Replication clients logs in solr 1.4

Hi All, I'm using the build in replication with master/slave(s) Solr and the indices are replicating just fine. Just something troubles me: Nothing happens in my logs/ directory .. On the slave(s), no logs/snapshot.current file. And on the master, nothing either appears on logs/clients/ The

Re: Replication clients logs in solr 1.4

Oops. Ok my mistakes. The logs are actually for the solr 1.3 system scripts based distribution only. And the config files synchronize only on change .. J. 2010/1/20 Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com: Hi All, I'm using the build in replication with master/slave(s) Solr and the indices

Re: Lock problems: Lock obtain timed out

Hi, It seems this situation is caused by some No space left on device exeptions: SEVERE: java.io.IOException: No space left on device at java.io.RandomAccessFile.writeBytes(Native Method) at java.io.RandomAccessFile.write(RandomAccessFile.java:466) at

Re: exact match lookup

Hi, you need to quote your phrase when you search for 'Social News': feedClass:Social News (URI encoded of course). otherwise your request will become (I assume you're using a standard query parser) feedClass:Social defaultField:News . Well that's the idea. It should then work using the type

Re: character encoding issue

Hi, How do you post your data to solr? If it's by posting XML, then it should be properly encoded in UTF-8 (which is the XML default). Regardless of what's in the DB (which can be a mystery with MySQL). At query time, if the XML writer is used, then it's encoded in UTF-8. If the json one is

Re: exact match lookup

/str str name=firstLetterTitleM/str str name=titleMix/str /doc On Nov 4, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Jérôme Etévé wrote: Hi, you need to quote your phrase when you search for 'Social News': feedClass:Social News (URI encoded of course). otherwise your request will become (I assume you're using

Lock problems: Lock obtain timed out

Hi, I've got a few machines who post documents concurrently to a solr instance. They do not issue the commit themselves, instead, I've got autocommit set up at solr server side: autoCommit maxDocs5/maxDocs !-- commit at least every 5 docs -- maxTime6/maxTime !--

Re: Slow Commits

Hi, here's two thing that can slow down commits: 1) Autowarming the caches. 2) The Java old generation object garbage collection. You can try: - Turning autowarming off (set autowarmCount=0 in the caches configuration) - If you use the sun jvm, use -XX:+UseConcMarkSweepGC to get a less

Multifield query parser and phrase query behaviour from 1.3 to 1.4

Hi All, I'm using a multified query parser to generated weighted queries across different fields. For instance, perl developer gives me: +(title:perl^10.0 keywords:perl company:perl^3.0) +(title:developer^10.0 keywords:developer company:developer^3.0) Either in solr 1.3 or solr 1.4 (from 12 oct

Re: Multifield query parser and phrase query behaviour from 1.3 to 1.4

. Jerome. 2009/10/27 Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:44 AM, Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com wrote: I don't really get why these two tokens are subsequently put together in a phrase query. That's the way the Lucene query parser has always worked... phrase

Re: Multifield query parser and phrase query behaviour from 1.3 to 1.4

0,9 10,11 12,19 20,26 10,19 Could you see a reason why title:d affaire works with textgen but not with our type? Thanks! Jerome. 2009/10/27 Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com: Hum, That's probably because of our own customized types/tokenizers/filters. I tried reindexing

QTime always a multiple of 50ms ?

Hi all, I'm using Solr trunk from 2009-10-12 and I noticed that the QTime result is always a multiple of roughly 50ms, regardless of the used handler. For instance, for the update handler, I get : INFO: [idx1] webapp=/solr path=/update/ params={} status=0 QTime=0 INFO: [idx1] webapp=/solr

Re: QTime always a multiple of 50ms ?

2009/10/23 Andrzej Bialecki a...@getopt.org: Jérôme Etévé wrote: Hi all, I'm using Solr trunk from 2009-10-12 and I noticed that the QTime result is always a multiple of roughly 50ms, regardless of the used handler. For instance, for the update handler, I get : INFO: [idx1] webapp

Where the new replication pulls the files?

