SinceI changed heap size to 10G, I found that solr always uses around
6G-6.5G. Just wondering where I can set to limit memory usage, for example,
I just want to give solr 6G.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2021 at 1:51 PM Luke wrote:
> looks like the solr-8983-console.log was overridden after I restarted Solr
looks like the solr-8983-console.log was overridden after I restarted Solr
with 10G memory, I cannot find it anymore.
as for how I install and start solr, I did as below
1. download binary file(8.7.0)
2. change configuration in solr.in.sh(setup external zk)
3. start it by ./bin/solr start &
On 1/23/2021 6:41 PM, Luke wrote:
I don't see any log in solr.log, but there is OutOfMemory error in
solr-8983-console.log file.
Do you have the entire text of that exception? Can you share it? That
is the real information that I am after here.
I only asked how Solr was installed and
Shawn,
What version of Solr? 8.7.0
How is it installed and started? I download binary file and change
configuration in solr.in.sh, then start it by ./bin/solr start &
What OS? centos 7
Java version? openJDK 8
I don't see any log in solr.log, but there is OutOfMemory error in
On 1/23/2021 6:29 AM, Luke Oak wrote:
I use default settings to start solr , I set heap to 6G, I created 10
collections with 1node and 1 replica, however, there is not much data at all,
just 100 documents.
My server is 32 G memory and 4 core cpu, ssd drive 300g
It was ok when i created 5
Hi there,
I use default settings to start solr , I set heap to 6G, I created 10
collections with 1node and 1 replica, however, there is not much data at all,
just 100 documents.
My server is 32 G memory and 4 core cpu, ssd drive 300g
It was ok when i created 5 collections. It got oom killed
Hi all..
Following the advice at https://issues.apache.org/jira I'm explaining my
situation here before creating an issue.
The short version is that the ICU tokenizer can split tokens differently
after a space depending on what comes *before* the space. For example, *x
14th* is tokenized as x |
I'm very familiar with using the Unifier Highligher on a project with this
requirement. The main "trick" we used was using only one field but
analyzing both ways with a term differentiator (e.g. a leading symbol), and
then coupled with a custom query parser that knows a phrase query is to be
Hello folks,
I am currently working on an issue where we need to enable exact highlighting
on a text field.
Only problem is that it should also be possible to have also parts of the query
which don't need to be exact.(e.g. "Hello World" Test, so "Hello World" needs
to be an exact match, but
Hello Steven,
I believe what you are looking for cannot be accessed using SolrJ (I didn't
really check though).
But you can easily access it either via the Collections APIs and/or the Metrics
API depending on what you need exactly.
See
Hello,
Do you mean that you want searches for "gain" to match documents with
"revenue" on them, but do *not* want searches for "revenue" to match
documents with "gain" on them?
If that's what you mean, how have you defined your synonyms? If you're
using the SynonymGraphFilterFactory
Hi everyone,
Is there a SolrJ API that I can use to collect statistics data about Solr
(everything that I see on the dashboard if possible)?
I am in need to collect data about Solr instances, those same data that I
see on the dashboard such as swap-memory, jvm-memory, list of cores, info
about
Hi All,
I’m currently trying to change the uniqueKey of my Solr Cloud schema using
Solrj.
While creating new Fields and FieldDefinitions is pretty straight forward, I
struggle to find any solution to change the Unique Key field with Solrj.
Any advice here?
Best Regards,
Timo Gruen
Hi All,
Using SOLR default Synonyms search I am able to search Synonyms but for
some cases it is giving ambiguous results.
For example one of Synonyms of "Revenue" is "Gain"
Input Keyword for search: Revenue and Company
Irrelevant Output: Our company doesn't want to gain success through
Hi,
I am using timeAllowed and a collection with shards.
Docs list contains results only if QTime(query time) < timeAllowed.
In other cases (partialResults=true in responseHeader) docs are empty.
/solr/collection_with_shards/select?etimeAllowed=1000=some_slow_query
docs is empty
If access a
Thanks Alessandro.
We found this Jira ticket that may be the root cause of this issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14356
I'm not sure whether it is the reason of the leader election initially
failing, but it prevents Solr from exiting this error loop.
Le mer. 13 janv. 2021 à
On 1/21/2021 3:42 AM, Parshant Kumar wrote:
Do value(true or false) of cold searcher play any role during the
completion of replication on slave server.If not please tell in which
process in solr its applied?
