figured out referred to the docs here
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/0ce635ec01e9d3ce04a5fbf5d472ea9d5d28bfee?short_path=421a323#diff-421a323f596319f0485e0b03070d94e6
Thanks
Jay
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 3:38 PM Jay Potharaju wrote:
> Hi,
> I am trying to update the conn
Hi,
I am trying to update the connection & sockettime out value for my `select`
handler. After updating the configs i do not see that value being set and
it defaults to 60 sec.
How can i update these values?
Also looks like the docs have sockeTimeout & connectionTimeout values
swapped.
Thanks Shawn!
Can any of the committers comment about the CDCR error that I posted above?
Thanks
Jay
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 2:56 PM Shawn Heisey wrote:
> On 10/25/2019 3:22 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
> > Is there a solr slack channel?
>
> People with @apache.org email addres
Is there a solr slack channel?
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 9:00 AM Jay Potharaju wrote:
> Hi,
> I am frequently seeing cdcr-replicator null pointer exception errors in
> the logs.
> Any suggestions on how to address this?
> *Solr version: 7.7.2*
>
> Ex
Hi,
I am frequently seeing cdcr-replicator null pointer exception errors in the
logs.
Any suggestions on how to address this?
*Solr version: 7.7.2*
ExecutorUtil
Uncaught exception java.lang.NullPointerException thrown by thread:
cdcr-replicator-773-thread-3
java.lang.Exception: Submitter stack
Hi,
I am trying to implement some auditing fields in solr to track when was the
last time a document was updated. Basically when a document is updated, I
would like to store when the last time updated + the current timestamp.
example :
*First time indexing*
Doc1 : {id:1, category:shoes,
boost for earlier matches.
> The other approach suggested was to use Payloads (which got better
> since the original thread).
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
>> On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 at 22:01, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> I am trying to implement autocomplete f
Hi,
I am trying to implement autocomplete feature that should rank documents based
on term position in the search field.
Example-
Doc1- hello world
Doc2- blue sky hello
Doc3 - John hello
Searching for hello should return
Hello world
John hello
Blue sky hello
I am currently using ngram to do
Hi
I am trying to implement autocomplete feature from two fields, name &
attribute1. I have setup ngram for both the fields and have copyfield that
stores the ngrams results.
fl only contains name which is used by ui.
Is it possible to display records that match on values from attribute1? The
Hi,
I have a collection with 8 shards. 6 out of the shards are in sync but the
other 2 are lagging behind by more than 10 plus hours. The tlog is only 0.5
GB in size. I have tried stopping and starting CDCR number of times but it
has not helped.
>From what i have noticed there is always a shard
java:721)
at
org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getTermCounts(SimpleFacets.java:497)
at
org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.getTermCounts(SimpleFacets.java:426)
at
org.apache.solr.request.SimpleFacets.lambda$getFacetFieldCounts$0(SimpleFacets.java:826)
... 46 more
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
I was reading the debug info incorrectly it is working as expected
...thanks for the help.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 10:58 PM Jay Potharaju
wrote:
> Edwin, I tried escaping the special characters but it does not seems to
> work. I am using 7.7
> Than
the shard.
fq=fieldB:456=shard1.
Any suggestions why that would not be working when using _route_ to query
the documents.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:58 AM Branham, Jeremy (Experis) <
jb...@allstate.com> wrote:
> Jay –
> I’m not familiar with the document I
I just learnt that java 11 is . Is anyone using open jdk11 in production?
Thanks
> On Mar 23, 2019, at 5:15 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>
> I have not kept up with jdk versions ...will try with jdk 11 and see if it
> addresses the high cpu issue. Thanks
>
>
>> On M
, so it requires escaping during
> the search.
> You can try to search with query _route_="a\:b!".
>
> Regards,
> Edwin
>
>> On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 07:59, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> My document id has a format of a:b!c, when I query _route_=&
Hi,
My document id has a format of a:b!c, when I query _route_="a:b!" it does
not return any values. Any suggestions?