Hi all, I'm wondering where a slave pulls the files from the master on replication. Is it directly to the index/ directory or is it somewhere else before it's completed and gets copied to index? Cheers! Jerome. -- Jerome Eteve. http://www.eteve.net jer...@eteve.net

Re: Is Relational Mapping (foreign key) possible in solr ??

Hi, here's what you could do: * Use multivalued fields instead of 'comma separated values', so you won't need a separator. * Store project identifiers in the user index. Denormalised projects informations in a user entry will fatally need re-indexing lot of user entries when project info

Replication filelist command failure on container restart

Hi All, I'm facing a small problem with the replication handler: After restarting my master container (tomcat), /admin/replication/index.jsp shows me the right information, basically the same indexversion as before the restart (no commits/optimize have been done after restart): Local Index

Fwd: Replication filelist command failure on container restart

-- Forwarded message -- From: Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com Date: 2009/10/16 Subject: Re: Replication filelist command failure on container restart To: yo...@lucidimagination.com Thanks Yonik, It works now! J. 2009/10/16 Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com: I think

Solr 1.4 Release date/ lucene 2.9 API ?

Hi all, Have you planned a release date for solr 1.4? If I understood well, it will use lucene 2.9 release from last sept. 24th with a stable API? Thanks. Jerome. -- Jerome Eteve. http://www.eteve.net jer...@eteve.net

init parameters for queryParser

Hi all, I've got my own query parser plugin defined thanks to the queryParser tag: queryParser name=myqueryparser class=my.package.MyQueryParserPlugin / The QParserPlugin class has got an init method like this: public void init(NamedList args); Where and how do I put my args to be passed to

Re: delay while adding document to solr index

Hi, - Try to let solr do the commits for you (setting up autocommit feature). (and stop committing after inserting one document). This should greatly improve the delays you're experiencing. - If you do not optimize, it's normal your index size only grows. Optimize once regularly when your load

Re: Where do I need to install Solr

Solr is a separate service, in the same way a RDMS is a separate service. Whether you install it on the same machine as your webserver or not, it's logically separated from your server. Jerome. 2009/9/30 Claudio Martella claudio.marte...@tis.bz.it: Kevin Miller wrote: Does Solr have to be

What options would you recommend for the Sun JVM?

Hi solr addicts, I know there's no one size fits all set of options for the sun JVM, but I think It'd be useful to everyone to share your tips on using the sun JVM with solr. For instance, I recently figured out that setting the tenured generation garbage collection to Concurrent mark and sweep

Best strategy to commit often under load.

Hi all, I've got a solr server under significant load ( ~40/s ) and a single process which can potentially commit as often as possible. Typically, when it commits every 5 or 10s, my solr server slows down quite a lot and this can lead to congestion problems on my client side. What would you

Re: do NOT want to stem plurals for a particular field, or words

Hi, You can enable/disable stemming per field type in the schema.xml, by removing the stemming filters from the type definition. Basically, copy your prefered type, rename it to something like 'text_nostem', remove the stemming filter from the type and use your 'text_nostem' type for your

Implementing customized Scorer with solr API 1.4

Hi all, I'm kind of struggling with a customized lucene.Scorer of mine, since I use solr 1.4. Here's the problem: I wrote a DocSetQuery which inherit from a lucene.Query. This query is a decorator for a lucene.Query that filters out the documents which are not in a given set of predefined

Writing and using your own Query class in solr 1.4 (trunk)

Hi all, I have a custom search component which uses a query I wrote. Basically, this Query (called DocSetQuery) is a Query decorator that skips any document which is not in a given document set. My code used to work perfectly in solr 1.3 but in solr 1.4, it seems that my DocSetQuery has lost all

Re: Writing and using your own Query class in solr 1.4 (trunk)

. Shortly (when Solr trunk updates Lucene), Solr will go back to just createWeight and weight. The main change that will be left is that Weight will be an abstract class rather than an interface. -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com Jérôme Etévé wrote: Hi all, I have a custom search