The setting to use a cold searcher applies whenever a new searcher is
opened. It
Can you provide a sample expression that would be able to reproduce this?
Are you able to try a newer version by chance - I know we've fixed a few
NPEs recently, maybe https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-14700
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 4:13 PM ufuk yılmaz
wrote:
> Solr version 8.4. I’m
Solr version 8.4. I’m getting an unexplanetory NullPointerException when
executing a simple 2 level nodes stream, do you have any idea what may cause
this?
I tried setting /stream?partialResults=true=true and
shards.tolerant=true in nodes expressions, with no luck. I also tried reading
source
Solr is not a database. I strongly recommend that you NOT use it as a data
store. You will lose data.
Solr does not have transactions. Don’t think of a Solr “commit” as a database
commit. It is a command to start indexing the queued updates. It does not even
attempt to meet ACID properties.
On 2021-01-20 6:26 PM, Joshua Wilder wrote:
Please reconsider the removal of the DIH from future versions. The repo
it's been moved to is a ghost town with zero engagement from Rohit (or
anyone). Not sure how 'moving' it caused it to now only support MariaDB but
that appears to be the case. The
If, during index time, your "information" and "informed" are tokenized
into the same root (inform?), then you will not be able to distinguish
them without storing original forms somewhere, usually with copyField.
Same with information vs INFORMATION. The search happens based on
indexed tokens.
Hi,
You can try search query -> "+information +retrieval"
Meaning the document should have both the keywords. Doc 5 will also be in
the results.
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_7/the-standard-query-parser.html#the-boolean-operator
- Mohandoss.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 1:38 AM gnandre
Hi,
Master/Slave concept is not there in SolrCloud, but similar thing we can
achive by choosing TLOG + PULL replicas, where writes will happen in TLOG
nodes and the PULL replicas gets the updated segments.
Ensure minimum 2 TLOG nodes as PULL replica notes can't became leader of a
shard.
You can
Hello All,
I'm running SolrCloud(1 shard,9 replicas) on Amazon EKS.
The other day, when I accidentally stopped CoreDNS of EKS,
the entire Solr cluster went down due to the inability to resolve names of
each node.
I restarted CoreDNS shortly afterwards, but the Solr node just repeated
down and
Thanks Mohandoss,
It is realtime inserting and updating if a query is executed. My environment is
three nodes, 3 shards and 2 replicas.
I noticed there was master slave mode in the old version, but for solr cloud,
I don’t know whether it is doable.
Derrick
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jan
Looked at the source code of the parallel stream and it seems I need equal
number of SHARDS and workers count parameter. I thought I needed as many
replicas, it was shards.
Maybe helps someone.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: ufuk yılmaz
Sent: 21 January 2021 11:16
To:
Adding more queries :-
Do value(true or false) of cold searcher play any role during the
completion of replication on slave server.If not please tell in which
process in solr its applied?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 3:11 PM Parshant Kumar
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please help me in below queries:
>
>
It only works when I set workers to 1, which defeats the point of parallel.
Sent from Mail for Windows 10
From: ufuk yılmaz
Sent: 21 January 2021 11:16
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Parallel streaming expression java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException
Hello all,
Hi all,
Please help me in below queries:
1) what is the impact of making cold searcher false,true?
2)After full replication completion of data on slave server, new searcher
is opened or not?
3)If opensearcher is false in autocommit and cold searcher is true , what
does this conclude , Is their
Hello all,
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_4/stream-decorator-reference.html#parallel
I’m sending the same query in the docs, (just collection names changed) to my
Solr but always getting the exception:
{
"result-set":{
"docs":[{
Hi,
You haven't shared information about your environment and how frequently
you are commiting the changes, whether your user searching collection gets
real time inserts / updates etc.,
but if you are not doing any real time analysis with the user query
information, you can store the information
Hello,
We at VNC are using Solr for search and as a data store. We have a use-case in
which we want to hit a REST endpoint whenever documents are inserted, updated,
or deleted in Solr with the documents under consideration as well. When
exploring the Solr documentation, we found Event
Please reconsider the removal of the DIH from future versions. The repo
it's been moved to is a ghost town with zero engagement from Rohit (or
anyone). Not sure how 'moving' it caused it to now only support MariaDB but
that appears to be the case. The current implementation is fast, easy to
work
Do collection names in request url affect how the query works in any way?
