is possible (in fact I’m dealing with this very situation with a client
> as we speak) to set parameters this way, but I don’t recommend it. Create
> a SearchComponent to do this job instead.
>
> Erik
>
>
>
> > On Aug 9, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Beale, Jim (US-KOP)
>
Anyone??
From: Beale, Jim (US-KOP) [mailto:jim.be...@hibu.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2016 1:23 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Modifying fl in QParser
Hi,
Is it possible to modify the SolrParam, fl, to append selected dynamic fields,
while rewriting a query in QParser.parse
Hi,
Is it possible to modify the SolrParam, fl, to append selected dynamic fields,
while rewriting a query in QParser.parse()?
Thanks in advance!
Jim Beale
Senior Lead Developer
2201 Renaissance Boulevard, King of Prussia, PA, 19406
Mobile: 610-220-3067
[cid:image001.png@01CD6E5F.BE5E6C20]
. [mailto:dsmi...@mitre.org]
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2014 11:30 AM
To: Beale, Jim (US-KOP); solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Indexing spatial fields into SolrCloud (HTTP)
Hello Jim,
By the way, using GeohashPrefixTree.getMaxLevelsPossible() is usually an
extreme choice. Instead you probably want
To: Beale, Jim (US-KOP); solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Indexing spatial fields into SolrCloud (HTTP)
That’s pretty weird. It appears that somehow a Spatial4j Point class is having
it’s toString() called on it (which looks like Pt(x=-72.544123,y=41.85) )
and then Spatial4j
, 2014 11:30 AM
To: Beale, Jim (US-KOP); solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Indexing spatial fields into SolrCloud (HTTP)
Hello Jim,
By the way, using GeohashPrefixTree.getMaxLevelsPossible() is usually an
extreme choice. Instead you probably want to choose only as many levels needed
I am porting an application from Lucene to Solr which makes use of spatial4j
for distance searches. The Lucene version works correctly but I am having a
problem getting the Solr version to work in the same way.
Lucene version:
SpatialContext geoSpatialCtx = SpatialContext.GEO;
Thanks Michael,
I am having a terrible time getting this non-sharded index up. Everything I
try leads to a dead-end.
http://10.0.15.44:8511/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATEname=tpnumShards=1replicationFactor=5
it uses the solrconfig.xml from another core. That solrconfig.xml is deployed
-
From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 5:00 PM
To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: SolrCloud question
You shouldn't be configuring the replication handler if you are using solrcloud.
- Mark
On Nov 18, 2013, at 3:51 PM, Beale, Jim (US-KOP) jim.be
Hello all,
I am trying to set up a SolrCloud deployment consisting of 5 boxes each of
which is running Solr under jetty. A zookeeper ensemble is running separately
on 3 of the boxes.
Each Solr instance has 2 cores, one of which is sharded across the five boxes
and the other not sharded at
On Nov 15, 2013, at 11:47 AM, Beale, Jim (US-KOP) jim.be...@hibu.com wrote:
Hello all,
I am trying to set up a SolrCloud deployment consisting of 5 boxes each of
which is running Solr under jetty. A zookeeper ensemble is running
separately on 3 of the boxes.
Each Solr instance has 2 cores
and you're adding a bunch of docs, try
lowering that number. If you're sending one doc at a time I'm on the
wrong track.
Best
Erick
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 2:51 PM, Beale, Jim (US-KOP) jim.be...@hibu.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I've been migrating an application which indexes about 15M documents from
Hey folks,
I've been migrating an application which indexes about 15M documents from
straight-up Lucene into SolrCloud. We've set up 5 Solr instances with a 3
zookeeper ensemble using HAProxy for load balancing. The documents are
processed on a quad core machine with 6 threads and indexed
13 matches
Mail list logo