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
I have not kept up with jdk versions ...will try with jdk 11 and see if it
addresses the high cpu issue. Thanks
> On Mar 23, 2019, at 11:48 AM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>
> Thanks for that info Tim
>
>> On Mar 23, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Tim Underwood wrote:
>>
>> We
gt;> Finally, there was one issue with JDK 9 and Kerberos that I’m unsure what
>> the resolution is, if there is any. If you use Kerberos, be sure to test
>> that first.
>>
>> Best,
>> Erick
>>
>>> On Mar 23, 2019, at 9:47 AM, Jay Potharaju
>> wrot
Thanks I missed that info. Will try running with jdk9 and see if it addresses
the issue.
Jay
> On Mar 23, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Shawn Heisey wrote:
>
>> On 3/23/2019 8:12 AM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>> Can I use java 9 with 7.7.0. I am planning to test if fixes issue with high
Hi
Can I use java 9 with 7.7.0. I am planning to test if fixes issue with high cpu
that I am running into.
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129861
Was solr 7.7 tested with java 9?
Thanks
Jay
This might be causing the high CPU in 7.7.x.
https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/commit/eb652b84edf441d8369f5188cdd5e3ae2b151434#diff-e54b251d166135a1afb7938cfe152bb5
That is related to this JDK bug
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8129861.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019
Hi,
I just enabled CDCR for one collection. I am seeing high CPU usage and the
high number of tlog files and increasing.
The collection does not have lot of data , just started reindexing of data.
.
Solr 7.7.0 , implicit sharding 8 shards
I have enabled buffer on source side and disabled buffer
ient side or by an
> UpdateRequestProcessor).
>
> Cheers,
> Andrea
>
> On 14/01/2019 08:46, Jay Potharaju wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I have a copy field in which i am copying the contents of text_en field
> to
> > another custom field.
> > After indexing i was expect
copyfield syntax from my schema file...
Thanks
Jay
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 11:46 PM Jay Potharaju
wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a copy field in which i am copying the contents of text_en field to
> another custom field.
> After indexing i was expecting any of the specia
Hi,
I have a copy field in which i am copying the contents of text_en field to
another custom field.
After indexing i was expecting any of the special characters in the
paragraph to be removed, but it does not look like that is happening. The
copied content is same as the what is there in the
:
32.0 = docFreq
275.0 = docCount
0.82538307 = tfNorm, computed as (freq * (k1 + 1)) / (freq + k1 * (1
- b + b * fieldLength / avgFieldLength)) from:
1.0 = termFreq=1.0
1.2 = parameter k1
0.75 = parameter b
3.4436364 = avgFieldLength
5.224489
Hi,
When searching I get different results when the query contains question
mark vs without question mark . The field i am searching on does not have
any question marks.
Any suggestions?
<
tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> <
filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
Solr cdcr : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-12380
deletebyid: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8889
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:41 PM Jay Potharaju wrote:
> Hi Amrit,
> I am using a curl command to send a request to solr for deleting
>
uot;: {"id":"documentid13123123"}
}'
The deletes doesn't seem to propagate correctly to the target side.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 5:37 PM Amrit Sarkar wrote:
> Jay,
>
> Can you sample delete command you are firing at the source to understand
> the
:
8 shards : 2 on each node
Solr:6.6.4
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
hat the deletions can be routed to the correct leader
> > by hashing on the id field.
> >
> > Best,
> > Erick
> >
> > On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:02 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Thanks Emir & Shawn for chim
> Thanks,
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> > On 23 May 2018, at 02:35, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
Hi,
I have a quick question about deletebyQuery vs deleteById. When using
deleteByQuery, if query is id:123 is that same as deleteById in terms of
performance.
Thanks
Jay
that would explain about inner
working of solrcloud networking?