Re: Writing and using your own Query class in solr 1.4 (trunk)

, or for the primitive Query it rewrites itself too). -- - Mark http://www.lucidimagination.com Jérôme Etévé wrote: Hi Mark, Thanks for clarifying this. So should I keep both sets of method implemented? I guess it won't hurt when solr trunk will use the updated version of lucene without those

Re: facet performance tips

performance. Do note that trunk (soon Solr 1.4) has dramatically improved faceting performance. Erik On Aug 12, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Jérôme Etévé wrote: Hi everyone, I'm using some faceting on a solr index containing ~ 160K documents. I perform facets on multivalued string fields

facet performance tips

Hi everyone, I'm using some faceting on a solr index containing ~ 160K documents. I perform facets on multivalued string fields. The number of possible different values is quite large. Enabling facets degrades the performance by a factor 3. Because I'm using solr 1.3, I guess the facetting

Re: Solr 1.3 and JDK1.6

Hi, I'm running solr 1.3 with java -version java version 1.6... . No problem to report. Cheers. J 2009/8/12 vaibhav joshi callvaib...@hotmail.com: Hi I am using Solr 1.3 ( official released version) and JDk1.5. My company is moving towards upgrading all systems to JDK1.6. is it safe to

Synonym aware string field typ

Hi all, I'd like to have a string type which is synonym aware at query time. Is it ok to have something like that: fieldType name=sastring class=solr.StrField analyzer type=query tokenizer class=solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory/ filter class=solr.SynonymFilterFactory

Re: Synonym aware string field typ

that, it will be used both at index and query time. Otis -- Sematext is hiring -- http://sematext.com/about/jobs.html?mls Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR - Original Message From: Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org

Re: Synonym aware string field typ

Lucene, Solr, Nutch, Katta, Hadoop, HBase, UIMA, NLP, NER, IR - Original Message From: Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com To: Otis Gospodnetic otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com Cc: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2009 12:39:33 PM Subject: Re: Synonym aware string field

Faceting in more like this

Hi all, Is there a way to enable faceting when using a more like this handler? I'd like to have facets from my similar documents. Cheers ! J. -- Jerome Eteve. Chat with me live at http://www.eteve.net jer...@eteve.net

Posting data in JSON

Hi All, I'm wondering if it's possible to post documents to solr in JSON format. JSON is much faster than XML to get the queries results, so I think it'd be great to be able to post data in JSON to speed up the indexing and lower the network load. All the best ! Jerome Eteve. -- Jerome

Re: Posting data in JSON

Hi, Nope, I'm not using solrj (my client code is in Perl), and I'm with solr 1.3. J. 2009/7/30 Shalin Shekhar Mangar shalinman...@gmail.com: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, I'm wondering if it's possible to post documents to solr

Mailing list: Change the reply too ?

Hi all, I don't know if it does the same from everyone, but when I use the reply function of my mail agent, it sets the recipient to the user who sent the message, and not the mailing list. So it's quite annoying cause I have to change the recipient each time I reply to someone on the list.

Re: Mailing list: Change the reply too ?

2009/7/30 Erik Hatcher e...@ehatchersolutions.com: On Jul 30, 2009, at 1:44 PM, Jérôme Etévé wrote: Hi all, I don't know if it does the same from everyone, but when I use the reply function of my mail agent, it sets the recipient to the user who sent the message, and not the mailing list

Reasonable number of maxWarming searchers

Hi All, I'm planning to have a certain number of processes posting independently in a solr instance. This instance will solely act as a master instance. No clients queries on it. Is there a problem if i set maxWarmingSearchers to something like 30 or 40? Also, how do I disable the cache

Synchronisation problem with replication

Hi All, I've got here a small problem about replication. Let's say I post a document on the master server, and the slaves do a snappuller/installer via crontab every 1 minutes. Then between in average 30 seconds, all my search servers are not synchronized. Is there a way to improve

Concurrent run of snapshot scripts.

