I have tried to set all the docValues in my schema.xml to false and do the
indexing again.
There isn't any difference with the indexing speed as compared to when we
have enabled the docValues.
Seems like the cause of the regression might be somewhere else?
Regards,
Edwin
On Wed, 3 Apr
Hi guys,
I'm seeing the same problems with Shalin nightly indexing benchmark. This
happen around this period
git log --before=2018-12-07 --after=2018-11-21
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 8:45 AM Toke Eskildsen wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 15:24 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> > Yes, I am using
Hi all,
I've found NestPathField fieldType in the solr 8.0.0 configuration.
But looking in the documentation I haven't found anything.
Just curious, someone have time to share something about?
For example explain how to use this?
Best regards,
Vincenzo
--
Vincenzo D'Amore
Hello,
I got an "Unexpected docvalues type SORTED_NUMERIC" exception when I perform
group facet on an IntPointField. Debugging into the source code, the cause is
that internally the docvalue type for PointField is "NUMERIC" (single value) or
"SORTED_NUMERIC" (multi value), while the
Thanks Roger. This was reported earlier but missed our attention.
The issue is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-11208
On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 5:56 PM Roger Lehmann
wrote:
> To be more specific: I currently have 19 collections, where each node has
> exactly one replica per collection.
Hey Solr community.
I’ve been following a couple of open JIRA tickets relating to use of the basic
auth plugin in a Solr cluster (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12584
, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12860) and recently I’ve noticed
similar behaviour when adding tlog
On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 15:24 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> Yes, I am using DocValues for most of my fields.
So that's a culprit. Thank you.
> Currently we can't share the test data yet as some of the records are
> sensitive. Do you have any data from CSV file that you can test?
Not
Yes, I am using DocValues for most of my fields.
I am using dynamicField, in which I have appended the field name with
things like _s, _i, etc in the CSV file.
Currently we can't share the test data yet as some of the
Hi All,
We recently migrated our existing solr(version 5.3.0) from AIX OS server to
Linux based server.And it works fine(http solr) .
RHEL version 7.6
Java version 1.8(IBM Java)
But now ,when trying to enable SSL over same ,the solr doesnt start after
enabling SSL.
It says "Address already
Hello,
I got a task to index in Solr 7.71 a PDF files which are stored in SqlBase
database. I did half the job - I can to index all table fields, I can do a
search in these fields except field in which is stored a pdf file content.
As I am ttotally new in Solr, spent unsuccessfully a lot a time
On Wed, 2019-04-03 at 10:17 +0800, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo wrote:
> What could be the reason that causes the indexing to be slower in
> Solr 8.0.0?
As Aroop states there can be multiple explanations. One of them is the
change to how DocValues are handled in 8.0.0. The indexing impact
should be tiny,
28 matches
Mail list logo