Thanks
Jay
org.apache.solr.update.StreamingSolrClients
>
> org.apache.solr.update.processor.DistributedUpdateProcessor$DistributedUpdatesAsyncException:
> Async exception during
> On May 13, 2018, at 9:21 PM, Jay Pothara
nitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
> Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/
>
>
>
> > On 8 May 2018, at 17:53, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Emir,
> > I was seeing this error
work blip and
there are a few errors for streaming solr client...but have never seen this
error before.
Thanks
Jay
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 12:56 AM, Emir Arnautović <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi Jay,
> This is low ingestion rate. What is the size of
I have about 3-5 updates per second.
> On May 7, 2018, at 5:02 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 5/7/2018 5:05 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>> There are some deletes by query. I have not had any issues with DBQ,
>> currently have 5.3 running in p
Thanks for explaining that Shawn!
Emir, I use php library called solarium to do updates/deletes to solr. The
request is sent to any of the available nodes in the cluster.
> On May 7, 2018, at 5:02 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 5/7/2018 5:05 PM, J
There are some deletes by query. I have not had any issues with DBQ,
currently have 5.3 running in production.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The updates are pushed in real time not batched. No complex
The updates are pushed in real time not batched. No complex analysis and
everything is committed using autocommit settings in solr.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:00 PM, Emir Arnautović <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> How do you send documents? Large batches
I didn't see any OOM errors in the logs on either of the nodes. I saw GC
pause of 1 second on the box that was throwing error ...but nothing on the
other node. Any other recommendations?
Thanks
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:48 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
Ah thanks for explaining that!
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:45 AM, Emir Arnautović <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Node A receives batch of documents to index. It forwards documents to
> shards that are on the node B. Node B is having issues with GC
.
thanks
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 9:34 AM, Emir Arnautović <
emir.arnauto...@sematext.com> wrote:
> Hi Jay,
> My first guess would be that there was some major GC on other box so it
> did not respond on time. Are your nodes well balanced - do they serve equal
&
Hi,
I am seeing the following lines in the error log. My setup has 2 nodes in
the solrcloud cluster, each node has 3 shards with no replication. From the
error log it seems like all the shards on this box are throwing async
exception errors. Other node in the cluster does not have any errors in
A is part of stopwords ...that is why it got dropped. Protected words will
only stop it from stemming
https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/language-analysis.html
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 11:35 AM, Wendy2 <wendy@rcsb.org> wrote:
> Hi fellow Users,
>
&g
LR-7867>.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 4/17/2018 8:44 PM, Erick Erickson wrote:
>
>> The other possibility is that you have LuceneMatchVersion set to
>> 5-something in solrconfig
(SimpleFacets.java:803)
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi
> Has anyone seen issues with group faceting on multivalued fields in solr
> 6x? Can any of the committers comment?
> Thanks
> Jay
>
> On Ap
Hi
Has anyone seen issues with group faceting on multivalued fields in solr 6x?
Can any of the committers comment?
Thanks
Jay
> On Apr 16, 2018, at 1:44 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I deleted my collection and rebuilt it to check if there are any issues w
but rather on small subset of data, which is fixed by reindexing.
Any suggestions on what else to check for??
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:20 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am testing solr 6.6.3 and have been running into interm
Hi,
I am testing solr 6.6.3 and have been running into intermittent group
faceting errors. I did some bulk indexing to initially setup the
collection I have multiple facet fields it only throws error on one of the
fields. The issue goes away when I reindex the data.
I am upgrading from solr
Hi,
I am getting Indexwriter is closed error only on some of my shards in the
collection. This seems to be happening on leader shards only. There is are
other shards on the box and they are not throwing any error. Also there is
enough disc space on the box available at this time.
Solr: 5.3.0.
This is my
query:
facet=true=true=true=product_id=true=category_id
Field def:
Tried adding both docvalues & without docvalues.
Shards: 2
Has anyone else experienced this error?
Thanks
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:20 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com
It looks like it was fixed as part of 6.6.3 : SOLR-6160
<http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6160>.