Hi Everyone, I'm running solr 1.3 and I was wondering if there's a problem with running the snapshot script concurrently . For instance, I have a cron job which performs a snappuller/snapinstaller every minute on my slave servers. Sometime (for instance after an optimize), the snappuller can

Re: Disable unique-key for Solr index

Hi ! Is there any primary table in your view with a unique single key you could use ? J. 2009/5/11 jcott28 jcot...@yahoo.com: I have a case where I would like a solr index created which disables the unique-key option. I've tried commenting out the uniqueKey option and that just spits

Re: Very long commit time.

Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: Looks like cache autowarming. If you have statically defined warming queries in solrconfig.xml, you could try setting autowarmCount=0 for all the caches. -Yonik http://www.lucidimagination.com On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 2:37 PM, Jérôme Etévé jerome.et

Re: Very long commit time.

On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Yonik Seeley yo...@lucidimagination.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com wrote: Great, It went down to less than 10 secs now :) What I don't really understand is that my autowarmCount were pretty low ( like 128

Very long commit time.

Dear solr fans, I have a solr index of roughly 8M docs and I have here a little problem when I commit some insertion into it. The insert itself is very fast, but my commit takes 163 seconds. Here's the solr trace the commit leaves: INFO: start

Collection distribution in a multicore environment

Hi fellow Solr fans, I'm setting up some collection distribution along with multicore solr . I'm using version 1.3 I have no problem with the snapshooter, since this can be set within each core in solrconfig.xml. My question is more about the rsyncd . The rsyncd-start creates a

Precisions on solr.xml about cross context forwarding.

Hi all, In solr.xml ( /lucene/solr/trunk/src/webapp/web/WEB-INF/web.xml ),it's written that It is unnecessary, and potentially problematic, to have the SolrDispatchFilter configured to also filter on forwards. Do not configure this dispatcher as dispatcherFORWARD/dispatcher. The

Re: Precisions on solr.xml about cross context forwarding.

at 6:24 PM, Jérôme Etévé jerome.et...@gmail.com wrote: Maybe there's an 'internal query' concept in j2ee that could be a workaround ? I'm not really a j2ee expert .. Jerome. On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Smiley, David W. dsmi...@mitre.org wrote: This bothers me too. I find it really

Re: AW: Cross-context-forward to solr-instance

Hi Lance, Can you tell us what's this parameter and how to set it ? I'm also stucked with the same problem :( Thanks !! Jerome On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 6:02 PM, Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com wrote: You can give a default core set by adding a default parameter to the query in

MoreLikeThis and boost functions

Hi everyone, I'm wondering if the MoreLikeThis handler takes the boost function parameter into account for the scoring (hence the sorting I guess) of the similar documents it finds. Thanks for your help ! Jerome. -- Jerome Eteve. Chat with me live at http://www.eteve.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]

delivering customized results using a SearchComponent plugin

Hi there, I developed a personalized SearchComponent in which I'm building a docset from a personalized Query, and a personalized Priority Queue. To be short, I'm doing that (in the process method) : HitCollector hitCol = new HitCollector() { @Override public void

Different tokenizing algorithms for the same stream

next(Token result) there is no information about the location inside the stream. I can read characters from the input Reader, but couldn't find a way to know if it's the beginning of the input or not. -J On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 6:13 AM, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I think you

Re: Batch and Incremental mode of indexing

Hi, For batch indexing, what you could do is to use two core. One in production and one used for your update. Once your update core is build (delete *:* plus batch insert) , you can swap the cores to put it in production:

Re: Different tokenizing algorithms for the same stream

Hi, I think you could implement your personalized tokenizer in a way it changes its behaviour after it has delivered X tokens. This implies a new tokenizer instance is build from the factory for every string analyzed, which I believe is true. Can this be confirmed ? Cheers ! Jerome. On

DocSet: BitDocSet or HashDocSet ?