A streaming expression is sent to http://mySolrHost/solr/col1,col2/stream
(notice multiple collections in url)
Col1 has 2 shards, each have 3 replicas.
* Shard1 has replicas on nodes A, B, C
* Shard2 has replicas on D,E,F
Hi,
I have one data collection on 3 shards and 2 replicas, user searches on it.
Also I log all user queries and save to another collection on the same solr
cloud, but user queries are very slow when there are a lot of logs to be
written to the log collection.
any solution for me, please advise.
Hello everyone,
I have a nasty problem with the scheduled Solr collections backup. From
time to time when a scheduled backup is triggered (backup operation takes
around 10 minutes) Solr freezes for 20-30 seconds. The freeze happens on
one Solr instance at time but this affects all queries latency
I am using `geodist()` in solr query. Following this
`select?==*,_dist_:geodist()={!geofilt
d=30444}=on=50.53,-9.5722616=*:*=geo=true=json`
However, it seems like distance calculations aren’t working. Here’s an
example query where the pt is several hundred kilometers away from the
POLYGON. The
Hi,
I am upgrading from Solr 6.5.1 to solr 8.6.1 and have noticed a change in
the Edismax parser behavior which is affecting our search results. If user
operators are present in the search query, the Solr 6 behavior was to take
mm parameters from the user query string which was 0% by default if
On 1/19/2021 4:19 PM, ufuk yılmaz wrote:
Lets say I had only 1 replica for each collection but I split it to 6 shards, 1
for every node.
Or I had 2 shards (1 shard is too big for a single node I think) but I had 3
replicas, 3x2=6, 1 on every node.
How would it affect the performance?
It all
I’m trying to learn all I can on Solr for a year now and I still scratch my
head when it comes to effects of shards and replicas on performance.
- info about my setup
We have a SolrCloud setup with 6 nodes.
Each collection has 2 shards and 2 replicas. 1 shard’s size is about 100GB.
Thanks for replying, Dave.
I am afraid that I am looking for non-index time i.e. query time solution.
Actually in my case I am expecting both documents to be returned from your
example. I am just trying to avoid returning of documents which contain a
tokenized versions
of the provided search
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/4_6_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/analysis/ReversedWildcardFilterFactory.html
?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 4:01 AM mosheB wrote:
>
> Hi, is there any sophisticated way [using the schema] to block brutal regex
> queries?
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from:
We had the same requirement. Just to echo back your requirements, I understand
your case to be this. Given these 2 doc titles:
doc 1: "information retrieval"
doc 2: "Advanced information retrieval with Solr"
You want a phrase search for "information retrieval" to find both documents,
but an
Hi,
I am aware that to do exact matching (only whatever is provided inside
double quotes should be matched) in Solr, we can copy existing fields with
the help of copyFields into new fields that have very minimal tokenization
or no tokenization (e.g. using KeywordTokenizer or using string field
Relevance Slack is open to anyone working on search & relevance - #solr is only
one of the channels, there's lots more! Hope to see you there.
Cheers
Charlie
https://opensourceconnections.com/slack
On 16/01/2021 02:18, matthew sporleder wrote:
IRC has kind of died off,
Hi, is there any sophisticated way [using the schema] to block brutal regex
queries?
Thanks
--
Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html
I further checked that BM25Similarity class until solr 7.7 has a null check
for norms in the explainTFNorm method but this is removed in Solr 8
onwards. Does omitNorms work in Solr8? Can someone send me what the debug
output looks like with omitNorms="true"?
Here is my config:
On Mon, Jan 18,
Hi Everyone,
We are using solr8.5.2 (Solr cloud mode), external zookeeper ensemble
(hosted on the separate node)
All of a sudden we are seeing sudden spike in CPU but at the same same time
neither any heavy indexing is performed nor any sudden increase in request
rate.
Collection info:
On 1/17/2021 11:12 PM, Doss wrote:
Thanks Michael Gibney , Shawn Heisey for pointing in the right direction.
1. Will there be any performance degrade if we use shards.preference?
2. How about leader election if we decided to use NRT + PULL ? TLOG has the
advantage of participating in leader
Hi eveybody,
I am migrating from solr 6.5.1 to solr 8.6.1 and am having a couple of
issues for which I need your help. There is a significant change in ranking
between Solr 6 and 8 search results which I need to fix before using Solr8
in our live environment. I noticed a couple of changes upfront
Thanks Michael Gibney , Shawn Heisey for pointing in the right direction.