FYI: I have 2 shards in my test environment.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am runn
.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
500
The above query worked in solr 5.3. Any suggestions ?
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
nvm i see the first comment on the ticket ...that hypens are allowed
but not when it is the first character. It looks like 5.5 was the last
version where it was supported.
Thanks
Jay
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 9:29 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
&g
Thanks for the reply Shawn. Was this a recent change ? As per the ticket it was
fixed in 6.0. Is this change(no hyphens as starting of name ) applicable to all
6x versions.
Thanks
> On Mar 14, 2018, at 6:25 PM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2018 6:20
I tested in solr 6.5.1 and there also it is broken. Any recommendation
which version of 6 is that feature functioning. At this time the shard name
cant be changed because of dependency with other applications.
Thanks
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspot
Hi ,
I am creating a new collection in solr 6.6.3 and it wont allow me create a
shard with hyphen. This ticket(
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8725) was closed earlier. But it
is not working for me in 6.6.3.
Upgrading from 5.3 to 6.6.3.
Thanks
Jay
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 1:02 PM, Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote:
> Jay
> Did you try using text_en_splitting copied out of another release?
> Though if someone went to the trouble of removing it from the example,
> there could be something broken in it
I am upgrading to solr 6.6.3 and one of my fields uses text_en_splitting.
Are there any recommendations on how to adjust the fieldtype definition for
these fields.
Thanks
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 5:09 AM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Webster,
>
for scaling would also be great.
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
Hi,
I was wondering if there are any best practices for doing solr backup &
restore. In the past when running backup, I stopped indexing during the
backup process.
I am looking at this documentation and it says that indexing can continue
when backup is in progress.
<apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
> On 10/22/2016 6:19 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
> > I am trying to understand how load balancing works in solrcloud.
> >
> > As per my understanding solrcloud provides load balancing when querying
> > using an http endpoint. When a que
of the sub-request QTimes.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am trying to understand how load balancing works in solrcloud.
> >
> > As per my understanding so
Hi,
I am trying to understand how load balancing works in solrcloud.
As per my understanding solrcloud provides load balancing when querying
using an http endpoint. When a query is sent to any of the nodes , solr
will intelligently decide which server can fulfill the request and will be
start : "NOW/DAY%2D10DAYS",
> end : "NOW/DAY",
> gap : "%2B1DAY"
>
> }
> }
>
>
> On 06/28/2016 01:19 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>
>> json.facet={daterange : {type : range, field : datefield, start :
>> &q
PM, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> First thing I'd do is escape the plus. It's probably being interpreted
> as a space.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > I am tr
Hi,
I am trying to use the json range facet with a tdate field. I tried the
following but get an error. Any suggestions on how to fix the following
error /examples for date range facets.
json.facet={daterange : {type : range, field : datefield, start
:"NOW-10DAYS", end : "NOW/DAY", gap : "+1DAY"
ctory.html
>
> Regards,
> Alex.
>
> Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
> http://www.solr-start.com/
>
>
>> On 24 June 2016 at 13:42, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any ideas on how to handle case insensitive sea
>
> Regards,
> Alex
> On 24 Jun 2016 9:01 AM, "Jay Potharaju" <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > yes, that is what i thought. but was checking to see if there was
> something
> > I was missing.
> > Thanks
> >
> > On Thu, Jun
Hi,
I am trying to do a case insensitive sorting on couple of fields.
For this I am doing the following
Above would not allow using this datatype with docvalues. Docvalues can
only be used with string & trie fields.
And also docvalues are recommended for sorting &
Hi,
I am running facet query on a date field and the results are coming back on
an avg 500ms. The field is set to use docvalues & field type is tdate.
SOLR - 5.5
d field.
> Sorting requires a single value (token) to be meaningful.