Hi all, In my code, I'd like to keep a subset of my 14M docs which is around 100k large. What is according to you the best option in terms of speed and memory usage ? Some basic thoughts tells me the BitDocSet should be the fastest for lookup, but takes ~ 14M * sizeof(int) in memory,

Deadlock problem on searcher at warm up.

Hi everyone, I'm implementing a search component inherited from SearchComponent . This component has to build a data structure from the index. Like in the SpellChecker, I trigger this building by giving a special argument at query time (from the process method) and I'm using the searcher I

Re: One document inserted but nothing showing up ? SOLR 1.3

Hi there, Are you sure you did a commit after your insertion ? On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:11 AM, sunnyfr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even that doesn't work, How can I check properly, I did insert one document but I can't get it back ??? Feak, Todd wrote: Unless q=ALL is a special query I

Re: Deadlock problem on searcher at warm up.

Great, it works now. Thanks ! J On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 4:45 PM, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 8:21 AM, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I though it'd be ok to trigger this the very first time the process method is called by doing something like

Re: solr 1.3 database connection latin1/stored utf8 in mysql?

Hi, See http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/intl/encoding.doc.html and http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/api/java/lang/String.html#getBytes(java.lang.String) Also note that you cannot transform a latin1 string in a utf-8 string. What you can do is to decode a latin1 octet

Re: Discarding undefined fields in query

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : req.getSchema().getQueryAnalyzer(); : : I think it's in this analyzer that the undefined field error happens : (because for instance the field 'foo' doesn't exists in the schema, : and so it's impossible to find a

Re: Discarding undefined fields in query

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 2:42 PM, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But still I have an error from the webapp when I try to query my schema with non existing fields in my query ( like foo:bar ). I'm wondering if the query q is parsed in a very simple way somewhere

Discarding undefined fields in query

Hi All, I wrote a customized query parser which discards non-schema fields from the query (I'm using the schema field names from req.getSchema().getFields().keySet() ) . This parser works fine in unit tests. But still I have an error from the webapp when I try to query my schema with non

Multicore and custom jars loading

Hello all. I'm using a multicore installation and I've got a small issue with the loading of our customized jars. Let's say I've got a class my.company.MyAnalyzer which is distributed in a jar called company-solr.jar If I put this jar in the lib directory, at the solr home like this:

Re: Multicore and custom jars loading

My mistake, Using the sharedLib=lib/ attribute in the solr tag of solr.xml solved the problem. J. On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 2:43 PM, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all. I'm using a multicore installation and I've got a small issue with the loading of our customized jars

Querying multicore

Hi everyone, I'm planning to use the multicore cause it seems more convenient than having multiple instances of solr in the same container. I'm wondering if it's possible to query different cores ( hence different schemas / searchers ... indices !) from a customized SolrRequestHandler to

Re: Solr deployment in tomcat

Hi, Here's what I've got (multiplesolr instance within the same tomcat server) In /var/tomcat/conf/Catalina/localhost/ For an instance 'foo' : foo.xml : Context path=foo docBase=/var/tomcat/solrapp/solr.war debug=0 crossContext=true Environment name=solr/home type=java.lang.String

Re: Solr deployment in tomcat

On 10/9/07, Chris Laux [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Jérôme Etévé wrote: [...] /var/solr/foo/ is the solr home for this instance (where you'll put your schema.xml , solrconfig.xml etc.. ) . Thanks for the input Jérôme, I gave it another try and discovered that what I was doing wrong

Re: Problem with html code inside xml

If I understand, you want to keep the raw html code in solr like that (in your posting xml file): field name=storyFullText html/html /field I think you should encode your content to protect these xml entities: - lt; - gt; - quot; - amp; If you use perl, have a look at HTML::Entities.

Re: How to get all the search results - python

By design, it's not very efficient to ask for a large number of results with solr/lucene. I think you will face performance and memory problems if you do that. On 9/24/07, Thorsten Scherler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 16:29 +0530, Roopesh P Raj wrote: Hi Roopesh, I am

-field:[* TO *] doesn't seem to work

Hi all I've got a problem here with the '-field:[* TO *]' syntax. It doesn't seem to work as expected (see http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrQuerySyntax ). My request is 'word -fieldD:[* TO *]' and the debugQuery=1 solr option shows that it's properly transformed as : +(fieldA:chef^10.0

Re: Index HotSwap

On 8/21/07, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : I'm wondering what's the best way to completely change a big index : without loosing any requests. use the snapinstaller script -- or adopt the same atomic copying approach it uses. I'm having a look :) : - Between the two mv's,

Re: Indexing HTML content... (Embed HTML into XML?)

You need to encode your html content so it can be include as a normal 'string' value in your xml element. As far as remember, the only unsafe characters you have to encode as entities are: - lt; - gt; - quote; - amp; (google xml entities to be sure). I dont know what language you use , but

Using MMapDirectory instead of FSDirectory

Hi ! Is there a way to use a MMapDirectory instead of FSDirectory within Solr ? Our index is quite big and It takes a long time to go up in the OS cached memory. I'm wondering if an MMapDirectory could help to have our data in memory quicker (our index on disk is bigger than our memory

Index HotSwap

Hi all, I'm wondering what's the best way to completely change a big index without loosing any requests. That's how I do at the moment: solr index is a soft link to a directory dir. When I want to install a new index (in dir.new), I do a mv dir dir.old ; mv dir.new dir Then I ask for a

Pluggable IndexSearcher Proposal

Hi all ! I need a new feature in solr : to allow the configuration of the IndexSearcher class in the schema configuration to override the lucene IndexSearcher . I noticed that there's only one point in the code where the searcher is built: code in org/apache/solr/search/SolrIndexSearcher.java:

Re: Pluggable IndexSearcher Proposal

in the solr jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-288 but I didn t find the way to upload the patch. Thanks for your comments. Jerome. On 7/5/07, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all ! I need a new feature in solr : to allow the configuration of the IndexSearcher class in the schema

Specific fields with DisMaxQueryHandler

Hi , when we use DisMaxQueryHandler, queries that includes specific fields which are not part of the boost string doesn't seem to work. For instance, If the boost string ( qf ) is 'a^3 b^4' and my query is 'term +c:term2' , it doesnt produce any result. Am I using this QueryHandler the bad way

Log levels setting

Hi, is there a way to avoid going to the web interface to set up the solr log level ? I'm also a bit confused about the INFO log level. Actually it's very nice to see some startup info about the schema , solr home setting, customize modules loaded .. But also this INFO log levels gives two

Re: Log levels setting

On 6/29/07, Chris Hostetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: : Hi, : is there a way to avoid going to the web interface to set up the solr : log level ? he web intrface for tweaking the log level is actually a miss-feature in my opinion ... it's a handy way to quickly crank the logging level up if

MultifieldSolrQueryParser ?

Hi, Solr uses a default query parser which is a SolrQueryParser based on a org.apache.lucene.queryParser.QueryParser; I wonder which is the best way to make the IndexSchema use some kind of MultifieldSolrQueryParser which could be based on a org.apache.lucene.queryParser.MultiFieldQueryParser

Re: Problems querying Russian content

On 6/28/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/28/07, Daniel Alheiros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm in trouble now about how to issue queries against Solr using in my q parameter content in Russian (it applies to Chinese and Arabic as well). The problem is I can't send any Russian

Re: XML vs JSON writer performance issues

2007/6/27, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It would be helpful if you could try out the patch at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-276 -Yonik I just tryed it out and it works. json output is now as fast as xml ! Well done :) thank you ! J. -- Jerome Eteve. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

XML vs JSON writer performance issues

Hi all. I'm currently running some tests with solr on a small index and I noticed a big difference on the response time of queries depending on the use of XML or json as a response format. In average, my test queries (including http connections open and close ) takes 6 ms to perform when I ask

Re: XML vs JSON writer performance issues

On 6/26/07, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/26/07, Jérôme Etévé [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm currently running some tests with solr on a small index and I noticed a big difference on the response time of queries depending on the use of XML or json as a response format