1. Will there be any performance degrade if we use shards.preference?
2. How about leader election if we decided to use NRT + PULL ? TLOG has the
advantage of participating in leader election correct?
3. NRT + TLOG is there
IRC has kind of died off,
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/community.html has a slack mentioned,
I'm on https://opensourceconnections.com/slack after taking their solr
training class and assume it's mostly open to solr community.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 8:10 PM Justin Sweeney
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
Hi all,
I did some googling and didn't find anything, but is there a Slack
workspace for Solr? I think this could be useful to expand interaction
within the community of Solr users and connect people solving similar
problems.
I'd be happy to get this setup if it does not exist already.
Justin
You can try collapse as well.
Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 4:51 AM Bruno Mannina wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I found a temporary solution to my problem.
>
>
>
> I do a request without ngroups=true => result is quickly
>
> And just after, I do a simple
On 1/15/2021 7:56 AM, Doss wrote:
1. Suppose we have 10 node SOLR Cloud setup, is it possible to dedicate 4
nodes for writes and 6 nodes for selects?
2. We have a SOLR cloud setup for our customer facing applications, and we
would like to have two more SOLR nodes for some backend jobs. Is it
EDIT: "the equivalent terms are separated by commas (as they should be)" =>
"the equivalent terms are _not_ separated by commas (as they should be)"
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:09 AM Michael Gibney
wrote:
> Shaun,
>
> I'm not 100% sure, but don't give up on this just yet:
>
> > For example if I
I know you're asking about nodes, not replicas; but depending on what
you're trying to achieve you might be as well off routing requests based on
replica. Have you considered the various options available via the
`shards.preference` param [1]? For instance, you could set up your "write"
replicas
On 1/15/2021 7:20 AM, Jae Joo wrote:
Is non CDCR replication in SolrCloud still working in Solr 9.0?
Solr 9 doesn't exist yet. Probably won't for at least a few months.
The latest version is 8.7.0.
Solr's replication feature is used by SolrCloud internally for recovery
operations, but the
Shaun,
I'm not 100% sure, but don't give up on this just yet:
> For example if I enter diabetes it finds the acronym DM for diabetes
mellitus
I think the behavior you're observing may simply be a side-effect of a
misconfiguration of synonyms.txt. In the example you posted, the equivalent
terms
Dear All,
1. Suppose we have 10 node SOLR Cloud setup, is it possible to dedicate 4
nodes for writes and 6 nodes for selects?
2. We have a SOLR cloud setup for our customer facing applications, and we
would like to have two more SOLR nodes for some backend jobs. Is it good
idea to form these
Hi Michael
Thanks for that I'll have a study later. It's just reminded me of the
expand option which I meant to have a look at.
Thanks
Shaun
On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 14:33, Michael Gibney
wrote:
> The equivalent terms on the right-hand side of the `=>` operator in the
> example you sent should
Hi Charlie
I was indexing at index time only. The synonyms/acronyms were coming from
the published journals xml files so I wasn't expecting to maintain them
myself. If it worked, I was expecting, hopefully, to update the synonyms
file automatically.
As I just explained to Bernd I'm finding that
Hi Bernd
Thanks for that. I think it is working, but I think unfortunately what I'm
trying to do is impossible/not logical. When I enter a term it goes off
and searches using all the matching acronyms, because I'm finding a term
used in more than one synonym eg diabetes.
I think at the end of
The equivalent terms on the right-hand side of the `=>` operator in the
example you sent should be separated by a comma. You mention you already
tried only-comma-separated (e.g. one line: `SRN,Stroke Research Network`)
and that that yielded unexpected results as well. I would recommend
Is non CDCR replication in SolrCloud still working in Solr 9.0?
Jae
Hello list,
cloud it be that Apache Solr Reference Guide of all versions is wrong?
Example:
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/8_7/filter-descriptions.html#icu-normalizer-2-filter
NFC: (name="nfc" mode="compose") Normalization Form C, canonical decomposition
NFD: (name="nfc"
Hi There,
I am planning to implement Solr cloud 8.7.0 with existing Zookeeper 3.4.5. This
is cloudera provided zookeeper.
Is there any red flags, for such configuration, as I couldn’t find any
compatibility matrix?
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Subhajit
Hi Jim
Thanks for looking into it for me.
I did some more testing and if I created a base solr 7.7.1 database using
the 'out of the box' schema.xml and solrconfig and add this item manually
using the Solr Admin tool documents/XML
ABCD-N1
A test
And then update it using
I'm wondering if you should be using these acronyms at index time, not
search time. It will make your index bigger and you'll have to re-index
to add new synonyms (as they may apply to old documents) but this could
be an occasional task, and in the meantime you could use query-time
synonyms
Hi everybody,
I'm looking for a way to replace solr index field names in the highlighting
response.
For the query part there is the param fl=substitute:REAL_FIELD_NAME which
substitutes the field name REAL_FIELD_NAME by "substitute". Sadly the
substitution is not applied to the highlighter
If you are using multiword synonyms, acronyms, ...
Your should escape the space within the multiwords.
As synonyms.txt:
SRN, Stroke\ Research\ Network
IGBP, isolated\ gastric\ bypass
...
Redards
Bernd
Am 15.01.21 um 10:48 schrieb Shaun Campbell:
I have a medical journals search application
Hello,
I found a temporary solution to my problem.
I do a request without ngroups=true => result is quickly
And just after, I do a simple request with my query and this param:
.={x:"unique(fid)"}
Where the field « fid » is my group field name.
88 sec => 3~4 sec for both requests.
I have a medical journals search application and I've a list of some 9,000
acronyms like this:
MSNQ=>MSNQ Multiple Sclerosis Neuropsychological Screening Questionnaire
SRN=>SRN Stroke Research Network
IGBP=>IGBP isolated gastric bypass
TOMADO=>TOMADO Trial of Oral Mandibular Advancement Devices
On 1/14/2021 2:31 AM, Abhay Kumar wrote:
I am trying to post below query to Solr but getting error as “Bad
Message 414reason: URI Too Long”.
I am sending query using SolrNet library. Please suggest how to resolve
this issue.
*Query :*
Hi Alessandro,
I'm trying to retrieve party id 'abc' 'def' 'ghi' in the same order I pass to
filter query. Is this possible?
The sorting field which I want to get results is not in solr schema for party
core. The sorting field Is outside solr. I want to able to fetch the
QueryResponse(SolrJ)
Hi Mike,
Thanks for your reply.
I remember DocValues is enabled by default since solr 6.
If it is not and I reindex the data with DocValues= true for id field. How
much my index size will increase due to this.
Currently I have 90 GB as index size
On Wed, 13 Jan, 2021, 9:14 pm Mike Drob,
Hi All,
I have more than 130 million documents, with an index size of more than
400GB on Solr8.7.
I do a simple query and it takes around 1400ms, its ok but when I use
ngroups=true, I get an answer in 88sec.
I know its because Solr calculates the number of groups on a specific field
but
Hi,
Perfect !
it works when I increase the config.timeout (row 597).
The file app.js can be found here:
/opt/solr/server/solr-webapp/webapp/js/angular
-Message d'origine-
De : ufuk yılmaz [mailto:uyil...@vivaldi.net.INVALID]
Envoyé : mercredi 13 janvier 2021 14:57
À :
AFAIK, that could be a limit in Jetty and be raised in jetty.xml.
You might check the Jetty docs and look for something like BufferSize.
At least for Solr 6.6.x
Regards
Bernd
Am 14.01.21 um 13:19 schrieb Abhay Kumar:
Thank you Nicolas. Yes, we are making Post request to Solr using SolrNet
Thank you Nicolas. Yes, we are making Post request to Solr using SolrNet
library.
The current request length is approx. 32K characters, I have tested with 10K
characters length request and it works fine.
Any suggestion to increase request length size in Solr configuration.
Thanks.
Abhay
Hi Jonathan,
it was really helpful. Some of the metrics were crossing threshold like
network bandwidth etc.
Regards,
Abhishek
On Sat, Dec 26, 2020 at 7:54 PM Jonathan Tan wrote:
> Hi Abhishek,
>
> Merry Christmas to you too!
> I think it's really a question regarding your indexing speed NFRs.
Euh, sorry: I did not read your message well enough.
You did actually use a post request, with the parameters in the body
(your example suggests otherwise)
> On 14 Jan 2021, at 10:37, Nicolas Franck wrote:
>
> I believe you can also access this path in a HTTP POST request.