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Thursday, June 23, 2016 7:43 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to have 1 field that can used for both searching and case
> insensitiv
Hi,
I would like to have 1 field that can used for both searching and case
insensitive sorting. As far as i know the only way to do is to have two
fields one for searching (text_en) and one for sorting(lowercase & string).
Any ideas how the two can be combined into 1 field.
--
Thanks
ction. "
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:03 AM, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Do you have to group, or can you collapse instead?
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Collapse+and+Expand+Results
>
> Cheers
>
> Tom
>
> On Tue, Ju
Any suggestions on how to handle result grouping in sharded index?
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working on a functionality that would require me to group documents
> by a id field. I read that the ngroups feature
Hi,
I am working on a functionality that would require me to group documents by
a id field. I read that the ngroups feature would not work in a sharded
index.
Can someone recommend how to handle this in a sharded index?
Solr Version: 5.5
Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > That does seem long, but you haven't provided many details
> > about the fields. Are there 100 docs in your index? 100M docs? 500M docs?
> >
> > Are you using NOW in appropriately? See:
> >
> > On Fri, May 27, 201
Hi,
I am running filter query(range query) on date fields(high cardinality) and
the performance is really bad ...it takes about 2-5 seconds for it to come
back with response. I am rebuilding the index to have docvalues & tdates
instead of "date" field. But not sure if that will alleviate the
W/DAY+1]
> =fieldA:abc
> =dt1 asc,field2 asc, fieldC desc
>
> Play with the caches.
> Also consider disabling caching, and/or supplying execution order for the
> filer queries.
> Please see :
> https://lucidworks.com/blog/2012/02/10/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/
>
&g
suggestions on how handle filtering/querying/sorting on high
cardinality date fields?
Index size: 30Million
Solr: 4.3.1
Thanks
On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for the feedback. The queries I run are very basic filter queries
> wi
vide
performance benefits.
- Would there be a performance penalty because majority of the
documents(!fieldA:abc) dont have values in the new columns?
Thanks
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:40 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Any links that illustrate and talk about solr
Any links that illustrate and talk about solr internals and how
indexing/querying works would be a great help.
Thanks
Jay
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 6:30 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
> Thanks for the feedback. The queries I run are very basic filter queries
rver\slolr, e.g. /local/solr-5.4.1/server/solr/cugna.
> Index data is also saved there. But wish to save index data on other
> folder, say /var/sc_data/cugna. How can I dothis?
>
> scott.chu,scott@udngroup.com
> 2016/5/26 (週四)
>
--
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
rmation.\"",
>> : >
>> : > "summary":
>> "java/org/apache/catalina/core/AsyncContextImpl.java in
>> : > Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.40 does not properly handle the throwing
>> of a
>> : > RuntimeException in an AsyncListener in an application, which allows
>> : > context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive request information
>> intended
>> : > for other applications in opportunistic circumstances via an
>> application
>> : > that records the requests that it processes.",
>> : >
>> : > "summary": "Session fixation vulnerability in Apache Tomcat
>> 7.x
>> : > before 7.0.66, 8.x before 8.0.30, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M2, when
>> different
>> : > session settings are used for deployments of multiple versions of the
>> same
>> : > web application, might allow remote attackers to hijack web sessions
>> by
>> : > leveraging use of a requestedSessionSSL field for an unintended
>> request,
>> : > related to CoyoteAdapter.java and Request.java.",
>> : >
>> : > "summary": "The (1) Manager and (2) Host Manager applications
>> in
>> : > Apache Tomcat 7.x before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before
>> 9.0.0.M2
>> : > establish sessions and send CSRF tokens for arbitrary new requests,
>> which
>> : > allows remote attackers to bypass a CSRF protection mechanism by
>> using a
>> : > token.",
>> : >
>> : > "summary": "The setGlobalContext method in
>> : > org/apache/naming/factory/ResourceLinkFactory.java in Apache Tomcat
>> 7.x
>> : > before 7.0.68, 8.x before 8.0.31, and 9.x before 9.0.0.M3 does not
>> consider
>> : > whether ResourceLinkFactory.setGlobalContext callers are authorized,
>> which
>> : > allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended SecurityManager
>> : > restrictions and read or write to arbitrary application data, or
>> cause a
>> : > denial of service (application disruption), via a web application
>> that sets
>> : > a crafted global context.",
>> :
>> :
>>
>> -Hoss
>> http://www.lucidworks.com/
>>
>
>
--
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 4:52 PM, Ahmet Arslan <iori...@yahoo.com.invalid>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is it QueryComponent taking time?