> That way you do no
I believe you can also access this path in a HTTP POST request.
That way you do no hit the URI size limit
cf.
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/2997014/can-you-use-post-to-run-a-query-in-solr-select
I think some solr libraries already use this approach (e.g. WebService::Solr
in perl)
On 14
Hello,
I am trying to post below query to Solr but getting error as "Bad Message
414reason: URI Too Long".
I am sending query using SolrNet library. Please suggest how to resolve this
issue.
Query :
I have one collection, 3 shards, 2 replicas, I defined route field: title,
and ID is the unique key.
I index two document with same ID and different title, I configured dedupe
chain and I can see signature is generated, but the old document was
removed by solr, please help, thanks
Hi,
Checking in again if someone can pitch in for my earlier post to this
mailing list? Thanks in Advance.
Best Regards,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 8:30 AM Kaushal Shriyan
wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 12:10 AM Dmitri Maziuk
> wrote:
>
>> On 1/11/2021 12:30 PM, Walter Underwood wrote:
>>
I agree, documents may be gigantic or very small, with heavy text analysis
or simple strings ...
so it's not possible to give an evaluation here.
But you could make use of the nightly benchmark to give you an idea of
Lucene indexing speed (the engine inside Apache Solr) :
I faced these problems a while ago, but at the time I created a blog post
which I hope could help:
https://sease.io/2018/05/solrcloud-leader-election-failing.html
-
---
Alessandro Benedetti
Search Consultant, R Software Engineer, Director
Sease Ltd. - www.sease.io
--
Sent from:
Hi Srinivas,
Filter queries don't impact scoring but only matching.
So, what is the ordering you are expecting?
A bq (boost query) parameter will add a clause to the query, impacting the
score in an additive way.
The query you posted is a bit confused, what was your intent there?
To boost search
I think if you have _root_ in schema.xml you should look elsewhere. My memory
is merely adding this one line to schema.xml took care of our problem.
From: Flowerday, Matthew J
Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 3:23 AM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Query over migrating a solr
Yes, check performance before turning on the stats cache in prod.
When we tested the LRUStatsCache in 6.6.2, searches were 11X slower.
It should be possible to do distributed IDF with little extra overhead.
Infoseek was doing that in 1995 and the patent on the technique has
expired.
wunder
You should be using docvalues on your id, but note that switching this
would require a reindex.
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:04 AM Ajay Sharma
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have used cursors to search and export documents in solr according to
>
>
Hallo Bernd und Markus,
A very instructive article, by the creator of TLOG mode (introduced in 7.0,
btw):
https://medium.com/@caomanhdat317/indexing-flow-of-solrcloud-sharding-distributed-systems-1-bba411bf8994
It helped me when architecting our replication policy.
Not an easy matter, it's a
Hallo Bernd,
I see the different replica types in the 7.1 [1] manual but not in the 6.6.
ExactStatsCache should work in 6.6, just add it to solrconfig.xml, not the
request handler [1]. It will slow down searches due to added overhead.
Regards,
Markus
[1]
When I performa a long running streaming expression, sometimes I get:
{
"error": {
"metadata": [
"error-class",
"org.apache.solr.common.SolrException",
"root-error-class",
"java.net.SocketTimeoutException"
],
"msg":
Hello Markus,
thanks a lot.
Is TLOG also for SOLR 6.6.6 or only 8.x and up?
I will first try ExactStatsCache.
Should be added as invariant to request handler, right?
Comparing the replica index directories they have different size and
the index version and generation is different. Also Max
Hi,
A while ago I asked the same thing here. Looking at the source javascript code
of the frontend app, I saw a 10k millisecond timeout config in httpInterceptor
inside app.js. I changed it to something much larger and results of long
queries began to show.
Hope it helps
Sent from Mail for
Hello Bernd,
This is normal for NRT replicas, because the way segments are merged and
deletes are removed is not synchronized between replicas. In that case
counts for TF and IDF and norms become slightly different.
You can either use ExactStatsCache that fetches counts for terms before
scoring,
Hello,
I have a scenario where I'm using filter query to fetch the results.
Example: Filter query(fq) - PARTY_ID:(abc OR def OR ghi)
Now I'm getting query response through solrJ in different order. Is there a way
I can get the results in same order as specified in filter query?
Tried dismax
401 - 500 of 147688 matches
Mail list logo