> > Ot other components?
> >
> > Also make sure there is plenty of RAM for OS cache.
>
Hi,
I am trying to debug solr performance problems on an old version of solr,
4.3.1.
The queries are taking really long -in the range of 2-5 seconds!!.
Running filter query with only one condition also takes about a second.
There is memory available on the box for solr to use. I have been looking
filter(B)
> q=filter(A)
> q=filter(B)
>
> would only require two. Yet all of them would be satisfied only by
> looking at the filterCache.
>
> Aside from the example immediately above, which one you use is largely
> a matter of taste.
>
> Best,
> Erick
>
> On Mon
Hi,
I created a new config and uploaded it to zk with the name test_conf. And
then created a collection which uses this config.
CREATE COLLECTION:
/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE=test2=1=2=test_conf
When indexing the data using DIH I get an error.
m.invalid>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As I understand it useful incase you use an OR operator between two
> restricting clauses.
> Recall that multiple fq means implicit AND.
>
> ahmet
>
>
>
> On Monday, May 9, 2016 4:02 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
> w
he
filter cache. Since scores are not cached, all documents that match the
filter produce the same score (0 by default). Cached filters will be
extremely fast when they are used again in another query.
Thanks
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote
help you
> out.
>
> Thanks,
> Susheel
>
> On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the feedback, I was getting correct results when searching for
> > jon & john. But when I tried other names like 'khloe
in the
> > two boxes in the UI? I am not sure what "look at my solr data" means
> > in this particular context.
> >
> > Regards,
> >Alex.
> >
> > Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates:
> > http:/
> would have three simple filters running simultaneously. For low to
> medium query loads on a server with a whole bunch of CPUs, where there
> is plenty of spare CPU power, this can be a real gain in performance ...
> but if the query load is really high, it might be a bad thing.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
--
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
Thanks Shawn,Erick & Ahmet , this was very helpful.
> On May 6, 2016, at 6:19 AM, Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:
>
>> On 5/5/2016 2:44 PM, Jay Potharaju wrote:
>> Are you suggesting rewriting it like this ?
>> fq=filter(fromfield:[* TO NOW
AY-7DAY TO *] )
fq=filter(type:abc)
Is this something that I would need to determine by running some test
Thanks
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 1:44 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you suggesting rewriting it like this ?
> fq=filter(fromfield:[* TO NOW/DAY+1DAY]&&a
uery so it will be cached independently.
>
> Also consider disabling caching (using cost) in expensive queries:
> http://yonik.com/advanced-filter-caching-in-solr/
>
> Ahmet
>
>
>
> On Thursday, May 5, 2016 8:25 PM, Jay Potharaju <jspothar...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> Hi
Hi,
I have a filter query that gets documents based on date ranges from last n
days to anytime in future.
The objective is to get documents between a date range, but the start date
and end date values are stored in different fields and that is why I wrote
the filter query as below
> i found a strange thing with solr query,when i set the value of query
> field like "brand:amd",the size of query result is zero,but the real data
> is not zero,can some body tell me why,thank you very much!!
> my english is not very good,wish some body understand my words!
>
--
Thanks
Jay Potharaju
Hi,
I was wondering if it is possible to use Update Request Processor with DIH.
I would like to update an index_time field whenever documents are
added/updated in the collection.
I know that I could easily pass a time stamp which would update the field
in my collection but I was trying to do it
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo